Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 14 December 2020
Sec. Cardiovascular Biologics and Regenerative Medicine
This article is part of the Research Topic Cutting Edge Methodologies in Experimental Cardiovascular Research View all 10 articles

Editorial: Cutting Edge Methodologies in Experimental Cardiovascular Research

  • 1Department of Rheumatology, Center of Experimental Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Clinical Immunology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  • 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death and a serious economic burden to patients and society. An estimated 18 million people die of cardiovascular disease (including coronary heart disease, stroke, and non-ischemic heart failure) annually (1), and despite improvements in the treatment of cardiovascular disease, hospitalizations, morbidity, and mortality continue to increase. Over the past decade, clinical data has also shown that certain modern medications may be harmful when applied to heart failure patients (2). This is an emerging challenge and has driven the development of novel drugs and new therapeutic strategies for the prevention and management of this devastating disease that are both cardiac-oriented and disease-specific. Continued advancements in preclinical models may provide evidence for innovative and effective treatment strategies, while experimental research requires the use of up-to-date and standardized methodologies.

This Research Topic on Cutting Edge Methodologies in Experimental Cardiovascular Research presents a collection of nine experimental and review articles covering a broad area of experimental cardiovascular research ranging from studies on the preclinical cell (Burja et al.; Stellato et al.; Woulfe et al.; Zuppinger) and animal models (Bacmeister et al.; Błyszczuk; Daskalopoulos et al.; Oppi et al.) to mathematical modeling (Faes et al.). Two articles represent typical methodological studies demonstrating novel or improved protocols. In the first, Woulfe et al. present a method for the isolation of myofibrils (a basic unit of a muscle) from rat primary cardiomyocytes. Experiments with these isolated myofibrils provide insight into muscle mechanics in the absence of non-motor proteins. This advancement enables the study of specific aspects of the function of the cardiomyocyte contractile apparatus that are not possible when using intact cells. Myofibrils are traditionally obtained from a small section of cardiac muscle and their isolation from cultured cardiomyocytes opens new opportunities for the in vitro manipulation of cultured cells prior to the isolation of myofibrils. In the second methodological study, Stellato et al. present a new approach to identifying and isolating murine cardiac fibroblasts using simple two-color flow cytometry. They showed that the defined combination of cell surface antigens (lineage markers Ter119, CD45, and CD31 vs. gp38) allowed the identification of collagen-producing fibroblasts in freshly isolated hearts of wild-type, non-transgenic mice (Stellato et al.). This method is breaking new ground for employing flow cytometry-based approaches to study cardiac fibroblasts in mouse models without the need for specific reporter mouse strain. In an experimental study, Burja et al. used an in vitro model of atherosclerosis to show the anti-inflammatory effects of olive leaf extracts in human coronary artery endothelial cells activated by serum amyloid A. The proof-of-concept provided by this early preclinical study demonstrates how promising candidates (here olive oil) may be employed for future therapeutic use. The next step in this bench-to-bedside approach is to validate any beneficial effects of these potential therapeutic agents in a living organism.

Currently, experimental animal models of human disease represent the most advanced platform for preclinical research. A review paper by Oppi et al. describes commonly used mouse models of atherosclerosis. Because atherosclerosis can be induced in several atherosclerosis-prone genetic mouse strains by different mechanisms, the paper provides a road map for researchers to choose the most appropriate model for a specific scientific question (Oppi et al.). In another review article on animal models, Błyszczuk focused on myocarditis and its consequence of dilated cardiomyopathy. This review presents the pathogenesis of myocarditis with possible clinical scenarios for the patients as well as the most commonly used experimental mouse models (Błyszczuk). This Research Topic also contains two experimental studies on animal models. In the first, Bacmeister et al. identified key methodological factors in the murine pressure-volume analysis under β-adrenergic stimulation. The authors emphasized the importance of establishing measurement protocols for both accuracy and the reproducibility of experimental data. In the second, Daskalopoulos et al. describe problems of data irreproducibility in animal models. As an example, the authors presented experimental results following treatment with a homologous peptide fragment of Wnt3a/5a UM206 in a mouse model of myocardial infarction. The authors go on to describe the inherent weaknesses associated with a single animal study due to the high number of uncontrollable variables (Daskalopoulos et al.). In laboratory practice, large scale, multicenter animal studies are often not possible for ethical and economic reasons. These data underscore the difficulty of assessing animal studies where the complexity of living organisms and the variability of housing conditions can affect outcomes.

An alternative to animal studies is offered by in vitro and in silico models. Zuppinger presents an overview of cardiovascular 3D cell culture technologies and discusses the advantages and drawbacks of various cardiac organoid cultures. The generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes have been proposed as models of human cardiac tissue, while advanced cell culture models coupled with human genetics are highly desirable in both experimental research and in regenerative medicine. However, these models have a number of limitations and must be considered premature as a replacement for animal studies. Although certain aspects of cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology can be reliably mirrored by such in vitro models, it seems that the complete rejection of animal-based research is currently not possible. Mathematical modeling represents another option in cardiovascular research. Through the use of clinical data, Faes et al. built a mathematical model of coronary circulation to address the effects of the fractional flow reserve on the degree of coronary arterial stenosis. The successful implementation of a mathematical model to diagnostic procedures could reduce costs, save time, and minimize risk along with the social and economical burden for the patient.

Novel technologies and continued improvements to established protocols need to be shared across the scientific community to enhance experimental research and ensure that it is time- and cost- effective. The rapid development of machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence may broaden the application of in silico approaches to address more complex scientific questions in the future. On a global scale, such advances would contribute to the faster translation of bench findings into clinical applications. This collection of Research Topic articles offers important insights into recent methodological advances in cardiovascular research that will help in the development of innovative treatment strategies.

Author Contributions

PB, KB, and GK wrote manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. GBD 2017 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex-specific mortality for 282 causes of death in 195 countries and territories, 1980-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. (2018) 392:1736–88. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32203-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Rolski F, Blyszczuk P. Complexity of TNF-alpha signaling in heart disease. J Clin Med. (2020) 9:3267. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103267

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cardiovacsular disease(s), methodolody, heart, cutting edge, therapy

Citation: Błyszczuk P, Boheler KR and Kania G (2020) Editorial: Cutting Edge Methodologies in Experimental Cardiovascular Research. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 7:621900. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.621900

Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 20 November 2020;
Published: 14 December 2020.

Edited by:

Paolo Madeddu, University of Bristol, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Martino Deidda, University of Cagliari, Italy
Federico Quaini, University of Parma, Italy
Isotta Chimenti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Alessandra Magenta, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy

Copyright © 2020 Błyszczuk, Boheler and Kania. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Przemysław Błyszczuk, cHJ6ZW15c2xhdy5ibHlzemN6dWsmI3gwMDA0MDt1emguY2g=; Kenneth R. Boheler, a2JvaGVsZTEmI3gwMDA0MDtqaG1pLmVkdQ==; Gabriela Kania, Z2FicmllbGEua2FuaWEmI3gwMDA0MDt1emguY2g=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.