data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Nanobiotechnology
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1537856
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Biocompatible Piezoelectrics: Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The growing need for durable implants, driven by aging populations and increased trauma cases, highlights challenges like limited osseointegration and biofilm formation. 45S5 Bioglass® has demonstrated promise due to its bioactivity, antimicrobial properties, and ability to enhance osseointegration through electrical polarization. This study investigates the effects of incorporating different concentrations of ZrO2 and Fe3O4 into 45S5 Bioglass® to enhance its electrical and biological properties. Raman analysis revealed that these oxides influenced the amount of non-bridging oxygens (NBOs) affecting the glass network connectivity. Compared to Fe3O4, the bioglasses containing ZrO2 exhibited higher NBO content, resulting in improved electrical and biological properties. Electrical characterization was performed using impedance spectroscopy, confirming that the presence of ZrO2 increases the conductivity via ion mobility. Antibacterial activity was evaluated using the agar diffusion method, while bioactivity was assessed through SBF immersion tests. Results showed that Fe3O4 reduced both antibacterial activity and bioactivity, whereas ZrO2, particularly at 2 mol%, significantly enhanced these properties. Overall, ZrO2 addition improved the electrical and biological performance of 45S5 Bioglass®, while Fe3O4 showed limited benefits.
Keywords: Bioglass®, Zirconium, Iron, Bioactivity, Antibacterial activity, electrical properties, Bone Regeneration, Implant coatings
Received: 01 Dec 2024; Accepted: 17 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hammami, Graca, Gavinho, Regadas, Jakka, Padua, Silva, Sá Nogueira and Borges. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Manuel Pedro Graca, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.