ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biosensors and Biomolecular Electronics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1581402

This article is part of the Research TopicBiomechanics, Sensing and Bio-inspired Control in Rehabilitation and Assistive Robotics, Volume IIView all 10 articles

Thoraco-Abdominal Biomechanical Model and Dual-Layer Control Method for Soft Robotic System with Application to Respiratory Assistance

Provisionally accepted
Wenzhuo  ZhiWenzhuo Zhi1,2Wei  ZhaoWei Zhao1,3Yan  ZhangYan Zhang4*Enming  ShiEnming Shi1,2Yangfan  ZhouYangfan Zhou1,2Bi  ZhangBi Zhang1*
  • 1State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation (CAS), Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
  • 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, Beijing, China
  • 3Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
  • 4Beihang University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Introduction:Respiratory dysfunction remains a critical challenge for patients transitioning from intensive care. However, existing assistive devices often fail to address both human-robot dynamic synchronization and patient safety due to the lack of interaction force control. Therefore, this study proposes a human-robot force interaction control strategy by integrating a flexible force sensor, aimed at achieving precise alignment between assistive forces and natural respiratory rhythms.Methods: In this study, a wearable respiratory assistive robotic system was developed to provide respiratory assistance by applying compressive force to the user's abdomen through soft origami actuators. A thoracoabdominal biomechanical transmission analysis was conducted to reveal the cross-domain force transfer mechanisms. To improve the human-robot adaptability, a dual-layer control architecture for force-pressure coordinated control was designed. Besides, through hardware integration and system building, along with the implementation of interaction force control, the respiratory assistive robot achieves effective respiratory assistance control.Results: Within the 12-40 breaths/min effective respiratory rate range, PEF, MTV, and MV improved significantly. PEF had a 20.12% average increase, MTV a 19.69% average boost, and MV a 15.5% average rise. Statistically, PEF and MV improvements were highly significant across this range, while MTV was highly significant at 20 breaths/min. Respiratory MV measurements segmented by phase showed that the robot enhanced expiratory function and improved inspiratory function at certain rates within 12-40 breaths/min.Discussion: The proposed human-robot interaction control system integrates hardware and control systems. Tests on healthy subjects in the effective operating range show that the robotic system can enhance subjects' overall respiratory function and ventilation function, offering a technical reference for future respiratory-assist robot development.

Keywords: Human-robot interaction control, cross-domain biomechanics, Wearable robots, duallayer control architecture, respiratory function enhancement

Received: 22 Feb 2025; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhi, Zhao, Zhang, Shi, Zhou and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Yan Zhang, Beihang University, Beijing, 100083, Beijing Municipality, China
Bi Zhang, State Key Laboratory of Robotics, Shenyang Institute of Automation (CAS), Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more