Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 12 June 2023
Sec. General Cardiovascular Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Novel Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of Foam Cell Formation and Atherosclerosis View all 7 articles

Monocyte and macrophage foam cells in diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis

  • Department of Medicine, UW Medicine Diabetes Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

Diabetes results in an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This minireview will discuss whether monocyte and macrophage lipid loading contribute to this increased risk, as monocytes and macrophages are critically involved in the progression of atherosclerosis. Both uptake and efflux pathways have been described as being altered by diabetes or conditions associated with diabetes, which may contribute to the increased accumulation of lipids seen in macrophages in diabetes. More recently, monocytes have also been described as lipid-laden in response to elevated lipids, including triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, the class of lipids often elevated in the setting of diabetes.

Introduction

Foam cells are a hallmark of atherosclerosis which is the underlying pathology in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACVD) that results in myocardial infarction and stroke. These lipid-laden cells are named after their foamy appearance due to the increased uptake of pro-atherogenic lipids. Many lesional foam cells are derived from macrophages, but other cell types, such as vascular smooth muscle cells, also readily become foam cells (1), a topic discussed in other excellent reviews (2, 3). It has long been recognized that modified, but not native, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is excessively taken up by macrophages (4), and LDL is in the causal pathway of atherosclerosis. Still, other lipids such as very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and their remnants and lipolysis products can also induce lipid loading (5), which may become all the more important in conditions where those classes of lipids are elevated. One such condition is diabetes. Diabetes, both type 1 and type 2, results in about a 2-fold increase in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (6, 7), and in this mini-review, we will discuss if part of the increased risk could be driven by augmented monocyte and macrophage foam cell formation.

Foam cells in diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis

Macrophage foam cell in diabetes

Intracellular lipid accumulation, or foam cell formation, results from increased uptake relative to metabolism and efflux of said lipids. Like other cells, macrophages store excess lipids as lipid droplets within the cytoplasm, giving the cells their characteristic foamy appearance. As stated above, we know that diabetes results in increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (6), and post-mortem analysis of atherosclerotic lesions indicate that diabetes (both type 1 and type 2) is associated with increased macrophage accumulation and necrotic core burden (8, 9), making it tempting to hypothesize that macrophages and macrophage foam cells are key players in the acceleration of atherosclerosis seen in diabetes (Figure 1). We have shown that in a model of type 1 diabetes, which results in accelerated atherosclerosis (10), diabetes results in increased macrophage cholesteryl ester accumulation (11, 12). Similar findings have been reported in human monocyte-derived macrophages from people with type 2 diabetes (13), suggesting that part of the accelerated atherosclerotic phenotype could be due to increased macrophage lipid accumulation.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Monocyte and macrophage foam cells in diabetes. Foam cells may partly contribute to diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis through changes in the myeloid cell compartment. In the setting of diabetes, both hyperglycemia and insulin insufficiency has been linked with increased monocyte lipid loading, macrophage lipid uptake, and cholesterol efflux. The effects of diabetes may, in part, be driven by increases in the expression of receptors that mediate lipid uptake, such as CD36, SR-A, LOX-1, and LPL (lipoprotein lipase), and or reductions in cholesterol efflux transporter (ABCA1, ABCG1). TLR4 can mediate the uptake of aggregated LDL. In addition, diabetes increases circulating and artery wall levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) and their remnants, which are highly atherogenic. Figure created in part using BioRender.

Diabetes is a metabolic disease that results from a lack of (type 1 diabetes) or insufficient insulin production and insulin signaling (type 2 diabetes), resulting in increased blood glucose. Insulin also significantly affects lipid metabolism, and people with less well-controlled type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes often have elevated levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (VLDL and chylomicrons) and their partially metabolized remnants, which are believed to be highly atherogenic (14). The question remains, is the increased cholesteryl ester accumulation in macrophages in diabetes due to increased plasma lipids levels, or is there an effect of diabetes on macrophages allowing for augmented lipid loading, which may contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis? Primary macrophages isolated from models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes demonstrate that diabetes augments the uptake of exogenously added oxidized LDL (15, 16), arguing that diabetes may alter macrophages resulting in increased lipid uptake and or reduced efflux.

Diabetes augments lipid uptake

Macrophage lipid uptake of modified LDL is mediated by scavenger receptor (SR)-mediated endocytosis, phagocytosis, and micropinocytosis (17). The most studied scavenger receptors are cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36), SR-A, and lectin-like oxLDL receptor-1 (LOX-1), all of which have been shown to contribute to foam cell formation and atherosclerosis, at least in part (1824). In addition to the traditional SR-mediated uptake pathways, toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has been suggested to be involved in the uptake of aggregated LDL (25, 26), which may also contribute to foam cell formation. Early studies suggested that CD36 expression was more common in endarterectomy specimens from people with reported hyperglycemia (27). This observation was followed by investigating whether elevated glucose induces CD36 expression. Indeed, human monocyte-derived macrophages exposed to elevated glucose in the media displayed increased cell surface expression of CD36 via effects on translation rather than on transcription (27). Similar findings have been replicated in other myeloid cell systems, demonstrating that increased glucose concentrations can increase oxidized LDL uptake (16). Forced uptake of glucose via overexpression of the glucose transporter (GLUT1) results in increased CD36 expression and increased cholesterol accumulation in macrophages overexpressing GLUT1 compared to control cells expressing an empty vector (28), potentially suggesting that the hyperglycemia observed in diabetes primes the macrophages to take up more lipids by increasing their expression of CD36.

Similarly, defective insulin signaling within macrophages results in increased CD36 expression, again via a mechanism largely independent of increased transcription (29). Furthermore, both SR-A and LOX-1 mRNA and protein are increased in macrophages from mice with diabetes, again via mechanisms that point toward glucose being the culprit (30, 31), thus suggesting that the increase in lipid loading observed in diabetes may be in part due to intrinsic effects on uptake pathways which may be driven by hyperglycemia and or defective insulin signaling.

Alternatively, or perhaps in conjunction with the receptors mentioned above, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins may be acted upon locally in the artery wall by lipoprotein lipase (LPL), resulting in free fatty acids and remnant lipoproteins, both of which may result in lipid uptake and lipid loading. Diabetes has been shown, at least in some studies, to increase macrophage LPL (32). LPL deficiency selectively in macrophages results in reduced lipid loading in response to VLDL and concomitant reduced atherosclerosis (33).

Impairment of macrophage cholesterol esterification and cholesterol efflux in diabetes

Once lipoproteins are taken up into the cell, they are hydrolyzed by lysosomal acid lipase (LIPA). Interestingly, genome-wide association studies have indicated that the atherosclerotic risk allele for LIPA is associated with increased enzyme activity (34), suggesting a pro-atherosclerotic role for intracellular lipolysis of lipids. Cholesterol then undergoes re-esterification, which in macrophages primarily is accomplished by Acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase 1 (ACAT1). ACAT1-deletion, selectively in the hematopoietic compartment or macrophages, reduces cholesteryl ester accumulation and reduced atherosclerosis in most studies (35, 36), but not all (37). There are some suggestions that ACAT1 might be increased in the setting of diabetes. Teasaki et al. demonstrate that macrophages from mice with diabetes and monocyte-derived macrophages from people with type 1 diabetes had increased expression of ACAT1 (38), potentially suggesting that cholesterol esterification may be increased in diabetes too.

Conversely, cholesterol removal from cells largely depends on cholesterol efflux mediated via the ATP-binding cassette transporters A1 and G1 (ABCA1 and ABCG1) to apolipoprotein A1 (APOA1) and high-density lipoproteins (39). We and others have demonstrated that levels of both ABCA1 and ABCG1 are reduced, and efflux to APOA1 is impaired in macrophages isolated from mouse models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes (12, 13, 15), suggesting that reduced efflux of cholesterol might contribute to the increased lipid loading observed in macrophage in diabetes.

Consequences of lesional foam cell formation in diabetes

A key question remains; are foam cells really in the causal pathway of atherosclerosis, and in that case, how? Most studies show a clear correlation between macrophage lipid loading and atherosclerosis, indicating that this is the case. However, pathways that alter macrophage lipid uptake and handling often result in other changes in monocyte and macrophage behavior. For example, reduced cholesterol efflux or inability to esterify intracellular cholesterol increases monocyte levels in circulation. Deletion of either ABCA1 and/or ABCG1 dramatically enhances hematopoietic stem cell proliferation and results in monocytosis (40). Similarly, ACAT1-deficiency in the hematopoietic compartment changes circulating monocyte levels (35). Since monocytosis is thought to contribute to the accelerated atherogenesis (41, 42), it becomes difficult to assess the relative contribution of efflux or cholesterol esterification vs. monocytosis in atherogenesis.

Furthermore, receptors such as CD36 that contribute to lipid loading have other effects independent of their roles in lipid uptake, such as mediating sterile inflammation and migration, for example (43, 44). Additionally, oxidized phospholipids on LDL that mediate the lipid uptake and accumulation are thought to contribute to macrophage inflammation (45, 46). Some of the pro-inflammatory effects have been attributed to CD36 acting as a co-receptor alongside toll-like receptors 2 and 6 (43, 47), perhaps making it difficult to unequivocally conclude that foam cells per se play a role in atherosclerosis, based on data with deficiencies in those receptors. The idea that lipids and lipid loading induces inflammatory changes in macrophages and that this, in part, is what drives atherogenesis has recently been put into question. Work from the Glass laboratory (48) and recent data from atherosclerotic lesion macrophages suggest that lipid loading does not necessarily induce a proinflammatory state (49). At least three different macrophage populations have been identified in the aortas using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq); the resident, the inflammatory, and TREM2hi (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2) macrophages (4952). Interestingly, it is not the inflammatory macrophages but rather the TREM2hi macrophages that are lipid-laden or foamy (49). These inflammatory and foamy macrophage populations were first identified in mouse lesions, but similar inflammatory and lipid-associated clusters have since been detected in human atherosclerotic lesions (5355). To date, no global transcriptomic analyses have been carried out on atherosclerotic lesions comparing non-diabetic and diabetic lesions, but these will surely aid in our understanding of how diabetes accelerates atherosclerosis and what effects diabetes has on myeloid cells.

Another approach to interrogate whether lipid loading plays a causal role in atherosclerosis was employed by Paul et al. (56). Lipid loading induces the expression of lipid droplet-associated proteins such as perilipin 2, and perilipin 2 is known to promote lipid droplet formation. Notably, deleting said lipid droplet protein restricts lipid loading in macrophages and subsequently reduces atherosclerosis (56), suggesting that foam cells are in the causal pathway.

Lesional macrophages also contribute to the expansion of the necrotic core, a key feature often associated with unstable atherosclerotic lesions. Excess uptake of lipoproteins can result in macrophage cell death, which is believed to contribute to necrotic core expansion. Both human studies (8) and our work using mouse models (11, 57) suggest that diabetes results in an augmented necrotic core expansion. One of the pathways proposed to induce macrophage cell death in response to lipids is pyroptosis. However, very recently, we could demonstrate that hematopoietic deficiency of a key protein involved in pyroptosis, Gasdermin D, did not alter necrotic core expansions in response to diabetes, arguing that other pathways are involved in driving necrotic core expansion in diabetes (58). One such pathway may be driven by the dyslipidemia often observed in diabetes that increases triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants. These remnants accumulate in the artery wall and are in close proximity to lesional macrophages (11, 57, 59). Suppression of plasma triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants blocks the necrotic core expansion associated with diabetes, suggesting a link between dyslipidemia seen in diabetes and the increase in the unstable lesional phenotype (11, 57). Furthermore, if monocyte recruitment is impaired, the expansion of the necrotic core is blunted under diabetic conditions (60) arguing that monocytes and macrophages contribute to the enlarged necrotic core in response to diabetes.

Monocyte foam cells

Where do these lesional foam cells come from? Although local proliferation of resident intimal macrophages occurs early in atherosclerosis development, where they contribute to foam cell formation and early atherosclerosis (61, 62), the progression of atherosclerosis appears to be driven by the recruitment of monocyte-derived cells (61). Circulating monocytes are derived from bone marrow progenitor cells, and similar to humans, mice have two major subtypes of monocytes in circulation. Murine monocytes are distinguished based on the surface expression of the lymphocyte antigen 6 complex locus C (Ly6C), whereas human monocytes are separated based on their surface expression of CD14 and CD16. Ly6Chi are classical monocytes (CD14hiCD16 in humans) that are critical in acute inflammatory responses, while Ly6Clo monocytes (CD14CD16+ in humans) have been described as non-classical, patrolling monocytes that play an important role in vascular homeostasis. Both Ly6Clo and Ly6Chi monocytes can employ different receptors to exit the circulation and enter the artery wall, where they mature into macrophages within lesions (2, 61, 63). More recently, it was demonstrated that Ly6Clo monocytes might play an atheroprotective role via an increased patrolling behavior, which was mediated by CD36 and could be induced by modified LDL (64).

Studies have indicated that monocytes, similar to macrophages, become lipid loaded in response to hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia (65, 66). Data from our lab suggests that monocytes become lipid loaded in response to diabetes (57). Lipid-laden circulating monocytes have also been reported in individuals with metabolic syndrome (67). The increase in foamy monocytes correlates with fasting plasma triglyceride levels in these individuals, and following a high-fat meal, foamy monocytes are further increased in circulation, suggesting that circulating monocytes acutely respond to changes in triglyceride-rich lipoproteins.

The monocyte population that becomes lipid-laden primarily expresses CD11C and CD36 and upon exposure to cholesteryl ester-rich VLDLs, monocytes can mature towards CD11C+ monocytes in circulation (67, 68). These CD11C+/CD36+ are most likely the same non-classical patrolling monocytes, as CD36 is primarily expressed in this population in both mice and humans (69). Tracing studies confirm that these CD11C+ foamy monocytes infiltrate nascent lesions, and CD11C ablation prevents their accumulation in early atherosclerotic lesions (65). Neutral lipid accumulation in monocytes can alter their migratory capacity (66). One could speculate that excessive lipid loading of Ly6Clo monocytes changes their patrolling activity, so they are no longer atheroprotective.

What lipids are monocytes responding to? In experiments using poloxamer 407, Saja et al. showed that although the lipase inhibitor resulted in dramatic elevations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, which increased the crawling of non-classical monocytes in circulation and their extravasation into the heart, it did not result in significant monocyte lipid loading, arguing that monocytes are unable to take up these very large triglyceride-rich particles (70), potentially arguing that it is the smaller remnants that are taken up, or lipolysis products (71). Consistent with that idea of remnants inducing monocyte lipid loading, we recently demonstrated that in a model of type 1 diabetes, there is a dramatic increase Ly6Clo monocyte side-scatter (a marker of lipid accumulation (66)) which was reduced when remnant lipoprotein levels were reduced (57). This was associated with reduced diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis. At this point, whether these monocyte foam cells contribute to lesional foam cell formation and to diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis is unexplored.

Does suppressing foam cells by reducing triglyceride-rich lipoproteins prevent diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis?

Current approaches to lower plasma lipids in people with and without diabetes mainly include statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, primarily affecting LDL cholesterol. Despite lowering LDL cholesterol, diabetes still results in about a 2-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (6), suggesting additional pathways are at play. Remnant lipoproteins have been hypothesized to mediate this residual risk in people with diabetes (7). Remnants are particularly atherogenic, partly because they carry more cholesterol per particle than LDL and, even in their native form, induce cholesterol accumulation in macrophages (72) and potentially monocytes (57). As of yet, there are no approved therapies that successfully target triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and remnants, which are often elevated in diabetes, but inhibition of Apolipoprotein C3 (APOC3) or Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) has, in clinical trials, been shown to reduce triglycerides and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (7376). For example, antisense oligonucleotide-mediated suppression of APOC3 resulted in an almost 70% reduction in plasma triglycerides in people with type 2 diabetes (77).

We have recently demonstrated APOC3 silencing using an antisense approach results in a dramatic reduction in triglycerides and diminished diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis (11). This was associated with a dramatic reduction in diabetes-augmented macrophage cholesteryl ester accumulation, suggesting that lowering remnants reduces macrophage foam cells. Silencing ANGPTL3 also reduced atherosclerosis in several models of atherosclerosis in non-diabetic mice (74, 76), but nothing is known about whether reducing ANGPTL3 would rescue diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis or foam cell formation.

Discussion

As discussed above, macrophage foam cells are a key characteristic of atherosclerosis, and diabetes appears to augment this feature. Diabetes creates a perfect storm by inducing changes to monocytes and macrophages, priming them for increased lipid uptake and reduced ability to efflux cholesterol while also resulting in elevated circulating lipid levels, thus resulting in increased monocyte and macrophage lipid loading (Figure 1). More research is needed to fully understand the role of monocyte and macrophage foam cells in diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis and how best to reverse it. In addition to the studies mentioned above lowering plasma triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as an approach to reduced diabetes-augmented atherosclerosis, many studies have also pharmacologically targeted uptake or efflux of lipids (78). Intriguingly, foam cells have also been reported in other complications of diabetes, such as diabetic kidney disease (79). Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that augmented foam cell formation is a common theme in diabetes and that reducing foam cell formation in diabetes may also benefit other organs.

Author contributions

JC and JK co-wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The research in the author’s laboratory has been supported by NIH Grant R01DK121756 and ADA grant 11-22-IBSPM-09 to JEK.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Wang Y, Dubland JA, Allahverdian S, Asonye E, Sahin B, Jaw JE, et al. Smooth muscle cells contribute the majority of foam cells in ApoE (apolipoprotein E)-deficient mouse atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2019) 39:876–87. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gui Y, Zheng H, Cao RY. Foam cells in atherosclerosis: novel insights into its origins, consequences, and molecular mechanisms. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2022) 9:845942. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.845942

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Dubland JA, Francis GA. So much cholesterol: the unrecognized importance of smooth muscle cells in atherosclerotic foam cell formation. Curr Opin Lipidol. (2016) 27:155–61. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000279

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Lipoprotein metabolism in the macrophage: implications for cholesterol deposition in atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Biochem. (1983) 52:223–61. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.52.070183.001255

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ginsberg HN, Packard CJ, Chapman MJ, Boren J, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Averna M, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants: metabolic insights, role in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and emerging therapeutic strategies-a consensus statement from the European atherosclerosis society. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:4791–806. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzen S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. (2017) 376:1407–18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1608664

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Eckel RH, Bornfeldt KE, Goldberg IJ. Cardiovascular disease in diabetes, beyond glucose. Cell Metab. (2021) 33:1519–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Yahagi K, Kolodgie FD, Lutter C, Mori H, Romero ME, Finn AV, et al. Pathology of human coronary and carotid artery atherosclerosis and vascular calcification in diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2017) 37:191–204. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.306256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Moreno PR, Murcia AM, Palacios IF, Leon MN, Bernardi VH, Fuster V, et al. Coronary composition and macrophage infiltration in atherectomy specimens from patients with diabetes mellitus. Circulation. (2000) 102:2180–4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.18.2180

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Renard CB, Kramer F, Johansson F, Lamharzi N, Tannock LR, von Herrath MG, et al. Diabetes and diabetes-associated lipid abnormalities have distinct effects on initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesions. J Clin Invest. (2004) 114:659–68. doi: 10.1172/JCI200417867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kanter JE, Shao B, Kramer F, Barnhart S, Shimizu-Albergine M, Vaisar T, et al. Increased apolipoprotein C3 drives cardiovascular risk in type 1 diabetes. J Clin Invest. (2019) 130:4165–79. doi: 10.1172/JCI127308

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tang C, Kanter JE, Bornfeldt KE, Leboeuf RC, Oram JF. Diabetes reduces the cholesterol exporter ABCA1 in mouse macrophages and kidneys. J Lipid Res. (2010) 51:1719–28. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M003525

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Mauldin JP, Nagelin MH, Wojcik AJ, Srinivasan S, Skaflen MD, Ayers CR, et al. Reduced expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter G1 increases cholesterol accumulation in macrophages of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. (2008) 117:2785–92. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.741314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Chait A, Ginsberg HN, Vaisar T, Heinecke JW, Goldberg IJ, Bornfeldt KE. Remnants of the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. (2020) 69:508–16. doi: 10.2337/dbi19-0007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Mauldin JP, Srinivasan S, Mulya A, Gebre A, Parks JS, Daugherty A, et al. Reduction in ABCG1 in type 2 diabetic mice increases macrophage foam cell formation. J Biol Chem. (2006) 281:21216–24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510952200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hayek T, Hussein K, Aviram M, Coleman R, Keidar S, Pavoltzky E, et al. Macrophage foam-cell formation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice: stimulatory effect of glucose. Atherosclerosis. (2005) 183:25–33. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2005.02.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE. Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2016) 118:653–67. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Babaev VR, Gleaves LA, Carter KJ, Suzuki H, Kodama T, Fazio S, et al. Reduced atherosclerotic lesions in mice deficient for total or macrophage-specific expression of scavenger receptor-A. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2000) 20:2593–9. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.20.12.2593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Febbraio M, Guy E, Silverstein RL. Stem cell transplantation reveals that absence of macrophage CD36 is protective against atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2004) 24:2333–8. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000148007.06370.68

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Febbraio M, Podrez EA, Smith JD, Hajjar DP, Hazen SL, Hoff HF, et al. Targeted disruption of the class B scavenger receptor CD36 protects against atherosclerotic lesion development in mice. J Clin Invest. (2000) 105:1049–56. doi: 10.1172/JCI9259

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Guy E, Kuchibhotla S, Silverstein R, Febbraio M. Continued inhibition of atherosclerotic lesion development in long term Western diet fed CD36o/apoEo mice. Atherosclerosis. (2007) 192:123–30. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2006.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Manning-Tobin JJ, Moore KJ, Seimon TA, Bell SA, Sharuk M, Alvarez-Leite JI, et al. Loss of SR-A and CD36 activity reduces atherosclerotic lesion complexity without abrogating foam cell formation in hyperlipidemic mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2009) 29:19–26. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.176644

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Moore KJ, Kunjathoor VV, Koehn SL, Manning JJ, Tseng AA, Silver JM, et al. Loss of receptor-mediated lipid uptake via scavenger receptor A or CD36 pathways does not ameliorate atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic mice. J Clin Invest. (2005) 115:2192–201. doi: 10.1172/JCI24061

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Kennedy DJ, Kuchibhotla SD, Guy E, Park YM, Nimako G, Vanegas D, et al. Dietary cholesterol plays a role in CD36-mediated atherogenesis in LDLR-knockout mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2009) 29:1481–7. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.109.191940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Maxfield FR, Steinfeld N, Ma CJ. The formation and consequences of cholesterol-rich deposits in atherosclerotic lesions. Front Cardiovasc Med. (2023) 10:1148304. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1148304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Singh RK, Haka AS, Asmal A, Barbosa-Lorenzi VC, Grosheva I, Chin HF, et al. TLR4 (Toll-Like Receptor 4)-dependent signaling drives extracellular catabolism of LDL (Low-Density Lipoprotein) aggregates. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2020) 40:86–102. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Griffin E, Re A, Hamel N, Fu C, Bush H, McCaffrey T, et al. A link between diabetes and atherosclerosis: glucose regulates expression of CD36 at the level of translation. Nat Med. (2001) 7:840–6. doi: 10.1038/89969

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Freemerman AJ, Johnson AR, Sacks GN, Milner JJ, Kirk EL, Troester MA, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages: glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1)-mediated glucose metabolism drives a proinflammatory phenotype. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:7884–96. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.522037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Liang CP, Han S, Okamoto H, Carnemolla R, Tabas I, Accili D, et al. Increased CD36 protein as a response to defective insulin signaling in macrophages. J Clin Invest. (2004) 113:764–73. doi: 10.1172/JCI19528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Li L, Sawamura T, Renier G. Glucose enhances human macrophage LOX-1 expression: role for LOX-1 in glucose-induced macrophage foam cell formation. Circ Res. (2004) 94:892–901. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000124920.09738.26

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Fukuhara-Takaki K, Sakai M, Sakamoto Y, Takeya M, Horiuchi S. Expression of class A scavenger receptor is enhanced by high glucose in vitro and under diabetic conditions in vivo: one mechanism for an increased rate of atherosclerosis in diabetes. J Biol Chem. (2005) 280:3355–64. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408715200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Sartippour MR, Renier G. Upregulation of macrophage lipoprotein lipase in patients with type 2 diabetes: role of peripheral factors. Diabetes. (2000) 49:597–602. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.4.597

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Takahashi M, Yagyu H, Tazoe F, Nagashima S, Ohshiro T, Okada K, et al. Macrophage lipoprotein lipase modulates the development of atherosclerosis but not adiposity. J Lipid Res. (2013) 54:1124–34. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M035568

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Evans TD, Zhang X, Clark RE, Alisio A, Song E, Zhang H, et al. Functional characterization of LIPA (lysosomal acid lipase) variants associated with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2019) 39:2480–91. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Huang LH, Melton EM, Li H, Sohn P, Rogers MA, Mulligan-Kehoe MJ, et al. Myeloid Acyl-CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase 1 deficiency reduces lesion macrophage content and suppresses atherosclerosis progression. J Biol Chem. (2016) 291:6232–44. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.713818

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Melton EM, Li H, Benson J, Sohn P, Huang LH, Song BL, et al. Myeloid Acat1/Soat1 KO attenuates pro-inflammatory responses in macrophages and protects against atherosclerosis in a model of advanced lesions. J Biol Chem. (2019) 294:15836–49. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010564

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Fazio S, Major AS, Swift LL, Gleaves LA, Accad M, Linton MF, et al. Increased atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-null mice lacking ACAT1 in macrophages. J Clin Invest. (2001) 107:163–71. doi: 10.1172/JCI10310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Terasaki M, Yashima H, Mori Y, Saito T, Matsui T, Hiromura M, et al. A dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor inhibits foam cell formation of macrophages in type 1 diabetes via suppression of CD36 and ACAT-1 expression. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:4811–24. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Groenen AG, Halmos B, Tall AR, Westerterp M. Cholesterol efflux pathways, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. (2021) 56:426–39. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2021.1925217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Yvan-Charvet L, Pagler T, Gautier EL, Avagyan S, Siry RL, Han S, et al. ATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science. (2010) 328:1689–93. doi: 10.1126/science.1189731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Randolph GJ. Mechanisms that regulate macrophage burden in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2014) 114:1757–71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Swirski FK, Libby P, Aikawa E, Alcaide P, Luscinskas FW, Weissleder R, et al. Ly-6Chi monocytes dominate hypercholesterolemia-associated monocytosis and give rise to macrophages in atheromata. J Clin Invest. (2007) 117:195–205. doi: 10.1172/JCI29950

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Sheedy FJ, Grebe A, Rayner KJ, Kalantari P, Ramkhelawon B, Carpenter SB, et al. CD36 Coordinates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by facilitating intracellular nucleation of soluble ligands into particulate ligands in sterile inflammation. Nat Immunol. (2013) 14:812–20. doi: 10.1038/ni.2639

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Park YM, Febbraio M, Silverstein RL. CD36 modulates migration of mouse and human macrophages in response to oxidized LDL and may contribute to macrophage trapping in the arterial intima. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:136–45. doi: 10.1172/JCI35535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Que X, Hung MY, Yeang C, Gonen A, Prohaska TA, Sun X, et al. Oxidized phospholipids are proinflammatory and proatherogenic in hypercholesterolaemic mice. Nature. (2018) 558:301–6. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0198-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Choi SH, Sviridov D, Miller YI. Oxidized cholesteryl esters and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids. (2017) 1862:393–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.06.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Stewart CR, Stuart LM, Wilkinson K, van Gils JM, Deng J, Halle A, et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat Immunol. (2010) 11:155–61. doi: 10.1038/ni.1836

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Spann NJ, Garmire LX, McDonald JG, Myers DS, Milne SB, Shibata N, et al. Regulated accumulation of desmosterol integrates macrophage lipid metabolism and inflammatory responses. Cell. (2012) 151:138–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.054

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kim K, Shim D, Lee JS, Zaitsev K, Williams JW, Kim KW, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals nonfoamy rather than foamy plaque macrophages are proinflammatory in atherosclerotic murine models. Circ Res. (2018) 123:1127–42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312804

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Willemsen L, de Winther MP. Macrophage subsets in atherosclerosis as defined by single-cell technologies. J Pathol. (2020) 250:705–14. doi: 10.1002/path.5392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Winkels H, Ehinger E, Vassallo M, Buscher K, Dinh HQ, Kobiyama K, et al. Atlas of the immune cell repertoire in mouse atherosclerosis defined by single-cell RNA-sequencing and mass cytometry. Circ Res. (2018) 122:1675–88. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Cochain C, Vafadarnejad E, Arampatzi P, Pelisek J, Winkels H, Ley K, et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals the transcriptional landscape and heterogeneity of aortic macrophages in murine atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2018) 122:1661–74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.117.312509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Fernandez DM, Rahman AH, Fernandez NF, Chudnovskiy A, Amir ED, Amadori L, et al. Single-cell immune landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques. Nat Med. (2019) 35:1576–88. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0590-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Hardtner C, Kumar A, Ehlert CA, Vico TA, Starz C, von Ehr A, et al. A comparative gene expression matrix in Apoe-deficient mice identifies unique and atherosclerotic disease stage-specific gene regulation patterns in monocytes and macrophages. Atherosclerosis. (2023) 371:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2023.03.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Zernecke A, Erhard F, Weinberger T, Schulz C, Ley K, Saliba AE, et al. Integrated single-cell analysis based classification of vascular mononuclear phagocytes in mouse and human atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. (2022). doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvac161

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Paul A, Chang BH, Li L, Yechoor VK, Chan L. Deficiency of adipose differentiation-related protein impairs foam cell formation and protects against atherosclerosis. Circ Res. (2008) 102:1492–501. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.168070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Shimizu-Albergine M, Basu D, Kanter JE, Kramer F, Kothari V, Barnhart S, et al. CREBH Normalizes dyslipidemia and halts atherosclerosis in diabetes by decreasing circulating remnant lipoproteins. J Clin Invest. (2021) 131:e153285–301. doi: 10.1172/JCI153285

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Hsu CC, Fidler TP, Kanter JE, Kothari V, Kramer F, Tang J, et al. Hematopoietic NLRP3 and AIM2 inflammasomes promote diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis, but increased necrosis is independent of pyroptosis. Diabetes. (2023). doi: 10.2337/db22-0962

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Kanter JE, Bornfeldt KE. Apolipoprotein C3 and apolipoprotein B colocalize in proximity to macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions in diabetes. J Lipid Res. (2021) 62:100010. doi: 10.1194/jlr.ILR120001217

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kramer F, Martinson AM, Papayannopoulou T, Kanter JE. Myocardial infarction does not accelerate atherosclerosis in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. (2020) 69:2133–43. doi: 10.2337/db20-0152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Williams JW, Zaitsev K, Kim KW, Ivanov S, Saunders BT, Schrank PR, et al. Limited proliferation capacity of aortic intima resident macrophages requires monocyte recruitment for atherosclerotic plaque progression. Nat Immunol. (2020) 21:1194–204. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0768-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Robbins CS, Hilgendorf I, Weber GF, Theurl I, Iwamoto Y, Figueiredo JL, et al. Local proliferation dominates lesional macrophage accumulation in atherosclerosis. Nat Med. (2013) 19:1166–72. doi: 10.1038/nm.3258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Tacke F, Alvarez D, Kaplan TJ, Jakubzick C, Spanbroek R, Llodra J, et al. Monocyte subsets differentially employ CCR2, CCR5, and CX3CR1 to accumulate within atherosclerotic plaques. J Clin Invest. (2007) 117:185–94. doi: 10.1172/JCI28549

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Marcovecchio PM, Thomas GD, Mikulski Z, Ehinger E, Mueller KAL, Blatchley A, et al. Scavenger receptor CD36 directs nonclassical monocyte patrolling along the endothelium during early atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2017) 37:2043–52. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309123

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Xu L, Dai Perrard X, Perrard JL, Yang D, Xiao X, Teng BB, et al. Foamy monocytes form early and contribute to nascent atherosclerosis in mice with hypercholesterolemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2015) 35:1787–97. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.305609

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Jackson WD, Weinrich TW, Woollard KJ. Very-low and low-density lipoproteins induce neutral lipid accumulation and impair migration in monocyte subsets. Sci Rep. (2016) 6:20038. doi: 10.1038/srep20038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Khan IM, Pokharel Y, Dadu RT, Lewis DE, Hoogeveen RC, Wu H, et al. Postprandial monocyte activation in individuals with metabolic syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2016) 101:4195–204. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2732

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Gower RM, Wu H, Foster GA, Devaraj S, Jialal I, Ballantyne CM, et al. CD11c/CD18 expression is upregulated on blood monocytes during hypertriglyceridemia and enhances adhesion to vascular cell adhesion molecule-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2011) 31:160–6. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.215434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Ingersoll MA, Spanbroek R, Lottaz C, Gautier EL, Frankenberger M, Hoffmann R, et al. Comparison of gene expression profiles between human and mouse monocyte subsets. Blood. (2010) 115:e10–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Saja MF, Baudino L, Jackson WD, Cook HT, Malik TH, Fossati-Jimack L, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins modulate the distribution and extravasation of Ly6C/Gr1(low) monocytes. Cell Rep. (2015) 12:1802–15. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. den Hartigh LJ, Connolly-Rohrbach JE, Fore S, Huser TR, Rutledge JC. Fatty acids from very low-density lipoprotein lipolysis products induce lipid droplet accumulation in human monocytes. J Immunol. (2010) 184:3927–36. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903475

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Tomono S, Kawazu S, Kato N, Ono T, Ishii C, Ito Y, et al. Uptake of remnant like particles (RLP) in diabetic patients from mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Atheroscler Thromb. (1994) 1:98–102. doi: 10.5551/jat1994.1.98

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Stitziel NO, Kanter JE, Bornfeldt KE. Emerging targets for cardiovascular disease prevention in diabetes. Trends Mol Med. (2020) 26:744–57. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2020.03.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Dewey FE, Gusarova V, Dunbar RL, O'Dushlaine C, Schurmann C, Gottesman O, et al. Genetic and pharmacologic inactivation of ANGPTL3 and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:211–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1612790

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

75. Graham MJ, Lee RG, 3rd Bell TA, Fu W, Mullick AE, Alexander VJ, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III reduces plasma triglycerides in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans. Circ Res. (2013) 112:1479–90. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300367

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Graham MJ, Lee RG, Brandt TA, Tai LJ, Fu W, Peralta R, et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic effects of ANGPTL3 antisense oligonucleotides. N Engl J Med. (2017) 377:222–32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1701329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Digenio A, Dunbar RL, Alexander VJ, Hompesch M, Morrow L, Lee RG, et al. Antisense-mediated lowering of plasma apolipoprotein C-III by volanesorsen improves dyslipidemia and insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2016) 39:1408–15. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0126

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Wang D, Yang Y, Lei Y, Tzvetkov NT, Liu X, Yeung AWK, et al. Targeting foam cell formation in atherosclerosis: therapeutic potential of natural products. Pharmacol Rev. (2019) 71:596–670. doi: 10.1124/pr.118.017178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Eom M, Hudkins KL, Alpers CE. Foam cells and the pathogenesis of kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. (2015) 24:245–51. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: monocytes, diabetes, macropahge, foam cell, triglyceride-rich lipoprateins

Citation: Cervantes J and Kanter JE (2023) Monocyte and macrophage foam cells in diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10:1213177. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1213177

Received: 27 April 2023; Accepted: 30 May 2023;
Published: 12 June 2023.

Edited by:

Suowen Xu, University of Science and Technology of China, China

Reviewed by:

Chao Xue, University of Michigan, United States
Xiaoxiao Yang, Hefei University of Technology, China

© 2023 Cervantes and Kanter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jenny E. Kanter amVua2FAdXcuZWR1

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.