AUTHOR=Hosomi Sanae , Irisawa Taro , Nakao Shunichiro , Zha Ling , Kiyohara Kousuke , Kitamura Tetsuhisa , Ogura Hiroshi , Oda Jun TITLE=Association of sex with post-arrest care and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of initial shockable rhythm: a nationwide cohort study JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine VOLUME=10 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1269199 DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2023.1269199 ISSN=2297-055X ABSTRACT=Background

Research has described differences in the provision of prehospital treatment for women who experience out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, studies have reported conflicting results regarding survival outcomes or in-hospital interventions between sexes. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association of sex with survival outcomes and in-hospital treatments in Japan.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine–Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Registry. Patients aged ≥18 years who presented with a shockable rhythm at the scene between June 2014 and December 2020 were included in our analysis. Outcome measures were 30-day survival and in-hospital interventions. We compared the outcomes between the sexes using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

In total, 5,926 patients (4,270 men; 1,026 women) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were eligible for our analysis. The proportions of patients with 30-day survival outcomes were 39.5% (1685/4,270) and 37.4% (384/1,026) in the male and female groups, respectively (crude odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.06). Although there were no significant differences, survival outcomes tended to be better in women than in men in the multiple regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio: 1.38; 95% confidence interval: 0.82–2.33). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the sexes in terms of patients who received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (adjusted odds ratio: 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.49–1.33) or targeted temperature management (adjusted odds ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.68–1.46).

Conclusions

After adjusting for prognostic factors, there were no differences in survival rates and in-hospital interventions between men and women.