
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
MINI REVIEW article
Front. Blockchain
Sec. Financial Blockchain
Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1549729
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This investigation evaluates blockchain's dichotomous effects on auditing through systematic literature synthesis and comparative case studies of Big Four accounting firms. Empirical evidence demonstrates that distributed ledger technology (DLT) enhances audit efficacy through automated transaction authentication (exemplified by PwC's 90% temporal reduction in reconciliation protocols) and machine learning-powered anomaly detection algorithms, enabling comprehensive audit sampling and continuous monitoring capabilities. Persistent technical risks remain, notably 51% consensus vulnerabilities, self-executing contract exposures, and throughput constraints in decentralized architectures, which collectively compromise system integrity. Furthermore, regulatory lacunae in cross-jurisdictional compliance frameworks and practitioners' competency deficits in cryptographic validation techniques substantially impede technological assimilation. The analysis substantiates three critical imperatives: (1) harmonized regulatory frameworks with Turing-complete compliance protocols, (2) cross-disciplinary human capital development initiatives, and (3) applied research on heterogeneous system interoperability. Strategic mitigation of these implementation barriers could transition auditing toward cryptographic trust ecosystems, contingent upon synergistic collaboration between regulatory bodies establishing adaptive governance models, corporate entities developing hybrid audit architectures, and academic institutions advancing validation methodologies.
Keywords: Blockchain, audit, Risk Management, Smart contracts, Regulatory Compliance
Received: 21 Dec 2024; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 ZHANG, MA and MENG. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
YUNFAN ZHANG, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, SAR China
ZIFEI MA, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, SAR China
JIAMING MENG, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, Macao, SAR China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.