AUTHOR=Rieder Marina , Kreifels Paul , Stuplich Judith , Ziupa David , Servatius Helge , Nicolai Luisa , Castiglione Alessandro , Zweier Christiane , Asatryan Babken , Odening Katja E. 

TITLE=Genotype-Specific ECG-Based Risk Stratification Approaches in Patients With Long-QT Syndrome

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.916036

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2022.916036

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=<sec><title>Background</title><p>Congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS) is a major cause of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals, calling for sophisticated risk assessment. Risk stratification, however, is challenging as the individual arrhythmic risk varies pronouncedly, even in individuals carrying the same variant.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>In this study, we aimed to assess the association of different electrical parameters with the genotype and the symptoms in patients with LQTS. In addition to the heart-rate corrected QT interval (QTc), markers for regional electrical heterogeneity, such as QT dispersion (QT<sub>max</sub>-QT<sub>min</sub> in all ECG leads) and delta T<sub>peak/end</sub> (T<sub>peak/end</sub> V5 – T<sub>peak/end</sub> V2), were assessed in the 12-lead ECG at rest and during exercise testing.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>QTc at rest was significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients with LQT2 (493.4 ms ± 46.5 ms vs. 419.5 ms ± 28.6 ms, <italic>p</italic> = 0.004), but surprisingly not associated with symptoms in LQT1. In contrast, post-exercise QTc (minute 4 of recovery) was significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients with LQT1 (486.5 ms ± 7.0 ms vs. 463.3 ms ± 16.3 ms, <italic>p</italic> = 0.04), while no such difference was observed in patients with LQT2. Enhanced delta T<sub>peak/end</sub> and QT dispersion were only associated with symptoms in LQT1 (delta T<sub>peak/end</sub> 19.0 ms ± 18.1 ms vs. −4.0 ms ± 4.4 ms, <italic>p</italic> = 0.02; QT-dispersion: 54.3 ms ± 10.2 ms vs. 31.4 ms ± 10.4 ms, <italic>p</italic> = 0.01), but not in LQT2. Delta T<sub>peak/end</sub> was particularly discriminative after exercise, where all symptomatic patients with LQT1 had positive and all asymptomatic LQT1 patients had negative values (11.8 ± 7.9 ms vs. −7.5 ± 1.7 ms, <italic>p</italic> = 0.003).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Different electrical parameters can distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in different genetic forms of LQTS. While the classical “QTc at rest” was only associated with symptoms in LQT2, post-exercise QTc helped distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with LQT1. Enhanced regional electrical heterogeneity was only associated with symptoms in LQT1, but not in LQT2. Our findings indicate that genotype-specific risk stratification approaches based on electrical parameters could help to optimize risk assessment in LQTS.</p></sec>