Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1422327
This article is part of the Research Topic The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Revolutionizing and Aiding Cardiovascular Medicine View all 5 articles

Assessing the Precision of Machine Learning for Diagnosing Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

Provisionally accepted
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe cardiovascular condition characterized by pulmonary vascular remodeling, increased resistance to blood flow, and eventual right heart failure. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is the gold standard diagnostic technique, but due to its invasiveness, it poses risks such as vessel and valve injury. In recent years, machine learning (ML) technologies have offered non-invasive alternatives combined with ML for improving the diagnosis of PAH. Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of various methods, such as electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, blood biomarkers, microRNA, chest X-ray, clinical codes, computed tomography (CT) scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), combined with ML in diagnosing PAH. Methods: The outcomes of interest included sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). This study employed the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool for quality appraisal and STATA V.12.0 for the meta-analysis. Results: A comprehensive search across six databases resulted in 26 articles for examination. Twelve articles were categorized as low-risk, nine as moderate-risk, and five as high-risk. The overall diagnostic performance analysis demonstrated significant findings, with sensitivity at 81% (95% CI = 0.76-0.85, p < 0.001), specificity at 84% (95% CI = 0.77-0.88, p < 0.001), and an AUC of 89% (95% CI = 0.85-0.91). In the subgroup analysis, echocardiography displayed outstanding results, with a sensitivity value of 83% (95% CI = 0.72-0.91), specificity value of 93% (95% CI = 0.89-0.96), PLR value of 12.4 (95% CI = 6.8-22.9), and DOR value of 70 (95% CI = 23-231). ECG demonstrated excellent accuracy performance, with a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI = 0.80-0.84) and a specificity of 82% (95% CI = 0.78-0.84). Moreover, blood biomarkers exhibited the highest NLR value of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.42 -0.59).The implementation of echocardiography and ECG with ML for diagnosing PAH presents a promising alternative to RHC. This approach shows potential, as it achieves excellent diagnostic parameters, offering hope for more accessible and less invasive diagnostic methods.

    Keywords: machine learning, pulmonary arterial hypertension, diagnostic method, Area under the curve, area under receiving operator curve

    Received: 23 Apr 2024; Accepted: 30 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Fadilah, Putri, Puling and Willyanto. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Akbar Fadilah, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
    Valerinna Y. Putri, Faculty of Medicine, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.