Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1412869
This article is part of the Research Topic Enhanced Recovery in Cardiac Surgery (ERAS) View all 7 articles

Feasibility of Deescalating Postoperative Care in Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
  • 2 Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) prioritizes faster functional recovery after major surgery. An important aspect of postoperative ERAS is decreasing morbidity and immobility, which can result from prolonged critical care. Using current clinical data, our aim was to analyze whether a six-hour monitoring period after Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery (MICS) might be sufficient to recognize major postoperative complications in a future Fast Track pathway. Additionally, we sought to investigate whether it could be possible to deescalate the setting of postoperative monitoring. Methods: 358 patients received MICS and were deemed suitable for an ERAS protocol between 01/2021 and 03/2023 at our institution. Of these, 297 patients could be successfully extubated on-table, were transferred to IMC or ICU in stable condition and therefore served as study cohort. Outcomes of interest were incidence and timing of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE; death, myocardial infarction requiring revascularization, stroke), bleeding requiring reexploration and Fast Track associated complications (reintubation and readmission to ICU). Results: Patients' median age was 63 years (IQR 55-70) and 65% were male. 189 (64%) patients received anterolateral mini-thoracotomy, primarily for mitral and/or tricuspid valve surgery (n=177). 108 (36%) patients had partial upper sternotomy, primarily for aortic valve repair/ replacement (n=79) and aortic surgery (n=17). 90% of patients were normotensive without need for vasopressors within 6h postoperatively, 82% of patients were transferred to the general ward on postoperative day 1 (POD). Two (0.7%) MACE events occurred, as well as 4 (1.3%) postoperative bleeding events requiring reexploration. Of these complications, only one event occurred before transfer to the ward - all others took place on or after POD 1. There was one instance of reintubation and two of readmission to ICU. Conclusions: If MICS patients can be successfully extubated on-table and are hemodynamically stable, major postoperative complications were rare in our single-center experience and primarily occurred after transfer to the ward. Therefore, in well selected MICS patients with uncomplicated intraoperative course, monitoring for six hours, possibly outside of an ICU, followed by transfer to the ward appears to be a feasible theoretical concept without negative impact on patient safety.

    Keywords: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery (ERACS), Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS), heart valve surgery, Postoperative Care

    Received: 05 Apr 2024; Accepted: 29 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Stock, Berger Veith, Holst, Erfani, Pochert, Dumps and Girdauskas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Sina Stock, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Augsburg University Hospital, Augsburg, 86156, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.