Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1418741
This article is part of the Research Topic Generative Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Imaging and Cardiovascular Medicine View all articles

Artificial intelligence-assisted echocardiographic monitoring in pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Provisionally accepted
Weiling Chen Weiling Chen 1Wu Jinhui Wu Jinhui 2Zhang Zhenxuan Zhang Zhenxuan 2Zhifan Gao Zhifan Gao 2Xunyi Chen Xunyi Chen 1*Yu Zhang Yu Zhang 1*Luyao Zhou Luyao Zhou 1*Zhou Lin Zhou Lin 1*Zijian Tang Zijian Tang 1*Wei Yu Wei Yu 1*Shumin Fan Shumin Fan 1*Heye Zhang Heye Zhang 2Bei Xia Bei Xia 1*
  • 1 Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
  • 2 School of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is administered to pediatric patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. The traditional method uses focal echocardiography to complete the left ventricular measurement. However, echocardiographic determination of the ejection fraction (EF) by manual tracing of the endocardial borders is time consuming and operator dependent. The standard visual assessment is also an inherently subjective procedure. Artificial intelligence (AI) based machine learning-enabled image analysis might provide rapid, reproducible measurements of left ventricular volumes and EF for ECMO patients. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the applicability of AI for monitoring cardiac function based on Echocardiography in patients with ECMO. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 29 hospitalized patients who received ECMO support between January 2017 and December 2021. Echocardiogram was performed for patients with ECMO, including at pre-ECMO, during cannulation, during ECMO support, during the ECMO wean, and a follow up within 3 months after weaning. EF assessment of all patients was independently evaluated by junior physicians (junior-EF) and experts (expert-EF) using Simpson's biplane method of manual tracing. Additionally, raw data images of apical 2chamber and 4-chamber views were utilized for EF assessment via a Pediatric ECMO Quantification machine learning-enabled AI (automated-EF). Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the automated-EF and expert-EF for all groups (P>0.05). However, the differences between junior-EF and automated-EF and expert-EF were statistically significant (P<0.05). Inter-group correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated higher agreement between automated-EF and expert manual tracking (ICC: 0.983, 95% CI: 0.977~0.987) compared to junior assessments (ICC: 0.932, 95% CI: 0.913~0.946). Bland-Altman analysis showed good agreements among the automated-EF and the expert-EF and junior-EF assessments. There was no significant intra-observer variability for experts' manual tracking or automated measurements. Conclusions: Automated EF measurements are feasible for pediatric ECMO echocardiography. AI-automated analysis of echocardiography for quantifying left ventricular function in critically ill children has good consistency and reproducibility with that of clinical experts. The automated echocardiographic EF method is reliable for the quantitative evaluation of different heart rates. It can fully support the course of ECMO treatment, and it can help improve the accuracy of quantitative evaluation.

    Keywords: artificial intelligence 1, echocardiography 2, critical monitoring 3, ECMO 4, pediatrics 5, left ventricular function 6

    Received: 17 Apr 2024; Accepted: 27 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chen, Jinhui, Zhenxuan, Gao, Chen, Zhang, Zhou, Lin, Tang, Yu, Fan, Zhang and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xunyi Chen, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Yu Zhang, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Luyao Zhou, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Zhou Lin, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Zijian Tang, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Wei Yu, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Shumin Fan, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
    Bei Xia, Department of Ultrasonography, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.