The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioinform.
Sec. Genomic Analysis
Volume 5 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2025.1498921
This article is part of the Research Topic From one genome to many genomes: the evolution of computational approaches for pangenomics and metagenomics analysis View all 5 articles
Choosing the most suitable NGS technology to combine with a standardized viral enrichment protocol for obtaining complete Avian Orthoreovirus genomes from metagenomic samples
Provisionally accepted- 1 Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, United States
- 2 Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States
Since viruses are obligate intracellular pathogens, sequencing their genomes results in metagenomic data from both the virus and the host. Virology researchers are constantly seeking new, cost-effective strategies and bioinformatic pipelines for the retrieval of complete viral genomes from these metagenomic samples. Avian orthoreoviruses (ARVs) pose a significant and growing threat to the poultry industry and frequently cause economic losses associated with disease in production birds.Currently available commercial vaccines are ineffective against new ARV variants and ARV outbreaks are increasing worldwide, requiring whole genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize strains that evade vaccines. This study compares the effectiveness of long-read and short-read sequencing technologies for obtaining ARV complete genomes. We used eight clinical isolates of ARV, each previously processed using our published viral genome enrichment protocol. Additionally, we evaluate three assembly methods to determine which provided the most complete and reliable whole genomes:De novo, reference-guided or hybrid. The results suggest that our ARV genome enrichment protocol caused some fragmentation of the viral cDNA that impacted the length of the long reads (but not the short reads) and, as a result, caused a failure to produce complete genomes via de novo assembly.Overall, we observed that regardless of the sequencing technology, the best quality assemblies were generated by mapping quality-trimmed reads to a custom reference genome. The custom reference genomes were in turn constructed with the publicly available ARV genomic segments that shared the highest sequence similarity with the contigs from short-read de novo assemblies. Hence, we conclude that short-read sequencing is the most suitable technology to combine with our ARV genome enrichment protocol.
Keywords: Avian orthoreovirus, ARV, whole genome sequencing, WGS, short-read sequencing, Long-read sequencing, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, ont
Received: 19 Sep 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Alvarez-Narvaez, Harrell, Nour, Mohanty and Conrad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Telvin Lee Harrell, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, United States
Islam Nour, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, United States
Sujit K Mohanty, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, United States
Steven Jerry Conrad, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Athens, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.