94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Built Environ.
Sec. Urban Science
Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2025.1535964
This article is part of the Research Topic Data-Driven Urban Dynamics: Sustainable Urbanization and Mobility in Peripheral Areas View all articles
Urban Land Dispute and Resolution Mechanisms in two selected Ethiopian Towns; From Good
Provisionally accepted
Fraol Udessa *
Dagnachew Adugna - Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
The main objective of this paper is to examine Urban Land Dispute and Resolutions in two selected Ethiopian Towns from Governance perspective. Land tenure is widely recognized as vital to social security, sustainable development, economic growth and effective government. To achieve this objective a mixed methods research approach was used. Data were collected from 391households through questionnaires, 22 key interviews and 2 focus group discussions and analyzed descriptively. According to the study results, boundary disputes, expropriation of property rights based on false evidence, real estate loans, granting of use rights and illegal sale of urban land were the main causes of urban land disputes. The conflict resolution system was inadequate to protect the rights of vulnerable groups and public property.Judges were unable to interpret and apply land law because it was not an integral part of legal training. As a result, the quality of judgments was ultimately compromised by the fact that citylevel judges were less qualified and experienced than higher court judges. Furthermore, the responsibility for conflict resolution at various levels has not been delegated to the actual practices of cities. In addition, there was a local informal dispute resolution system that occasionally made unfair decisions, but due to the development plan, it was never taken into account by the administrative dispute resolution system. Questions over city lands persisted in the first instance and in regional high courts for many years because disagreements could not be quickly resolved in the formal system. Finally, limiting the various forms of dispute resolution requires legal scrutiny and increases the ability of regional arbitration organizations to resolve disputes quickly and cost-effectively by providing them with access to training, legal resources and office space.
Keywords: land management, Land disputes, resolutions mechanism; governance, Land managenment, Resolution mechanism, governance
Received: 28 Nov 2024; Accepted: 18 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Udessa and Adugna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Fraol Udessa, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.