AUTHOR=Rubab Maira , Kelleher John D. TITLE=Assessing the relative importance of vitamin D deficiency in cardiovascular health JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine VOLUME=11 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738 DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2024.1435738 ISSN=2297-055X ABSTRACT=

Previous research has suggested a potential link between vitamin D (VD) deficiency and adverse cardiovascular health outcomes, although the findings have been inconsistent. This study investigates the association between VD deficiency and cardiovascular disease (CVD) within the context of established CVD risk factors. We utilized a Random Forest model to predict both CVD and VD deficiency risks, using a dataset of 1,078 observations from a rural Chinese population. Feature importance was evaluated using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to discern the impact of various risk factors on the model’s output. The results showed that the model for CVD prediction achieved a high accuracy of 87%, demonstrating robust performance across precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Conversely, the VD deficiency prediction model exhibited suboptimal performance, with an accuracy of 52% and lower precision, recall, and F1 scores. Feature importance analysis indicated that traditional risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, age, body mass index, and waist-to-hip ratio significantly influenced CVD risk, collectively contributing to 70% of the model’s predictive power. Although VD deficiency was associated with an increased risk of CVD, its importance in predicting CVD risk was notably low. Similarly, for VD deficiency prediction, CVD risk factors such as systolic blood pressure, glucose levels, diastolic blood pressure, and body mass index emerged as influential features. However, the overall predictive performance of the VD deficiency prediction model was weak (52%), indicating the absence of VD deficiency-related risk factors. Ablation experiments confirmed the relatively lower importance of VD deficiency in predicting CVD risk. Furthermore, the SHAP partial dependence plot revealed a nonlinear relationship between VD levels and CVD risk. In conclusion, while VD deficiency appears directly or indirectly associated with increased CVD risk, its relative importance within predictive models is considerably lower when compared to other risk factors. These findings suggest that VD deficiency may not warrant primary focus in CVD risk assessment and prevention strategies, however, further research is needed to explore the causal relationship between VD deficiency and CVD risk.