Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 05 December 2024
Sec. Bioprocess Engineering

Repeated harvest enables efficient production of VSV-GP

Rebecca HabischRebecca Habisch1Peter NeubauerPeter Neubauer2Jorge Soza-RiedJorge Soza-Ried1Eva Puschmann
Eva Puschmann1*
  • 1Boehringer Ingelheim, Viral Therapeutics Center, Ochsenhausen, Germany
  • 2Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Institute of Biotechnology, Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Viral products keep gaining importance in multiple therapeutic fields. Considering the scale and production slot limitations, optimizing the outcome of every manufacturing batch is essential to minimize costs and make this therapeutic modality broadly available to patients. Most manufacturing processes for oncolytic viruses currently in clinical studies are based on a batch process. Here, we evaluated the benefits in terms of titer increase of a repeated harvest approach and compared it to the classical batch production process. While no effect on cell density was observed, the cumulated infectious titer following repeated harvest was over 400 times higher than the evaluated batch process yield. This shows that repeated harvests or perfusion have the potential to boost viral yields and should be considered when deciding on a process format for production.

1 Introduction

In the last decade, viral products gained importance both as gene therapy vectors and oncolytic therapy. Ongoing trials include a gene therapy for hemophilia A via adeno-associated viruses (Clinicaltrials, 2024) and the use of various oncolytic viruses for lung cancer treatment (Sakhi et al., 2023). Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is widely known for its oncolytic properties. In 2011 wildtype VSV was pseudo typed with the glycoprotein (GP) of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), eradicating previous issues of neurotoxicity (Muik et al., 2011). Since then, the resulting VSV-GP has shown potential for various applications. It was first proven to be a potent viral vaccine vector (Tober et al., 2014), shortly followed by first studies demonstrating its efficacy as cancer therapy (Dold et al., 2016; Kimpel et al., 2018). In 2022 the first clinical trial including VSV-GP started, investigating its efficacy against advanced and refractory solid tumors both as monotherapy or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (Porosnicu et al., 2022).

Production of VSV and VSV-GP is frequently performed in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. The HEK293 cell line was transformed using sheared DNA of human adenovirus (Graham et al., 1977). HEK293 cells can grow in suspension culture, thus providing well-known benefits regarding scalability, and culture handling. Nevertheless, with increasing demand and limited production capacities, the development of reproducible and robust processes resulting in high volumetric virus yields is essential. While the generation of suspension cell cultures has been critical for increasing viral titers, further improvements can be obtained by additives such as caffeine (Ellis et al., 2011), sodium butyrate (Olsen and Sechelski, 1995), potassium chloride or sodium chloride (Yu et al., 2021). Approaches focused on increasing viral titers by improvements in the manufacturing process include the implementation of fed-batch or perfusion. A fed-batch- process ensures the supply of required nutrients via specifically adjusted feed-media. Recently, a fed-batch process has been combined with a mathematical model to further optimize the outcome of baculovirus production (Sharma et al., 2023). Perfusion provides the additional benefit of removing potentially inhibitory host cell metabolites and, depending on the chosen filter, offers a possibility of continuous harvesting. Depending on the stability of a virus at cell culture conditions, perfusion with continuous harvest might be combined with subsequent storage of material to increase the total virus yield. In general, perfusion provides a consistent cellular environment, i.e., by supplying higher cell densities with feed media adjusted to the requirements of distinct process phases. Perfusion faces various challenges for its successful implementation. These include complex process controls and a lack of suitable scale-down models (Mayrhofer and Kunert, 2019). While several studies have already successfully addressed some of the obstacles, such as filter fouling by the use of acoustic settlers in perfusion processes with continuous harvest, a major task still remains to be solved with respect to its implementation for manufacturing at a large scale (Gränicher et al., 2021). There is a need for continuous supply of one or more feed media and a collection of spent medium, requiring additional containers in proximity of the bioreactor. As a result, many production sites established for batch or fed-batch production processes are not fit to accommodate these demands. Furthermore, the addition of harvest additives like NaCl cannot be easily applied in the perfusion set up and poses a specific challenge. An intermediate pulse-based addition of the salt and thus, the introduction of further process steps, would make the process even more complex.

In this study we evaluated the implementation of a perfusion process for the production of a recombinant VSV-GP carrying a cargo immunomodulating protein. For this, repeated batch harvests were performed and compared to a batch process. With the aim of including approaches representing continuous harvest and product retention, respectively, one approach included NaCl treatment before harvests to enhance virus recovery as described previously (Gautam et al., 2022), while another was performed without intermittent NaCl treatments. While this NaCl treatment doubled absolute virus harvest, the main effect was found to originate in media exchange, which caused a 400-fold increase in virus yield compared to the maximum of the batch control. Altogether, these data demonstrate that media exchange has the capacity to intensely boost virus yield in comparison to batch processes performed in unoptimized media. They further suggest that the majority of virus is produced within a short timeframe, although further investigation and closer monitoring is required to be certain.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Cell culture and production of recombinant VSV-GP using repeated harvest

HEK293 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were cultured in a chemically defined, serum-free in-house media at 37°C with 5% CO2 at 120 rpm. For virus production, HEK293 cells were seeded at 7.5E + 05 cells/mL and kept in the culture conditions described for 96 h in a volume of 25 mL in shake flasks (Corning, #431143). 80% media exchange for titer optimization (Elahi et al., 2019) was then performed via centrifugation at 180 × g, 5 min and exchange of supernatant. Following media exchange, cells were infected with recombinant VSV-GP at an MOI of 0.0005.

At 36, 44 and 52 h post infection (hpi) intermediate harvests were performed. 80% of the culture volume was harvested after centrifugation at 180 × g for 5 min and replaced with fresh medium. A total of three conditions were compared to a batch process. The first condition included treatment of cultures with NaCl before each harvest to increase virus recovery as described previously (Gautam et al., 2022). In the second condition harvests were performed without NaCl treatment. For full evaluation of process formats the third condition combined NaCl-free intermediate harvests with NaCl treatment at only the final harvest. For this, samples were taken from the NaCl free cultures of condition two before the final harvest and treated with NaCl as described for condition one. The batch process (control) was kept in culture without media exchanges and sampled at the same time points as harvests were performed in described test conditions.

2.2 Sample collection and treatment

Samples (1 mL) were collected from cultures and harvest fractions, which include all intermediate harvests and the final harvest. Cultures were sampled before every harvest to trace virus production and cell density, and after intermediate harvests to investigate the effect of the intermediate harvest on the respective viral titer in culture. To ensure comparability between the viral titers measured in NaCl-treated and untreated cultures, the samples collected from untreated cultures were subsequently treated with NaCl to have all virus particles released in that sample (see Figure 1, and differences in handling highlighted by blue and green arrows). Samples were centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min, and the supernatant was subsequently aliquoted and stored at −80°C.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Scheme of repeated harvest setup with (A) and without (B) NaCl treatment of cultures prior to harvest. Differences in handling are highlighted by blue and green arrows. Blue: Presence of NaCl in the culture and samples. Green: Addition of NaCl to samples of untreated cultures for comparability reasons.

2.3 Cell count and viability

Cell counts and viability were analyzed from samples taken before harvest steps using a NucleoCounter NC-202 (Chemotec).

2.4 Infectious titer analysis via TCID50 assay and calculation of cumulated titer

Samples taken from shake flask and harvest fractions were tested for recombinant VSV-GP infectious titer via TCID50 measurement as described previously (Hochdorfer et al., 2022). Briefly, BHK-21 cells were cultured in GMEM -BHK-21 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 5% tryptose phosphate broth. They were seeded at 104 cells/well in 96 well plates and infected after 24 ± 4 h 72 ± 4 h post infection wells showing cytopathic effect (CPE) were identified and the infectious titer was calculated using the Spearmen-Kärber method (Spearman, 1908; Kärber, 1931). The cumulated TCID50 was then determined by calculating the absolute TCID50 (titer in harvest multiplied by the harvest volume) for every timepoint and by subsequently adding them together.

2.5 Genomic titer analysis via RT-PCR

Viral RNA was extracted using the MagMax Viral/Pathogen Kit (Applied Biosystems, #A42352) in combination with the King Fisher Flex Purification System (Thermo Scientific). Genomic copies were quantified using the TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, #4444434) and the QuantStudio 6 Flex plate reader.

3 Results and discussion

The production yield of recombinant VSV-GP obtained in repeated harvest approaches was compared to the one of a batch process. In addition, it was evaluated whether NaCl treatment before harvests has an impact on the virus yield. Harvests were performed 36, 44, 52 and 60 h post infection.

3.1 Cell culture parameters are not affected by repeated harvests

First, the effect of multiple harvests on cell culture was analyzed by measuring the total number of cells and their viability at every intermediate harvest and at the end of the harvest process. As displayed in Figure 2, a slight decrease in viability was observed in the last sample of cultures treated with NaCl before intermediate harvests. In general, total cell count and viability remained similar between all conditions.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Cell culture parameters for recombinant VSV-GP production in repeated batch harvest mode in HEK293 cells. (A) Total cell count/mL (B) Viability. n = 3 (biological replicates).

3.2 VSV-GP titers in culture recovers and increase after intermediate harvests

Infectious viral titers were tracked by sampling cultures before every harvest step and after addition of fresh media, as displayed in Figure 3. Repeated harvest caused viral titers to reach maxima of over 230 times higher than observed in the batch process. Titers in cultures with intermediate harvests increased until 52 hpi when these intermediate harvests included NaCl treatment (blue line), and until 60 hpi when kept NaCl-free (p < 0.05). The batch process contrarily was in, or entered, the plateau phase around 36 hpi. In all evaluated conditions the genomic titer (Figure 3B) showed a similar trend as the infectious titer. The ratio of infectious to genomic titer followed no visible trend for repeated harvest conditions, stating that ratio of infectious to total virus particles was unaffected by the used harvest approach or repeated harvest itself (Figure 3C).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. VSV-GP titers in cultures harvested with NaCl treatment before intermediate harvests (blue circles) and without NaCl treatment (green triangles) (n = 4) in comparison to a batch process (black squares, n = 2). (A) Infectious particle titer (B) Genomic titer (C) TCID50/genomic copies ratio. Slashed lines indicate intermediate harvests, the solid line indicates the process end. n = 4 (biological replicates). Respective data is provided in Supplementary Table S1.

As expected based on previous studies (Gautam et al., 2022), treatment with NaCl to increase virus recovery in harvests resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) drop of infectious and genomic titers in respective cultures (Figures 3A, B). Interestingly, these titer drops are unimportant with respect to the increase of virus titer following the first two intermediate harvests. At 44 hpi and 52 hpi, viral titers have increased over 15-fold in comparison to the titer measured in culture before the respective previous harvest. After the third harvest step at 52 hpi, virus production slowed down. Less new virus particles were produced, and the amount of virus removed by intermediate harvest with NaCl treatment was not fully replaced, as shown by the final harvest titers being lower than the ones obtained at 52 hpi. In cultures harvested without NaCl, no significant amount of virus is removed from cultures during the individual harvest steps. Therefore, all produced virus particles accumulated, causing the maximum titer to be reached at the final harvest at 60 hpi.

The increased titer observed in repeated harvest approaches suggests two possible scenarios; the plateau in titer seen in the batch process is due to either media depletion of required nutrients to produce further virus particles, or cell’s virus production/infection are inhibited by spent media.

3.3 VSV-GP titers in harvest fractions and cumulative harvest show majority of product in final harvest

In line with the above, repeated harvest boosted both infectious (Figure 4A) and viral genomic harvest titer (Figure 4B). The highest titers observed in a single (intermediate) harvest fraction were over 150 times higher in all repeated harvest approaches than in the batch process. In cultures harvested with NaCl (blue bars) the harvested titer was equal to the titer measured in the respective culture, while in cultures harvested without NaCl (dark green) a significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between viral titers in cultures and in the harvest. As the viral titers measured at 60 hpi after NaCl-free intermediate harvests were the overall highest titers seen in culture, an additional final harvest including NaCl treatment was performed (light green). When compared to the NaCl-free harvest, this single NaCl step resulted in more than double the amount of infectious virus, which would represent a more than 400 times increase compared to the evaluated batch process.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. VSV-GP titers in harvest fractions with NaCl treatment before harvests (blue, “/” striped), without NaCl treatment (green, “\” striped), and with NaCl treatment only before the final harvest (light green, “-” striped) in comparison to a batch process (black, solid). (A) Infectious particle titer (B) Genomic titer (C) calculated cumulated infectious titer. n = 4 (biological replicates). Significance has been calculated for differences between measured values in (A) and (B). Significance of p < 0.05 are indicated by an Asterix (*). The presented data is provided in Supplementary Table S2.

Similarly, the highest cumulated infectious titers (Figure 4C) were received by using NaCl either for all, or at least for the final harvest at 60 hpi. These two options resulted in similar cumulated infectious titer at the end of the process, which was on average 400 times higher than the virus yield from the batch process (52 hpi). This further indicates that NaCl treatment before intermediate harvests has no influence on the positive effect of media exchange. It merely determines if the majority of infectious viruses is harvested in one culture volume during the final harvest or distributed over multiple harvest volumes.

Considering potential downstream activities, it may be beneficial to keep most produced viruses in a relatively small volume. Thus, the superior condition based on the here presented results would consist of regular media exchanges or perfusion with product retention, and a final harvest including NaCl treatment. Considering the retardation of virus production towards the end of the process, the final harvest would be proposed between 52 and 60 hpi.

Altogether, the demonstrated effect of media exchange boosts the low titer from the batch process by a factor of over 400. Similar titers have been achieved by others for related viruses (Elahi et al., 2019). However, in previous studies the main benefit of perfusion for VSV particle production seems to be based on increased cell density (Göbel et al., 2024). In contrast, the media exchange performed in this study had no effect on the number of cells or another parameter associated to their culture (Figure 2). This suggests either the removal of inhibitors of infection or virus production, or replacement of depleted nutrients by the media exchange.

4 Conclusion

The presented study compares repeated harvest approaches with a batch process for the production of recombinant VSV-GP. Here we demonstrated that low viral titers can be boosted by repeated media exchanges via replacement of 80% of intermediate harvest volumes with fresh media. In comparison to the batch process, the total yield of infectious virus was strongly increased, however in processes where media and seed virus have been optimized, effectiveness of media exchange might be lower. The maximum harvest of infectious virus is achieved with NaCl treatment at only the final harvest step, which in this study was at 60 hpi. In the respective approach, all intermediate harvests taken together contained less than 11% of the cumulated virus harvest. Considering the TCID50 assay has a geometric coefficient of variance (GCV) of up to 21% (Hochdorfer et al., 2022), this amount is negligible regarding total harvest. Thus, titer collection from intermediate harvest does not increase the final harvest titer sufficiently to justify the implementation of such a complex process manufacturing step. The highest increase in viral titers was observed between 44 and 52 hpi. After 52 hpi, viral particle production slowed down, but did not stop entirely. This suggests the majority of virus is produced at some point around 52 hpi; based on unpublished data regarding the cycle time for recombinant VSV-GP, we assume an 8-h production window. In summary, we showed that media exchanges can boost previously low viral titers in a batch process by more than 2 orders of magnitude. While media exchange was highly beneficial, semi-continuous harvest brought no benefit. Lastly, the effect of NaCl treatment prior to harvest efficiently improved virus particle release and doubled total virus yield in comparison to NaCl-free final harvest.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies on humans in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used.

Author contributions

RH: Writing–review and editing, Writing–original draft, Visualization, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. PN: Writing–review and editing, Supervision. JS-R: Writing–review and editing, Supervision. EP: Writing–review and editing, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank Johannes Wieland and Ingo Gorr for the valuable discussions and their support. We thank Sabrina Müller and Daniel Birk for their excellent technical support.

Conflict of interest

Authors RH, JSR, and EP were employed by Boehringer Ingelheim. All experiments were performed in Boehringer Ingelheim laboratories, using materials ordered through Boehringer Ingelheim and the publication was accepted by the Boehringer Ingelheim patent office.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338/full#supplementary-material

References

Clinicaltrials (2024). Study of a Gene Therapy Treatment for Hemophilia A. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06297486?intr=adeno&sort=StudyFirstPostDate&rank=10#study-plan (Accessed August 1, 2024).

Google Scholar

Dold, C., Urbiola, C. R., Wollmann, G., Egerer, L., Muik, A., Bellmann, L., et al. (2016). Application of interferon modulators to overcome partial resistance of human ovarian cancers to VSV-GP oncolytic viral therapy. Mol. Ther. - Oncolytics 3, 16021. doi:10.1038/mto.2016.21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Elahi, S. M., Shen, C. F., and Gilbert, R. (2019). Optimization of production of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) in suspension serum-free culture medium at high cell density. J. Biotechnol. 289, 144–149. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.11.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ellis, B. L., Potts, P. R., and Porteus, M. H. (2011). Creating higher titer lentivirus with caffeine. Hum. Gene Ther. 22, 93–100. doi:10.1089/hum.2010.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gautam, S., Xin, D., Garcia, A. P., and Spiesschaert, B. (2022). Single-step rapid chromatographic purification and characterization of clinical stage oncolytic VSV-GP. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 992069. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.992069

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Göbel, S., Pelz, L., Silva, C. A. T., Brühlmann, B., Hill, C., Altomonte, J., et al. (2024). Production of recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based vectors by tangential flow depth filtration. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 108, 240. doi:10.1007/s00253-024-13078-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Graham, F. L., Smiley, J., Russell, W. C., and Nairn, R. (1977). Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. J. Gen. Virol. 36, 59–72. doi:10.1099/0022-1317-36-1-59

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gränicher, G., Babakhani, M., Göbel, S., Jordan, I., Marichal-Gallardo, P., Genzel, Y., et al. (2021). A high cell density perfusion process for Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara production: process integration with inline DNA digestion and cost analysis. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118, 4720–4734. doi:10.1002/bit.27937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hochdorfer, D., Businger, R., Hotter, D., Seifried, C., and Solzin, J. (2022). Automated, label-free TCID50 assay to determine the infectious titer of virus-based therapeutics. J. Virol. Methods 299, 114318. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kärber, G. (1931). Beitrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Schmiedeb. Arch. Für Exp. Pathol. Und Pharmakol. 162, 480–483. doi:10.1007/bf01863914

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kimpel, J., Urbiola, C., Koske, I., Tober, R., Banki, Z., Wollmann, G., et al. (2018). The oncolytic virus VSV-GP is effective against malignant melanoma. Viruses 10, 108. doi:10.3390/v10030108

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mayrhofer, P., and Kunert, R. (2019). Screening of media supplements for high-performance perfusion cultures by design of experiment. Methods Mol. Biol. 2095, 27–39. doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-0191-4_3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Muik, A., Kneiske, I., Werbizki, M., Wilflingseder, D., Giroglou, T., Ebert, O., et al. (2011). Pseudotyping vesicular stomatitis virus with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoproteins enhances infectivity for glioma cells and minimizes neurotropism. J. Virol. 85, 5679–5684. doi:10.1128/jvi.02511-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olsen, J. C., and Sechelski, J. (1995). Use of sodium butyrate to enhance production of retroviral vectors expressing CFTR cDNA. Hum. Gene Ther. 6, 1195–1202. doi:10.1089/hum.1995.6.9-1195

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porosnicu, M., Quinson, A.-M., Crossley, K., Luecke, S., and Lauer, U. M. (2022). Phase I study of VSV-GP (BI 1831169) as monotherapy or combined with ezabenlimab in advanced and refractory solid tumors. Future Oncol. 18, 2627–2638. doi:10.2217/fon-2022-0439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sakhi, H., Arabi, M., Ghaemi, A., Movafagh, A., and Sheikhpour, M. (2023). Oncolytic viruses in lung cancer treatment: a review article. Immunotherapy 16, 75–97. doi:10.2217/imt-2023-0124

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, S., Mahadevan, J., Giri, L., and Mitra, K. (2023). Identification of optimal flow rate for culture media, cell density, and oxygen toward maximization of virus production in a fed-batch baculovirus-insect cell system. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 120, 3529–3542. doi:10.1002/bit.28558

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1908). The method of ‘right and wrong cases’ (‘constant stimuli’) without gauss's formulae. Br. J. Psychol. 2, 227–242. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1908.tb00176.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tober, R., Banki, Z., Egerer, L., Muik, A., Behmüller, S., Kreppel, F., et al. (2014). VSV-GP: a potent viral vaccine vector that boosts the immune response upon repeated applications. J. Virol. 88, 4897–4907. doi:10.1128/jvi.03276-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, C., Trivedi, P. D., Chaudhuri, P., Bhake, R., Johnson, E. J., Caton, T., et al. (2021). NaCl and KCl mediate log increase in AAV vector particles and infectious titers in a specific/timely manner with the HSV platform. Mol. Ther. - Methods Clin. Dev. 21, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2021.02.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: VSV-GP, oncolytic virus production, bioprocess development, repeated-batch, perfusion

Citation: Habisch R, Neubauer P, Soza-Ried J and Puschmann E (2024) Repeated harvest enables efficient production of VSV-GP. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 12:1505338. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1505338

Received: 02 October 2024; Accepted: 19 November 2024;
Published: 05 December 2024.

Edited by:

Krist V. Gernaey, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

Reviewed by:

Jianguo Zhang, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, China
Katja Bettenbrock, Max Planck Society, Germany

Copyright © 2024 Habisch, Neubauer, Soza-Ried and Puschmann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Eva Puschmann, ZXZhLnB1c2NobWFubkBib2VocmluZ2VyLWluZ2VsaGVpbS5jb20=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.