Skip to main content

PERSPECTIVE article

Front. Blockchain

Sec. Blockchain for Web3 and the Metaverse

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2025.1538227

Decentralizing Governance: Exploring the Dynamics and Challenges of Digital Commons and DAOs

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Hult International Business School, Cambridge, United States
  • 2 École des ponts ParisTech (ENPC), Marne-la-Vallée, Île-de-France, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Software) projects are software initiatives that follow the principles of freedom, transparency, and collaborative development involving open access to source code and non-proprietary licensing.This paper compares the efficacy of various models and examines the extent to which the decentralized, token-based nature of blockchain networks can improve the regulation of the digital commons based on Ostrom's principles. Historically, the decentralized nature of blockchain networks has been treated as a means to democratize digital spaces by introducing multilateral forms of governance adhering to the beliefs of many users. 5 However, the expansion of blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies in the developing world could also represent a new form of financial colonialism, where blockchain financialization perpetuates historical patterns of economic exploitation and dependency through digital networks. These challenges are not limited to the developing world but are also prevalent in industrialized nations, highlighting the global nature of digital inequality and the need for inclusive solutions 6 . Recent research has shed light 7 on the complex impacts of automated reputation and reward systems on online communities, revealing both benefits and potential drawbacks that warrant critical examination. For instance, while these systems can enhance user engagement, they may also inadvertently reinforce existing biases or create perverse incentives. 8 While blockchain networks aim to decentralize power and increase transparency, their design often reflects the assumptions and values of their creators, prioritizing efficiency over fairness or favoring users with more 5

    Keywords: Digital Commons, governance, Blockchain, artificial intelligence, Decentralized network

    Received: 02 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Esposito, Tse and Goh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mark Esposito, Hult International Business School, Cambridge, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more