Clinical Relevance of Plasma Endogenous Tissue-Plasminogen Activator and Aortic Valve Sclerosis: Performance as a Diagnostic Biomarker

Background: Aortic valve sclerosis (AVSc), a common precursor to calcific aortic valve disease, may progress into advanced aortic stenosis with hemodynamic instability. However, plasma biomarkers of such a subclinical condition remain lacking. Since impaired fibrinolysis featuring dysregulated tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) is involved in several cardiovascular diseases, we investigated whether endogenous t-PA was also associated with AVSc.

Methods: Plasma t-PA levels were measured in 295 consecutive patients undergoing standard echocardiography and Doppler flow imaging. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between t-PA and AVSc. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for determining the diagnostic value of t-PA for AVSc. The performance of adding t-PA to clinical signatures of AVSc was evaluated. Concentration of t-PA was assessed in human sclerotic and non-sclerotic aortic valves by histology and immunohistochemistry analysis.

Results: Plasma t-PA was higher in patients with AVSc than in non-AVSc counterparts (median, 2063.10 vs. 1403.17 pg/mL, p < 0.01). C-statistics of plasma t-PA for discriminating AVSc was 0.698 (95%CI: 0.639–0.758). The performance of t-PA for identifying AVSc was better among male and non-hypertensive patients [C-statistics (95%CI): 0.712 (0.634–0.790) and 0.805 (0.693–0.916), respectively]. Combination of t-PA and clinical factors improved classification of the patients (category-free NRI: 0.452, p < 0.001; IDI: 0.020, p = 0.012). The concentration of t-PA was three times higher in sclerotic compared to non-sclerotic aortic valves.

Conclusion: Elevated circulating t-PA level confers an increased risk for AVSc. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to examine if t-PA could serve as a diagnostic clinical marker for AVSc.

Introduction

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) represents the most prevalent valve disease worldwide (1), but it is usually detected at an advanced stage (known as aortic stenosis), with severe clinical symptoms and hemodynamic instability. Accumulating evidence revealed that aortic valve sclerosis (AVSc), a non-uniform thickening of valve leaflets without impairment of leaflet excursion or a significant transvalvular pressure gradient (2), is rather common in asymptomatic populations (3), with a prevalence ranging from 30 to 40% in general population and increased occurrence in the elderly (4, 5). Early identification of AVSc at its subclinical stage could improve risk stratification and enable timely intervention and disease control in clinical practice. However, scarce biomarkers were available regarding the identification of AVSc.

Although previous studies unveiled that CAVD shares certain pathophysiological similarities with atherosclerosis in terms of inflammation and dyslipidemia (6, 7), randomized trials did not prove a convincing protective effect of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) therapy on retarding aortic stenosis (8–10). These observations suggest that different mechanisms exist during these two disease processes, and the strategy of targeting risk factors of atherosclerosis may not be likely to reverse advanced aortic stenosis. Thus, investigations of novel pathogenesis and biomarkers in the initial stage of CAVD before the occurrence of clinical severe conditions are urgently required.

Over the past decades, increasing researches have demonstrated an extensive cross-talk between inflammation and coagulation in stenotic valve lesions, which is attributed, at least partly, to calcification and mineralization of the aortic valve leaflets (11, 12). Therefore, coagulation or fibrinolysis regulators may be potential participants in the development and progression of AVSc. Tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) has been proved as a risk factor in various cardiovascular diseases (13–16). Secreted by endothelia cells, t-PA facilitates the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin (17) and plays a pivotal role in the homeostasis of blood coagulation/fibrinolysis and matrix regulation (18, 19). Although the acute release of t-PA contributes to thrombus dissolution, disrupted fibrinolysis featuring chronic elevation of plasma t-PA might reflect presence of long-lasting endothelial injury, which is a remarkable early pathological alteration in AVSc (13, 20). Additionally, t-PA has been shown to act as a cytokine to activate profound receptor-mediated signaling events (21) such as inflammatory response to tissue ischemic injury in various models (22–24). These findings highlight that t-PA might also be implicated in AVSc. In this study, we aimed to explore the association of plasma t-PA levels with AVSc and evaluate the performance of t-PA in identification of AVSc.

Methods

The protocol was approved by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University ethic committee and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent.

Study Population

A total of 571 patients who underwent coronary angiography/intervention because of typical angina symptom and/or electrocardiographic ST-T wave changes from September 2017 to July 2018 were screened from the database of Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital PCI Outcome Program. Among them, 445 patients underwent standard two-dimensional echocardiography and Doppler flow imaging according to the recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography (25). All measurements were based on the observations of two independent experienced investigators. Data on demographics, clinical, laboratorial and angiographic features, and in-hospital management were collected.

432 patients who had high-quality images of transthoracic echocardiography and Doppler flow data were recruited. We excluded patients with history of aortic valve replacement (n = 21) or aortic stenosis (n = 13) as these conditions did not comply with the proper diagnosis of AVSc. We also excluded patients with acute coronary syndrome (n = 41), history of coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 16), renal failure requiring dialysis (n = 8), anticoagulation treatment (n = 17), blood system diseases (n = 2), pulmonary heart disease (n = 3), advanced heart failure (NYHA functional class III or IV, or left ventricular ejection fraction <30%) (n = 9) and cancer (n = 7), because these factors are likely to interfere t-PA measurement. Thus, the remaining 295 eligible patients were included in the cross-sectional study analysis, including 155 patients with and 140 patients without AVSc (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Flowchart of patient enrollment.

Definitions

AVSc was defined as non-transparent aortic valve cusps with focal areas of mild thickening or increased echogenicity without motive restriction and a peak flow velocity across the aortic valve <2.0 m/s (Figure 2) (26). Hypertension was diagnosed in accordance with ESC/ESH guidelines (27). Coronary artery disease was diagnosed if ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis in at least one major epicardial coronary artery was detected, according to the lesion classification scheme of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (28). Renal function was assessed based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), which was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation.

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Representative echo images of aortic valve. Upper: non-AVSc; Bottom: AVSc.

Determination of Plasma t-PA

Fasting venous blood samples were taken from all participants within 24 h of echocardiographic examination. All blood samples were transferred at the freezing temperature and centrifuged within 30 min at 3,000 rpm for 15 min to obtain cell-free plasma. All samples were stored at −80°C before analysis. Plasma level of t-PA was measured using an ELISA kit (Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) Human SimpleStep ELISA Kit; Abcam Cat No: ab190812) according to the product instructions.

Human Tissue Samples and Immunohistochemistry

Human sclerotic aortic valve tissues were obtained from three patients with AVSc who underwent aortic valve replacement within 3 years because of aortic dissection (n = 2) or moderate aortic regurgitation with deteriorating renal function (n = 1). The non-sclerotic aortic valve tissues were obtained from three explanted hearts of cardiac transplant recipients.

The concentration of t-PA in human sclerotic and non-sclerotic aortic valves was assessed by histological and immunochemical analysis. Briefly, after an overnight-fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, samples were sliced into serial cryosections (5 μm thickness). Sections were stained using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Alizarin Red S and Masson trichrome, respectively. For t-PA detection, sections were incubated with anti-t-PA antibody (1:50) (Rabbit monoclonal, Abcam: #ab157469) at 4°C for 12 h and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:100) (CST: #3900S) at room temperature for 2 h. Image of all sections were photographed through a microscope (Zeiss Microsystems).

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as mean with standard deviation (SD) if data were normally distributed, then presented as median with interquartile ranges (IQRs). Categorical data are summarized as proportions and frequencies. Continuous variables between two groups were compared using t-test (Student's t-test or Welch's t-test) or non-parametric test while categorical variables in two groups were compared by Chi-squared tests. Spearman rank correlation was conducted to evaluate the correlations between clinical parameters and t-PA concentrations. Due to its right skew, t-PA concentration was expressed as log 10 transformed per SD in logistic regression model analysis and divided into ordinal variable based on its tertile using the lowest tertile as reference for comparison. Univariate logistic regression models were performed to examine possible factors associated with AVSc. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the independent association between t-PA and AVSc. In Model 1, demographic features were included as covariates. To detect whether the association between t-PA levels and AVSc could be affected by other confounders, we further adjusted age, gender, smoking, diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, lipid profiles, C-reactive protein (CRP), gamma-glutamyltransferase (γGT), eGFR, and levels of phosphorus in Model 2. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to estimate the performance of t-PA concentration for discriminating AVSc in the whole study population and different subgroups. The optimal cut-off value of t-PA concentration was calculated based on the highest Youden index (sensitivity + specificity – 1). C-statistics with 95% CIs were reported. To distinguish the representative variables for AVSc, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) approach was utilized for feature selection (29–31). The selected variables were confirmed based on lambda with one standard error from the minimum using 5-fold internal cross-validation. T-PA and other four clinical features including age, coronary artery disease, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), eGFR were selected. A clinical model using the four clinical variables was constructed by multivariate logistic regression. C-statistics and brier score were respectively calculated for evaluating discrimination and calibration of the clinical model both before and after the addition of t-PA. Category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indexes were calculated to assess the added value of t-PA in reclassification of the patients.

Data were analyzed with the use of SPSS 22.0., statistical packages R glmnet (version 3.0-2) (The R Foundation; http://www.r-project.org; version 3.6.1), and two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline Clinical Characteristics

Compared with non-AVSc patients, those with AVSc were older and had a higher proportion of hypertension and coronary artery disease (all p < 0.01). In addition, plasma levels of HDL-C, phosphorus and eGFR were lower but CRP and γGT were higher in patients with AVSc (all p < 0.05). However, the two groups did not differ with respect to gender distribution, percentage of diabetes, smokers, plasma level of triglyceride, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and fast blood glucose. No significant difference was observed in terms of left ventricular geometry and function between the two groups. Medications including statin and antiplatelet treatments were also similar (Table 1).

TABLE 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of non-AVSc and AVSc patients.

Association of Plasma t-PA Levels With AVSc

Plasma levels of t-PA were significantly higher in patients with AVSc [median = 2063.10 pg/mL (IQR 1403.54.89–2731.46 pg/mL)] than in non-AVSc counterparts [median = 1403.17 pg/mL (IQR percentile 1026.50–1976.95 pg/mL, p < 0.001)] (Figure 3).The Spearman rank correlation analysis showed that plasma t-PA level correlated positively with age, status of coronary artery disease, as well as levels of CRP, γGT and triglyceride while it was inversely related to HDL-C levels and eGFR (Supplementary Table 1). In univariate analysis, plasma t-PA level as both continuous variable [OR 95%CI: 2.091 (1.592–2.746), p < 0.001] and categorical variable was associated with AVSc [tertile 3rd to tertile 1st OR 95%CI: 5.328 (2.885–9.840), p < 0.001]. Such an association remained significant even after adjusting for either demographic features alone [OR 95%CI: 1.753 (1.251–2.458), p = 0.001] or demographic features, clinical and laboratory cofounders [OR 95%CI: 1.582 (1.117–2.242), p = 0.010]. An independent association between the highest tertile of t-PA level and AVSc was also observed after full adjustment [OR 95%CI: 2.533 (1.122–5.716), p = 0025] (Table 2).

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Comparison of plasma t-PA between patients with and without AVSc. t-PA levels (pg/mL) were significantly higher in AVSc (median = 2063.10 pg/mL [IQR 1403.54.89–2731.46 pg/mL; range 297.18–5922.58 pg/mL], red dots) than in non-AVSc patients (median = 1403.17 pg/mL [IQR percentile 1026.50–1976.95 pg/mL; range 191.11–3687.57 pg/mL], blue dots) (p < 0.001).

TABLE 2

Table 2. Association between plasma t-PA levels and AVSc.

Furthermore, higher plasma levels of t-PA still tended to be associated with higher risks of AVSc in different subgroups after adjusting for other confounding factors. In particular, t-PA levels appeared to add more risk for AVSc in male patients, those with younger age, diabetes, or those without hypertension (Figure 4).

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Forest plot for association between t-PA levels and AVSc in different subgroups. In subgroup analysis, the adjusted odd ratios with 95% CI revealed that elevated t-PA levels remained associated with AVSc in various subgroups, and add more risk for AVSc in male patients, those with younger age, diabetes or without hypertension.

Performance of Circulating t-PA for Discrimination of AVSc

To evaluate the discriminability of plasma t-PA levels for AVSc, we performed ROC analysis and calculated the C-statistics. In our whole study population, t-PA held a C-statistics of 0.698 (0.639–0.758), with a cut-off value of 1845.79 pg/ml (specificity 0.707; sensitivity 0.626). The performance of t-PA in discriminating AVSc in different subgroups is summarized in Table 3. Notably, t-PA showed a stronger discriminability for AVSc among non-hypertensive [C-statistics, 0.805 (95% CI, 0.693–0.916)] and male patients [C-statistics, 0.712 (95% CI 0.634–0.790)] as well as those with normal renal function [C-statistics, 0.710 (95% CI 0.577–0.843)] (Figure 5).

TABLE 3

Table 3. Performance of t-PA in discriminating AVSc among different subgroups.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Diagnostic value of t-PA for AVSc in different subgroups. ROC curves of t-PA as a biomarker for AVSc among male patients (A) and female group (B) non-hypertensive group (C) and hypertensive group (D), normal renal function group (E), and impaired renal function group (F).

For detecting the potential role of t-PA in assisting clinical factors for AVSc classification, a LASSO logistic regression was initially performed for selecting the representative signatures of AVSc among all clinical and laboratory features. Remarkably, based on lambda with one standard error from the minimum, t-PA (lg/SD) was selected as one of the representative variables for AVSc, along with another four clinical variables, including age, presence of coronary artery disease, HDL-C as well as eGFR (Supplementary Figure 1). These factors were also well-established clinical variables associated with AVSc. Afterwards, a basic clinical model incorporating the four clinical factors was established by simple logistic regression. The addition of t-PA to the clinical model appeared to offer better discrimination and calibration than the basic clinical model alone, with a slightly higher C-statistics of 0.895 and a lower brier score of 0.129. More importantly, inclusion of plasma t-PA levels allowed a significant reclassification of the patients, with IDI of 0.020 (95% CI: 0.004–0.035) and category-free NRI of 0.452 (95% CI: 0.229–0.674) (Table 4).

TABLE 4

Table 4. Performance of t-PA in improving diagnosis of AVSc.

Increased Concentration of t-PA in Human Sclerotic Aortic Valve Tissues

Hematoxylin-eosin (HE), Masson, and alizarin red staining revealed that aortic valve leaflets were thicker and more fibrotic or calcified in AVSc patients compared to non-AVSc counterparts (Figures 6A,C,D). Immunohistochemical staining showed that t-PA level was three times higher in the AVSc group than in the non-AVSc group (Figures 6A,B).

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Levels of t-PA in sclerotic and non-sclerotic aortic valves. (A) Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining showed that aortic valve leaflets were thicker in AVSc than in non-AVSc group. Masson and alizarin red staining also revealed relatively stronger fibrosis and degree of calcification in sclerotic aortic valve leaflets. The immuno-histochemical staining revealed higher levels of t-PA in sclerotic aortic valves compared with non-sclerotic aortic valves. (B) The levels of t-PA were three times higher in sclerotic than in non-sclerotic aortic valves and the fibrosis degree of valve were two times stronger in the sclerotic aortic valves. The calcification degree of sclerotic valve was slightly stronger than the non-sclerotic valves, although without statistical significance. (C) Quantification of the extent of fibrosis based on Masson staining. (D) Quantification of calcific intensity by integrated optical density (IOD), and the calcific intensity was expressed as IOD/area. **p < 0.01.

Discussion

The results of this study showed that elevated t-PA levels in plasma were associated with higher risk of AVSc, and may hold potential in AVSc discrimination especially for male, non-hypertensive and normal renal function patients. The concentration of t-PA was increased in sclerotic aortic valves.

Growing publications indicated that impaired fibrinolysis was associated with CAVD (11, 32). However, to date, most studies regarding this topic mainly focused on aortic stenosis. Whether the alteration of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis was the product of adverse valve condition or reflected the early stage of CAVD has not been reported. In this study, the association between higher plasma t-PA levels and AVSc persisted even after adjusting for multiple variables including demographic features, clinical history and other laboratory factors. Interestingly, the risk of AVSc increased by 58.2% for every unit increase in plasma t-PA (lg per SD), even after full adjustment. Our finding is different from prior work by Kochtcebane et al. which implied that t-PA levels in stenotic or calcified human aortic valves was relatively normal (33). The reason for this remains unclear but may be more likely explained by different study populations and distinct reference and sample source.

Moreover, beyond the relatively satisfactory discriminability in the whole study population, plasma t-PA tended to be an indicator of AVSc among patients without hypertension. Over the past years, accumulating evidence revealed that hypertension was more prevalent in patients with CAVD (34, 35), and was considered as a risk factor for aortic valve disease (36, 37). Nevertheless, AVSc and even aortic stenosis also occurred in individuals without hypertension (38, 39). And for these patients without traditional risk factors, elevated plasma t-PA levels held higher discriminating power for early identification of AVSc in clinical scenarios. However, the clinical and pathological relevance of elevated t-PA levels and progression of AVSc in this population still needs to be investigated in a long-term follow-up study. In addition, our study showed a relatively higher diagnostic value of plasma t-PA for AVSc among male patients. Early identification of male patients with AVSc may be clinically meaningful as they tend to develop moderate and severe aortic stenosis and have a higher risk of all-cause mortality (40). Similarly, although the association of valve calcification with renal dysfunction is well-recognized (41–43), our results suggest that t-PA appears to display modest discriminability for AVSc, with reduced plasma t-PA being of potential to exclude risks of AVSc among patients with normal renal function.

In this study, we applied the machine learning approach LASSO regression for feature selection, which shrinks some variables coefficients to zero to ruling out redundant or irrelevant features or features that are strongly correlated and generate easily interpretable models with concise information (29). Interestingly, besides the established risk factors such as age, coronary artery disease, HDL-C and eGFR, t-PA was also selected as a representative feature for AVSc. Although the method did not reflect biological importance, it still indicates that t-PA might be an effective factor at least for AVSc classification. In line with that, when adding t-PA to the basic clinical model, more patients were better reclassified. This suggests that determination of plasma t-PA levels could provide additional information beyond clinical risk factors in terms of reclassification of patients into more appropriate diagnostic groups.

The mechanism of the development of AVSc is likely complex and multi-factorial. t-PA has been considered as a cytokine triggering profound intracellular signaling events and modulating inflammation response by interacting with membrane receptors such as low-density lipoprotein receptor—related protein-1 (LRP-1) (21). Animal experiments have identified t-PA as a regulator of inflammatory response. Several models have shown that t-PA knock-out caused less hepatic fibrosis with decreased T cells and relevant cytokines (44), less neutrophil influx into the interstitial area and quicker recovery of renal function than wildtype mice (23). Meanwhile, t-PA induced microglial activation with generation of an inflammatory response in the ischemic brain and adherence of polymorphonuclear neutrophils to the endothelium under flow conditions (22, 24). These findings support a notion that t-PA may induce inflammation via cytokine release, which in turn facilitate endothelium injury and contribute to the development of AVSc. Another possible mechanism can be attributed to the influence of t-PA on extracellular matrix remodeling. Specifically, t-PA increased the biological activity of metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 and 9 both in vivo and in vitro (18, 19). In accordance, given the essential role of MMPs activation in promoting valvular remodeling and inflammation in CAVD (45), it is reasonable to hypothesize that t-PA may contribute to AVSc through activation of MMPs.

Aortic stenosis is the most common form of valvular heart disease in the elderly population and occurs frequently in conjunction with coronary artery disease (46). In this study, elevated t-PA levels were associated with presence of coronary artery disease and old age, and both conditions tended to be more prevalent among patients with AVSc. Nevertheless, after adjusting for these confounding factors, higher t-PA levels remained independent risk factor for AVSc either as a continuous variable or within the highest tertile. This suggests that t-PA might be of interest regarding the pathophysiology of AVSc.

Limitations

Admittedly, several limitations exist in our study. First, as a single-center study, patient recruitment, staff characteristics, and departmental protocols might add a limitation to the universality of our results. Secondly, our diagnosis of AVSc is based on transthoracic echocardiography, and AVSc has not been assessed quantitatively by cardiac computed tomography. Though cardiac CT has not been recommended by guidelines as a routine test, it has been shown to display the burden of calcium weight in the aortic valve area. Additionally, despite careful adjustment for the major known confounders, unspecified elements could also interfere with our findings. Finally, as observational cross-sectional study, the prognostic value and causal relationship cannot be concluded. Further basic researches and clinical investigation are still required.

Conclusions

The current study indicates that elevated plasma t-PA confers an increased risk for AVSc. This observation could extend our understanding of the pathophysiology of CAVD. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to examine if t-PA is able to serve as a diagnostic clinical marker for AVSc.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Ruijin Hospital Ethics Committee, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and gave final approval of the version to be published. Individual significant contributions include: YL and KY provided study design, interpretation, and edited manuscript, were the guarantors of this work and took full responsibility for the work. ZC, YS, and QX performed data collection and wrote the manuscript. XH, YZ, YY, and ZC analyzed the data. WS contributed to interpretation, drafting, and editing the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81760734, 81770384, and 31660313), the Key Disciplines Group Construction Project of Pudong Health Bureau of Shanghai (Grant No. PWZxq2017-05), the Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 2017FA048), the fund of Diabetic Innovation Team (2019HC002), and Endocrine Clinical Medical Center of Yunnan Province (No. ZX2019-02-02). The fund of medical leader in Yunnan Province (No. L-201609).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Ying Huang and her associates in the core facility unit (Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine) for their professional support in imaging capture and processing.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2020.584998/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Bardon KM, Garelnabi M. The impact of altered mechanobiology on aortic valve pathophysiology. Arch Biochem Biophys. (2020) 691:108463. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2020.108463

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Gharacholou SM, Karon BL, Shub C, Pellikka PA. Aortic valve sclerosis and clinical outcomes: moving toward a definition. Am J Med. (2011) 124:103–10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. d'Arcy JL, Coffey S, Loudon MA, Kennedy A, Pearson-Stuttard J, Birks J, et al. Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: the OxVALVE Population Cohort Study. Eur Heart J. (2016) 37:3515–22. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Nasir K, Katz R, Takasu J, Shavelle DM, Detrano R, Lima JA, et al. Ethnic differences between extra-coronary measures on cardiac computed tomography: multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Atherosclerosis. (2008) 198:104–14. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation. (1997) 95:2262–70. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.9.2262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Mazzone A, Venneri L, Berti S. Aortic valve stenosis and coronary artery disease: pathophysiological and clinical links. J Cardiovasc Med. (2007) 8:983–9. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32802e6c3d

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. O'Brien KD, Reichenbach DD, Marcovina SM, Kuusisto J, Alpers CE, Otto CM. Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E accumulate in the morphologically early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (1996) 16:523–32. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.16.4.523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Cowell SJ, Newby DE, Prescott RJ, Bloomfield P, Reid J, Northridge DB, et al. A randomized trial of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in calcific aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. (2005) 352:2389–97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Rossebø AB, Pedersen TR, Boman K, Brudi P, Chambers JB, Egstrup K, et al. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med. (2008) 359:1343–56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804602

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Chan KL, Teo K, Dumesnil JG, Ni A, Tam J. Effect of Lipid lowering with rosuvastatin on progression of aortic stenosis: results of the aortic stenosis progression observation: measuring effects of rosuvastatin (ASTRONOMER) trial. Circulation. (2010) 121:306–14. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.900027

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Natorska J, Undas A. Blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in aortic valve stenosis: links with inflammation and calcification. Thromb Haemost. (2015) 114:217–27. doi: 10.1160/TH14-10-0861

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Glader CA, Birgander LS, Söderberg S, Ildgruben HP, Saikku P, Waldenström A, et al. Lipoprotein(a), chlamydia pneumoniae, leptin and tissue plasminogen activator as risk markers for valvular aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. (2003) 24:198–208. doi: 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00385-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Geppert A, Graf S, Beckmann R, Hornykewycz S, Schuster E, Binder BR, et al. Concentration of endogenous tPA antigen in coronary artery disease: relation to thrombotic events, aspirin treatment, hyperlipidemia, and multivessel disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (1998) 18:1634–42. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.18.10.1634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Fernández P, Marco P, Marín F, Roldán V, Sogorb F. The role of tissue plasminogen activator on the progression of the coronary disease. Eur Heart J. (2002) 23:88. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. van der Bom JG, de Knijff P, Haverkate F, Bots ML, Meijer P, de Jong PT, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator and risk of myocardial infarction. The Rotterdam Study. Circulation. (1997) 95:2623–7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.12.2623

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Freynhofer MK, Draxler DF, Gruber SC, Bruno V, Höchtl T, Fellner B, et al. Endogenous t-PA-antigen is an independent predictor of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause death in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thromb Haemost. (2013) 11:1069–77. doi: 10.1111/jth.12213

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Kanno Y. The role of fibrinolytic regulators in vascular dysfunction of systemic sclerosis. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:619. doi: 10.3390/ijms20030619

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Wang M, Lakatta EG. Altered regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in aortic remodeling during aging. Hypertension. (2002) 39:865–73. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000014506.13322.66

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Golab P, Kielbus M, Bielewicz J, Kurzepa J. The effect of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator on MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities in vitro. Neurol Res. (2015) 37:9–13. doi: 10.1179/1743132814Y.0000000412

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, Ioannidis JP, Macaskill P, Steyerberg EW, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. (2015) 162:1–73. doi: 10.7326/M14-0698

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lin L, Hu K. Tissue plasminogen activator and inflammation: from phenotype to signaling mechanisms. Am J Clin Exp Immunol. (2014) 3:30–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Zhang C, An J, Strickland DK, Yepes M. The low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 mediates tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced microglial activation in the ischemic brain. Am J Pathol. (2009) 174:586–94. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Roelofs JJTH, Rouschop KMA, Leemans JC, Claessen N, de Boer AM, Frederiks WM, et al. Tissue-type plasminogen activator modulates inflammatory responses and renal function in ischemia reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2006) 17:131–40. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005010089

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Montrucchio G, Lupia E, De Martino A, Silvestro L, Savu SR, Cacace G, et al. Plasmin promotes an endothelium-dependent adhesion of neutrophils. Involvement of platelet activating factor and P-selectin. Circulation. (1996) 93:2152–60. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.93.12.2152

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Baumgartner HC, Hung JC-C, Bermejo J, Chambers JB, Edvardsen T, Goldstein S, et al. Recommendations on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve stenosis: a focused update from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging and the American Society of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag. (2017) 18:254–75. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Milin AC, Vorobiof G, Aksoy O, Ardehali R. Insights into aortic sclerosis and its relationship with coronary artery disease. J Am Heart Assoc. (2014) 3:e001111. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:3021–104. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention, 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 2012 ACC/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease, 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, and 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Circulation. (2016) 134:123–55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Muthukrishnan R, Rohini R editors. LASSO: a feature selection technique in predictive modeling for machine learning. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computer Applications (ICACA). Coimbatore (2016). doi: 10.1109/ICACA.2016.7887916

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Pavlou M, Ambler G, Seaman S, De Iorio M, Omar RZ. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events. Stat Med. (2016) 35:1159–77. doi: 10.1002/sim.6782

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective. J R Statist Soc B. (2011) 73:273–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Natorska J, Wypasek E, Grudzień G, Sadowski J, Undas A. Impaired fibrinolysis is associated with the severity of aortic stenosis in humans. J Thromb Haemost. (2013) 11:733–40. doi: 10.1111/jth.12122

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kochtebane N, Alzahrani AM, Bartegi A. Expression of uPA, tPA, and PAI-1 in calcified aortic valves. Biochem Res Int. (2014) 2014:658643. doi: 10.1155/2014/658643

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bortnick AE, Bartz TM, Ix JH, Chonchol M, Reiner A, Cushman M, et al. Association of inflammatory, lipid and mineral markers with cardiac calcification in older adults. Heart. (2016) 102:1826–34. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309404

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Latsios G, Tousoulis D, Androulakis E, Papageorgiou N, Synetos A, Tsioufis C, et al. Monitoring calcific aortic valve disease: the role of biomarkers. Curr Med Chem. (2012) 19:2548–54. doi: 10.2174/092986712800492940

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Ferreira-González I, Pinar-Sopena J, Ribera A, Marsal JR, Cascant P, González-Alujas T, et al. Prevalence of calcific aortic valve disease in the elderly and associated risk factors: a population-based study in a Mediterranean area. Eur J Prev Cardiol. (2013) 20:1022–30. doi: 10.1177/2047487312451238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Chu Y, Lund DD, Doshi H, Keen HL, Knudtson KL, Funk ND, et al. Fibrotic aortic valve stenosis in hypercholesterolemic/hypertensive mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2016) 36:466–74. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.115.306912

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Iwata S, Russo C, Jin Z, Schwartz JE, Homma S, Elkind MS, et al. Higher ambulatory blood pressure is associated with aortic valve calcification in the elderly: a population-based study. Hypertension. (2013) 61:55–60. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.202697

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Tastet L, Capoulade R, Clavel MA, Larose É, Shen M, Dahou A, et al. Systolic hypertension and progression of aortic valve calcification in patients with aortic stenosis: results from the PROGRESSA study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag. (2017) 18:70–8. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jew013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Thomassen HK, Cioffi G, Gerdts E, Einarsen E, Midtbø HB, Mancusi C, et al. Echocardiographic aortic valve calcification and outcomes in women and men with aortic stenosis. Heart. (2017) 103:1619–24. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-311040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Brandenburg VM, Schuh A, Kramann R. Valvular calcification in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. (2019) 26:464–71. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2019.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Ternacle J, Côté N, Krapf L, Nguyen A, Clavel MA, Pibarot P. Chronic kidney disease and the pathophysiology of valvular heart disease. Can J Cardiol. (2019) 35:1195–207. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Kume T, Kawamoto T, Akasaka T, Watanabe N, Toyota E, Neishi Y, et al. Rate of progression of valvular aortic stenosis in patients undergoing dialysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. (2006) 19:914–8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.01.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Higazi AA, El-Haj M, Melhem A, Horani A, Pappo O, Alvarez CE, et al. Immunomodulatory effects of plasminogen activators on hepatic fibrogenesis. Clin Exp Immunol. (2008) 152:163–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03606.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Bossé Y, Miqdad A, Fournier D, Pépin A, Pibarot P, Mathieu P. Refining molecular pathways leading to calcific aortic valve stenosis by studying gene expression profile of normal and calcified stenotic human aortic valves. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. (2009) 2:489–98. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.108.820795

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Paradis JM, Fried J, Nazif T, Kirtane A, Harjai K, Khalique O, et al. Aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: what do we know? What don't we know? A comprehensive review of the literature with proposed treatment algorithms. Eur Heart J. (2014) 35:2069–82. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu247

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar