- 1Research Station for Viticulture and Enology Blaj (SCDVV Blaj), Blaj, Romania
- 2“Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 3Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical Pharmacology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Grape pomace and grape seeds, by-products of the wine industry, and grapevine cane resulting from grapevine pruning are cheap matrices containing important amounts of polyphenols. While there is a continuous need of introducing new ways of these by-products valorization, we propose their use as a source of bioactive polyphenols for complementary therapy in ischemic heart diseases. As oxidative stress plays an important role in these diseases, by their antioxidant/pro-oxidant properties, these compounds, mainly flavan-3-ols, procyanidins, and resveratrol may counteract the damage of the oxidative stress. For instance, to some extent, the grape seed extract, considered as an antioxidant nutritive supplement, may have pro-oxidant activity as well, depending on dose, duration of administration, and other dietary components. In vitro studies confirm that the antioxidant activity of this extract might be mediated by pro-oxidant o-quinones and oxidation products of the polyphenols from grape and winery byproducts, indicating that quinones, as oxidation products, are involved in the modulation of the antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance at the cellular level in the case of catechin-type compounds, in the absence or presence of oxidative stress inducers. In vivo, studies indicate that a grape pomace-rich diet results in a significant increase of the total antioxidant status in the plasma, liver, spleen, and kidneys. Also, the administration of grape pomace shows antioxidant activity with positive effects on health. In this context, the present review aims to present the most recent research focused on the antioxidant/pro-oxidant actions of the bioactive polyphenols from grapevine and wine byproducts, in conditions of ischemic heart diseases as assessed in vitro or in vivo.
Introduction
Generally, the food chain including the wine industry generates besides the final product, byproducts that contain a substantial proportion of nutrients originating from the input materials (1). According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) fruits and vegetable waste production are considered the highest as compared with all types of foods, reaching up to 60%. The high amounts of resulted by-products, their impact on the environment as well as their nutritional composition, make these matrices a significant topic for careful recovery and valorization (1) in the framework of the circular model of economy. This concept represents also a great opportunity, not only to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and fossil fuel (2) but also to contribute to the generation of multiple valuable ideas on how to valorize the waste into different value-added by-products, transforming it into raw material for other industries and applications (cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, food industry, animal feedstock, and others).
One of these high potential fruits suitable for by-products valorization is the grape (Vitis vinifera). Currently, grapes are the most cultivated around the world, with 77.1 million tons in 2019 (3), from which 57% was for wine grape production, 36% for table grape utilization, and 7% for dried grapes (4, 5). Vitis vinifera is a key growing system characterized by underutilized woody and fiber-rich biomass by-products that can be valorized by reducing the carbon footprint of its high-quality products (grapes and wine). A by-product of pruning and summer trimming, grapevine cane which usually is destroyed by burning, can also be regarded as a widely available potential source of natural resveratrol (RESV) (4, 5). The wine processing industry produces high amounts of by-products like grape pomace (GP) that accounts for 13–25% of grapes total weight. Grape pomace is of particular interest because of its rich chemical composition, especially phenolic compounds (6). Overall, all grape by-products were reported to contain high quantities of phenolics like phenolic acids, flavonols, flavones, flavanones, tannins, flavan-3-ols, proanthocyanidins and, anthocyanins, and stilbenes (7–9). These compounds have been reported to possess multiple pharmacological activities like anticancer (10), antifungal (11), antibacterial (12), antioxidant (8), and anti-inflammatory activities (10). One of the most studied is the antioxidant capacity because of phenolics can act as free radical scavengers, hydrogen donators, metal chelators, and singlet oxygen quenchers (13). However, it was also reported that phenolic compounds can act as pro-oxidants if conditions favorable for autoxidation are present (e.g., high pH, high transition metal ions concentrations, the presence of oxygen molecules) (14). Thus, depending on the environment, some phenolic compounds, especially small molecules, can act either as antioxidants (electron donors) either as pro-oxidants (electron acceptors) (14). Dual antioxidant and pro-oxidant activities were already reported in the literature for a wide range of phenolic compounds like phenolic acids (e.g., gallic, protocatechuic, syringic, vanillic, ellagic, caffeic, coumaric, chlorogenic, and ferulic acids), flavonoids (e.g., myricetin, quercetin, rutin, and kaempferol), flavan-3-ols (e.g., catechin and epicatechin) and anthocyanidins (e.g., delphinidin and malvidin) (14, 15).
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. In 2019 CVDs accounted for an estimated 17.9 million mortalities worldwide, representing 32% of global deaths (WHO). People living in low- and middle-income countries are more exposed to pre-mature deaths of CVD origin. Among CVDs, ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the most prevalent (16). Ischemic heart disease is a pathological process that is characterized by an imbalance between the demand and supply of myocardial oxygen as a consequence of the reduced cardiac blood flow (17). The causes can be multiple from atherosclerotic obstruction, microvascular dysfunction, coronary artery vasospasm, or congenital anomalies. Ischemic heart disease is often used as coronary artery disease (CAD), being considered synonyms (17, 18). Thus, IHD or CAD is considered a multifactorial phenomenon influenced by the non-modifiable (e.g., genetics, gender, age, family history) or by modifiable risk factors (e.g., obesity, lipid profile, smoking, alcohol, low fruit and vegetable intake, physical inactivity or other psychosocial variables) (19). Current treatments are aiming to reduce the addressable risk factors, especially atherosclerotic disease progression by using classical treatments and/or by counseling the patients on dietary and lifestyle changes. The classical treatments include several classes of compounds. β-blockers are used for the reduction of myocardial oxygen demand and to decrease heart rate and contractility; calcium channel blockers to reduce the systemic vascular resistance translated in a decrease myocardial contractility; nitrates to induce venous dilation influencing heart oxygen demand by a decrease pre-load and demand, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockers by the reduction of blood pressure and infarct size and antiplatelet drugs to prevent the formation of thrombus in the coronary arteries. Additionally, lipid-lowering drugs are also used to reduce the risk of heart attacks (20, 21).
Despite the complex management of IHD that is already focused on primary prevention, improved diagnosis, and treatment, globally it remains a major public concern producing enormous health and economic burdens (22). Therefore, key strategies targeted at the prevention of IHD or CVD are expected from all sectors to have global significance with a positive impact. To best accomplish this, a collaborative effort could be performed among the wine industry, medical and pharmaceutical research to valorize grapevine and wine byproducts rich in polyphenols. This can be possible due to the strong link between polyphenols and CVD, and their major impact on oxidative stress, one of the principal pathophysiological processes involved in the pathogenesis of IHD. Thus, polyphenols from grapevine and wine industry by-products can target several oxidation markers derived from excessive interactions with ROS, RNS, and RCS like oxidation of DNA (oxidized purine and pyrimidine bases like 8-OH-dG), or specific proteins (protein carbonyls, oxidized aminoacids), lipids (MDA, isoprostanes, ox-LDL and their antibody) and carbohydrates (23, 24).
Hence, this work aims to offer a complex overview of the antioxidant/pro-oxidant activity of grapevine and wine by-products polyphenols referring to the in vivo and in vitro studies in the perspective of IHD prevention.
Grapevine and Wine By-Products—Valuable Sources of Polyphenols
The production of wine from Vitis ssp. grapes is carried out in different steps: grape collection, destemming, crushing, and pressing (25). From the process of winemaking, two different by-products mainly accumulate grape stems and grape pomace (GP) (skins, seeds, and lees) (25). Grape pomace is frequently destined for distillation and production of alcoholic beverages, like grappa in Italy and tsikoudia and tsipouro in Greece, but there is no real utilization of stems except for composting (25). Grape pomace represents ~25% of the grape's weight and, besides distillation most of GP is reused in the vineyards in the carbon cycle (26). Thus, attention should be directed toward other sustainable practices to optimize GP valorization. Among the alternatives used in GP valorization special interest was observed in the food and pharmaceutical industries. The use of GP and grape seeds (GS) in functional foods (dietary fiber + polyphenols), food industry (biosurfactants), pharmaceutical (food supplements like grape pomace and grape seed powder), and cosmetics (grapeseed oil + antioxidants) (26). Finding alternatives for GP utilization is more and more motivated by the increased consumer demand toward natural compounds and their awareness toward alternative uses of waste and by-products. Also, GP, and GS are very rich sources of polyphenols (up to 8%) (27), and they already have a grounded tradition in food and cosmetic sectors as natural additives (coloring agents, conservative agents, antioxidants, or nutritional additives) (28). Polyphenols from GP and GS are mainly represented by monomeric flavan-3-ols like catechin, epicatechin, and gallocatechin (Figure 1) (29). Procyanidin dimers, trimers, highly polymerized procyanidins, and phenolic acid (gallic acid) precursors are also present (Figure 1) (27, 30, 31). Among monomers, catechin and epicatechin are the representative flavanols found in GS and grape skin, having similar levels, or higher epicatechin levels according to grape varieties, geographical area, climate, growing or harvesting conditions (32, 33). Procyanidin B1 was found representative in the grape skin (34). Other compounds like C4–C8 procyanidin dimers were predominantly reported in GS, with procyanidin B2 in higher concentrations (35). Anthocyanins are an important class of polyphenols present in red grapes but not in white ones. Delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, and malvidin are the most important anthocyanins found in red grapes, and they differ in the B ring substitution (Figure 1). The mono-glucoside forms of delphinidin, cyanidin, petunidin, peonidin, and malvidin are the most common substitutions (36). Compared to Vitis vinifera L. grapes, other grape species, such as Vitis labrusca and American grape species, have been reported to possess both, 3-mono-glucoside and 3,5-di-glucosides anthocyanin forms (37). As in the case of the other polyphenol classes, GP resulted from the red winemaking, contains a large part of these antioxidant compounds originating from the input material, the grapes (34, 38). In addition to polyphenols, GP contains important quantities of dietary fiber (46/100 g), carbohydrates (29/100 g), protein (8/100 g), and lipids (8/100 g) (39).
Figure 1. Chemical composition of principal phenolic compounds identified in grapevine and wine by-products.
Another phenolic compound found in wine and grapevine tissues and their by-products, with significant benefits in human health, is resveratrol (3,5,4′-trihydroxy-stilbene, RESV) (Figure 2). RESV is produced in the epidermis of leaves and the skin of grapes, particularly when the grapevine is infected with Botrytis cinerea (40). In wine, the RESV concentration varies according to wine type: in red wines can be even higher than 580 μg per 100 mL while in white wines, it is much lower (~68 μg per 100 mL) (41). This discrepancy can be explained by the fact that for obtaining the white wine, the skin is removed sooner in the winemaking process, resulting in less RESV being extracted. In addition, red wine has a higher concentration of trans-resveratrol than white wine (29). The latter, on the other hand, contains a greater concentration of cis-resveratrol, which is very sensitive to light (42). RESV and its derivatives levels in plants are influenced by a variety of variables including environmental conditions, abiotic (light, UV radiation), and biotic stress (Botrytis cinerea and Plasmopara viticola infection) (43). Even though RESV is found in over 72 species of plants (44) some of the main dietary sources are wine, grapes, and grape products as well as their by-products (29, 45).
Polyphenols Significance in Cardiovascular Diseases
It is already known that the development of CVD is influenced by several factors. Changes in cholesterol and lipid metabolism, the inflammation and oxidative processes characteristic at the vascular wall level, endothelium cellular disruption and intra-lumenal platelet activation and aggregation are the most common pathophysiological processes characteristics for CVD diseases. Some of these processes like atherosclerotic lesions or endothelial dysfunction can be observed in the earlier stages of disease development and therefore are targeted in disease prevention (46). According to literature data, several candidates biomarkers were linked to pathophysiological changes in CAD. For example, the prognosis in stable CAD was associated with myocardial stress and remodeling biomarkers like B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), Mid-regional pro-A-type natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP), Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), Renin, Copeptin and Pro-endothelin-1 (47). Further, the myocardial injury was correlated with cardiac troponins (troponin I and troponin T). Inflammatory processes were linked with C-reactive protein (CRP), Pentraxin 3, Growth differentiation factor-15, Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity (sST2), Myeloperoxidase, Osteoprotegerin, Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, Interleukin-6 and others (47). On the other hand, the acute coronary syndrome was strongly linked to malondialdehyde low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL) as a sensitive biomarker of plaque destabilization (46) and with myeloperoxidase (MPO) that, in high concentrations, also contribute to plaque destabilization. Choline and Whole blood choline (WBCHO) were also found in high concentrations after activation of ischemia (46), alongside the increased circulating levels of free fatty acids and ischemia modified Albumin (46). More accessible, an altered profile of serum lipid level is considered one of the most important risk factors for CAD (48). Thus, the reduction of LDL cholesterol that is directly linked to atherosclerosis development and can predict high CVD risks can be considered an easy and important therapeutic target in reducing the CVD risks (48).
Overall, multiple known markers are used to predict CAD or CVDs but considering that their morbidity prevalence is still in the forehead, earlier intervention in the identification and treatment of associated CVD risk factors is needed. Hence, continuous efforts are put to discover new preventive therapies useful in the fight of reducing CVD risks factors. In this sense, collective evidence indicates that polyphenols possess multiple pharmacological effects with positive effects against CVD factors (49–52).
Many overlapping mechanisms characteristic for CVD, particularly IHD, were found to be influenced by polyphenols. Of these mechanisms, polyphenols were found to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption and/or to increase oxygen supply (8, 53), to enhance myocardium metabolism following ischaemia/reperfusion (53, 54), to inhibit platelet aggregation (51, 55), thrombosis (55), to regulate lipid metabolism (52), to reduce inflammation (56), to inhibit atheromatous plaques formation (50), to promote endothelial cell repair (57), to protect remaining myocardial cells or to restore myocardial contraction (58). According to these mechanisms, polyphenols will act on multiple molecular targets involving different synergistic protective pathways. For example, referring to polyphenols role in atherosclerotic lesions or endothelial dysfunction (significant in early IHD prevention) it was observed that they have the ability to reduce atherosclerotic progression (59). The proposed mechanisms are related to the improvement of lipid profile (increased HDL, reduced LDL, and total cholesterol). Also, polyphenols can inhibit NADPH oxidase complex, NO release, endothelial activation or can reduce monocyte adhesion to the endothelium (59). Alongside, polyphenols can reduce the production of chemokines, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and angiogenic factors. They were also shown to modulate enzymatic signaling associated with T-cell proliferation, B-cell activation, and cytokine production (59). Polyphenols can modulate endothelial function through the regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules expression. In addition, polyphenols can reduce the expression of some adhesion molecules like vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1), platelet, and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) known for their contribution in the early plaque development (57). More than that, polyphenols radical-scavenging properties have been shown to have antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects. Thus, polyphenols can reduce ROS production through oxidases inhibition, can reduce superoxide production, can inhibit OxLDL formation (48). Also, polyphenols through their antioxidant activity can modulate dyslipidemia offering protection against free radicals and thus decreasing the oxidation of the lipoproteins (Figure 3) (56).
Figure 3. Synergistic and prophylactic effect of grapevine and wine by-products polyphenols in ischemic heart disease. I—Polyphenols reduce LDL levels; II—Polyphenols reduce oxLDL formation; III—Polyphenols reduce monocytes adhesion by reducing the expression of VCAM-1; IV—Polyphenols reduce ROS production; V—Polyphenols inhibit platelets activation and adhesion by reducing the expression of PECAM-1.
As seen, oxidative stress is a common process in many pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CVD. Polyphenols are known for their effect in reducing oxidative stress through their antioxidant activities (Figure 4). Much research is available regarding polyphenols antioxidant action. Even though most studies indicate that these compounds possess strong antioxidant activity, some studies are pointing out their pro-oxidant activity. That is why this review aims to discuss whether polyphenols contained in grapevine and wine by-products can be considered good candidates in the prevention of IHD in the light of their antioxidant action, pro-oxidant effect or their antioxidant action/pro-oxidant balance as demonstrated in the literature.
Figure 4. Grapevine and wine by-products antioxidant effect in ischemic heart disease. SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GPx, glutathione peroxidase; NRF2, nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2; NQO1, quinone oxidoreductase-1; HO-1, heme oxygenase 1; GCLC, glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit; MDA, malondialdehyde; ROS, reactive oxygen species; 8-OhdG, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine.
Does Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products Possess Antioxidant or Pro-oxidant Activity?
The antioxidant activity of phenolic compounds is described concerning their capacity to prevent the oxidation of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and DNA, generally at low concentrations (60, 61). Opposed, the pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols is described concerning their capacity to induce lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, or apoptosis in cancer cells (61). It was already established that some phenolic compounds possess both antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity. These activities are in strong correlation with the administered dose, time, containing matrix as well as the presence of other components like metal ions. Cumulating these factors, the balance between beneficial and harmful effects can be very difficult to be controlled or predicted (27, 60, 62).
In general, polyphenols' action is described as being balanced in favor of keeping the organism's redox homeostasis (61). It was described that after ingestion, the polyphenols firstly act in the stomach then at the gastrointestinal tract level, and further in the blood system (61). Interestingly, it was observed that at the gastrointestinal level they act as reducing agents, while in the blood system, even at very low concentrations, they have pro-oxidant action through the generation of H2O2 or other oxidants capable to initiate oxidative stress processes (61). These processes may then be further identified in different organs, especially in the cardiovascular system, liver, pancreas, kidneys, lungs, or blood-brain barrier cells (61).
Therefore, it is very important to analyze if polyphenols act as both antioxidant or pro-oxidants and observe their health implications in more complex experimental settings that could potentially lead to the identification of both positive and/or negative effects in different organism structures.
Firstly, the positive health effects of GP or other polyphenols contained in wine grape by-products were tested on numerous in vitro studies that indicated both antioxidant or pro-oxidant action (Table 1). These studies raised multiple questions regarding their mechanism of action or the conditions affecting the balance from antioxidant toward pro-oxidant effect. Afterwards, several in vivo studies are verifying these hypotheses trying to establish a correlation between compounds concentrations and their effects and to identify their exact mechanism of action after being metabolized, in different organs (Table 1).
Table 1. In vitro and in vivo evidence of antioxidant and pro-oxidant effect of resveratrol and polyphenols from grapevine and wine by-products.
In vitro Antioxidant/Pro-oxidant Activity of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products
The promising health benefits of GP, GS, or of its bioactive compounds including RESV contributed to the numerous in vitro studies conducted to investigate their potential as antioxidant agents using various models of cell lines.
The effect of grape seed proanthocyanidins extracts (GSPE), epicatechin (EC), gallic acid (GA), and RESV was investigated on a cytokine-induced vascular endothelial inflammation using a blood-brain barrier model. The endothelial damage, leptin receptors expression, and leptin transfer were investigated (82). Leptin is a hormone produced by adipokines that play a role in the metabolic system. Leptin is inhibiting appetite and hunger sensation in the central nervous system which in dietary obesity it cannot pass the blood-brain barrier due to existing low-grade inflammation. This fact can lead to fulnessless and weight gain (82). It was investigated whether phenolic compounds from grape could be beneficial for obesity by increasing the levels of leptin which can cross the blood-brain barrier. In this regard, a co-culture of rat brain endothelial cells, glial cells, and pericytes was used. Within the complex experimental settings, the effect of GSPE, EC, GA, and RESV against oxidative stress was also investigated., Their antioxidant capacity was measured after cellular incubation with IL-1β and TNF-α pro-inflammatory cytokines (82). By choosing the GSPE as a complex mixture of phytochemicals alongside EC as a flavonoid representant, RESV as a stilbene representant, and GA as a phenolic acid representant, an important overview on how the most important classes of phenolic compounds identified in grape by-products exert their antioxidant effects among others was obtained. Thus, GPSE and compounds' effect on ROS production, nitric oxide (NO) levels, NF-kB activation, and leptin transporter expression (Ob-Ra) were measured. It was observed that GSPE and RESV exhibited the highest antioxidant effect by reducing ROS levels, increasing NO levels, inhibiting NF-kB activation, and increasing Ob-Ra expression (82). Interestingly, on brain endothelial cells, GSPE increased NO production in both situations - when used alone and when used with the pro-inflammatory cytokines. Referring to EC and RESV, the NO levels were decreased when used in combination with the cytokines (82). This is an important observation related to phenolic compounds antioxidant /pro-oxidant activity especially to the one of GSPE. Within these experimental settings, the potential of GPSE to increase the NO production in both situations can lead to other hypotheses. Since NO is already known for its role as a regulator in numerous vital physiological functions (e.g., blood pressure, neural communication, and immune response) (83) we must ask if NO will act as an antioxidant or can have a pro-oxidant effect. Thus, the balance between a low concentration of NO known for the protective effect (antioxidant activity) and high NO concentrations (pro-oxidant activity) must be carefully controlled and modulated to induce the health-protective effects. These observations will need further research for new strategies in pharmacotherapeutic agents capable of maintaining antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance.
The effect of grape seed extract (GSE) and proanthocyanidin B2 on oxidative stress was also studied in an in vitro study using luteinized granulosa cells (hGC) and tumor granulosa cell line (KGN) (66). Regarding oxidative stress, ROS levels, and the NADPH oxidases 4 (NOX4) mRNA expression, a predominant ROS production enzyme found in hGC (66), were measured. It is known that GSE can have both positive or negative health effects in relation to NOX modulation (84). It was observed that low concentrations of GSE and proanthocyanidin B2 (0.1–1 μg/ml) reduced ROS levels but at higher concentrations (50 and 100 μg/ml) showed a significant increase of ROS. To support these results NOX4 mRNA expression was also tested and were found similar effects for both GSE and proanthocyanidin B2, with increased expression levels (66). Thus, this study demonstrates again the importance of antioxidant concentration in the induction of the antioxidant or pro-oxidant effect.
The capacity of GSE to modulate the antioxidant activity and its associated gene expression was investigated on a model of goat muscle cells subjected to the pro-oxidant effect of H2O2. Using different doses of GSE (0, 1, 10, 60 μg/ml—stressed group) or with GSE alone (unstressed group) it was investigated the antioxidant activity by measuring catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione (GSH) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). CAT, copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZn-SOD), and GPx-1 genes relative mRNA levels were also measured. Grape seed extract presented the capacity to regulate gene expression and activity of antioxidant enzymes. Total antioxidant activity was significantly increased in the unstressed group compared to one exposed to H2O2. In terms of GSH levels, this was not affected in the unstressed group. In the stressed group, H2O2 made the levels of GSH drop. A moderate dose of GSE (1, 10 μg/ml) not only didn't recover the previous levels of GSH but further increase in the dose (60 μg/ml) produced an even significant depletion in GSH levels. Enzyme activity and genes expression mRNA levels of SOD and CAT were also determined in both group cells. In the unstressed group, it was observed a significant drop-in activity of CAT and SOD compared with control. Corresponding changes in genes expression of these two enzymes (GSE-10 μg/ml) were also observed. In the stressed group, the activity of SOD and CAT rebounded to the level of the control group (10 μg/ml). mRNA levels of CAT showed a parallel growth with the activity of the enzyme and the same tendency was observed in the case of mRNA CuZn-SOD. GPx activity was also increased in the stressed group with levels increased back to the control levels (10 μg/ml). GPx-1 mRNA levels, had also rebounded to the level of the control group (70). Grape seed extracts show significant antioxidant activity in stressed cells by modulating the activity and expression of antioxidant enzymes.
Further, the antioxidant/ pro-oxidant balance of RESV, one of the main compounds in grapevine and wine by-products, was investigated on GRX cells exposed to different concentrations of RESV for different periods (24 and 120 h). It was observed an increase of ROS production in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The increase of ROS production caused a shortage in SOD activity, which was decreased after 24 h due to its consumption to convert into H2O2. After 120 h SOD activity was significantly increased in a time- and dose- pattern (63). Catalase activity was not significantly changed in the experimental groups (except for the group treated with 50 μM of RESV for 120 h). This observation may be significant for the outcome of the cells through regulation of the increased levels of H2O2. There were also changes in the dynamics of GSH levels (63). Treated cells with a low dose of RESV for 24 h and those treated with 50 μM of RESV for 120 h showed an increase in GSH levels (cells counterattack the pro-oxidant effect of resveratrol). Lipid peroxidation was also monitored through TBARS assay. After 24 h, 50 μM RESV showed a significant lipid peroxidation which lowered after 120 h (63). This change can be explained by the fact that RESV decreased the number of viable cells in the experimental groups and the remaining cells were the ones who adapted to oxidative stress conditions and continue division (hormesis concept) (63). The dual action of RESV on human colorectal adenocarcinoma (HT-29) and human colon carcinoma cells (HCT-116) was also observed. At a lower concentration of RESV (1 and 10 μmol/l), an increase in cell number occurred in HT-29 cell line but this effect diminished after the dose was increased to 25 and 50 μmol/l and even further at 100 μmol/l, resulting in a reduction in cell number (64). In the case of the HCT-116 cell line, there was not noticed a biphasic effect but a reduction in the number of cells based on the concentration of RESV. The effect of RESV on superoxide anions production and NADPH oxidase activity was also investigated. At 1 and 10 μmol/l, there was no significant modification in superoxide anions production or NADPH oxidase activity which correspond to the effect of RESV on cell proliferation observed in the first part of the study. At higher concentrations (50 μmol/l), NADPH oxidase activity was significantly higher which correspond to the concentration at which RESV exercised a decrease in cells number (64). To further investigate the pro-oxidant effect, the DNA damage and SIRT6 levels were assessed. By using histone γ2AX which is considered a DNA damage marker they showed that the level of DNA damage became significantly higher in a dose-dependent manner (25, 50, 100 μmol/l). Also by using SIRT6, enzymes with a role in antioxidant defense with a potential role in tumor growth inhibition in a low concentration, they showed that RESV had an opposite result, increasing the SIRT6 levels in a concentration-dependent manner (64). These observations were supported by some recent studies as well, done in different experimental settings. The role of RESV in oxidative stress damage was also investigated using TM3 mouse Leydig cells, cultured with H2O2. Here, RESV showed a protective effect for the Leydig cell (mitochondrial activity, metabolic activity, cell membrane, cell proliferation) at a low dose (10 μg/ml) but at a higher dosage revealed a tendency for negative effects. Superoxide production showed a significant decrease at low doses of RESV and a significant increase in production at high doses. Also, the steroidogenesis function was studied and the results showed biphasic results according to RESV concentration (85). The positive effect of RESV low dosage in oxidative stress damage was seen when applied to human trophoblast cells (HTR-8/SVneo) cultured with H2O2. The antioxidant enzymes like SOD and CAT showed a significant increase at a low concentration of RESV. The markers for cell membrane damage lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and lipid oxidation (MDA) had a significant decrease when a low dose of RESV was given. Autophagy markers like Beclin-1 and LCR3II were also investigated to further analyze the antioxidant effect. It was observed that after cells incubation with RESV there was a significant decrease of their levels. The inflammation markers IL-1β and caspase-1 were also decreased in the presence of RESV (86).
In vivo Antioxidant/Pro-oxidant Activity of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products
Since numerous in vitro studies already showed the potential health effects of these products but also underlined the importance between the concentration of these compounds and their influence in inducing both antioxidant and pro-oxidant effects, it is important to check whether this observation can be translated in in vivo studies as well. Thus, further, there will be discussed literature studies that can offer insights into the antioxidant/pro-oxidant processes within different experimental studies with a focus on how oxidative stress can affect different organs.
Accordingly, it was demonstrated that grape extract had beneficial effects against chronic seizures by its anti-oxidant action in the hippocampus, improving cognitive performance (87). Epilepsy represents, in a pathophysiological way, a pro-oxidant state in which oxidative stress, along with other mechanisms, plummets antioxidant substances, decreases antioxidant enzymes activity, increases ROS which affects mitochondria and that can trigger apoptosis cascade. Thus, the antioxidant effects of GSPE on rats with pentylenetetrazole (PZT) induced-epileptic seizures were studied. Ninety male rats were divided into 5 groups: control group (intraperitoneal saline injection for 60 days), PZT group (i.p saline injection 24 days followed by i.p 35 mg/kg/day of PZT for 36 days), PTZ + GSPE groups in which rats received GSPE (100 or 200 mg/kg/day) for 24 days before the first PZT administration and then pre-treated 30 min before everyday PZT injection for 36 days, and GSPE group who received 200 mg/kg/day for 60 days. After the treatment, they investigated the antioxidant effects of GSPE by measuring the levels of MDA, and GSH in the hippocampal homogenate and of hippocampus mitochondrial ROS. Cytochrome c, caspase 3, and 9 were also determined after 60 days, at the end of the treatment. In the epileptic seizure group treated with GSPE, there was a significant dose-dependent decrease in MDA levels and ROS compared to the PTZ group, but still at higher levels when compared to the control group. The level of GSH was also upregulated in a dose-dependent manner in the groups treated with GSPE when compared to the PZT group, but still reduced when compared to the control group (87). Thus, the results showed that GSPE can partly reduce the nocive effect of pentylenetetrazole. Since excessive ROS production can trigger apoptosis cascade, the levels of cytochrome c, caspase 3, and 9 were also determined. The levels of cytochrome c, caspase 3, and 9 were significantly lowered in epileptic seizure groups treated with GSPE as compared to the epileptic group and at higher levels when compared with the saline group indicating again the partly reverse antioxidant effect of GSPE (87). According to this in vivo study, GPSE is considered a safe intervention to attenuate the oxidative stress process in rat's hippocampus with chronic seizures. This study is also very important because it offers the perspective of the GPSE administration effect on some oxidative stress parameters like MDA, GSH, and ROS in normal physiological conditions. Since there were no significant differences between the saline group and GSPE group we can conclude that in vivo GPSE administration does not induce a pro-oxidant effect in rats hippocampus.
The antioxidant effect of GSPE on lead (Pb) -induced lung toxicity in rats was also investigated. Rats were divided into four groups: a control group who received saline, Pb (2,500 ppm of Pb acetate) group, GSPE (200 mg/kg) + Pb group, and GSPE group (88). To demonstrate the antioxidant effect of GSPE in Pb-induced lung toxicity, the levels of MDA, GSH, and SOD activities, and glutamylcysteine synthetase (γ-GCS) were determined. Also, for the study of oxidative stress, apoptotic rate, nuclear factor-erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf 2), adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) expression, protein p62 levels, nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) expression, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), Bcl-2 associated x protein (Bax), B-cell lymphoma-extra large (Bcl-xl), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) and p53 were determined (88). The group that received GSPE showed a significant decrease in MDA and ROS levels compared to the Pb group. The activities of SOD and γ-GCS also showed a significant increase in activity in the group of rats who received treatment with GSPE compared to the Pb group. For the study of apoptosis, lung apoptotic rate, pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins were determined. In the GSPE + Pb group compared to the group who received only Pb, the apoptotic rate was significantly reduced, pro-apoptotic proteins significantly decreased (Bax and p53) and anti-apoptotic proteins significantly increased (Bcl-xl and Bcl-2). GSPE treatment significantly decreased NF-κB translocation in the nucleus and TNF-α expression. GSPE activity increased Nrf2 nuclear accumulation and increased NQO1, p62, and HO-1 levels compared with the Pb group. GSPE treatment showed increased activity of AMPK. The activation of AMPK can increase the accumulation of the Nrf2 in the nucleus which can lead to increase expression of NQO1, p62, and HO-1 and increased γ-GCS who can further increase the levels of GSH (88). Furthermore, HO-1 leads to decreased nucleus translocation of NF-κB and implicit, TNF-α expression. p62 is a protein with a role in protecting cells from oxidative stress. Increased levels of p62 by the Nrf 2 can lead to higher levels of Nrf 2 translocated to the nucleus through a positive feedback loop that further can increase the antioxidant response to the Pb-induced toxicity. Through the correlation of the results, it was concluded that GSPE reduced the toxic effects of Pb through AMPK/Nrf2/p62 pathway. Importantly, the fact that there were no significant differences between the group which received only GSPE and the control group, allows us to conclude that the antioxidant effects of GSPE manifest in the toxic environment without the induction of a pro-oxidant effect in rat lungs.
Moving down forward in the terms of reproduction, the protective effect of GSPE on apoptosis and oxidative stress was studied on a testicular dysfunction model induced by a high-fat diet (HFD) in rats. Forty male rats were divided into four groups: the control group (saline solution), HFD group, and HFD + GSPE groups (100 or 300 mg/kg) (89). The antioxidant activity of GSPE was determined by measuring GSH, GSH-PX, SOD, and MDA levels in the testicular homogenates. In terms of enzyme activity, the high-fat diet groups which received GSPE showed an increase in SOD and GSH-PX levels compared to the high-fat diet group. Also, the administration of GSPE in both concentrations increased the levels of GSH and decreased the levels of MDA when compared to the HFD group, suggesting GSPE's protective effect against the induced testicular oxidative damage (89). Moreover, administration of GSPE significantly decreased apoptosis in testicular germ cells when compared to the induced testicular toxicity group. However, when compared to the saline solution group, it was observed the tendency of GSPE to restore the levels of oxidative stress parameters to the normal conditions. Thus, at the highest dose of GSPE (300 mg/kg), there was no significant difference when compared to the saline group. These are suggesting that GSPE can attenuate the effect of induced oxidative stress through high-fat diet administration in testes tissues (89). Overall, the results of GPSE administration showed, besides an indirect effect by reducing body weights, several other direct effects: prevention in the drop of serum testosterone levels, reduction of testicular oxidative stress and germ cells apoptosis, and the attenuation of changes in spermatogenesis induced by a high-fat diet.
Furthermore, in a study realized on obese Zucker rats (model for genetic obesity), it was demonstrated that the treatment with GSPE has a beneficial effect on redox homeostasis by its antioxidant action on the liver (90). Thus, the effect of metabolic disorders on antioxidant reserves of the organism and the benefic effect of GSPE, specifically related to GSH hepatic metabolism was studied, considering GHS as a central defense response in oxidative stress prevention. Using 10 lean Zucker rats (control group treated with diluted sweetened condensed milk as a vehicle) and 20 fat Zucker rats divided into two groups: obese Zucker rats (OZ) feed with the vehicle and obese Zucker rats treated with GSPE (vehicle and 35 mg GSPE/kg body weight/day) (90). To assess the antioxidant capacity of GSPE, the GSH metabolism (glutathione/ oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) ratio), the antioxidant enzymes activities (GPX, GR, and GST activities), lipid peroxidation (MDA), and hepatic ROS levels were determined in the liver tissue. In addition, TAC was determined in rat's plasma. The results of these analyses were discussed also in correlation with the mRNA expression of the investigated antioxidant enzymes like glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit (Gclc), GR, GPx, and GST as well as of Cu, Zn-SOD. It is known that Gclc is responsible for GSH synthesis, GR for the reduction of GSSG to GSH in an NADPH-dependent manner, GPx for lipid protection against peroxidation, GST for cellular detoxification, and Cu,Zn-SOD acts as a scavenger of superoxide anions sustaining the oxidant/antioxidant steady-state (90). The results indicated that GSH/GSSG ratio had increased levels in OZ + GSPE compared to the OZ group, suggesting the protective effect against oxidative stress production in the liver. In the case of the enzymes that regulate the levels of GSH and GSSG, some modifications deserve mention. Accordingly, it was observed that in the OZ + GSPE group Gclc mRNA expression and GSH levels had no significant difference when compared to the OZ group. Concerning GR mRNA expression, it was observed that even if GR expression was not decreased, the enzyme activity was decreased in the OZ + GSPE group (lower than the control group). The GPx relative expression showed a significant reduction in the OZ + GSPE group compared to the OZ group while GPx enzyme activity had significantly higher levels in OZ and OZ + GSPE groups when compared to control (90). Finally, the GST mRNA expression suffered no modifications among groups while GST enzyme activity had significantly lower levels in the OZ + GSPE group as compared to the OZ group. Further, regarding MDA and ROS levels, there was a significant decrease of MDA in OZ and OZ + GSPE groups and no significant changes between any group in the case of ROS. Also, Cu,Zn-SOD mRNA expression had no significant modifications in the OZ or OZ + GSPE group. This study is very important since it correlated the mRNA expression of some important antioxidant enzymes involved in liver GHS alteration with their corresponding enzyme activities and it allowed to provide insights regarding the GSPE mechanism of action. Thus, it can be observed that GSPE treatment can directly lower some of the enzymes activities (GST, GPx, and GR) by their direct antioxidant effect and not through the activation of the cellular antioxidant defense (90).
The beneficial effects of GSPE were also tested on mouse liver, using an iron overload-induced fluoride model (91). In this regard, forty rats were divided in four groups: control group (distilled water), natrium fluoride (NaF−100 mg/l) group, NaF + GSPE (400 mg/kg body weight) and GSPE group. For oxidative stress assay, the levels of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), TAC, SOD, and MDA were measured (91). To determine iron overload, the iron levels in the liver were determined as well as the levels of mRNA expression and protein levels of hepcidin and ferroportin. It is known that iron in excess can be cytotoxic and can produce oxidative stress through the Fenton reaction in which hydroxyl radicals are formed. Hepcidin is the key role protein in the regulation of iron metabolism. The hepcidin production is regulated by iron stores and when the iron stores are higher than physiological value more hepcidin is produced and iron is sequestered in the cells through internalization and even destruction of ferroportin, a protein with a role in externalizing iron from the cell. Once is being captive in the cells, excess iron can produce oxidative stress through the Fenton reaction (91). Thus, the iron levels significantly dropped in the group treated with GSPE when compared to the NaF group (91). The hepcidin mRNA and protein expression were significantly lower in the group treated with GSPE compared to the NaF group. Ferroportin mRNA and protein expression were significantly higher in the group treated with GSPE compared to the NaF group. In terms of oxidative stress, the treatment group (NaF + GSPE) showed significantly increased levels of GSH-Px, TAC, and SOD compared with the NaF group. The MDA levels were significantly lower in the NaF + GSPE group compared with NaF. Even if the GSPE showed significant antioxidant activity compared with the NaF group, the levels were still not comparable with the control group. This study also supports the previous research' findings regarding GSPE treatment in healthy rats. Since there was not a significant difference between the GSPE group and the control group we can conclude that GSPE did not induce pro-oxidant effects and its antioxidant effects were manifested only in oxidative stress conditions.
So far the results of in vivo studies suggest that GSPE administration does not induce a pro-oxidant effect on rats hippocampus, lungs, and liver when administrated in normal physiological conditions and its antioxidant effect occurs only when the oxidative stress was experimentally induced.
In vitro and In vivo—Antioxidant/ Pro-oxidant Balance of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products
In this context, before the in vivo experiments, the presence through absorption of polyphenols derived from GP as well as the antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance generated by those was investigated in an in vitro study on IPEC-1 cells and further an in vivo study in the piglets' duodenum and colon (30). To establish the best correlation between in vivo and in vitro settings, the antioxidant or pro-oxidant activities of phenolic compounds were indirectly investigated by UV-VIS spectroscopy. It was demonstrated that oxidation occurs when a bathochromic shift of λmax was observed in spectral assessment. Both extracellular and intracellular matrices were analyzed. During the in vitro experiment, it was observed that the highest dose of GP extract produced a λmax bathochromic shift already after 3 h of treatment, and after 24 h in case of the lowest dose, suggesting that the oxidation of the GP extract is time and dose-dependent (30). Interestingly, in the intracellular matrix, the GPE treatment did not affect it after 3 h, but after 24 h a bathochromic shift was observed only at the highest dose, indicating slight oxidation of polyphenolic molecules. Further, within the in vivo studies, the λmax of the polyphenols identified in the colon and duodenum was shifted, indicating slight oxidation after ingestion (30). The antioxidant activity of colon and duodenum tissues was also investigated following lipid peroxidation (TBARS), Total Antioxidant Status (TAS), CAT, SOD, and GPx. It was observed that piglets diet supplementation with 5% GP had a differential effect according to the investigated organs. Thus, TAS was increased and TBARS was decreased in both duodenum and colon, while SOD activity was increased only in the duodenum and CAT and GPx activity only in the colon (30).
Further, GP antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo using a different approach. If the previous study used UV-Vis spectroscopy as the main method of evaluation of antioxidant/pro-oxidant activity, within this study, cyclic voltammetry assay was used to establish the in vitro antioxidant or pro-oxidant potential of polyphenols compounds found in the GP extract. This method evaluates both antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity of the extracts at the same time, indicating, for a mixture of different extracted phenolics the potential to act as antioxidant or as pro-oxidant (14). Thus, extracts are characterized simultaneously in terms of anodic oxidation potentials. Accordingly, low oxidation potentials are describing the antioxidant activity of the extract, whereas the high oxidation potentials are describing the pro-oxidant activity (14). It was observed that in vitro antioxidant and pro-oxidant activity are depending on the extraction method and grape varieties. Also, the presence in different mixtures of different phenolic classes are influencing the radical scavenging activity through the OH substitution or conjugation patterns on the skeleton of the compound (14). A different approach was then further applied during the in vivo study. Using the phytopathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea, different GP mixtures previously assayed by the cyclic voltammetry method were chosen to see their influence on mycelial growth. By measuring the accumulation of ROS it was established the pro-oxidant effect of the extracts on B. cinerea mycelial growth. Overall the in vitro antioxidant activity with in vivo assays could not be correlated (14).
The effect of grape seed extract on the modulation of antioxidant and pro-oxidant balance was investigated on different yeast strains with the compromised antioxidant system (e.g., deleted cells in SOD, CAT, GSH synthase and simultaneously knockout in old yellow enzyme 2 and glutathione reductase 1). This was performed to simulate the most common cellular dysfunctions encountered in the oxidative stress process. Thus, programmed cell death was induced through a known concentration of H2O2 in four deleted cells. When compared the untreated with treated wild-type yeast strain (BY4741), treatment with GSE (50 uM gallic acid equivalents of GSE) had a significant effect (12% enhancement) on cellular growth. Interestingly, at a lower concentration (5 uM gallic acid equivalents of GSE) the extract had a pro-oxidant effect (92). Regarding the deleted cells the GSE positively influenced the growing proliferation in CAT or GSH deleted cells indicating the extract potential involvement in the intracellular peroxide concentration, membranes oxidative damage, or GSH metabolic pathway (92). The pro-oxidant effect was observed in cells deleted in SOD activity, the production of ROS levels varying in a dose-dependent manner (92). Thus, the results gave an important perspective on the in vivo manifestation of antioxidant/pro-oxidant effect which according to their experimental setting is depending on the cellular antioxidant system deficiencies.
The pro-oxidant activity of polyphenols from red wine was studied on human erythrocytes in an ex vivo study (93). It was demonstrated that polyphenols from red wine can activate the plasma membrane redox system that is involved in the neutralization of plasma free radicals by changing the GSH pathway via intracellular ROS production. The erythrocytes from 10 healthy donors were incubated with red wine polyphenols in a concentration similar to the one obtained after regular consumption of red wine for 2 weeks. It was observed that red wine polyphenols increased ROS concentration which generated a pro-oxidant effect. Importantly, by measuring the aldose and NADH-methaemoglobin reductase activities, it was observed that the induced pro-oxidative process had no harmful effect on the erythrocytes. The aldose reductase is an enzyme responsible for multiple physiological roles including aldehydes detoxification (93). The NADH-methaemoglobin reductase offers insights regarding the toxicokinetic of methemoglobin reduction, indicating the oxidation of hemoglobin from ferrous (Fe2+) to the ferric (Fe3+) state, a form that is unable to bind oxygen (94). Thus, it was concluded that the anti-oxidant effect was not connected to any harmful effect, since no significant differences were observed between treated and untreated cells (95). This induced the adaptive stress-response translated in erythrocytes protection against numerous adverse conditions considering that moderate induction of the oxidative stress can stimulate cell defense systems activation (95). This is an important study that highlight that even if polyphenols compound in grape wine act as pro-oxidants agents, they, in turn, trigger the erythrocyte adaptive cellular response with a final protective effect.
It was also demonstrated that on primary leucocyte culture a GSE had an antioxidant activity mediated by the polyphenols pro-oxidant oxidation products and o-quinones. Even though the flavan-3-ols are well-known for their antioxidant activity, they can also become pro-oxidant because they can be oxidized to o-quinones or semiquinones, which further initiate the redox cycling and reactive oxygen species generation, and thiol, DNA, and protein alkylation (62, 96). While the simple catechin o-quinone are pro-oxidants, the procyanidin o-quinones form oligomeric compounds with the same number of hydroxyl groups through the same futile redox cycling process (97). It was also indicated that the procyanidins are superior antioxidants compared to monomeric catechin which is more easily prone to enter the redox cycle and generate a pro-oxidant action (97). O-quinones, on the other hand, are expected to have an antioxidant action because they can be reduced back to diphenols through semiquinones (98). Catechin o-quinones can react via phenolic coupling forming dimers and oligomers. Each formed molecule has its original reactive hydroxyl groups, thereby increasing their antioxidant properties until a certain level when the oligomers will precipitate becoming insoluble (98). This can explain how the delicate antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance is tuned through o-quinones. It was also demonstrated that o-quinones are involved in the pro-oxidant behavior of quercetin and caffeic acid mixture (99).
Ischemic Heart Diseases: Current Treatment and Limitations
Coronary artery disease can be characterized by long, stable periods or at some point can become unstable. Generally, the instability can be caused by an acute atherothrombotic event as a result of plaque rupture or erosion. However, CAD is considered a chronic and progressive disease, that according to its dynamic can be conveniently classified as acute coronary syndromes (ACS) or chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) (100). The clinical manifestation of CAD is angina pectoris, typically observed in the chest, neck, or left arm, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction and heart failure (58). The clinical manifestation of chronic angina can double the risk for important cardiovascular events (101). Treatment of patients with IHD has as primary goal to maximize the quality of life and further reduce the mortality risk. According to the imposed clinical situation, the management of IHD is realized via medical, interventional, and even surgical treatment. The initial treatment for patients with angina pectoris and persistent elevated ST segment (STEMI) is focused on patients' pain, dyspnea, and anxiety. Thus, potent antalgic drugs like opioids (morphine), oxygen through masks for dyspnea and benzodiazepines are used to reduce anxiety. The gold standard for STEMI patients is the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 2 h from the diagnose of the myocardial infarction and pharmacotherapy like antiplatelet (aspirin and either prasugrel or ticagrelor) and anticoagulant (unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin) drugs. If PCI cannot be performed in time, fibrinolysis treatment should be considered: alteplase (t-PA), reteplase (r-PA), or tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) in combination with antiplatelet and anticoagulation drugs (102).
On the other hand, long-term pharmacotherapy includes the utilization of several drugs that are aiming to reduce, control or stop the progression of CAD. Thus, the decrease in oxygen demand and the increase in oxygen supply are achieved by nitroglycerines that induce coronary artery dilatation (58). The stabilization of atherosclerotic vascular plaque is achieved by the use of statins, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, and antiplatelets (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel) through their pleiotropic antioxidative effects (103). Statins are also important in reducing cholesterol, improving endothelial function, blood vessels dilatation, and have anti-inflammatory effects. Aspirin and clopidogrel (as anti-platelet agents) are used to lower the atheromatous plaque formation by inhibiting platelet aggregation. Further, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, are used to decrease myocardial oxygen consumption, increase myocardial blood flow and decrease the risk for recurrent myocardial infarction. Calcium channel blockers are used to lower the intracellular calcium level, to relax vascular smooth muscle, and to dilate the blood vessels (58). Beta-blockers can also be used to reduce myocardial oxygen consumption.
No matter the approach, the incidence of deaths and myocardial infarction due to CAD complications is still far from being at an acceptable rate.
Overall CAD management can relieve symptoms and reduce the risk of complications, but long pharmacotherapy term use of CAD can also come with multiple side effects. Antiplatelets can increase the risk of bleeding (clopidogrel) or induce stomach ulcers (acetylsalicylic acid). Statins can induce hepatic toxicity via moderate elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) serum levels, can get muscle pain or rhabdomyolysis (104). Beta-blockers can decrease blood pressure or heart rate too much. ACE inhibitors can also lower blood pressure too much and may also induce dry cough (104). These are the most common side effects that most of the time are solved by dose adjustments.
But irrespective of how revascularization techniques and drugs effectiveness is, a healthy lifestyle and appropriate diet management should not be ignored since these factors can initiate and also worsen CAD prognostic. Thus, for long-term treatment the patient should be more cautious to reduce the risk factors (e.g., quit smoking, reduce blood pressure, control body weight, have a healthy diet, physical activity) (105).
That is why new pharmacological alternatives may be able to both reduce side effects and decrease risk factors for IHD treatment are of great interest. This is the loophole where polyphenols, taken as adjunctive therapies can have a positive impact in reducing CAD risk factors through their synergistic effects.
In vitro and In vivo Studies—Antioxidant/Pro-oxidant Balance of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products: Focus on IHD
It is known that organisms are exposed to ROS, or reactive oxygen metabolites like superoxide anions (•) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), or hydroxyl radicals (•OH) as resulted of the oxidative metabolism or by exposure to the radical-generating compounds (106, 107). Also, free radicals and ROS were studied for their role in the different development stages of various diseases and how these are affecting the target organs. So far, as previously discussed, GP and grapevine by-products have proved to protect against multiple stress injuries by their antioxidant effects in various in vitro and in vivo models (Table 2). Moreover, their consumption proved to be safe and showed a protective effect against induced oxidative stress in various organs like testes, liver, kidneys, colon, duodenum, hippocamp. Their consumption has been shown to manifest a protective effect on the cardiovascular system mainly through their hypolipidemic, hypotensive, and anti-atherosclerotic effects (23, 121, 122). Also, it was demonstrated their effectiveness in improving plasma antioxidant status (122). Through different experimental studies, it was shown that polyphenols could reduce atherosclerosis by inhibition of LDL oxidation or other cellular redox states, by improvement of endothelial function, by lowering blood pressure, by inhibition of platelet aggregation, by reducing inflammation, or other mechanisms (Figures 3, 5) (123). Special attention should be directed toward the anti-atherosclerotic effects since it was already demonstrated that while atherosclerosis is a key factor involved in the process of CAD development and progression, the oxidative modifications within the arterial wall are directly involved in the initiation and/or contribution of the atherogenesis (Figure 3) (124).
Table 2. In vitro and in vivo evidence of antioxidant effect of resveratrol and polyphenols from grapevine and wine by-products.
Figure 5. Grapevine and wine by-products antioxidant/pro-oxidant influence on ischemic heart disease risk factors.
The effect of red wine GP on atherosclerosis and myocardial damage was studied using a lethal model of IHD on SR-B1 KO/ApoER61h/h mice, fed with an atherogenic diet (114). The mice were divided into three groups. The first group was fed with the high cholesterol atherogenic diet with 20% of total diet of control chow diet (control group), the second with 20% RWGP flour (GP group), and the third with 10% chow/10% oat fiber (the positive control group) (114). Regarding the oxidative stress status, plasma was used to investigate HDL-containing plasma antioxidant activity and MDA levels, while aortic roots for the investigation of the atherosclerosis process. The levels of inflammatory markers like tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 10 (IL-10), total lipoprotein, and total cholesterol were also assessed. It was observed that food supplementation of the atherogenic diet with red wine GP increased the antioxidant activity of plasma containing HDL particles after 14 days of treatment, suggesting its effect on lipid peroxidation modulation (114). Also, red wine GP supplementation significantly decreased the induced atherosclerotic lesions as compared to the control group as seen after the aortic root cross-sectional area analysis. The red wine GP supplementation had a positive impact on myocardial dysfunction and reduced the myocardial infarction after 14 days of supplementation, the risk of macroscopic IHD being reduced by 86% (114). This study strongly suggests that red wine GP supplemented via food intake can have a positive effect on atherosclerosis development associated with an increased plasma antioxidant capacity (114). Thus, it was considered a strong adjuvant in the prevention of ischemic cardiovascular events, in disease development and progression.
Further, the antioxidant properties, as well as endothelium-dependent vasodilatation effect of an enzymatic GP extract, were tested for the vascular reactivity using intraperitoneally and thoracic aorta and small mesenteric arteries isolated from male Wistar rats (125). The NO involvement in GP effect on the vascular response has been assessed. Grape pomace effect on the aorta and small mesenteric arteries contraction was determined after SOD or endothelin-1 exposures, known for its capacity to induce through NADPH oxidase activation (125). Afterwards, the arterial production was determined to evaluate ROS's role on the vascular effects. The concentration of phenolic compounds in GP used to treat rat arteries ranged from 0.0001 to 0.03 g/L. It was observed that the extracts had a relaxation effect in the aortic rings in a dose-dependent manner. The relaxation effect was attributed to endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) activation following a NO-dependent mechanism (125). Grape pomace extract reduced production at only 0.03 g/L. This observation is important since it gives important information related to the concentration of phenolic compounds needed to inhibit NADPH oxidase, the main source of production in the vascular tissues. Accordingly, the inhibition effect was obtained at three-fold lower concentrations than previously determined scavenging properties obtaining a reduction of 50% in the DPPH assay (125).
The antioxidant and cardioprotective effect of GPE was studied on isoproterenol-induced myocardial ischemia in rats (113). Twenty rats were divided into four groups: the control group, which received a saline solution, the positive control group that received a saline solution, and isoproterenol (150 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection) on the 8th and 9th day. The other two groups received instead of saline, GPE of fresh or fermented GP, and isoproterenol following the same conditions (113). Fermented GP was used since it is known that the fermentation process releases an increased amount of polyphenols from GP. The cardioprotective and antioxidant effects of GPE were analyzed considering the electrocardiography results, the oxidative stress and cardiac markers serum results. The results of the electrocardiography indicated that fresh GPE had better cardioprotective results as expressed by reduced RR, QT, and increased QTc, HR increasing, and reduction of ST depression as compared to the positive control group (113). Further, knowing that in myocardial infarction, the myocardial injury is mainly caused by the imbalance in the oxidant and antioxidant defense system (113, 126), the oxidative stress was investigated following the next parameters: TOS, total antioxidant response—(TAR), oxidative stress index—(OSI) as the ratio between TOS and TAR, MDA, total thiols (SH) and NO synthesis (NOx). The GPE pre-treatment significantly reduced TOS and OSI levels while increasing TAR, opposite to results from the positive control groups. Also, MDA production was significantly decreased in GPE groups as compared to the isoproterenol group. No effect was observed on SH and NOx production (113). Overall, it was concluded that in vivo pre-treatment with GPE manifest cardioprotection effect in rats with induced isoproterenol myocardial injury by oxidative stress reduction. The interesting thing within this study is represented by the fact that even if GPE, obtained from the fermented GP, had better in vitro antioxidant capacity, thus promising in vivo expectations, the GPE obtained from fresh GP with lower in vitro antioxidant capacity had better in vivo results. These results underline again that the profile of phenolic compounds is paying an important role in inducing cardioprotective effect through antioxidant processes modulation.
That is why, many studies are evaluating the cardioprotective effect of the major phenolic compounds identified in grapes or wine (including RESV), intending to identify the compounds responsible for the pharmacological effects. Thus, the antioxidant capacity of RESV to protect against myocardial ischemic damage or ischemia-reperfusion injury concerning oxidative stress was also studied.
The cardioprotection effect of RESV after ischemia/reperfusion injury through the antioxidant enzymes modulation was studied in rats hearts. Male rats were divided into two groups. One group received an intraperitoneal injection with 25 mg/ kg of RESV/day while the other received an intraperitoneal injection with 10% ethanol/day for 7 days. After the last injection, surgery was performed on rats and, their hearts were removed and preserved to perform ischemia/reperfusion model and to assay further examinations. After 1 week of RESV injection, hearts from the experimental group showed increased contractility, SOD activity, and peroxidase levels and decreased MDA, iron levels, and CAT function. Iron is a catalyst for Fendon reaction in which ROS are formed as hydroxyl radicals. Malondialdehyde was determined to assess lipid peroxidation which was significantly decreased in the RESV group. In the case of CAT there was a significant decrease in function of the enzyme but not in the levels of the enzyme (127).
The cardioprotective effects of RESV after myocardial ischemia and reperfusion were also studied on rats, with no other pre-conditions imposed (128). The rats were divided into two groups (experimental and control). The experimental group received a dose of 10 μM of RESV. The rats suffered cardiac surgery, where their hearts were removed and after that, the hearts were subjected to ischemia/reperfusion lesion (128). For cardiac lesion, the levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), and troponin I was measured. For oxidative stress, nitrite and MDA levels, CAT, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and SOD were determined. In the RESV group, there was a significant decrease in levels of LDH, CK-MB, and troponin I (128). Resveratrol showed antioxidant effect by increasing antioxidant enzymes activity (SOD, CAT, GSH-Px) compared to the control group. Lipid peroxidation measured through MDA showed a decrease when compared to the control group. Nitrite levels (a metabolite of nitric oxide) showed also a significant increase when was compared with the control group (128).
Resveratrol showed antioxidant effects on cardiomyocytes subjected to oxidative stress as observed on H9c2 cells (embryonic rat heart cells) (129). Cells were divided into the exposed group, subjected to ischemia/reperfusion lesion, and the control group. In the first set of experiments, cells were pre-treated with 50 μM RESV before ischemia exposure (129). In the second set, cells were transfected with negative control small interfering RNA (NC siRNA) and protein deglycase Dj-1 small interfering RNA (Dj-1 siRNA down-regulation of Dj-1 expression) followed by a dose of 50 μM RESV and exposure to ischemia. In the third set, cells were treated with RESV and after that with 50 μM Sitrinol (SIRT1 inhibitor) and ischemic exposure (129). Suppression of apoptosis and oxidative stress induced by RESV were measured through cell viability, Dj-1, silent information regulator 1 (Sirt1), and tumor protein P53 (p53) expression. Pre-treatment with RESV showed an increased expression of Dj-1 when cells were transfected with NC siRNA compared with cells transfected with DJ-1 siRNA. After the SIRT1 expression was determined, it was found a significant increase in the NC siRNA group pre-treated with RESV. In the group with Dj-1 siRNA, the effect of RESV on SIRT1 expression was reduced. In addition, the positive effect of RESV decreased, when cells received Sitrinol. The link between Dj-1 expression induced by RESV and increased binding of SIRT1 to Dj-1 was assessed. Resveratrol pre-treatment showed increased Dj-1 expression in transfected NC siRNA cells, and also increased binding between SIRT1 and Dj-1. It can be concluded that increased Dj-1 expression by RESV also increased SIRT1 expression. p53 activity was also examined. In the group NC siRNA and pre-treated with RESV, the activity of p53 was significantly suppressed. The group of cells that received Sitrinol showed increased activity of p53. Apoptosis was significantly lower in the group who received pre-treatment with resveratrol with the same tendency toward group transfected with Dj-1 siRNA or SItrinol who showed an increase in apoptotic cells. Dj-1 is a protein with a role in the suppression of oxidative stress and it was discovered that Dj-1 bounds and activates SIRT1 (anti-apoptotic effect) which further suppresses the activity of p53 (pro-apoptotic protein).
Prenatal hypoxia can lead to cardiovascular and metabolic complications in later life (130). Pregnant rats were subjected to hypoxia/normoxia protocol. In the hypoxia protocol, prenatal hypoxia was induced. Later on, the offsprings were randomly divided into 4 groups: normoxia–high fat (HF) diet group, normoxia-HF + RESV group, pre-natal hypoxia-HF group, pre-natal hypoxia-HF + RESV group. After 9 weeks of a high-fat diet, their hearts were isolated through cardiac surgery and subjected to ischemia/reperfusion lesion (ex vivo). In terms of heart function in vivo, there were no significant changes to influence the global activity of the heart. In ex vivo, after induced ischemia/reperfusion lesion, there was a significant decrease of heart recovery from an ischemic event in pre-natal hypoxia group with even significant differences between sexes (90% in male pre-natal hypoxia rats > 50% female pre-natal hypoxia rats) (130). Resveratrol increased heart recovery in males and females rats exposed to pre-natal hypoxia and a high-fat diet. Oxidative stress was significantly higher in pre-natal hypoxia compared to the normoxia group and treatment with RESV showed a significant decrease in oxidative stress who were subjected to the effects of pre-natal hypoxia and a high-fat diet. Summed up, the RESV showed a significant cardioprotective effect.
Even though there are multiple studies suggesting polyphenols effect on the modulation of oxidative stress and other important pathophysiological changes in CAD like lipid metabolism and prevention of atheromatous plaque formation through their antioxidant activities much evidence is still needed especially for the in vivo studies. Referring to the antioxidant /pro-oxidant balance of polyphenols action in CAD, there are no literature studies to elucidate both aspects at the same time. Moreover, the existing studies are focused only on the antioxidant effect. Future studies should focus on the antioxidant/ pro-oxidant approach to have a comprehensive view of their action. Also, given the ability of these compounds in reducing important risk factors in CAD and CVD, the use of the grapevine and wine by-products should be indicated as adjunctive therapies only after complex studies covering their safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies, toxicity, and drug interactions. Also, the problem related to the confidence in the use of these products could be solved if the regulations applied to drugs could be applied to these types of natural supplements or nutraceuticals.
Conclusions
Limited data are available concerning the effect of grapevine by-products toward modulating the antioxidant/pro-oxidant effect in vitro or in vivo ischemic heart disease conditions. Most of the literature data available and that can offer information in this regard is referring to grapes and wine products or some specific compounds, including RESV, specific for these products. Also, their influence on oxidative stress is mainly discussed concerning their effects on several cardiovascular factors, simulated under various experimental settings. More homogenous experimental studies are needed so that an accurate conclusion could be drawn. The antioxidant/pro-oxidant balance is multifactorial depended, especially dose and time, therefore it is an extremely sensitive process that can be easily shifted. Therefore, the fine line between doses that induce beneficial or undesirable effects should always be investigated. Also, the antioxidant/pro-oxidant effect should be approached globally, a correlation between the plasmatic and the tissues levels in both normal physiological or pathological conditions could offer insight in finding the optimal dose and time for a balanced antioxidant/pro-oxidant effect. Once established, the recommendation of grapevine by-products administration as a preventive measure could be done. Knowing that endothelial dysfunction is a condition that proceed clinically manifested IHD and that the mentioned grapevine and wine by-products, especially grape pomace, grape seed, and resveratrol, in the correct amount, have a positive impact on maintaining the redox endothelial balance as well on the atherosclerosis development we can only think that their preventive administration in persons with high cardiovascular risks will be beneficial.
Author Contributions
VSC and RMP: conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation. ICB, LLT, MLI, and CMV: methodology. LLT, MLI, ADB, and ICB: validation and visualization. VSC, ŞOM, DCM, and RMP: formal analysis and investigation. LLT and MLI: resources. VSC, CMV, ADB, and RMP: data curation. VSC, ICB, ŞOM, DCM, and RMP: writing—review and editing. RMP: supervision. VSC: project administration. LLT: funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Romanian Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Grant Number ADER 7.5.3.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Banaszewska A, Cruijssen F, Claassen GDH. van der Vorst JGAJ. Effect and key factors of byproducts valorization: the case of dairy industry. J Dairy Sci. (2014) 97:1893–908. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-7283
2. Rawdkuen S, Kaewprachu P. Valorization of food processing by-products as smart food packaging materials and its application. Food Preserv Waste Exploit. (2019). doi: 10.5772/intechopen.86245
3. FAOSTAT (2021). Available online at: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed July 21, 2021).
4. Çetin ES, Altinöz D, Tarçan E, Baydar NG. Chemical composition of grape canes. Ind. Crops Prod. (2011) 34:994–8. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.03.004
5. Angelov G, Boyadzhiev L, Georgieva S. Useful bioactive substances from wastes: recovery of trans-resveratrol from grapevine stems. Open Chem Eng J. (2016) 10:4–9. doi: 10.2174/1874123101610010004
6. Koutelidakis A. Grape pomace: a challenging renewable resource of bioactive phenolic compounds with diversified health benefits. MOJ Food Process Technol. (2016) 3:65. doi: 10.15406/mojfpt.2016.03.00065
7. Unusan N. Proanthocyanidins in grape seeds: an updated review of their health benefits and potential uses in the food industry. J. Funct. Foods. (2020) 67:861. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2020.103861
8. Guaita M, Bosso A. Polyphenolic characterization of graper skins and seeds of four Italian red cultivars at harvest and after fermentative maceration. Foods. (2019) 8:395. doi: 10.3390/foods8090395
9. Bordiga M, Travaglia F, Locatelli M. Valorisation of grape pomace: an approach that is increasingly reaching its maturity - a review. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2019) 54:933–42. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14118
10. Karami S, Rahimi M, Babaei A. An overview on the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and anti-cancer activity of grape extract. Biomed Res Clin Pract. (2018) 3:1–4. doi: 10.15761/BRCP.1000162
11. Friedman M. Antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal properties of wines winery byproducts in relation to their flavonoid content. J Agric Food Chem. (2014) 62:6025–42. doi: 10.1021/jf501266s
12. Chedea VS, Braicu C, Chirilǎ F, Ogola HJ, Pelmuş RS, Călin LG, et al. Antibacterial action of an aqueous grape seed polyphenolic extract. African J Biotechnol. (2011) 10:6276–80. doi: 10.5897/AJB10.2373
13. Luchian CE, Cotea VV, Vlase L, Toiu AM, Colibaba LC, Răschip IE, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of grape pomace extracts. Bio Web Conf. (2019) 15:04006. doi: 10.1051/bioconf/20191504006
14. Cotoras M, Vivanco H, Melo R, Aguirre M, Silva E, Mendoza L. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antioxidant and prooxidant activity of phenolic compounds obtained from grape (Vitis vinifera) pomace. Molecules. (2014) 19:21154. doi: 10.3390/molecules191221154
15. Fukumoto LR, Mazza G. Assessing antioxidant prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds. J Agric Food Chem. (2000) 48:3597–604. doi: 10.1021/jf000220w
16. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa HY, Baniyas MY, Al Suwaidi SKBM, AlKatheeri R, et al. Global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease: results from the global burden of disease study. Cureus. (2020) 12:e9349. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9349
17. Jensen RV, Hjortbak MV, Bøtker HE. Ischemic heart disease: an update. Semin Nucl Med. (2020) 50:195–207. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.02.007
18. Dababneh E, Goldstein S. Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease Selection of Treatment Modality. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing (2019).
19. Shahjehan RD, Bhutta BS. Coronary Artery Disease. Treasure Island, FL: 3D Echocardiogr (2021). p. 27–35.
20. Stringer JL editor. Drugs used in ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure. In: Basic Concepts in Pharmacology: What You Need to Know for Each Drug Class, 5e. McGraw Hill (2017). Available online at: https://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=2147§ionid=161351434
21. Agrawal V, Gupta JK, Qureshi SS, Vishwakarma VK. Role of cardiac renin angiotensin system in ischemia reperfusion injury preconditioning of heart. Indian Heart J. (2016) 68:856. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.06.010
22. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD (2019). Study J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010
23. Urquiaga I, D'Acuña S, Pérez D, Dicenta S, Echeverría G, Rigotti A, et al. Wine grape pomace flour improves blood pressure, fasting glucose and protein damage in humans: a randomized controlled trial. Biol Res. (2015) 48:49. doi: 10.1186/s40659-015-0040-9
24. Yang J, Xiao YY. Grape phytochemicals and associated health benefits. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2013) 53:1202–25. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.692408
25. Spatafora C. Valorization of vegetable waste: identification of bioactive compounds their chemo-enzymatic optimization. Open Agric J. (2012) 6:9–16. doi: 10.2174/1874331501206010009
26. Dwyer K, Hosseinian F, Rod M. The market potential of grape waste alternatives. J Food Res. (2014) 3:91–106. doi: 10.5539/jfr.v3n2p91
27. Chedea VS, Braicu C, Socaciu C. Antioxidant/prooxidant activity of a polyphenolic grape seed extract. Food Chem. (2010) 121:132–9. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.12.020
28. Soto M, Falqué E, Domínguez H. Relevance of natural phenolics from grape and derivative products in the formulation of cosmetics. Cosmetics. (2015) 2:259–76. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics2030259
29. Chedea VS, Vicaş SI, Sticozzi C, Pessina F, Frosini M, Maioli E, et al. Resveratrol: from diet to topical usage. Food Funct. (2017) 8:3879–92. doi: 10.1039/C7FO01086A
30. Chedea VS, Palade LM, Marin DE, Pelmus RS, Habeanu M, Rotar MC, et al. Intestinal absorption, and antioxidant activity of grape pomace polyphenols. Nutrients. (2018) 10:588. doi: 10.3390/nu10050588
31. Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly JE, Kakuda Y. Polyphenolics in grape seeds-biochemistry functionality. J Med Food. (2003) 6:291–9. doi: 10.1089/109662003772519831
32. Chedea VS, Echim C, Braicu C, Andjelkovic M, Verhe R, Scocaciu C. Composition in polyphenols and stability of the aqueous grape seed extract from the romanian variety “merlot recas.” J Food Biochem. (2011) 35:92–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4514.2010.00368.x
33. González-Manzano S, Rivas-Gonzalo JC, Santos-Buelga C. Extraction of flavan-3-ols from grape seed and skin into wine using simulated maceration. Anal Chim Acta. (2004) 513:283–9. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2003.10.019
34. Mateus N, Marques S, Gonçalves AC, Machado JM, De Freitas V. Proanthocyanidin composition of red Vitis vinifera varieties from the Douro valley during ripening: influence of cultivation altitude. Am J Enol Vitic. (2001) 52:115–21.
35. Jordão AM, Ricardo-da-Silva JM, Laureano O. Evolution of catechins and oligomeric procyanidins during grape maturation of castelão francês and touriga francesa. Am J Enol. Vitic. (2001) 52.
36. Alcalde-Eon C, Escribano-Bailón MT, Santos-Buelga C, Rivas-Gonzalo JC. Changes in the detailed pigment composition of red wine during maturity and ageing: a comprehensive study. Anal Chim Acta. (2006) 563:238–54. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2005.11.028
37. de Castilhos MBM, Corrêa dos SOL, Zanus MC, Maia JDG, Gómez-Alonso S, García-Romero E, et al. Pre-drying, and submerged cap winemaking: effects on polyphenolic compounds and sensory descriptors. Part II: BRS Carmem and Bordô (Vitis labrusca L.). Food Res Int. (2015) 76:697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.07.033
38. Chedea VS, Palade LM, Rotar MC, Călin G, Dragomir C. The anthocyanin composition of a red grape pomace in relation with the wine industry by-products valorization in animal feed. Lucr Ştiinţifice Ser Hortic. (2015)58:29–34.
39. Sousa EC, Uchôa-Thomaz AMA, Carioca JOB, de Morais SM, de Lima A, Martins CG, et al. Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.), Benitaka variety, grown in the semiarid region of Northeast Brazil. Food Sci Technol. (2014) 34:135–42. doi: 10.1590/S0101-20612014000100020
40. Creasy L, Coffee M. Phytoalexin production potential of grape berries. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. (1988) 113:230–234.
41. Romero-Pérez AI, Lamuela-Raventós RM, Waterhouse AL, De La Torre-Boronat MC. Levels of cis- and trans-resveratrol and their glucosides in white and rosé Vitis vinifera wines from Spain. J Agric Food Chem. (1996) 44:2124–8. doi: 10.1021/jf9507654
42. Feijóo O, Moreno A, Falqué E. Content of trans- and cis-resveratrol in Galician white and red wines. J Food Compos Anal. (2008) 21:608–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2008.06.002
43. Nour V, Trandafir I, Muntean C. Ultraviolet irradiation of trans-resveratrol HPLC determination of trans-resveratrol cis-resveratrol in Romanian red wines. J Chromatogr Sci. (2012) 50:920–7. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/bms091
44. Schwarz LJ, Danylec B, Yang Y, Harris SJ, Boysen RI, Hearn MTW. Enrichment of (E)-resveratrol from peanut byproduct with molecularly imprinted polymers. J Agric Food Chem. (2011) 59:3539–43. doi: 10.1021/jf104230f
45. Acuña-Avila PE, Vásquez-Murrieta MS, Franco Hernández MO, López-Cortéz MDS. Relationship between the elemental composition of grapeyards and bioactive compounds in the Cabernet Sauvignon grapes Vitis vinífera harvested in Mexico. Food Chem. (2016) 203:79–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.031
46. Gaze DC editor. Biomarkers of cardiac ischemia david. In: Ischemic Heart Disease. London: IntechOpen (2013). p. 91–122. doi: 10.5772/55250
47. Omland T, White HD. State of the art: blood biomarkers for risk stratification in patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Clin Chem. (2017) 63:165–76. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.255190
48. Upadhyay RK. Emerging risk biomarkers in cardiovascular diseases and disorders. J Lipids. (2015) 2015:1–50. doi: 10.1155/2015/971453
49. Zhang N, Wei W-Y, Li L-L, Hu C, Tang Q-Z. Therapeutic potential of polyphenols in cardiac fibrosis. Front Pharmacol. (2018) 9:122. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00122
50. Ito F. Polyphenols can potentially prevent atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease by modulating macrophage cholesterol metabolism. Curr Mol Pharmacol. (2020) 14:175–90. doi: 10.2174/1874467213666200320153410
51. Ed Nignpense B, Chinkwo KA, Blanchard CL, Santhakumar AB. Polyphenols: modulators of platelet function and platelet microparticle generation? Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:146. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010146
52. Leifert WR, Abeywardena MY. Grape seed, and red wine polyphenol extracts inhibit cellular cholesterol uptake, cell proliferation, 5-lipoxygenase activity. Nutr Res. (2008) 28:729–37. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2008.09.001
53. Cheng Y-C, Sheen J-M, Hu WL, Hung Y-C. Polyphenols, and oxidative stress in atherosclerosis-related ischemic heart disease and stroke. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2017) 2017:8526438. doi: 10.1155/2017/8526438
54. Cebova M, Pechanova O. Protective effects of polyphenols against ischemia/reperfusion injury. Molecules. (2020) 25:3469. doi: 10.3390/molecules25153469
55. Jin JW, Inoue O, Suzuki-Inoue K, Nishikawa G, Kawakami Y, Hisamoto M, et al. Grape seed extracts inhibit platelet aggregation by inhibiting protein tyrosine phosphatase. Clin Appl Thromb. (2014) 20:278–84. doi: 10.1177/1076029613481103
56. Zhang H, Tsao R. Dietary polyphenols, oxidative stress and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects. Curr Opin Food Sci. (2016) 8:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2016.02.002
57. Di Pietro N, Baldassarre MPA, Pandolfi A, Formoso G, Pipino C. Role of polyphenols and carotenoids in endothelial dysfunction: an overview from classic to innovative biomarkers. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2020:6381380. doi: 10.1155/2020/6381380
58. Du G, Sun L, Zhao R, Du L, Song J, Zhang L, et al. Polyphenols: potential source of drugs for the treatment of ischaemic heart disease. Pharmacol Ther. (2016) 162:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.008
59. Santhakumar AB, Battino M, Alvarez-Suarez JM. Dietary polyphenols: structures, bioavailability and protective effects against atherosclerosis. Food Chem Toxicol. (2018) 113:49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.01.022
60. Guardado E, Molina E, Joo M, Uriarte E. Antioxidant, and pro-oxidant effects of polyphenolic compounds and structure-activity relationship evidence. Nutr Well Being Heal. (2012). doi: 10.5772/29471
61. Kanner J. Polyphenols by generating H2O2, affect cell redox signaling, inhibit PTPs and activate Nrf2 axis for adaptation and cell surviving: in vitro, in vivo and human health. Antioxidants. (2020) 9:797. doi: 10.3390/antiox9090797
62. Galati G, O'Brien PJ. Potential toxicity of flavonoids and other dietary phenolics: significance for their chemopreventive and anticancer properties. Free Radic Biol Med. (2004) 37:287–303. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.04.034
63. Martins LAM, Coelho BP, Behr G, Pettenuzzo LF, Souza ICC, Moreira JCF, et al. Resveratrol induces pro-oxidant effects and time-dependent resistance to cytotoxicity in activated hepatic stellate cells. Cell Biochem Biophys. (2014) 68:247–57. doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9703-8
64. San Hipólito-Luengo Á, Alcaide A, Ramos-González M, Cercas E, Vallejo S, Romero A, et al. Dual effects of resveratrol on cell death and proliferation of colon cancer cells. Nutr. Cancer. (2017) 69:1019–27. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2017.1359309
65. Del Pino-García R, Rivero-Pérez MD, Gonzalez-Sanjosé ML, Ortega-Heras M, Lomillo JG, Muñiz P. Chemopreventive potential of powdered red wine pomace seasonings against colorectal cancer in HT-29 cells. J Agric Food Chem. (2017) 65:66–73. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b04561
66. Barbe A, Ramé C, Mellouk N, Estienne A, Bongrani A, Brossaud A, et al. Effects of grape seed extract and proanthocyanidin B2 on in vitro proliferation, viability, steroidogenesis, oxidative stress, and cell signaling in human granulosa cells. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:4215. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174215
67. Shrotriya S, Deep G, Lopert P, Patel M, Agarwal R, Agarwal C. Grape seed extract targets mitochondrial electron transport chain complex III and induces oxidative and metabolic stress leading to cytoprotective autophagy and apoptotic death in human head and neck cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. (2015) 54:1734–47. doi: 10.1002/mc.22246
68. Raina K, Tyagi A, Kumar D, Agarwal R, Agarwal C. Role of oxidative stress in cytotoxicity of grape seed extract in human bladder cancer cells. Food Chem Toxicol. (2013) 61:187–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.06.039
69. Yen CY, Hou MF, Yang ZW, Tang JY, Li KT, Huang HW, et al. Concentration effects of grape seed extracts in anti-oral cancer cells involving differential apoptosis, oxidative stress, DNA damage. BMC Complement Altern Med. (2015) 15:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12906-015-0621-8
70. Yang T, Li X, Zhu W, Chen C, Sun Z, Tan Z, et al. Alteration of antioxidant enzymes and associated genes induced by grape seed extracts in the primary muscle cells of goats in vitro. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e0107670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107670
71. Luo L, Bai R, Zhao Y, Li J, Wei Z, Wang F, et al. Protective effect of grape seed procyanidins against H2O2-induced oxidative stress in PC-12 neuroblastoma cells: structure-activity relationships. J Food Sci. (2018) 83:2622–8. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14349
72. Tyagi A, Raina K, Gangar S, Kaur M, Agarwal R, Agarwal C. Differential effect of grape seed extract against human non-small-cell lung cancer cells: the role of reactive oxygen species and apoptosis induction. Proc Nutr Cancer. (2013) 65:44–53. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.785003
73. Lu M-C, Yang M-D, Li P-C, Fang H-Y, Huang H-Y, Chan Y-C, et al. Effect of oligomeric proanthocyanidin on the antioxidant status and lung function of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In vivo (Brooklyn). (2018) 32:753. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11304
74. Filip A, Daicoviciu D, Clichici S, Bolfa P, Catoi C, Baldea I, et al. The effects of grape seeds polyphenols on SKH-1 mice skin irradiated with multiple doses of UV-B. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. (2011) 105:133–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2011.08.002
75. Aloui F, Charradi K, Hichami A, Subramaniam S, Khan NA, Limam F, et al. Grape seed, and skin extract reduces pancreas lipotoxicity, oxidative stress and inflammation in high fat diet fed rats. Biomed Pharmacother. (2016) 84:2020–8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.11.017
76. Liu B, Jiang H, Lu J, Baiyun R, Li S, Lv Y, et al. Grape seed procyanidin extract ameliorates lead-induced liver injury via miRNA153 and AKT/GSK-3β/Fyn-mediated Nrf2 activation. J Nutr Biochem. (2018) 52:115–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2017.09.025
77. Liu T, Qi H, Ma L, Liu Z, Fu H, Zhu W, et al. Resveratrol attenuates oxidative stress and extends life span in the annual fish nothobranchius guentheri. Rejuvenation Res. (2015) 18:225–33. doi: 10.1089/rej.2014.1618
78. Ayuda-Durán B, González-Manzano S, Gil-Sánchez I, Victoria Moreno-Arribas M, Bartolomé B, Sanz-Buenhombre M, et al. Antioxidant characterization, and biological effects of grape pomace extracts supplementation in caenorhabditis elegans. Foods. (2019) 8:75. doi: 10.3390/foods8020075
79. Zhao J, Jin Y, Du M, Liu W, Ren Y, Zhang C, et al. The effect of dietary grape pomace supplementation on epididymal sperm quality and testicular antioxidant ability in ram lambs. Theriogenology. (2017) 97:50–6. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.010
80. Kerasioti E, Terzopoulou Z, Komini O, Kafantaris I, Makri S, Stagos D, et al. Tissue specific effects of feeds supplemented with grape pomace or olive oil mill wastewater on detoxification enzymes in sheep. Toxicol Reports. (2017) 4:364–72. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.06.007
81. Kafantaris I, Stagos D, Kotsampasi B, Hatzis A, Kypriotakis A, Gerasopoulos K, et al. Grape pomace improves performance, antioxidant status, fecal microbiota and meat quality of piglets. Animal. (2018) 12:246–55. doi: 10.1017/S1751731117001604
82. Ardid-Ruiz A, Harazin A, Barna L, Walter FR, Bladé C, Suárez M, et al. The effects of Vitis vinifera L. phenolic compounds on a blood-brain barrier culture model: expression of leptin receptors and protection against cytokine-induced damage. J. Ethnopharmacol. (2020) 247:112253. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2019.112253
83. Pierini D, Bryan NS. Nitric oxide availability as a marker of oxidative stress. Methods Mol Biol. (2015) 1208:63–71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1441-8_5
84. Tousson EE, Elgharabawy RM, Elmasry TA. Grape seed proanthocyanidin ameliorates cardiac toxicity induced by boldenone undecylenate through inhibition of NADPH oxidase and reduction in the expression of NOX2 and NOX4. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2018) 2018:9434385. doi: 10.1155/2018/9434385
85. Greifová H, Jambor T, Tokárová K, Speváková I, KníŽatová N, Lukáč N. Resveratrol attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress in TM3 Leydig cells in vitro. J Environ Sci Heal A Toxic/Hazardous Subst Environ Eng. (2020) 55:585–95. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2020.1717899
86. Li M, Wu X, An P, Dang H, Liu Y, Liu R. Effects of resveratrol on autophagy and the expression of inflammasomes in a placental trophoblast oxidative stress model. Life Sci. (2020) 256:117890. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117890
87. Zhen J, Qu Z, Fang H, Fu L, Wu Y, Wang H, et al. Effects of grape seed proanthocyanidin extract on pentylenetetrazole-induced kindling associated cognitive impairment in rats. Int J Mol Med. (2014) 34:391. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1796
88. Lu J, Jiang H, Liu B, Baiyun R, Li S, Lv Y, et al. Grape seed procyanidin extract protects against Pb-induced lung toxicity by activating the AMPK/Nrf2/p62 signaling axis. Food Chem Toxicol. (2018) 116:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2018.03.034
89. Wang EH, Yu ZL, Bu YJ, Xu PW, Xi JY, Liang HY. Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract alleviates high-fat diet induced testicular toxicity in rats. RSC Adv. (2019) 9:11842–50. doi: 10.1039/C9RA01017C
90. Fernández-Iglesias A, Pajuelo D, Quesada H, Díaz S, Bladé C, Arola L, et al. Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract improves the hepatic glutathione metabolism in obese Zucker rats. Mol Nutr Food Res. (2014) 58:727–37. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201300455
91. Niu Q, He P, Xu S, Ma R, Ding Y, Mu L, et al. Fluoride-induced iron overload contributes to hepatic oxidative damage in mouse and the protective role of Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract. J Toxicol Sci. (2018) 43:311–9. doi: 10.2131/jts.43.311
92. Ignea C, Dorobantu CM, Christopher Paul Mintoff NB-N, Michael R, Ladomery PK, Chedea VS. Modulation of the antioxidant / pro-oxidant balance, cytotoxicity and antiviral actions of grape seed extracts. Food Chem. (2013) 141:3967–76. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.094
93. Jannapureddy S. Aldose reductase: an emerging target for development of interventions for diabetic cardiovascular complications. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). (2021) 12:636267. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.636267
94. Uwakwe AA, Wodu E, Monanu MO. Erythrocyte methaemoglobin concentration and methaemoglobin reductase activity in the presence of nevirapine and efavirenzin wistar rats. Sch J Appl Med Sci. (2015) 3:897–900.
95. Tedesco I, Spagnuolo C, Russo GL, Russo M, Cervellera C, Moccia S. The pro-oxidant activity of red wine polyphenols induces an adaptive antioxidant response in human erythrocytes. Antioxidants. (2021) 10:800. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050800
96. Van Der Woude H, Boersma MG, Alink GM, Vervoort J, Rietjens IMCM. Consequences of quercetin methylation for its covalent glutathione and DNA adduct formation. Chem Biol Interact. (2006) 160:193–203. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.005
97. Bors W, Michel C, Stettmaier K. Electron paramagnetic resonance studies of radical species of proanthocyanidins and gallate esters. Arch Biochem Biophys. (2000) 374:347–55. doi: 10.1006/abbi.1999.1606
98. Bors W, Foo LY, Hertkorn N, Michel C, Stettmaier K. Chemical studies of proanthocyanidins and hydrolyzable tannins. Antioxid Redox Signal. (2001) 3:995–1008. doi: 10.1089/152308601317203530
99. Chedea VS, Choueiri L, Jisaka M, Kefalas P. o-Quinone involvement in the prooxidant tendency of a mixture of quercetin and caffeic acid. Food Chem. (2012) 135:1999–2004. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.094
100. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:407–77. doi: 10.1093/EURHEARTJ/EHZ425
101. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2014. Update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2014) 129:e28. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000441139.02102.80
102. Collet JP, Thiele H, Barbato E, Bauersachs J, Dendale P, Edvardsen T, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:1289–367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575
103. Kibel A, Lukinac AM, Dambic V, Juric I, Selthofer-Relatic K. Oxidative stress in ischemic heart disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2020) 2020:6627144. doi: 10.1155/2020/6627144
104. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). Medication for the Long-Term Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease. Cologne: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) (2017). p. 1–5.
105. Jia S, Liu Y, Yuan J. Evidence in guidelines for treatment of coronary artery disease. In: Wang M, editor. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology - Coronary Artery Disease : Therapeutics and Drug Discovery. Berlin: Springer. (2020) p. 37–73.
106. Choi C-S, Chung H-K, Choi M-K, Kang M-H. Effects of grape pomace on the antioxidant defense system in diet-induced hypercholesterolemic rabbits. Nutr Res Pract. (2010) 4:114–20. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.2.114
107. BP Y. Cellular defenses against damage from reactive oxygen species. Physiol Rev. (1994) 74:139–62. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.139
108. Hao E, Lang F, Chen Y, Zhang H, Cong X, Shen X, et al. Resveratrol alleviates endotoxin-induced myocardial toxicity via the Nrf2 transcription factor. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e69452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069452
109. Xuan W, Wu B, Chen C, Chen B, Zhang W, Xu D, et al. Resveratrol improves myocardial ischemia and ischemic heart failure in mice by antagonizing the detrimental effects of fractalkine. Crit Care Med. (2012) 40:3026–33. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31825fd7da
110. Shen M, Wu RX, Zhao L, Li J, Guo H-T, Fan R, et al. Resveratrol attenuates ischemia/reperfusion injury in neonatal cardiomyocytes and its underlying mechanism. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e0051223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051223
111. Gao RY, Mukhopadhyay P, Mohanraj R, Wang H, Horváth B, Yin S, et al. Resveratrol attenuates azidothymidine-induced cardiotoxicity by decreasing mitochondrial reactive oxygen species generation in human cardiomyocytes. Mol Med Rep. (2011) 4:151–5. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2010.390
112. Movahed A, Yu L, Thandapilly SJ, Louis XL, Netticadan T. Resveratrol protects adult cardiomyocytes against oxidative stress mediated cell injury. Arch Biochem Biophys. (2012) 527:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.05.002
113. Balea SS, Pârvu AE, Pop N, Marín FZ, Pârvu M. Polyphenolic compounds, antioxidant, and cardioprotective effects of pomace extracts from Fetească neagră cultivar. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2018) 2018:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2018/8194721
114. Rivera K, Salas-Pérz F, Echeverría G, Urquiaga I, Dicenta S, Pérez D, et al. Red wine grape pomace attenuates atherosclerosis and myocardial damage and increases survival in association with improved plasma antioxidant activity in a murine model of lethal ischemic heart disease. Nutrients. (2019) 11:2135. doi: 10.3390/nu11092135
115. Guler A, Sahin MA, Yucel O, Yokusoglu M, Gamsizkan M, Ozal E, et al. Proanthocyanidin prevents myocardial ischemic injury in adult rats. Med Sci Monit. (2011) 17:326–31. doi: 10.12659/MSM.882042
116. Giribabu N, Roslan J, Rekha SS, Salleh N. Methanolic seed extract of Vitis vinifera ameliorates oxidative stress, inflammation and ATPase dysfunction in infarcted and non-infarcted heart of streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced male diabetic rats. Int J Cardiol. (2016) 222:850–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.250
117. Sfaxi I, Charradi K, Limam F, El May MV, Aouani E. Grape seed, skin extract protects against arsenic trioxide induced oxidative stress in rat heart. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. (2016) 94:168–76. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2015-0088
118. Grujić-Milanović J, Jaćević V, Miloradović Z, Jovović D, Milosavljević I, Milanović SD, et al. Resveratrol protects cardiac tissue in experimental malignant hypertension due to antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic properties. Int J Mol Sci. (2021) 22:5006. doi: 10.3390/ijms22095006
119. Das S, Mitrovsky G, Vasanthi HR, Das DK. Antiaging properties of a grape-derived antioxidant are regulated by mitochondrial balance of fusion and fission leading to mitophagy triggered by a signaling network of sirt1-sirt3-foxo3-pink1-parkin. Oxid Med Cell Longev. (2014) 2014:5105. doi: 10.1155/2014/345105
120. Xia N, Daiber A, Habermeier A, Closs EI, Thum T, Spanier G, et al. Resveratrol reverses endothelial nitric-oxide synthase uncoupling in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. (2010) 335:149–54. doi: 10.1124/jpet.110.168724
121. Ferri M, Bin S, Vallini V, Fava F, Michelini E, Roda A, et al. Recovery of polyphenols from red grape pomace and assessment of their antioxidant and anti-cholesterol activities. N Biotechnol. (2016) 33:338–44. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2015.12.004
122. Pérez-Jiménez J, Saura-Calixto F. Grape products, and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Nutr Res Rev. (2008) 21:158–73. doi: 10.1017/S0954422408125124
123. Dohadwala MM, Vita JA. Grapes cardiovascular disease. J Nutr. (2009) 139:1788S−93S. doi: 10.3945/jn.109.107474
124. Magyar K, Halmosi R, Palfi A, Feher G, Czopf L, Fulop A, et al. Cardioprotection by resveratrol: a human clinical trial in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. (2012) 50:179–87. doi: 10.3233/CH-2011-1424
125. Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Justo ML, Claro CM, Vila E, Parrado J, Herrera MD, et al. Endothelium-dependent vasodilator, and antioxidant properties of a novel enzymatic extract of grape pomace from wine industrial waste. Food Chem. (2012) 135:1044–51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.05.089
126. Makazan Z, Saini HK, Dhalla NS. Role of oxidative stress in alterations of mitochondrial function in ischemic-reperfused hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. (2007) 292:H1986–94. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01214.2006
127. Mokni M, Hamlaoui S, Karkouch I, Amri M, Marzouki L, Limam F, et al. Resveratrol provides cardioprotection after ischemia/reperfusion injury via modulation of antioxidant enzyme activities. Iran J Pharm Res. (2013) 12:867.
128. Kazemirad H, Kazerani HR. Cardioprotective effects of resveratrol following myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Mol Biol Rep. (2020) 47:5843–50. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05653-7
129. Xu RY, Xu XW, Deng YZ, Ma ZX, Li XR, Zhao L, et al. Resveratrol attenuates myocardial hypoxia/reoxygenation-induced cell apoptosis through DJ-1-mediated SIRT1-p53 pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2019) 514:401–6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.04.165
Keywords: antioxidant/pro-oxidant activity, grape pomace, grape seed, polyphenols, resveratrol, ischemic heart diseases
Citation: Chedea VS, Tomoiagǎ LL, Macovei ŞO, Mǎgureanu DC, Iliescu ML, Bocsan IC, Buzoianu AD, Voşloban CM and Pop RM (2021) Antioxidant/Pro-Oxidant Actions of Polyphenols From Grapevine and Wine By-Products-Base for Complementary Therapy in Ischemic Heart Diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8:750508. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.750508
Received: 30 July 2021; Accepted: 11 October 2021;
Published: 03 November 2021.
Edited by:
Rabab Sayed, Cairo University, EgyptReviewed by:
Abhijit Chakraborty, Baylor College of Medicine, United StatesYinchuan Xu, Zhejiang University, China
Copyright © 2021 Chedea, Tomoiagǎ, Macovei, Mǎgureanu, Iliescu, Bocsan, Buzoianu, Voşloban and Pop. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Veronica Sanda Chedea, chedeaveronica@yahoo.com; Raluca Maria Pop, raluca_parlog@yahoo.com