data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 13 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1533088
This article is part of the Research Topic Biomechanical and Biomaterial Advances in Degenerative Diseases of Bone and Joint View all 16 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
OBJECTIVE: Screw loosening is a common complication following lumbar spine fixation surgery, yet the biomechanical outcomes after screw loosening remain rarely reported. This study aims to utilize finite element (FE) models to compare the biomechanical performance of PEEK rod dynamic fixation and titanium rod rigid fixation in the postoperative lumbar spine, exploring potential biomechanical mechanisms for re-stabilization of loosened screws.A FE model of the lumbar spine from L3 to the sacrum was developed using CT image segmentation. Four L4-S1 fixation models were constructed: PEEK rod dynamic fixation(PEEK model), titanium rod rigid fixation(titanium model), PEEK rod with pedicle screw loosening(PEEK-PSL model), and titanium rod with pedicle screw loosening(titanium -PSL model).A preload of 300 N was applied to the superior surface of L3. Stress distributions in the intervertebral discs, facet joints, pedicle screws, and rods were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical effects of different fixation methods.Across four physiological loading conditions, the stress differences in intervertebral discs, facet joints, and nucleus pulposus between the PEEK model and titanium model were minimal.However, vertebral body stress was significantly higher in the PEEK model, whereas screw and rod stresses were greater in the titanium model. Screw loosening further increased stress in all models.The S1 screw in the PEEK-PSL model exhibited lower and more uniform stress, while stress was concentrated at the screw-rod junction in the titanium-PSL model.The PEEK rod fixation system demonstrated superior stress distribution, reducing stress concentration risks and improving stability while minimizing screw loosening rates. In contrast, the titanium rod system offers advantages in scenarios requiring high rigidity, potentially making it more suitable for patients with greater stability needs.
Keywords: Pedicle screw loosening, Finite Element, Biomechanics, PEEK rods, Titanium rods
Received: 23 Nov 2024; Accepted: 27 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Jiang, Wang, Xu, Li, Feng, Qiu, Yang and Yu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Xing Yu, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.