Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med.
Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1306159
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in General Cardiovascular Medicine: 2023 View all 3 articles

Causal factors of cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease with maintenance hemodialysis: A longitudinal and Mendelian Randomization study

Provisionally accepted
Dandan Tian Dandan Tian 1You Xu You Xu 2*Ying Wang Ying Wang 3*Xirui Zhu Xirui Zhu 4*Chun Huang Chun Huang 4Min Liu Min Liu 1*Panlong Li Panlong Li 4,5*Xiangyong Li Xiangyong Li 6*
  • 1 Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
  • 2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 3 School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
  • 4 School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 5 Department of Medical Imaging, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 6 Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: The risk factors of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with hemodialysis remain not fully understood. In this study, we developed and validated a clinical-longitudinal model for predicting CVD in patients with hemodialysis, and employed Mendelian randomization to evaluate the causal relationships. Methods: The study included 468 hemodialysis patients, and biochemical parameters were evaluated every three months. A generalized linear mixed (GLM) predictive model was applied to longitudinal clinical data. Calibration curves and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the performance of the model. Kaplan-Meier curves were applied to verify the effect of selected risk factors on the probability of CVD. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data for CVD (n=218792101866 cases), end-stage renal disease (ESRD, n=16405, 326 cases), diabetes (n=202046, 9889 cases), creatinine (n=7810), and uric acid (UA, n=109029) were obtained from the large-open GWAS project. The inverse-variance weighted MR was used as the main analysis to estimate the causal associations, and several sensitivity analyses were performed to assess pleiotropy and exclude variants with potential pleiotropic effects. Results: The AUCs of the GLM model was 0.93 (with accuracy rates of 93.9% and 93.1% for the training set and validation set, sensitivity of 0.95 and 0.94, specificity of 0.87 and 0.86). The final clinical-longitudinal model consisted of 5 risk factors, including age, diabetes, ipth, creatinine, and UA. Furthermore, the predicted CVD response also allowed for significant (p<0.05) discrimination between the Kaplan-Meier curves of each age, diabetes, ipth, and creatinine subclassification. MR analysis indicated that diabetes had a causal role in risk of CVD (β=0.088, p<0.0001) and ESRD (β=0.26, p=0.007). In turn, ESRD was found to have a causal role in risk of diabetes (β=0.027, p=0.013). Additionally, creatinine exhibited a causal role in the risk of ESRD (β=4.42, p=0.01). Conclusions: The results showed that old age, diabetes, and low level of ipth, creatinine, and UA were important risk factors for CVD in hemodialysis patients, and diabetes played an important bridging role in the link between ESRD and CVD.

    Keywords: end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis, cardiovascular disease, Causal Factors, diabetes

    Received: 03 Oct 2023; Accepted: 08 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Tian, Xu, Wang, Zhu, Huang, Liu, Li and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    You Xu, Department of Clinical Laboratory, Third Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
    Ying Wang, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China
    Xirui Zhu, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, 450002, Henan Province, China
    Min Liu, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
    Panlong Li, School of Electrical and Information Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, 450002, Henan Province, China
    Xiangyong Li, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510000, Guangdong Province, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.