AUTHOR=Dong Yiqun , Wang Kangling , He Ruxin , Zheng Kai , Wang Xiaohong , Huang Guozhi , Song Rong 

TITLE=Hybrid and adaptive control of functional electrical stimulation to correct hemiplegic gait for patients after stroke

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

VOLUME=11

YEAR=2023

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1246014

DOI=10.3389/fbioe.2023.1246014

ISSN=2296-4185

ABSTRACT=<p><bold>Introduction:</bold> Gait, as a fundamental human movement, necessitates the coordination of muscles across swing and stance phases. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the tibialis anterior (TA) has been widely applied to foot drop correction for patients with post-stroke during the swing phase. Although the gastrocnemius (GAS) during the stance phase is also affected, the Functional electrical stimulation of the gastrocnemius received less attention.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> To address this limitation, a timing- and intensity-adaptive Functional electrical stimulation control strategy was developed for both the TA and GAS. Each channel incorporates a speed-adaptive (SA) module to control stimulation timing and an iterative learning control (ILC) module to regulate the stimulation intensity. These modules rely on real-time kinematic or kinetic data during the swing or stance phase, respectively. The orthotic effects of the system were evaluated on eight patients with post-stroke foot drop. Gait kinematics and kinetics were assessed under three conditions: no stimulation (NS), Functional electrical stimulation to the ankle dorsiflexor tibialis anterior (SA-ILC DS) and FES to the tibialis anterior and the ankle plantarflexor gastrocnemius (SA-ILC DPS).</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> The ankle plantarflexion angle, the knee flexion angle, and the anterior ground reaction force (AGRF) in the SA-ILC DPS condition were significantly larger than those in the NS and SA-ILC DS conditions (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). The maximum dorsiflexion angle during the swing phase in the SA-ILC DPS condition was similar to that in the SA-ILC DS condition, with both being significantly larger than the angle observed in the NS condition (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, the angle error and force error relative to the set targets were minimized in the SA-ILC DPS condition.</p><p><bold>Discussion:</bold> The observed improvements can be ascribed to the appropriate stimulation timing and intensity provided by the SA-ILC DPS strategy. This study demonstrates that the hybrid and adaptive control strategy of functional electrical stimulation system offers a significant orthotic effect, and has considerable potential for future clinical application.</p>