Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1412811
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights into the manufacturing, storage and transport of therapies for regenerative medicine: Challenges and Changing perspectives View all articles

Key Quality Parameter Comparison of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Product Cryopreserved in Different Cryopreservation Solutions for Clinical Applications

Provisionally accepted
Yuan Tan Yuan Tan 1,2Mahmoud Salkhordeh Mahmoud Salkhordeh 1Aidan B. Murray Aidan B. Murray 1Luciana Souza-Moreira Luciana Souza-Moreira 1Duncan J. Stewart Duncan J. Stewart 1,2Shirley H. Mei Shirley H. Mei 1*
  • 1 Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada
  • 2 University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Cryopreservation is a critical process of cell products for achieving a commercial viability through wide scale adoption. By preserving cells in a lower temperature, cryopreservation enables a product to be off-the-shelf and ready for infusion. An optimized cryopreservation strategy can maintain the viability, phenotype, and potency of thawed mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) while being regulatory compliant. We compared three clinical-ready formulations with one research cryopreservation solutions and evaluated key quality parameters of post thawed MSCs.MSCs were cryopreserved at 3, 6, and 9 million cells/mL (M/mL) in four different cryopreservation solutions: NutriFreez (10% Dimethyl Sulfoxide [DMSO]), Plasmalyte A (PLA)/5% human albumin (HA)/10% DMSO (PHD10), CryoStor CS5 (5% DMSO), and CryoStor CS10 (10% DMSO). To establish post thaw viability, cells were evaluated with no dilution of DMSO (from 3 M/mL), 1:1 dilution (from 6 M/mL), or 1:2 dilution (from 9 M/mL) with PLA/5% HA, to achieve uniform concentration at 3 M/mL. Cell viability was measured at 0-, 2-, 4-, and 6-hour post thaw with Trypan blue exclusion and Annexin V/PI staining. Dilution (1:2) of final cell products from 9M/mL resulted in an improvement of cell viability over 6 hours but showed a trend of decreased recovery. MSCs cryopreserved in solutions with 10% DMSO displayed comparable viabilities and recoveries up to 6 hours after thawing, whereas a decreasing trend was noted in cell viability and recovery with CS5. Cells from all groups exhibited surface marker characteristics of MSCs. We further evaluated cell proliferation after 6-day recovery in culture. While cells cryopreserved in NutriFreez and PHD10 presented similar cell growth post thaw, MSCs cryopreserved in CS5 and CS10 at 3 M/mL and 6M/mL showed 10-fold less proliferative capacity. No significant differences were observed between MSCs cryopreserved in NutriFreez and PHD10 in their potency to inhibit T cell proliferation and improve monocytic phagocytosis.MSCs can be cryopreserved up to 9 M/mL without losing notable viability and recovery, while exhibiting comparable post thaw potency with NutriFreez and PHD10. These results highlight the importance of key parameter testing for selecting the optimal cryopreservation solution for MSC-based therapy.

    Keywords: mesenchymal stem cells1, cryopreservation2, Stability3, cell therapy4, Final Cell Products5, quality6, off-the-shelf7, Potency8. (Min.5-Max. 8)

    Received: 05 Apr 2024; Accepted: 12 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Tan, Salkhordeh, Murray, Souza-Moreira, Stewart and Mei. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Shirley H. Mei, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.