Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.

Sec. Biomechanics

Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1548265

This article is part of the Research Topic Use of Digital Human Modeling for Promoting Health, Care and Well-Being View all 12 articles

Development of repetitive traumatic brain injury risk function based on real-world accident reconstruction and wavelet packet energy analysis

Provisionally accepted
Tao Xiong Tao Xiong 1Qinghang Luo Qinghang Luo 1Qiuju Chen Qiuju Chen 1Liangliang Shi Liangliang Shi 2Aowen Duan Aowen Duan 3Shengxiong Liu Shengxiong Liu 1*Kui Li Kui Li 4*
  • 1 School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China
  • 2 China Automotive Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd, Chongqing, China
  • 3 Department of Medical Engineering, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
  • 4 College of Medical Information, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Existing evaluation criteria for pedestrian head impact injury only focus on single impact, and less attention has been paid to repetitive traumatic brain injury (rTBI), which is common in motor vehicle collisions, falls, and sports.Improving pedestrian collision protection safety requires a complete understanding of the tolerance of the repeated collisions of the human brain to injury. Therefore,this study was to collect data from 72 pedestrian collisions that were reconstructed using MADYMO and THUMS finite element head models(version 4.0.2). The evaluation metrics for rTBI were developed by integrating brain injury criteria based on time-domain features, including the Head Injury Criterion (HIC), Brain Injury Criterion (BrIC), Diffuse Axonal Multi-Axis General Evaluation (DAMAGE), and Maximum Principal Strain (MPS), with frequency-domain features obtained from wavelet packet transform energy analysis of head motion responses.The proposed brain tolerance for mild and severe rTBI was estimated through parametric survival analysis and presented as injury risk curves based on the selected injury metrics. Results showed a significant difference in brain injury tolerance between repetitive and single collisions. For the 50% probability of mild and severe brain injury in real accidents, the thresholds for rTBI metrics based on BrIC and DAMAGE were 1.085 and 1.513, and 0.494 and 0.678, respectively, all higher than the thresholds of single-impact reported in previous studies. However, the thresholds for repetitive head injury criteria based on MPS were 0.604 and 0.838, lower than the thresholds of single-impact reported in previous studies, which implies that the prediction of tolerance to repetitive brain injury is more consistent with tissue kinematics than head kinematics. This study developed injury risk functions (IRFs) for rTBI by integrating the amplitude-frequency characteristics of head responses and brain injury criteria. This knowledge further provides crucial support for understanding the tolerance to rTBI and enhancing pedestrian safety.

    Keywords: accident reconstruction, Wavelet packet transform, survival analysis, injury risk function, repetitive traumatic brain injury tolerance

    Received: 19 Dec 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Xiong, Luo, Chen, Shi, Duan, Liu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Shengxiong Liu, School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China
    Kui Li, College of Medical Information, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more