REVIEW article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1580490

This article is part of the Research TopicEffect of Mechanical Loading on the Tendon for Tissue Engineering ApproachesView all 3 articles

Tendon Regeneration Deserves Better: Focused Review on In vivo Models, Artificial Intelligence and 3D Bioprinting Approaches

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye
  • 2Firat University, Elazig, Elazig, Türkiye
  • 3Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Sakarya, Türkiye
  • 4Kutahya Health Sciences University, Kutahya, Kütahya, Türkiye
  • 5Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Plovdiv Medical University, Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • 6Research Institute, Plovdiv Medical University, Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
  • 7Musculoskeletal Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Wuerzburg, Bavaria, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Tendon regeneration has been one of the most challenging issues in orthopedics. Despite various surgical techniques and rehabilitation methods, tendon tears or ruptures cannot wholly regenerate and gain the load-bearing capacity the tendon tissue had before the injury. The enhancement of tendon regeneration mostly requires grafting or an artificial tendon-like tissue to replace the damaged tendon. Tendon tissue engineering offers promising regenerative effects with numerous techniques in the additive manufacturing context. 3D bioprinting is a widely used additive manufacturing method to produce tendon-like artificial tissues based on biocompatible substitutes. There are multiple techniques and bio-inks for fabricating innovative scaffolds for tendon applications. Nevertheless, there are still many drawbacks to overcome for the successful regeneration of injured tendon tissue. The most important target is to catch the highest similarity to the tissue requirements such as anisotropy, porosity, viscoelasticity, mechanical strength, and cell-compatible constructs. To achieve the best-designed artificial tendon-like structure, novel AI-based systems in the field of 3D bioprinting may unveil excellent final products to re-establish tendon integrity and functionality. AI-driven optimization can enhance bio-ink selection, scaffold architecture, and printing parameters, ensuring better alignment with the biomechanical properties of native tendons. Furthermore, AI algorithms facilitate real-time process monitoring and adaptive adjustments, improving reproducibility and precision in scaffold fabrication. Thus, in vitro biocompatibility and in vivo application-based experimental processes will make it possible to accelerate tendon healing and reach the required mechanical strength. Integrating AI-based predictive modeling can further refine these experimental processes to evaluate scaffold performance, cell viability, and mechanical durability, ultimately improving translation into clinical applications. Here in this review, 3D bioprinting approaches and AI-based technology incorporation were given in addition to in vivo models.

Keywords: Tendon rupture, tendon regeneration, Tissue Engineering, Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting, Biomaterials, scaffolds, Animal Models, AI systems

Received: 20 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 AYKORA, TAŞCI, Zahid Şahin, Tekeoğlu, Uzun, Sarafian and Docheva. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: DAMLA AYKORA, Faculty of Medicine, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Türkiye

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more