AUTHOR=Oliveros María José , Seron Pamela , Román Claudia , Gálvez Manuel , Navarro Rocío , Latin Gonzalo , Marileo Tania , Molina Juan Pablo , Sepúlveda Pablo , Marzuca-Nassr Gabriel Nasri , Muñoz Sergio 

TITLE=Two-Minute Step Test as a Complement to Six-Minute Walk Test in Subjects With Treated Coronary Artery Disease

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=9

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.848589

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2022.848589

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=<p>The 2-Minute Step Test (2MST) has been presented as an alternative to the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) based on the association between the two tests in older adults; however, some authors propose that it should not be a substitute but rather a complement to the latter in the fitness evaluation. Specifically, in coronary disease, despite the potential and clinical utility of 2MST, the relationship of both tests in this population is unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between 6MWT and 2MST and to explore the relationship of biodemographic factors for both tests in subjects with treated coronary artery disease. For this, the 6MWT and the 2MST were applied to patients with coronary artery disease treated in 6 hospitals in Chile between May 2019 and February 2020. Additionally, lower limb strength was assessed by a chair-stand test, grip strength was assessed by a dynamometer, and physical measurements were applied. In total, 163 participants underwent both tests (average age = 58.7 ± 9.8 years; 73.6% men; 64.4% revascularized by angioplasty; 28.2% revascularized by surgery, and 7.4% treated by drugs or thrombolysis). Heart rate was higher at the end of the 6MWT, while the perception of effort was greater at the end of the 2MST. There was a weak positive correlation between the 6MWT and the 2MST in subjects with treated coronary disease (<italic>r</italic> = 0.28, <italic>p</italic> = 0.0003). While age (<italic>r</italic> = –0.27), weight (<italic>r</italic> = 0.25), height (<italic>r</italic> = 0.49), and strength of both lower limbs (<italic>r</italic> = 0.41) and grip strength (<italic>r</italic> = 0.53) correlated weakly or moderately to the covered distance in 6MWT, the number of steps by the 2MST correlated only weakly to height (<italic>r</italic> = 0.23), lower limb strength (<italic>r</italic> = 0.34), and grip strength (<italic>r</italic> = 0.34). Age, weight, height, lower limb strength, and grip strength would explain better the meters walked in the 6MWT than the steps achieved in the 2MST. With these findings, we can conclude that, in patients with treated coronary artery disease, it does not seem advisable to replace 6MWT with 2MST when it is possible to do so. Additionally, the 2MST may provide additional information in the fitness evaluation. However, the usefulness of 2MST in this population needs to be further studied.</p>