Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiac Rhythmology
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1463815
This article is part of the Research Topic Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) View all articles

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in women with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Provisionally accepted
Maura M. Zylla Maura M. Zylla 1*Johannes Leiner Johannes Leiner 2Ann-Kathrin Rahm Ann-Kathrin Rahm 1Tobias Hoffmann Tobias Hoffmann 1Patrick Lugenbiel Patrick Lugenbiel 1Patrick Schweizer Patrick Schweizer 1Christine Mages Christine Mages 1Derliz Mereles Derliz Mereles 1Meinhard Kieser Meinhard Kieser 3Eberhard Scholz Eberhard Scholz 1Hugo A. Katus Hugo A. Katus 1Norbert Frey Norbert Frey 1Dierk Thomas Dierk Thomas 1
  • 1 Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2 Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Lower Saxony, Germany
  • 3 Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coincide. Female sex is associated with both increased prevalence of HFpEF and reduced therapeutic efficacy of catheter ablation of AF. This sub-analysis of the previously published AFFECT-study evaluates outcome after cryoballoon-ablation in women with and without HFpEF.Methods: One-hundred-and-two patients (LVEF≥50%) scheduled for cryoballoon-ablation of AF were prospectively enrolled. Forty-two were female. Comprehensive baseline assessment included echocardiography, stress echocardiography, six-minute-walk-test, biomarker-and quality-of-life-assessment (QoL, SF-36), and was repeated at follow-up ≥12 months after AFablation. Baseline parameters, procedural characteristics and outcome after AF-ablation were compared between women with and without HFpEF.Results: Women with HFpEF (n=20) were characterized by higher median left atrial volume index (35.8ml/m 2 vs. 25.8 ml/m 2 , P<0.001), left ventricular hypertrophy (median left ventricular mass index: 92.0g/m 2 vs. 83.0g/m 2 , P=0.027), reduced distance in the six-minute-walk-test (median: 453m vs. 527m, P=0.008) and higher left atrial pressures (median: 14.0mmHg vs.9.5mmHg, P=0.008) compared to women without HFpEF (n=21). During follow-up, HFpEFpatients more often experienced AF-related re-hospitalization (36.8% vs. 9.1%, P=0.039) and numerically higher AF-recurrence-rates (57.9% vs. 31.1%, P=0.109). There was no significant improvement of heart failure-related symptoms, echocardiographic parameters and cardiac biomarkers levels. QoL showed no significant improvement in both subgroups. Women with HFpEF still exhibited a lower SF-36 Physical Component Summary Score vs. women without HFpEF (median: 41.2 vs. 52.1, P<0.001).Women with HFpEF constitute a distinct subgroup with high rates of AF-related events after AF-ablation, and persistence of both symptoms and functional hallmarks of HFpEF. Consideration of sex-specific cardiac co-morbidites is crucial for personalization and optimization of AF-therapy.

    Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Women, HFPEF

    Received: 12 Jul 2024; Accepted: 17 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Zylla, Leiner, Rahm, Hoffmann, Lugenbiel, Schweizer, Mages, Mereles, Kieser, Scholz, Katus, Frey and Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Maura M. Zylla, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.