The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 12 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1495266
Why Do Patients with Isolated PCL Rupture Experience No Subjective Knee Joint Instability During Walking? An In Vivo Biomechanical Study
Provisionally accepted- 1 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, The Eighth Clinical Medical College, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan City, China
- 2 Department of Sports Medicine, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China
- 3 Department of Rehabilitation Therapy Teaching and Research, Gannan Health Vocational College, Gan Zhou, China
- 4 School of Materials Science and Engineering (National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction), South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
- 5 Department of Orthopaedics, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical Universit, Guangzhou, China
- 6 Department of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medic, Foshan, China
- 7 Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,, The Eighth Clinical Medical College, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan City, China
Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the kinematic changes in the knee joint during walking in patients with isolated PCL-deficiency (PCLD) to determine the presence of walking-related joint instability (mechanical instability—abnormal displacement form structural damage). Additionally, the study seeks to provide biomechanical insights into the observed differences between subjective and objective assessments. Methods: 35 healthy volunteers and 27 patients with isolated PCLD (both involved and uninvolved sides) were included in the study. All participants walked on a treadmill at a self-selected comfortable speed. An optical 3D motion capture system was employed to collect six degrees of freedom kinematic data of the knee joint during walking. Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) was employed, using independent and paired t-tests to evaluate differences between the healthy control group and the PCLD group, as well as between the involved and uninvolved sides, respectively. Results: Compared with the healthy control group, posterior tibial displacement (the main indicator for anterior-posterior instability) of the involved limb was significantly decreased during 79-94%. additionally, knee flexion angles of the involved limb were significantly increased compared with healthy control group during 0-5% and 95-99% of the gait cycle and significantly decreased during 66-87%; In the uninvolved side, adaptive gait changes were observed, with knee flexion angles significantly reduced during 20-50% and 64-89% of the gait cycle and posterior tibial displacement significantly reduced during 60-94% compared with the healthy control group; Compared to the uninvolved limb, the involved limb showed increased internal rotation during 62-71% of the gait cycle and increased knee flexion during 8-53%, with no significant differences in other dimensions. Conclusion: From a biomechanical perspective, patients with PCL rupture exhibit no joint instability during walking. Compared to the healthy control group, the involved leg shows a significant reduction in posterior tibial displacement and a diminished range of knee flexion. Clinical evaluations of PCLD should incorporate dynamic functional assessments, thereby providing a more comprehensive basis for treatment decisions.
Keywords: Posterior Cruciate Ligament, Joint Instability, Kinematic, Gait, Biomechanics
Received: 21 Oct 2024; Accepted: 19 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Lu, Chen, jp_1214@163.com, Huang, Gao, Zhao, Li, He and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jinpeng jp_1214@163.com, School of Materials Science and Engineering (National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction), South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
Wenhan Huang, Department of Orthopaedics, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical Universit, Guangzhou, China
Junqing Gao, Department of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medic, Foshan, China
Lilian Zhao, Department of Sports Medicine, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China
Shilin Li, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine,, The Eighth Clinical Medical College, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan City, 528000, China
Lilei He, Department of Sports Medicine, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.