AUTHOR=Yuan Tan , Lu Yi , Bian Chang , Cai Zhejun 

TITLE=Early Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Conservative Management in Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Meta-Analysis

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

VOLUME=7

YEAR=2021

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cardiovascular-medicine/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2020.621149

DOI=10.3389/fcvm.2020.621149

ISSN=2297-055X

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Background:</bold> Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular disease in developed countries. Until now, the specific timing of intervention for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction remains controversial.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> A systematic search of four databases (Pubmed, Web of science, Cochrane library, Embase) was conducted. Studies of asymptomatic patients with severe AS or very severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction underwent early aortic valve replacement (AVR) or conservative care were included. The end points included all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and non-cardiac mortality.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Four eligible studies were identified with a total of 1,249 participants. Compared to conservative management, patients who underwent early AVR were associated with lower all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and non-cardiac mortality rate (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09–0.31, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.00001; OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–0.62, <italic>P</italic> = 0.01; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21–0.63, <italic>P</italic> = 0.0003, respectively).</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> Early AVR is preferable for asymptomatic severe AS patients with preserved ejection fraction.</p>