
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1569553
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: Cardiovascular patient-specific phantoms can improve patient care through testing and simulation. However, materials like silicone and 3D-printing polymers differ mechanically from biological tissues. Agilus30Clear, the primary material for 3D-printed phantoms, is much stiffer, nearly isotropic, and lacks strain hardening behaviour. To overcome these challenges, novel 3D voxel-printing approach could potentially address these limitations.Methods/Aim: This study aimed to explore the applicability of 3D voxel-printing and assess how different parameters (strand structure, density, orientation) affect mechanical properties and comparing them to established phantom materials and porcine cardiovascular tissues.Progressive uniaxial cyclic tension tests were performed across 9 stages, varying strain rates and target strain levels, with elastic modulus calculated for comparison. The goal was to stepwise assess, whether the overall material stiffness can be reduced, achieving anisotropy, and replicating strain hardening behaviour.Results: In the first step, varying the strand density the tested samples showed a 0-60% strain modulus of elasticity of 0.215 to 0.278 N/mm 2 , representing a 4-5 fold reduction in elastic modulus in that range, compared to the base material Agilus30Clear. In the second step, varying the orientation of the structures a significant influence on the elastic moduli was measured. The 0-60% modulus of elasticity dropped to 0.161-0.192 N/mm 2 , displaying anisotropic material behaviour. In the third step, two strand structures specifically designed to mimic fibre recruitment were tested. These resulted in slightly flatter (more linear) stress-strain curves compared to the non-linear strain-softening behaviour observed in Agilus30Clear. However, they still fell short of replicating the desired non-linear strain-hardening behaviour characteristic of fibre recruitment in cardiovascular tissuesIn the third step, the two strand structures specifically designed to mimic fibre recruitment were tested, which lead to slightly flatter (linear) stress-strain curves, when compared to the Agilus30Clears non-linear strain softening curves, but far from the desired non-linear strain hardening behaviour, of the fibre recruitment in cardiovascular tissues.The novel 3D voxel-printing material approach resulted in reduced elastic modulus, anisotropic behaviour, and strain hardening, providing a much closer representation of the mechanical behaviour of porcine cardiovascular tissues compared to other available
Keywords: Patient-Specific Phantoms, 3D-printing, Additive manufacturing, Artificial Cardiovascular tissue, Non-Linear Material Mechanics, Voxel-Printing, cardiovascular phantoms, Uniaxial tensile test
Received: 01 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Illi, Bergamin, Ilic, Stark, Bracher, Hofmann, Burger, Shiri, Haeberlin and Gräni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Christoph Gräni, Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.