data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1538809
This article is part of the Research Topic Diagnostic and Predictive Roles of Computational Cardiovascular Hemodynamics in the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases View all 11 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background and aims: Hybrid atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a therapeutic option in non-paroxysmal AF. Our study examines cardiac mechanics changes after hybrid AF ablation plus epicardial closure of left atrial appendage (LAA).Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing hybrid AF ablation at UZ Brussel were evaluated. They received pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), posterior wall isolation (LAPWI), and epicardial LAA closure. LA and LV mechanics were analyzed, with the following measures obtained at baseline, post-ablation, and follow-up: 1) volumes (EDV, ESV); 2) ejection fraction (EF); 3) strain (ENDO GCS, ENDO GLS); 4) forces (LVLF, LVsysLF, LVim, LVs).Results: A total of 50 patients were included. At follow-up, LAEDV decreased from baseline [44.7 ml vs. 53.8 ml, P = 0.025]. LA ENDO GCS and GLS increased post-ablation, with further GLS improvement at follow-up. LV ENDO GCS and LV ENDO GLS also rose post-ablation [-26.7% vs. -22.5%, P < .001] and [-20.57% vs. -16.6%, P < .001], respectively. LVEF increased post-ablation [54.6% vs. 46.3%, P < .001]. There was an increase in all LV hemodynamic forces (HDFs) and in particular: LVLF and LVsysLF increased post-ablation [15.5% vs. 10.4%, P < .001] and [21.5% vs. 14.11%, P < .001], respectively. LVim also increased post-ablation [19.6% vs. 12.8%, P < .001]. Finally, there was an increase in LVs post-ablation compared to baseline [10.6% vs. 5.4%, P < .001]. Conclusions: In patients undergoing hybrid AF ablation, there was a significant and persistent improvement in the mechanical and hemodynamic functions of both LA and LV.
Keywords: Atrial Fibrillation, Hybrid ablation, Appendage closure, cardiac mechanics, Hemodynamic forces
Received: 03 Dec 2024; Accepted: 24 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Paparella, Pannone, Pedrizzetti, Talevi, Della Rocca, Sorgente, Kronenberger, PAPARELLA, Overeinder, Bala, Almorad, Ströker, Sieira, La Meir, Sarkozy, Brugada, Chierchia, Gharaviri and de Asmundis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Carlo de Asmundis, Heart Rhythm Management Center, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.