AUTHOR=Li Ya , Feng Yujia , Li Shu , Ma Yulin , Lin Jiesheng , Wan Jing , Zhao Min 

TITLE=The atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) is a predictor for the severity of coronary artery disease

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140215

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2023.1140215

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Objective</title><p>Dyslipidemia is a key risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and the severity of CAD.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>2,491 patients were enrolled in this study and analyzed retrospectively, including 665 non-CAD patients as the control group and 1,826 CAD patients. The CAD patients were classified into three subgroups according to tertiles of SYNTAX score (SS). Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) was defined as serum total cholesterol (TC) minus serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (Non-HDL-C), atherogenic index (AI) was defined as the ratio of non-HDL-C to HDL-C; AIP was defined as the logarithm of the ratio of the concentration of triglyceride (TG) to HDL-C; lipoprotein combine index (LCI) was defined as the ratio of TC∗TG∗ low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL)to HDL-C; Castelli Risk Index I (CRI I) was defined as the ratio of TC to HDL-C; Castelli Risk Index II (CRI II) was defined as the ratio of LDL-C to HDL-C.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>The levels of AIP (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), AI (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), and LCI (<italic>P </italic>= 0.013) were higher in the CAD group compared with the non-CAD group. The Spearman correlation analysis showed that AIP (<italic>r</italic> = 0.075, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), AI (<italic>r</italic> = 0.132, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), and LCI (<italic>r</italic> = 0.072, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001) were positively correlated with SS. The multivariate logistic regression model showed CRI I (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03–1.19, <italic>P</italic> = 0.005), CRI II (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.15–1.39, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), AI (OR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.17–1.40, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), AIP (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.38–3.07, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), and LCI (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01–1.02, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) were independent predictors of severity of CAD After adjusting various confounders.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>CRI I, CRI II, AIP, AI, and LCI were independent predictors of the severity of CAD, which could be used as a biomarker for the evaluation of the severity of CAD.</p></sec>