![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomaterials
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1557279
This article is part of the Research Topic Functional Biomaterials and Seed Cells in Tissue Engineering View all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Bone defect repair remains a major challenge in modern medicine. Although bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) possess multilineage differentiation potential, traditional BMSC constructs are often limited in clinical applications due to insufficient osteogenic differentiation efficiency and inadequate vascularization. This study developed an innovative bone tissue engineering strategy by combining BMSCs with gelatin/polycaprolactone (GT/PCL) nanofiber membranes to form cell sheets, which were then modified with endothelial cells (ECs) on the surface. The sheets were subsequently rolled into three-dimensional scaffolds to systematically evaluate their osteogenic potential and underlying mechanisms. Results showed that electrospun GT/PCL nanofiber membranes exhibited uniform fiber structure (diameter 200-500 nm), successfully mimicking the microstructure of natural extracellular matrix. In vitro experiments demonstrated that after 14 days of culture, EC modification significantly enhanced the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs compared to unmodified controls, with approximately 3-fold increase in ALP expression (p<0.05) and 2.5-fold increase in angiogenic factor VEGF expression (p<0.01). Subcutaneous implantation in nude mice revealed superior bone formation capability of EC-modified constructs at both 4 and 8 weeks: micro-CT analysis showed bone density reaching 350 mg/cm³ , bone surface area approaching 400 mm² , and bone volume fraction of approximately 20%, significantly higher than control groups (p<0.0001). Immunohistochemical evaluation further confirmed more mature trabecular bone structure and richer vascular networks in EC-modified groups. Mechanistic studies revealed that EC modification promoted bone regeneration through three key pathways: optimization of local vascular microenvironment for improved nutrient supply, activation of intercellular synergistic signaling pathways, and reconstruction of physiological bone tissue microenvironment. This study not only validates the application value of this composite strategy in bone tissue engineering but also provides important theoretical basis for developing novel bone regeneration solutions.
Keywords: bone tissue engineering, cell sheet engineering, Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial cell modification, GT/PCL nanofiber membrane, Bone Regeneration
Received: 08 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhou, Wen, Zhang, Wang, Zhou and Liang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Guangdong Zhou, Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering Research, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200011, China
Xiaoqin Liang, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.