Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Coronary Artery Disease
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1480501

Prognostic Value of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Reserve Acquired by Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with CAD and Reduced Stress LVEF

Provisionally accepted
Shuang Zhang Shuang Zhang Jingjing Meng Jingjing Meng Yihan Zhou Yihan Zhou Lijun Lv Lijun Lv Xiaoli Zhang Xiaoli Zhang *
  • Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Chaoyang District, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) strongly predicts cardiac events. However, conflicting findings exist regarding the prognostic value of the LVEF reserve (△LVEF) when measured by gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT G-MPI). In particular, data related to the prognostic value of △LVEF when measured by SPECT in patients with reduced LVEF are scarce. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of △LVEF when acquired by SPECT G-MPI in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and a LVEFStress < 60%. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 260 consecutive patients diagnosed with CAD by coronary angiography (CAG) and a LVEFStress < 60%, as determined by SPECT G-MPI. These patients were followed up for 33.4 ± 7.6 months. The patients were divided into two groups (△LVEF > 0% and △LVEF ≤ 0%), and survival analyses were conducted. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina. Results: We observed 69 MACEs (26.5%). The cumulative incidence of MACEs in patients with △LVEF ≤ 0% was significantly higher than in patients with △LVEF > 0% (P = 0.042). Multivariate Cox regression further revealed that a △LVEF ≤ 0% represented an independent predictor of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.276; 95% confidence interval [CI]: (1.006, 1.618), P = 0.045). Adding a △LVEF ≤ 0% to traditional myocardial perfusion and function variables evaluated by MPI significantly improved the ability to predict MACEs (P = 0.044). Conclusions: Determining △LVEF by SPECT G-MPI was associated with MACEs and improved risk stratification compared to prediction models based on traditional perfusion and functional parameters in CAD patients with left ventricular dysfunction, particularly those with no or mild myocardial ischemia.Coronary artery bypass graft CAD Coronary artery disease CAG Coronary angiography EDV End-diastolic volume ESV End-systolic volume LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction MACEs Major adverse cardiac events MPI Myocardial perfusion imaging PCI Percutaneous coronary intervention PET Positron emission computed tomography SPECT Single-photon emission computed tomography TID Transient ischemic dilatation TPD Total perfusion defect △LVEF Left ventricular ejection fraction reserve 1

    Keywords: Ejection fraction reserve, Myocardial Perfusion Imaging, GATED SPECT, prognosis, Coronary Artery Disease

    Received: 14 Aug 2024; Accepted: 26 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zhang, Meng, Zhou, Lv and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaoli Zhang, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Chaoyang District, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.