The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 13 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1502669
This article is part of the Research Topic Biomechanical and Biomaterial Advances in Degenerative Diseases of Bone and Joint View all 15 articles
AI-based biplane X-ray image-guided method for distal radius fracture reduction
Provisionally accepted- 1 School of Clinical Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
- 2 Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
- 3 Shanghai University, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
- 4 Shandong Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital, Shandong, China
Background: In the course of manual reduction of distal radius fractures, many doctors rely on tactile perception to assess the displacement of the fracture. However, a more accurate determination of the severity of the fracture and the success of the reduction requires measurement software to annotate the fracture images, which is difficult to achieve in real-time in the actual reduction procedure. Which may lead to misdiagnosis when experienced doctors rely on their intuition. Therefore, developing an AI-based method for calculating fracture parameters is necessary to provide real-time display, particularly in fracture reduction machines. Methods: An AI-based method for automatically calculating radiographic parameters in distal radius fractures (DRF) was developed. Initially, anteroposterior (AP) and lateral (LAT) X-ray images of patients with distal radius fractures were collected from three hospitals and preprocessed. Following this, the contours of the radius and ulna were extracted using OpenCV, key points were detected, and the principal axes were calculated. Finally, the computed parameters including radial angle (RA), radial length (RL), ulnar variance (UV), and palmar tilt (PT) were calculated and displayed on the image. The advantages and disadvantages of several models were considered, and finally, the UNet neural network model was used as the core algorithm of the image segmentation model in this study. The segmentation accuracy for the radius and ulna in the AP and LAT X-ray images reached 91.31% and 88.63%, respectively. The average errors between the automated calculations of parameters RA, RL, UV, and PT and the manually annotated results by physicians were -1.36°, -1.7 mm, 0.66 mm, and -1.06°, respectively. The system has been initially deployed on the same computer that operates the radial fracture fracture repositioning robot.The automated parameter calculation method developed in this study accurately computes diagnostic parameters for assessing distal radius fractures and can be utilized in the image-guided reduction process of fracture rehabilitation robots. This method has the potential to evolve into an intelligent diagnostic tool for physicians, thereby enhancing the accuracy of distal radius fracture diagnosis.
Keywords: distal radius fracture reduction, artificial intelligence, X-ray image-guided, parameters computation, UNET
Received: 27 Sep 2024; Accepted: 03 Feb 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zha, Shen, Ma, Yu, Bi and Yang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Manqiu Yu, Shandong Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital, Shandong, 264400, China
Hongzheng Bi, Shandong Wendeng Osteopathic Hospital, Shandong, 264400, China
Hongbo Yang, School of Clinical Medicine, Department of Life Sciences and Medicine,University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.