Trends in hypertension and hypertension treatment in primary care in general practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022

Background: There is a scarcity of data on the epidemiology of hypertension and its treatment in Germany in recent years.

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate trends in the number of adults diagnosed with hypertension and those being prescribed antihypertensive drugs each year in general practices from this country between 2013 and 2022.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used data of adults aged ≥18 years continuously collected from 336 general practices in Germany (IQVIA) during 2013–2022. The diagnosis of hypertension and the prescription of antihypertensive drugs were coded using the ICD-10 and the EphMRA classification, respectively. Covariates included the total number of patients, mean (SD) age of patients, and proportion of women per practice. Trends in hypertension diagnosis and treatment were studied using linear regression models.

Results: The mean (SD) total number of patients per practice ranged from 2,235 (1,055) in 2013–2,845 (2,090) in 2021 (p-value < 0.001). The mean (SD) age of patients per practice was between 48.4 (21.5) and 50.5 (21.4) years, while the proportion of women was 52.1%–53.9% (p-values < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, there was a significant decrease in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension (beta coefficient = −7.91, p-value < 0.001) and treated with any antihypertensive drug per practice per year between 2013 and 2022 (beta coefficient = −5.40, p-value < 0.001).

Conclusion: This study identified decreasing trends in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in general practices in Germany in the last decade. These data may suggest that the prevention of hypertension has improved in this country in recent years.

1 Introduction

Hypertension, also known as high blood pressure, is a chronic condition defined as systolic blood pressure higher or equal to 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure higher or equal to 90 mmHg (1). The number of hypertension-related deaths per 100,000 people increased from 97.9 in 1990–106.3 in 2015 (2). Compared with the general population, individuals with hypertension are at an increased risk for premature mortality (3) and are more likely to be diagnosed with physical diseases [e.g., myocardial infarction (4) and stroke (5)] and have lower quality of life (6, 7). Furthermore, hypertension is associated with a major economic burden, with high direct and indirect costs (8). In this context, public health measures should aim at the prevention of hypertension in primary care, and to be effective, these measures should rely on recent epidemiological data.

In the last decade, several studies have focused on the trends of the prevalence of hypertension (9–18). There is some discrepancy in the findings of this literature, and trends have been found to increase (9, 15, 16, 18), stagnate (10, 11, 14), or decrease (12, 13, 17). Although this body of research has advanced the field, there are several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, a substantial proportion of these studies were conducted in China (15, 16) and the United States of America (USA) (11, 12, 18), and their results may not be extrapolated to other countries. Second, in these studies, trends in the prevalence of hypertension were analyzed prior to 2019, and there is no data on how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted these trends. This lack of data is of concern, as some evidence suggests that COVID-19 may favor the onset of hypertension (19, 20) and that the related health crisis may have had deleterious effects on the management of hypertension (21). Third, to the best of the authors' knowledge, only one research has studied trends in the prescription of different antihypertensive drugs (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEis], beta-blockers [BBs], and diuretics) (18). Taking these limitations into consideration, more data are warranted on how the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension have evolved in recent years.

Therefore, the goal of this longitudinal study was to investigate trends in hypertension (i.e., prevalence of diagnosis) and hypertension treatment (i.e., prevalence of treatment) in adults followed in general practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022. The study results may help in the implementation of public health measures preventing the occurrence of hypertension in this country.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Database

The present study used data from the Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA). This database has already been described extensively in the literature (22). Briefly, the Disease Analyzer database includes data from general and specialized practices in Germany. The data are collected from the computers of the practices and anonymized before being sent to IQVIA every month. Data include demographics, diagnoses, and prescriptions. Diagnoses are coded using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision (ICD-10), while prescriptions are coded using the Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products of the European Pharmaceutical Market Research Association (EphMRA). Data quality is assessed by IQVIA on a regular basis, and this assessment relies on several criteria (e.g., completeness of data and linkage between diagnoses and prescriptions). Several factors are taken into account for the selection of practices to include in the database (e.g., age of practitioner, type of practice, community size, and German federal state). Finally, the Disease Analyzer database has been found to be representative of primary care practices in Germany and includes approximately 3% of all practices.

2.2 Study population, outcomes, and covariates

This study included all patients aged ≥18 years who were followed in 336 general practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022. General practices included in the analyses were those continuously sending data to IQVIA between 2013 and 2022, with a total number of 1,284 practices for this period. Individuals may have been followed for a single year or several years. The first outcome of the study was the number of patients diagnosed with essential hypertension (ICD-10 code: I10; incident and prevalent cases) each year between 2013 and 2022. The second outcome of the study was the number of patients being prescribed any antihypertensive drug, ACEis (EphMRA classification codes: C09A and C09B), angiotensin receptor blockers (EphMRA classification codes: C09C and C09D), BBs (EphMRA classification code: C07), calcium channel blockers (EphMRA classification code: C08), and diuretics (EphMRA classification code: C03).

2.3 Statistical analyses

The characteristics of the practices (i.e., the total number of patients, mean [standard deviation] age [in years], proportion of patients aged 18–39, 40–59, and ≥60 years, and proportion of women and men) were studied for each year between 2013 and 2022. These characteristics were compared between the 10 different years using the Kruskal-Wallis test for the total number of patients and the mean age of patients per practice and the Chi-square test for the other variables. The number of patients diagnosed with hypertension was described for each year using the mean (standard deviation) in the overall population and by age (i.e., 18–39, 30–59, and ≥60 years) and sex (i.e., female and male). Trends in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension were further investigated using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models with years included as a continuous independent variable and the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension as a continuous dependent variable. The adjusted model included as covariates the total number of patients, the mean age, and the proportion of women per practice for a given year. Finally, the number of adults being prescribed antihypertensive drugs (i.e., any drug, ACEis, ARBs, BBs, CCBs, and diuretics) was described for each year using the mean (standard deviation) in the overall population. Trends in the number of individuals receiving antihypertensive treatments were studied in the overall sample using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models. In the adjusted linear regression model, the total number of patients, mean age, and proportion of women were included as covariates. Given that the COVID-19 pandemic may have impacted trends in hypertension diagnosis and treatment, analyses were repeated after excluding data collected after 2019. p-values lower than 0.050 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of the general practices

The yearly characteristics of the 336 general practices between 2013 and 2022 are displayed in Table 1. The mean (standard deviation) number of patients per practice ranged from 2,235 (1,055) in 2013–2,845 (2,090) in 2021 (p-value < 0.001). In terms of age, the mean (standard deviation) age of patients per practice was at the lowest in 2013 [i.e., 48.4 (21.5) years] and the highest in 2020 [i.e., 50.5 (21.4) years], with the proportion of people aged ≥60 years ranging from 36.0% to 38.5% during the 10-year period. Regarding sex, the proportion of female patients per practice was between 52.1% in 2021 and 53.9% in 2014.

Table 1

Table 1. Yearly demographic characteristics of the 336 general practices from Germany included in the study (2013–2022).

3.2 Trends in the diagnosis of hypertension

Figure 1 and Table 2 show the trends in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population and by age and sex. In the overall population, the unadjusted linear regression model revealed that the mean number of patients diagnosed with hypertension per practice significantly increased from 507 in 2013–592 in 2022 [beta coefficient (for an increase in one year) = 6.90, p-value < 0.001]. However, after adjusting for the total number of patients, the mean age, and the proportion of women per practice, there was a negative and significant relationship between years and the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension per practice (beta coefficient = −7.91, p-value < 0.001). The adjusted analyses conducted in the age and sex subgroups corroborated this finding, with the beta coefficient ranging from −0.27 in people aged 18–39 years to −4.13 in those aged ≥60 years. Similar results were obtained in the sensitivity analyses based on the data collected between 2013 and 2019 [unadjusted analysis (overall population): beta coefficient = 3.92, p-value = 0.141; adjusted analysis (overall population): beta coefficient = −7.58, p-value < 0.001].

Figure 1

Figure 1. Trends in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population.

Table 2

Table 2. Trends in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population and by age and sex.

3.3 Trends in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs

Figure 2 and Table 3 display the trends in the number of patients being prescribed antihypertensive drugs per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population. The number of individuals receiving any antihypertensive medication increased from 445 in 2013–527 in 2022 [beta coefficient (for an increase in one year) = 6.91, p-value < 0.001]. Nonetheless, the trends were decreasing after adjusting for the covariates mentioned above (beta coefficient = −5.40, p-value < 0.001). Similar negative and significant results were obtained for ACEis (beta coefficient = −7.02) and BBs (beta coefficient = −5.83). In contrast, non-significant associations were observed for CCBs (beta coefficient = 0.56) and diuretics (beta coefficient = −0.44), while there was a positive and significant association between years and ARBs (beta coefficient = 3.69). These findings were corroborated in the analyses which did not include data collected after 2019 [unadjusted analysis (any antihypertensive drug): beta coefficient = 4.63, p-value = 0.065; adjusted analysis (any antihypertensive drug): beta coefficient = −4.77, p-value = 0.012].

Figure 2

Figure 2. Trends in the number of patients being prescribed any antihypertensive drug per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population.

Table 3

Table 3. Trends in the number of patients being prescribed different antihypertensive drugs per general practice in Germany between 2013 and 2022 in the overall population.

4 Discussion

4.1 Main findings

This study, which was conducted in 336 practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022 and included more than 750,000 patients per year, revealed that the number of those diagnosed with hypertension significantly decreased over time in the overall population. These findings were corroborated in the age- and sex-stratified analyses. In terms of the treatment of hypertension, the number of individuals receiving any antihypertensive drug significantly decreased between 2013 and 2022. Similar results were obtained in the analyses based on data exclusively collected prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. To the best of the knowledge of the authors, the present study is the first to investigate trends in the diagnosis of hypertension in the years following the COVID-19 pandemic and one of the first bodies of research analyzing trends in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs.

4.2 Interpretation of the findings

The decreasing trend in the number of adults diagnosed with hypertension observed in this research is in line with several prior studies. For example, in a sample of 38,276 individuals from the USA, there was a decrease in the age-standardized prevalence of hypertension from 48.4% in 1999–2000–45.4% in 2015–2016 (12). Another study, including 38,825 adults aged 30–79 years living in Norway, showed that the prevalence of hypertension decreased in all age (i.e., 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, and 70–79 years) and sex groups (i.e., female and male) between 1979 and 2015 (17). A third analysis of 1,563 older adults (i.e., individuals aged ≥75 years) from Poland reported a decrease in the proportion of men with hypertension from 83.8% in 2007–77.9% in 2013–2014, the following figures being 75.4% and 71.8% in women (13). The present study adds to the literature by showing that decreasing trends in the diagnosis of hypertension persisted in the last years despite the human crisis related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Finally, it should also be noted that other studies have found either stable (10, 11, 14) or increasing trends in the prevalence of hypertension (9, 15, 16, 18). This discrepancy in the findings in the literature may be related to several factors, such as differences in the settings in which the studies of interest were conducted, differences in the years during which the data were collected, and differences in the definition of hypertension.

The decrease in the number of incident and prevalent cases of hypertension per year in general practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022 may reflect an improvement in the prevention of hypertension in the German population in recent years. This preliminary finding should be interpreted with caution pending future corroborating research. That being said, there is some evidence suggesting that risk factors for hypertension might have become less prevalent in Germany in the last decades. As a matter of fact, a study has investigated trends in health behaviors in this country between 1990 and 2011 (23). In this research, including 18,058 adults aged 25–69 years, a healthy lifestyle was defined as the presence of at least four out of five health behaviors (i.e., daily intake of both fruits and vegetables, sufficient physical activity, no current smoking, no current risk drinking, and body mass index between 18.5 and less than 25 kg/m²). It was observed that the prevalence of a healthy lifestyle increased from 9.3% in 1990–1992–13.5% in 1997–1999 and 14.7% in 2008–2011, with this increase being confirmed in most age and sex groups. It may be hypothesized that a healthy lifestyle has continued to become more frequent after 2011, potentially explaining, at least partially, the decrease in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension in primary care each year in 2013–2022. Finally, the decrease in hypertension diagnosis in recent years could be related to some of the deleterious effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, such as decreased face-to-face consultations in general practices (24) and increased mortality in people with hypertension (25).

Another critical result of the study is the decrease in the number of adults being prescribed any antihypertensive drug per year between 2013 and 2022. This finding may be explained by the concomitant reduction in the number of patients diagnosed with hypertension each year. It should be noted that this study apart, little research has analyzed trends in the prescription of antihypertensive drugs. A survey of 53,496 adults living in the USA found that, among those with hypertension, there was an uptrend in the use of ACEis and ARBs and a downtrend in the use of BBs between 1999 and 2018 (18). Regarding CCBs, there was an increase in the use of these molecules until 2005 and a subsequent decrease after 2005. Opposite changes (i.e., decrease and then increase in the use) were observed for diuretics. These antihypertensive drug-specific trends differ from those reported in the present study, highlighting potential substantial differences in the pharmacological treatment of hypertension between the USA and Germany. These between-country differences aside, the increase in the number of patients being prescribed ARBs in the present research may be explained by the fact that, although the effects on blood pressure levels are comparable between ARBs and ACEis, ARBs display a better tolerability profile and are particularly effective in the prevention of major cardiovascular events (26). In this context, general practitioners may have favored the prescription of ARBs compared with other antihypertensive drugs over time.

4.3 Public health implications and directions for future research

Despite the fact that the study findings should be treated as preliminary, these results are reassuring and highlight a slight decrease in the number of people diagnosed with hypertension and treated for this chronic condition in general practices in Germany. Given that the decreasing trends are relatively modest, further public measures are warranted to better prevent the occurrence of hypertension in the general population. These measures may include, for example, education about the deleterious effects of alcohol on blood pressure levels, promotion of regular physical activity, and smoking cessation (27). In terms of future research, further studies are needed to corroborate or invalidate the present results in other settings and countries. Besides, more research is warranted on the differential trends by type of antihypertensive drug observed in this study.

4.4 Strengths and limitations

The major strengths of the study are the large sample size, the use of data collected until 2022, and the use of diagnosis and prescription data relying on the ICD-10 and EphMRA classification, respectively. Nonetheless, the study findings should be interpreted in the light of several limitations. First, there is no information on blood pressure, although blood pressure data would have allowed more detailed analyses. More specifically, it was not known if the diagnosis of hypertension relied on a sphygmomanometer or 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Second, there are no data in the Disease Analyzer database on health behaviors (e.g., alcohol consumption and smoking status), and it was, therefore, not possible to adjust the analyses for these factors. Third, this study only included general practices, and the results cannot be extrapolated to specialized practices or hospital settings.

4.5 Conclusion

Overall, this study found decreasing trends in the number of patients diagnosed with and treated for hypertension in general practices in Germany between 2013 and 2022. Although these findings should be interpreted with caution, they might indicate that the prevention of hypertension has improved in German general practices in recent years. Finally, more studies are warranted to corroborate or invalidate these results in other settings in Germany and other countries.

Data availability statement

The data used for the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Requests to access these datasets should be directed to Sarah Krieg; sarah.krieg@mara.de.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies involving humans because German law allows the use of anonymous electronic medical records for research purposes under certain conditions. According to this legislation, it is not necessary to obtain approval from a medical ethics committee for this type of observational study that contains no directly identifiable data. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements because according to the same legislation, it is not necessary to obtain informed consent from patients for this type of observational study that contains no directly identifiable data.

Author contributions

KK: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. SK: Writing – review & editing. LJ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University for the article processing charge.

Conflict of interest

KK was employed by company IQVIA.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1390902/full#supplementary-material

References

1. World Health Organization. Hypertension. (2023). Available online at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hypertension (accessed December 4, 2023).

2. Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110–115 mm Hg, 1990–2015. JAMA. (2017) 317:165–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2020) 16:223–37. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Psaty BM, Furberg CD, Kuller LH, Cushman M, Savage PJ, Levine D, et al. Association between blood pressure level and the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and total mortality: the cardiovascular health study. Arch Intern Med. (2001) 161:1183–92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.9.1183

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Blomstrand A, Blomstrand C, Hakeberg M, Sundh V, Lissner L, Björkelund C. Forty-four-year longitudinal study of stroke incidence and risk factors—the prospective population study of women in Gothenburg. Scand J Prim Health Care. (2022) 40:139–47. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2057040

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Adedapo ADA, Akunne OO, Adedokun BO. Comparative assessment of determinants of health-related quality of life in hypertensive patients and normal population in south-west Nigeria. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2015) 53:265–71. doi: 10.5414/CP202257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Zhang L, Guo X, Zhang J, Chen X, Zhou C, Ge D, et al. Health-related quality of life among adults with and without hypertension: a population-based survey using EQ-5D in Shandong, China. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:14960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15083-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Wierzejska E, Giernaś B, Lipiak A, Karasiewicz M, Cofta M, Staszewski R. A global perspective on the costs of hypertension: a systematic review. Arch Med Sci. (2020) 16:1078–91. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.92689

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Großschädl F, Stolz E, Mayerl H, Rásky É, Freidl W, Stronegger WJ. Prevalent long-term trends of hypertension in Austria: the impact of obesity and socio-demography. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0140461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140461

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Neuhauser HK, Adler C, Rosario AS, Diederichs C, Ellert U. Hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control in Germany 1998 and 2008–11. J Hum Hypertens. (2015) 29:247–53. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2014.82

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Zhang Y, Moran AE. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among young adults in the United States, 1999–2014. Hypertension. (2017) 70:736–42. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09801

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Dorans KS, Mills KT, Liu Y, He J. Trends in prevalence and control of hypertension according to the 2017 American college of cardiology/American heart association (ACC/AHA) guideline. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7:e008888. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008888

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Niklas AA, Flotyńska A, Zdrojewski T, Pająk A, Topór-Mądry R, Nadrowski P, et al. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control among Polish adults 75 years and older during 2007–2014. Cardiol J. (2018) 25:333–44. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Long-term and recent trends in hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in 12 high-income countries: an analysis of 123 nationally representative surveys. Lancet. (2019) 394:639–51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31145-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Ma S, Yang L, Zhao M, Magnussen CG, Xi B. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates among Chinese adults, 1991–2015. J Hypertens. (2021) 39:740–8. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002698

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Yi Q, Zha M, Yang Q, Zhang Y, Hou L, Ye X, et al. Trends in the prevalence of hypertension according to severity and phenotype in Chinese adults over two decades (1991–2015). J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). (2021) 23:1302–15. doi: 10.1111/jch.14306

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Desai T, Clarke R, Ross S, Grimsgaard S, Njølstad I, Lewington S. Trends in prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension in 38,825 adults over 36 years in Tromsø prospective study. Scand J Public Health. (2023) 51:1033–41. doi: 10.1177/14034948221122395

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Fan Z, Yang C, Zhang J, Huang Y, Yang Y, Zeng P, et al. Trends and influence factors in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among US adults from 1999–2018. PLoS One. (2023) 18:e0292159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292159

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Akpek M. Does COVID-19 cause hypertension? Angiology. (2022) 73:682–7. doi: 10.1177/00033197211053903

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Schmidt-Lauber C, Alba Schmidt E, Hänzelmann S, Petersen EL, Behrendt C-A, Twerenbold R, et al. Increased blood pressure after nonsevere COVID-19. J Hypertens. (2023) 41:1721–9. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003522

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Gotanda H, Liyanage-Don N, Moran AE, Krousel-Wood M, Green JB, Zhang Y, et al. Changes in blood pressure outcomes among hypertensive individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a time series analysis in three US healthcare organizations. Hypertension. (2022) 79:2733–42. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19861

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Rathmann W, Bongaerts B, Carius H-J, Kruppert S, Kostev K. Basic characteristics and representativeness of the German disease analyzer database. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. (2018) 56:459–66. doi: 10.5414/CP203320

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Finger JD, Busch MA, Heidemann C, Lange C, Mensink GBM, Schienkiewitz A. Time trends in healthy lifestyle among adults in Germany: results from three national health interview and examination surveys between 1990 and 2011. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0222218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222218

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Huibers L, Bech BH, Kirk UB, Kallestrup P, Vestergaard CH, Christensen MB. Contacts in general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a register-based study. Br J Gen Pract. (2022) 72:e799–808. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0703

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Pranata R, Lim MA, Huang I, Raharjo SB, Lukito AA. Hypertension is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. (2020) 21:1470320320926899. doi: 10.1177/1470320320926899

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Gallo G, Volpe M, Rubattu S. Angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension: a real-world perspective and current recommendations. Vasc Health Risk Manag. (2022) 18:507–15. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S337640

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Xia T, Zhao F, Nianogo RA. Interventions in hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis of natural and quasi-experiments. Clin Hypertens. (2022) 28:13. doi: 10.1186/s40885-022-00198-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar