AUTHOR=Lee Doo Hwan , Oh Seok , Kim Min Chul , Sim Doo Sun , Hong Young Joon , Kim Ju Han , Ahn Youngkeun , Han Jae Bok , Kim In Soo , Jeong Myung Ho 

TITLE=Comparative treatment outcomes of a single long stent vs. overlapped short stents in acute myocardial infarction

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1284396

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2023.1284396

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Objectives</title><p>There is no consensus regarding the optimal choice between single long stent (SLS) and overlapped double short stents (DSS) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, we aimed to compare treatment outcomes among patients with AMI treated with these two different stenting methods.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>In total, 537 patients with AMI from a single tertiary center were categorized into two groups: (1) those who received an SLS (stent length ≥38 mm) (<italic>n</italic> = 254; 47.3%) and (2) those who received overlapped DSS (individual stent lengths &lt;38 mm) (<italic>n</italic> = 283; 52.7%). The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) within 1 year.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The mean age of participants was 65.4 years, and 75.0% were male. Patients receiving an SLS had a higher rate of serum creatinine level ≥1.5 mg/dl (16.3% vs. 8.9%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.009) but a lower rate of hypertension (46.8% vs. 55.8%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.038), lesser total stent length (38.26 ± 1.31 vs. 45.20 ± 9.25 mm, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), total procedure time (41.40 ± 15.74 vs. 53.31 ± 21.75 min, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and total contrast volume (134.13 ± 30.72 vs. 160.57 ± 39.77 ml, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) than in those receiving DSS. One-year MACCEs were comparable between the two groups before [hazard ratio (HR), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.80–2.24] and after adjusting for covariates (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67–2.19).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Stenting with an SLS demonstrated similar outcomes compared to those achieved when using stenting with overlapped DSS in patients with AMI. Therefore, if the deliverability is acceptable, stenting with an SLS appears to be a safe and effective strategy for AMI treatment.</p></sec>