Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1457871

The biomechanical evaluation of metacarpal fractures fixation methods during finger movements: A finite element study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 School of Basic Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China
  • 2 Postdoctoral Innovation Practice Base, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, China
  • 3 Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • 4 Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong, China
  • 5 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digital Medicine and Biomechanics, National Key Discipline of Human Anatomy, Guangdong, China
  • 6 School of Basic Medical Science, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  • 7 Department of Orthopedics,Central Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China
  • 8 School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • 9 Department of Orthopaedic, The First Hospital of Qiqihar, Qiqihar, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Abstract Objective: This study used finite element analysis to simulate four commonly used fixation methods for metacarpal shaft oblique fractures during finger motion and evaluate their biomechanical performance. The aim was to provide evidence for clinically selecting the optimal fixation method, guiding early rehabilitation treatment, and reducing the risk of complications. Methods: Finite element analysis simulated dynamic proximal phalanx motion (60° flexion, 20° extension, 20° adduction, and 20° abduction). We analysed stress, displacement, and distributions for dorsal plates, intramedullary nails, Kirschner wire, and screw fixation methods. Results: At 60° of finger flexion and 20° of abduction, plate fixation demonstrated greater stability and minimal displacement, with a peak displacement of 0.19mm; however, it showed higher stress levels in all motion states, increasing the risk of failure. The stability of the intramedullary nail was similar to that of the dorsal plate, with a maximum displacement difference of 0.04mm, and it performed better than the dorsal plate during adduction of 20°. Kirschner wire showed the highest stress levels of 81.6 Mpa during finger flexion of 60°, indicating a greater risk of failure and unstable displacement. Screws had lower stress levels in all finger motion states, reducing the risk of failure, but had poorer stability. Stress and displacement distributions showed that the dorsal plate, intramedullary nail, and Kirschner wire mainly bore stress on the implants, concentrating near the fracture line and the proximal metacarpal. In contrast, the screws partially bore stress in the screw group. The anterior end of the metacarpal mainly hosted the maximum displacement. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that under simulated finger motion states, the dorsal plate fixation method provides the best stability in most cases, especially during finger flexion and abduction. However, high stress levels also indicate a higher risk of failure. The intramedullary nail is similar to the dorsal plate in stability and performs better in certain motion states. Kirschner wire exhibits the highest risk of failure during flexion. Although screws have poorer stability in some motion states, they offer a lower risk of failure. These findings provide important reference and surgical selection strategies for treating metacarpal fractures.

    Keywords: oblique metacarpal shaft fracture, Finite Element Analysis, dorsal plate, Intramedullary nail, Kirschner wire, Screw

    Received: 01 Jul 2024; Accepted: 27 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Liu, Luo, Lin, Lv, VASHISTH, Li, Shen, Xu and Huang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Lincong Luo, Postdoctoral Innovation Practice Base, Yuebei People's Hospital, Shaoguan, 512025, China
    Xiaoyu Lv, School of Basic Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China
    Jiaying Li, Guangdong Engineering Research Center for Translation of Medical 3D Printing Application, Guangdong, China
    Lin Xu, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
    Wenhua Huang, School of Basic Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.