The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. Cardiovascular Imaging
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1373240
Feasibility of Relaxation Along a Fictitious Field in the 2 nd Rotating Frame (T RAFF2 ) mapping in the human myocardium at 3T
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
- 2 Mannheim Institute for Intelligent Systems in Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- 3 Barts Heart Centre, London, England, United Kingdom
- 4 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- 5 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- 6 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Purpose Evaluate the feasibility of quantification of Relaxation Along a Fictitious Field in the 2 nd rotating frame (RAFF2) relaxation times in the human myocardium at 3T. Methods T RAFF2 mapping was performed using a breath-held ECG-gated acquisition of five images: one without preparation, three preceded by RAFF2 trains of varying duration, and one preceded by a saturation prepulse. Pixel-wise T RAFF2 maps were obtained after three-parameter exponential fitting. The repeatability of T RAFF2 , T 1 , and T 2 was assessed in phantom via the coefficient of variation (CV) across three repetitions. In seven healthy subjects, T RAFF2 was tested for precision, reproducibility, inter-subject variability, and image quality (IQ) on a Likert scale (1=Nondiagnostic, 5=Excellent). Additionally, T RAFF2 mapping was performed in three patients with suspected cardiovascular disease, comparing it to late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), native T 1 , T 2 , and ECV mapping.In phantom, T RAFF2 showed good repeatability (CV<1.5%) while showing no (R 2 =0.09) and high (R 2 =0.99) correlation with T 1 and T 2 , respectively. Myocardial T RAFF2 maps exhibited overall acceptable image quality (IQ=3.0±1.0) with moderate artifact levels, stemming from off-resonances near the coronary sinus. Average T RAFF2 time across subjects and repetitions was 79.1±7.3ms. Good precision (7.6±1.4%), reproducibility (1.0±0.6%), and low inter-subject variability (10.0±1.8%) were obtained. In patients, visual agreement of the infarcted area was observed in the T RAFF2 map and LGE.Myocardial T RAFF2 quantification at 3T was successfully achieved in a single breathhold with acceptable image quality, albeit with residual off-resonance artifacts. Nonetheless, preliminary clinical data indicate potential sensitivity of T RAFF2 mapping to myocardial infarction detection without the need for contrast agents, but off-resonance artifacts mitigation warrants further investigation.
Keywords: T RAFF2 mapping, Myocardial Infarction, late gadolinium enhancement, T 1, Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, Relaxation Along a Fictitious Field
Received: 19 Jan 2024; Accepted: 31 Oct 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Tourais, Bozic-Iven, Zhao, Tao, Pierce, Nitsche, Thornton, Schad, Treibel, Weingärtner and Akcakaya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Sebastian Weingärtner, Department of Imaging Physics, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2628 CJ, Netherlands
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.