Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Blockchain, 30 August 2023
Sec. Blockchain Technologies
This article is part of the Research Topic Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technology - enabled architectures for improving healthcare View all 5 articles

Editorial: Blockchain and distributed ledger technology—enabled architectures for improving healthcare

  • 1Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • 2Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, United States
  • 3Department of Computer Science, School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States
  • 4Data Science Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States

The interest in blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies (DLT) among health and healthcare research/practice communities has experienced rapid growth in recent years. These technologies are currently being explored in different parts of the world for a diverse array of topics (Zhang and Boulos, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Kuo et al., 2021, 2023; Zhang and Kuo). These areas include but are not limited to securing patient/provider identities, establishing secure health data repositories, maintaining a single source of truth, overseeing pharmaceutical and medical device supply chains, detecting medical fraud, enabling secure medical data sharing among researchers, fostering collaborative data analysis, exploring research data monetization, crisis mapping and recovery scenarios, integrating blockchain-enabled augmented reality, facilitating research patient recruitment, and even tackling environmental plastic pollution with blockchain reward systems. Given the increasing availability of health data and the advancements in the Internet of Things (IoT), recent research has seamlessly incorporated artificial intelligence into blockchain-powered healthcare applications (Kuo and Pham, 2022; Zhang and Kamel Boulos, 2022). Although many blockchain use cases in healthcare have been identified, a notable gap persists in the availability of reproducible architectures and prototypes coupled with pragmatic designs.

Meanwhile, recent developments in blockchain and DLT have enabled much more sophisticated computing in a decentralized manner. Blockchain-based architectures, with crucial inherent technical attributes such as immutability and transparency, hold the potential to revolutionize the healthcare industry in multifaceted ways. Their application has the capability to address pressing challenges in healthcare, notably in data sharing interoperability, medical supply chain management, accurate patient identity matching, and various other critical healthcare services (Zhang and Kuo, 2021; Zhang and Kuo). While the demand for interoperable solutions remains substantial, it is important to acknowledge that blockchain and associated DLTs face their own limitations in data privacy, security, and scalability. Therefore, the primary objective of this Research Topic is to include research studies of blockchain- or DLT-powered designs that will improve healthcare practices, processes, systems, and eventually patient outcomes while overcoming those technical limitations.

Within this Research Topic, the authors have studied several timely and pivotal avenues of inquiry. First, Thakur et al. explored different generations of blockchain, challenges inherent in healthcare applications, and potential remedies based on the utility of blockchain technologies, from the healthcare industry perspective. Alongside the investigation of different blockchain and DLT healthcare applications, this study also discussed the latest trends and factors driving the need to integrate blockchain/DLT into the healthcare sector. Continuing this trajectory, Westphal and Seitz et al. reviewed current research on blockchain implementations in healthcare for three use cases: secure storage for medical records, access to medical data with permission management, and health asset tracking within supply chains. This work identified two important needs for blockchain—secure storage and easy access to complete patient data—and revealed the trend of hybrid solutions as well as the automated processes enabled by smart contracts. Next, Ho et al. proposed a novel blockchain-supported Massive Group Insurance (MGI) model, aiming at reducing the costs of orphan drugs for rare diseases and avoiding adverse selection. The key idea is to leverage blockchain for improving orphan drug data traceability and authentication as well as facilitating effective intellectual property rights payments, to ensure data security at a relatively low administrative overhead, and to support the concept of group insurance to finance and increase the use of orphan drugs. This insurance model also exhibits extensibility beyond orphan drugs to expensive drugs and vaccines, thereby lending support to patient care, drug development, clinical research, and public policy. Finally, Zhang et al. focused on addressing the challenge of lacking design recommendations in blockchain and DLT development for the healthcare sector. Specifically, the study introduced a concrete collection of architectural blockchain design patterns, as well as healthcare domain-specific considerations, to foster secure and scalable health data sharing and exchange. Considering the requirements of both healthcare systems and blockchain solutions, seven novel software design patterns (i.e., Layered Ring, Guarded Update, Contract Manager, Database Connector, Database Proxy, Entity Registry, Tokenized Exchange, and Publisher-Subscriber) were proposed to mitigate the concerns while developing Decentralized Applications (DApps).

On one hand, from the studies in this Research Topic, the authors shed light on the benefits of adopting blockchain and DLT in healthcare as decentralization, immutability, transaction traceability, provenance establishment, enhanced security measures, uninterrupted availability, and programmability via smart contracts. On the other hand, potential areas to improve blockchain adoption include understanding the implications of associated costs, achieving clarity in domain-specific regulations and policies, harnessing technological advancements, encouraging organizational incentives, addressing scalability challenges, and mitigating the storage and communication overhead. Looking ahead, the trajectory of progress hints at the promising rise of reproducible architectures and prototypes rooted in the foundation of blockchain and DLT. These innovative frameworks will transcend theoretical boundaries with practical designs, which will serve as catalysts for a profound and transformative paradigm shift within the healthcare industry.

Author contributions

T-TK: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. PZ: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing.

Funding

TTK is supported by the U.S. NIH (R00HG009680, R01EB031030, R01GM118609, R01HG011066, R01HL136835, RM1HG011558, T15LM011271, U24LM013755, and U54HG012510). PZ is supported by NSF’s CISE-CRII program (Project No. 2153232). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH and NSF. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Kuo, T.-T., Bath, T., Ma, S., Pattengale, N., Yang, M., Cao, Y., et al. (2021). Benchmarking blockchain-based gene-drug interaction data sharing methods: A case study from the iDASH 2019 secure genome analysis competition blockchain track. Int. J. Med. Inf. (IJMI) 154, 104559. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104559

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, T.-T., and Pham, A. (2022). Quorum-based model learning on a blockchain hierarchical clinical research network using smart contracts. Int. J. Med. Inf. (IJMI) 169, 104924. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104924

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuo, T.-T., A. Pham, M. E., Edelson, J., Kim, J., Chan, Y., Gupta, L., et al. (2023). Blockchain-enabled immutable, distributed, and highly available clinical research activity logging system for federated COVID-19 data analysis from multiple institutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) 30 (6), 1167–1178.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., and Boulos, M. N. K. (2020). Blockchain solutions for healthcare. Precision medicine for investigators, practitioners and providers. Elsevier, 519–524.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., Downs, C., Le, N. T. U., Martin, C., Shoemaker, P., Wittwer, C., et al. (2020). Toward patient-centered stewardship of research data and research participant recruitment with blockchain technology. Front. Blockchain 3, 32. doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.00032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., and Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2022). Privacy-by-Design environments for large-scale health research and federated learning from data. Int. J. Environ. Res. public health 19 (19), 11876. doi:10.3390/ijerph191911876

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, P., and Kuo, T.-T. (2021). “The feasibility and significance of employing blockchain-based identity solutions in health care,” Block technology and innovations in business processes, smart innovation, systems and technologies (Singapore: Springer), 219.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: blockchain design pattern, blockchain implementation, blockchain technology, distributed ledger technology, healthcare industry, orphan drugs, medical insurance, patient data

Citation: Kuo T-T and Zhang P (2023) Editorial: Blockchain and distributed ledger technology—enabled architectures for improving healthcare. Front. Blockchain 6:1275474. doi: 10.3389/fbloc.2023.1275474

Received: 10 August 2023; Accepted: 21 August 2023;
Published: 30 August 2023.

Edited and reviewed by:

George M. Giaglis, University of Nicosia, Cyprus

Copyright © 2023 Kuo and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peng Zhang, peng.zhang@vanderbilt.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.