Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
Sec. Biomaterials
Volume 12 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1409487
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Biomaterials for Hard Tissue Repair and Regeneration View all 21 articles

The Effects of Antimicrobial Peptides buCaTHL4B and Im-4 on Infectious Root Canal Biofilms

Provisionally accepted
Ziqiu Hu Ziqiu Hu 1,2Haixia Ren Haixia Ren 1,2Yifan Min Yifan Min 3Yixin Li Yixin Li 1,2Yuyuan Zhang Yuyuan Zhang 1,2Min Mao Min Mao 1,2Weidong Leng Weidong Leng 1,2*Lingyun Xia Lingyun Xia 1,2*
  • 1 Department of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
  • 2 Institute of Oral Diseases, School of Dentistry, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
  • 3 Department of Stomatology, Zhushan County People's Hospital, Shiyan, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Purpose The primary cause of pulp and periapical diseases is the invasion of bacteria into the root canal, which results from the continuous destruction of dental hard tissues. Effective management of infections during root canal therapy necessitates effectively irrigation. This study aims to investigate the effects of two antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), buCaTHL4B and Im-4, on root canal biofilms in vitro. Methods Two-species biofilms (Enterococcus faecalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum) were selected and anaerobically cultivated. The following treatments were applied: 10 μg/mL buCaTHL4B, 10 μg/mL Im-4, 5 μg/mL buCaTHL4B, 5 μg/mL Im-4, 1 μg/mL buCaTHL4B, 1 μg/mL Im-4, 1% NaOCl, and sterile water. Each group was treated for three minutes. Subsequently, the two strains were co-cultured with 10 μg/mL buCaTHL4B, 10 μg/mL Im-4, 1% NaOCl, and sterile water for 24, 48, and 72 hours. The biofilms were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) with fluorescent staining, and the percentages of dead bacteria were calculated. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was employed to assess the variations in bacterial proportions during biofilm formation. Results Compared to 1% NaOCl, 10 μg/mL buCaTHL4B or Im-4 exhibited significantly greater bactericidal effects on the two-species biofilms (p < 0.05), leading to their selection for subsequent experiments. Over a 48-hour period, 10 μg/mL Im-4 demonstrated a stronger antibiofilm effect than buCaTHL4B (p < 0.05). Following a 24-hour biofilm formation period, the proportion of F. nucleatum decreased while the proportion of E. faecalis increased in the sterile water group. In the buCaTHL4B and 1% NaOCl groups, the proportion of F. nucleatum was lower than that of E. faecalis (p < 0.05), whereas in the Im-4 group, the proportion of F. nucleatum was higher than that of E. faecalis (p < 0.05). The proportions of bacteria in the two AMPs groups gradually stabilized after 24 hours of treatment. Conclusion buCaTHL4B and Im-4 exhibited remarkable antibacterial and anti-biofilm capabilities against pathogenic root canal biofilms in vitro, indicating their potential as promising additives to optimize the effectiveness of root canal treatment as alternative irrigants.

    Keywords: Antimicrobial peptide, buCaTHL4B, Im-4, apical periodontitis, Enterococcus faecalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum

    Received: 30 Mar 2024; Accepted: 18 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Hu, Ren, Min, Li, Zhang, Mao, Leng and Xia. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Weidong Leng, Department of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
    Lingyun Xia, Department of Stomatology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.