Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Bioprocess Engineering
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1435695
This article is part of the Research Topic Bioprocess and Bioengineering for Waste Treatment and Recycling View all 6 articles

Biofilm mitigation in hybrid chemical-biological upcycling of waste polymers

Provisionally accepted
Hunter Stoddard Hunter Stoddard 1Daniel Kulas Daniel Kulas 1Ali Zolghadr Ali Zolghadr 1Sulihat Aloba Sulihat Aloba 1Laura G. Schaerer Laura G. Schaerer 2Lindsay Putman Lindsay Putman 2Isabel Valencia Isabel Valencia 2Jeffrey A. Lacey Jeffrey A. Lacey 3David R. Shonnard David R. Shonnard 1Stephen Techtmann Stephen Techtmann 2Rebecca G. Ong Rebecca G. Ong 1*
  • 1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, United States
  • 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, United States
  • 3 Biological Processing Department, Idaho National Laboratory (DOE), Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Accumulation of plastic waste in the environment is a serious global issue. To deal with this, there is a need for improved and more efficient methods for plastic waste recycling. One approach is to depolymerize plastic using pyrolysis or chemical deconstruction followed by microbial-upcycling of the monomers into more valuable products. Microbial consortia may be able to increase stability in response to process perturbations and adapt to diverse carbon sources, but may be more likely to form biofilms that foul process equipment, increasing the challenge of harvesting the cell biomass. To better understand the relationship between bioprocess conditions, biofilm formation, and ecology within the bioreactor, in this study a previously-enriched microbial consortium (LS1_Calumet) was grown on (1) ammonium hydroxide-depolymerized polyethylene terephthalate (PET) monomers and (2) the pyrolysis products of polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP). Bioreactor temperature, pH, agitation speed, and aeration were varied to determine the conditions that led to the highest production of planktonic biomass and minimal formation of biofilm. The community makeup and diversity in the planktonic and biofilm states were evaluated using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Results showed that there was very little microbial growth on the liquid product from pyrolysis under all fermentation conditions. When grown on the chemically-deconstructed PET the highest cell density (0.69 g/L) with minimal biofilm formation was produced at 30 °C, pH 7, 100 rpm agitation, and 10 sL/hr airflow. Results from 16S rRNAsequencing showed that the planktonic phase had higher observed diversity than the biofilm, and that Rhodococcus, Paracoccus, and Chelatococcus were the most abundant genera for all process conditions. Biofilm formation by Rhodococcus sp. and Paracoccus sp. isolates was typically lower than the full microbial community and varied based on the carbon source. Ultimately, the results indicate that biofilm formation within the bioreactor can be significantly reduced by optimizing process conditions and using pure cultures or a less diverse community, while maintaining high biomass productivity. The results of this study provide insight into methods for upcycling plastic waste and how process conditions can be used to control the formation of biofilm in bioreactors.

    Keywords: Plastic, upcycling, Chemical-Biological Recycling, Biofilms, Biodiversity, Pyrolysis, Depolymerization

    Received: 20 May 2024; Accepted: 28 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Stoddard, Kulas, Zolghadr, Aloba, Schaerer, Putman, Valencia, Lacey, Shonnard, Techtmann and Ong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Rebecca G. Ong, Department of Chemical Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.