
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Built Environ.
Sec. Indoor Environment
Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1556698
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Non-natural airborne microfibres are an emerging concern in indoor air pollution, yet relatively little is known about their sources or concentrations. This is particularly relevant in home environments, where individuals spend significant amounts of time, but which are challenging for researchers to access at scale. Consequently, the concentration of indoor airborne microfibres remains poorly constrained. This paper presents results from the pilot phase of a participatory community (or citizen) science project, where participants collected airborne microfibres in their homes using simple, low-cost passive samplers consisting of petri dishes lined with forensic tape. Microfibre deposition rates were then quantified through a combination of participant-contributed microscopy images and laboratory-based manual counting. The study found an average indoor microfibre deposition rate of 1,960 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹, with significant variability between homes (mean rates ranging from 570 to 4,534 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹). Among rooms sampled, bedrooms had the highest deposition rates (2,893 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹), followed by bathrooms (2,482 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹), with kitchens (1,225 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹) and living rooms (942 fibres m⁻² day⁻¹) showing lower rates. This study demonstrates a scalable, community-driven method for measuring indoor microfibres in the built environment.
Keywords: Microfiber (MF), Indoor air, Textiles & clothing, Citizen Science (CS), Microplastic (MP)
Received: 09 Jan 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Pringle, Sardo, Lamb-Riddell, De Vito, McGoran, Laggan, Hansen and Williams. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Kirsty J Pringle, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.