- 1Department of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
- 2Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
- 3Multimodality Preclinical Molecular Imaging Center, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China
Introduction: Cancer selectivity, including targeted internalization and accelerated drug release in tumor cells, remains a major challenge for designing novel stimuli-responsive nanocarriers to promote therapeutic efficacy. The hypoxic microenvironment created by photodynamic therapy (PDT) is believed to play a critical role in chemoresistance.
Methods: We construct dual-responsive carriers (DANPCT) that encapsulate the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) and hypoxia-activated prodrug tirapazamine (TPZ) to enable efficient PDT and PDT-boosted hypoxia-activated chemotherapy.
Results and discussion: Due to TAT masking, DANPCT prolonged payload circulation in the bloodstream, and selective tumor cell uptake occurred via acidity-triggered TAT presentation. PDT was performed with a spatially controlled 660-nm laser to enable precise cell killing and exacerbate hypoxia. Hypoxia-responsive conversion of the hydrophobic NI moiety led to the disassembly of DANPCT, facilitating TPZ release. TPZ was reduced to cytotoxic radicals under hypoxic conditions, contributing to the chemotherapeutic cascade. This work offers a sophisticated strategy for programmed chemo-PDT.
Introduction
In recent years, a variety of nanocarriers has been designed to deliver therapeutic agents for combined chemo-photodynamic therapy (chemo-PDT) (Kim et al., 2017; Pei et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2023). The complementary cell-killing mechanisms of combined chemo-PDT eliminate the limitations of monotherapy and improve anticancer therapeutic efficacy (Conte et al., 2016; Cheng et al., 2020; Majerník et al., 2022). Despite the theoretical promise of chemo-PDT, outcomes are significantly limited by a lack of precise tumor targeting. Rather than relying on passive enrichment in tumors via enhanced permeability and retention (EPR), tethering cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) to the nanocarriers promotes payload delivery to tumor cells (Guidotti et al., 2017; Zorko et al., 2022). However, the clearance by macrophages and non-specific distribution in healthy tissue are major obstacles that limit the efficacy of CPPs (Deshpande et al., 2013; Futaki and Nakase, 2017). To overcome these limitations, CPP function must be precisely masked in the bloodstream and activated only within the targeted solid tumors (Dohmen and Wagner., 2011; Zhu et al., 2013). Many studies have focused on developing strategies for spatially controlled, tumor-specific CPP presentation (Huang et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014; Ruoslahti, 2017; Jing et al., 2018; Mohammed et al., 2019). Due to its homogeneity and stability, extracellular acidity (pHe ∼6.5–6.8) is a promising stimulus, and growing evidence has suggested the outstanding sensitivity of the dimethyl maleate (DA) moiety to pHe (Du et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2017; Ma and Sun, 2020).
The photosensitization reaction generally produces many toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) by consuming surrounding oxygen (Abrahamse and Hamblin, 2016; Han et al., 2022; Tang et al., 2022). As a result, cells that survive PDT exist in a hypoxic microenvironment, and hypoxia-induced chemoresistance has become a critical issue in these residual cells (Wang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2021). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α activity is upregulated, altering metabolism and drug efflux in hypoxic tumor cells (Majmundar et al., 2010; Cairns et al., 2011; Ma et al., 2022). Hypoxia also alters DNA methylation and autophagy, which are related to chemotherapy resistance (Jing et al., 2019; Kopecka et al., 2021). Pioneering studies have demonstrated that hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs), which can be converted from non-toxic to toxic molecules under hypoxic conditions, offer a powerful strategy that can be combined with PDT for the selective killing of hypoxic cells after PDT (Feng et al., 2017; Sun et al., 2019; Zhu et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2022). HAPs typically interact with nuclear DNA, so boosted intracellular drug release is also a highly desirable feature of nanocarriers (Li et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2022). Specific and effective cancer therapy requires the design of nanosystems with pHe-sensitive TAT presentation and hypoxia-boosted cargo release to simultaneously achieve tumor homing and HAP liberation and activation inside the targeted tumor.
We developed a mixed polymeric micelle (DANPCT) capable of TAT presentation at pHe and hypoxia-responsive dissociation for controlled PDT and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy. TAT-modified poly (ethylene glycol)-polyphosphoesters (TAT-PEG-PHEP) and 2-nitroimidazole-grafted PEGylated polyphosphoesters PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI) were self-assembled to encapsulate chlorin e6 (Ce6; photosensitizer) and tirapazamine (TPZ; HAPs). We hypothesized that DANPCT could achieve prolonged blood circulation due to temporary shielding of the TAT ligands via the DA moiety (Figure 1). After entering the tumor matrix, pHe-induced DA deshielding activated the TAT to promote cellular penetration. PDT with a 660-nm laser triggered the production of cytotoxic ROS, thus leading to cell killing and O2 consumption. Local hypoxia converted hydrophobic NI to hydrophilic 2-aminoimidazole to facilitate DANPCT dissociation and TPZ release and activation to produce toxic radical species for the selective killing of hypoxic cells that remain after PDT. Cascade-amplified therapeutic outcomes were studied in vitro and in vivo.
FIGURE 1. Scheme of DANPCT design and pHe-sensitive TAT presenting and PDT-induced hypoxia-activated chemotherapy.
Materials and methods
Materials
Ce6, 2,2-dimethoxy-2-phenyl acetophenone (DMPA), and TPZ were obtained from Macklin. We synthesized (2-nitro-1H-imidazol-1-yl) methanethiol (NI-SH), the diblock copolymer of PEG-b-PAEP, and TAT-PEG-PHEP as described previously (Li et al., 2017; Ma and Sun, 2020). The cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) was obtained from Shanghai Saint-Bio. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Gibco (Gibco, United States). Phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 488 and DAPI were obtained from Beyotime Biotechnology. All other reagents were of analytical grade and used as received.
Synthesis of diblock PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI)
NI-SH (292.8 mg; 1.84 mmol) and DMPA (14.1 mg) were mixed in THF (16 mL) containing 287.2 mg PEG-b-PAEP and purged with Ar2 for 25 min. The reaction was incubated for 60 min at room temperature under a 365-nm UV light, then transferred to a dialysis tube (MWCO 3500 Da), and dialyzed against ddH2O at 4°C. The solution was lyophilized to obtain PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI).
Preparation of Ce6 and TPZ-loaded nanocarriers
TAT-PEG-PHEP, PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI), Ce6, and TPZ were mixed at a weight ratio of 3:7:1:1 in DMF. The organic solution was then added slowly to ddH2O under gentle stirring. After stirring overnight, DMF and unencapsulated Ce6 and TPZ were removed by dialysis against ddH2O. After centrifugation at 800 g for 15 min, the nanoparticles (NPCT) were collected. To fabricate pHe-sensitive DANPCT, NPCT was reacted with excess 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride in ddH2O at pH 8–9 and 4°C for 6 h and then purified by ultrafiltration. A similar method was used to prepare pHe-insensitive SANPCT with succinic anhydride instead of 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride.
Cellular uptake of nanocarriers at different pH conditions
MCF-7 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and incubated with fresh DMEM containing NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT (pretreated at pH 7.4 or 6.5) at 37°C for 6 h. The cells were washed with cold PBS, fixed with paraformaldehyde, and analyzed by FACS. Total protein and Ce6 concentrations in the cell lysate were analyzed using a bicinchoninic acid kit and spectrofluorimetry, respectively.
MCF-7 cells were seeded on coverslips in 12-well plates and incubated with NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT (pretreated at pH 7.4 or 6.5) at 37°C for 6 h. The cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and then stained with phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 488 and DAPI, according to standard protocols. The cells were then visualized on a Zeiss LSM 810 confocal laser scanning microscope.
Cell killing by DATAT-NPCe6 in vitro
To study the biocompatibility of nanoparticles that have not been loaded with Ce6 or TPZ, MCF-7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (10,000 cells per well) and incubated with NP, SANP, or DANP for 72 h. To study the therapeutic efficacy of PDT and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy, MCF-7 cells were seeded in 96-well plates (10,000 cells per well). The normoxic (21% O2 pressure) or hypoxic condition (2% O2 pressure) was generated in a three-gas incubator, while the partial pressure of CO2 was maintained at 5%. NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT was added at pH 7.4 or 6.5, incubated for 4 h, and then incubated with MCF-7 cells under normoxic conditions at different Ce6 concentrations for 24 h. The medium was replaced with DMEM (10% FBS) without nanoparticles, and then, the cells were exposed to a 660-nm laser (100 mW/cm2; 15 min). After incubation for another 48 h under normoxic or hypoxic conditions, viability was measured using a standard CCK-8 assay.
Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of DANPCT in vivo
Female BALB/c mice were randomly divided into four groups and treated with free Ce6, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT via tail vein injection (Ce6 10 mg/kg). At 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-injection, blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus. The plasma was obtained by centrifugation, and Ce6 content was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
To study the accumulation of DANPCT in the major organs and tumor tissues, 1 × 107 MCF-7 cell suspension (200 μL) was injected into the mammary fat pad of female BALB/c nude mice to develop a tumor model. Mice bearing MCF-7 xenografts were treated with an intravenous (i.v.) injection of free Ce6, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT (Ce6 10 mg/kg). At 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h, tumor tissues and other organs were excised and homogenized, and Ce6 content was quantified by HPLC.
Antitumor efficacy in vivo
Female MCF-7 tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 6), and, once the tumor volume reached ∼100 mm3, the mice were treated with 0.9% NaCl, free Ce6 + TPZ, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT (TPZ 5 mg/kg) every week. At 12 h post-injection, the tumor sites were exposed to 660-nm light for 15 min at a power density of 200 mW/cm2. Tumor volume (0.5 × length × width2) and body weight were monitored every 3 days. On day 24, blood samples and the major organs were collected for ELISA analysis and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, respectively.
Results and discussion
Preparation of pHe- and hypoxia-responsive DANPCT
To prepare hierarchically responsive nanocarriers, TAT-PEG-PHEP and hypoxia-sensitive PEG-PAEP-NI were synthesized as described previously. The efficiency of NI modification was approximately 100% after thiol–ene “click” chemistry, as indicated by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Figure S1). Hydrophobic Ce6 and TPZ were encapsulated with TAT-PEG-PHEP and PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI) at a 3:7 weight ratio to form the mixed micelle (NPCT). Finally, 2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride was introduced to react with the lysine amines of NPCT to yield nanoparticles with pHe-responsive TAT reactivation properties (DANPCT). For comparison, pHe-insensitive SANPCT was prepared by decoration with succinic anhydride. The hydrodynamic diameter of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT was measured by dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. The various nanoparticles had a diameter of ∼80 nm and a uniform, spherical morphology (Figures 2A,B). According to the UV-vis absorbance at 642 and 698 nm, the encapsulation efficacies of the mixed micelles were 2.31% (Ce6) and 2.69% (TPZ), respectively. The average size of the nanoparticles, regardless of TAT modification, remained unchanged in PBS over 168 h (Supplementary Figure S2), verifying the outstanding colloidal stability provided by the outer PEG layer.
FIGURE 2. (A) Size distribution of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT measured by DLS. (B) TEM observation of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT. The scale bar is 200 nm. (C) Zeta potential change of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT at pH 7.4 or 6.5. (D) ROS production indicated by DCFH (Em = 525 nm) of Ce6-loaded nanoparticles. Vitamin C acts as an ROS scavenger.
As expected, the TAT amine groups are exposed to enable cell penetration following degradation at an acidic tumor pH. We monitored the zeta potential at pH 6.5 or 7.4 and found that NPCT maintained its original zeta potential at both pH values, comparable to that of TAT-decorated nanocarriers reported elsewhere (Figure 2C) (Li et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2020). However, the zeta potential of DANPCT increased dramatically from +1.4 mV to +15.1 mV at pH 6.5. Meanwhile, the slight zeta potential elevation of DANPCT at pH 7.4 could be explained as the partial breakage of unstable amide bonds within the DA moieties. With SA modification, SANPCT masked the TAT ligand, and a minimal zeta potential change was observed at both pH levels. The fluorescamine method was used to quantify the exposed amine groups. Compared to the control groups, the DA degradation efficiency of DANPCT reached 85.78% ± 4.65% at pH 6.5 (Supplementary Figure S3), and only 22.36% ± 2.58% of DA moieties broke at neutral pH.
The PDT effect at 660 nm was measured using a 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate probe because it was oxidized by ROS to obtain fluorescent DCFH (Eruslanov and Kusmartsev, 2010; Kim and Xue, 2020). Emission fluorescence measurements of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT at 525 nm (excitation = 488 nm) revealed comparable laser power-dependent ROS production rates (Figure 2D). The fluorescence intensity of DCFH induced by NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT was reduced by nearly ∼11.6-fold after adding an ROS scavenger (vitamin C). ROS generated by Ce6 was mainly derived from singlet oxygen via the Type 1 mechanism. The abundant ROS generation confirmed that Ce6-encapsulated nanoparticles are efficient for PDT application and accelerated hypoxia-boosted TPZ release.
According to our design, the hypoxic conditions created by PDT facilitate hydrophobic NI conversion to hydrophilic AI and boost micelle disassembly and cargo release. Therefore, we measured the variability in the diameter of NI-containing nanoparticles after 660-nm laser exposure. The diameters of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT significantly decreased to ∼45 nm following photosensitization (Figure 3A), and negligible changes were observed in the dark. We quantified the TPZ release profiles with or without PDT via fluorescence spectrometry. At 48 h, there were 75.96% ± 3.94%, 72.31% ± 2.14%, and 73.14% ± 2.96% TPZ leakages from NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT after laser treatment, respectively (Figure 3B). In contrast, less than 12.50% of the total TPZ was detected without laser irradiation, and there was no significant difference in TPZ release rates. TPZ release from DANPCT exhibited a power density-dependent pattern, and PDT resulted in 73.66% ± 3.34%, 49.53% ± 2.34%, and 30.21% ± 2.09% of TPZ liberation at different power densities (Figure 3C). The 660-nm laser on/off cycle induced controlled pulses of TPZ release from DANPCT (Figure 3D). The hierarchy of pHe and hypoxic conditions enabled TAT ligand presentation and cargo release, promoting the accumulation of active drug content at the target site.
FIGURE 3. (A) Diameter change in NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT after exposure to 660-nm near infrared light. (B) Cumulative TPZ release profile of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT. The power density of 660-nm laser was 500 mW/cm2. *p < 0.05. (C) Cumulative TPZ release profile of DANPCT at 500 mW/cm2, 200 mW/cm2, and 100 mW/cm2 or in the dark. *p < 0.05. (D) Pulsed 660-nm laser-triggered TPZ release from DANPCT. The samples were exposed to laser at the predetermined time intervals indicated by the black arrows.
Cellular uptake of DANPCT at pH 6.5
To track the TAT presentation of DANPCT under acidic conditions to facilitate cellular internalization, MCF-7 cells were cultured and treated with NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT for 4 h. The internalized NP content was analyzed by FACS, which revealed limited cellular uptake with SANPCT pretreatment at pH 7.4 and 6.5, suggesting reduced interaction between masked TAT-induced and targeted cells (Figure 4A). Due to the pHe-sensitive TAT, the intracellular DANPCT content was significantly higher at pH 6.5 than at pH 7.4, comparable to that of NPCT. Following cell lysis, we used HPLC to detect intracellular TPZ concentration and found that the internalized TPZ of DANPCT increased from 0.69 ± 0.07 μg/mg protein (pH 7.4) to 1.39 ± 0.09 μg/mg protein (pH 6.5) (Figure 4B). However, there was no noticeable change in the NPCT and SANPCT groups at neutral or acidic pH. The pH-induced DANPCT pattern was confirmed by confocal imaging. Compared to the weakened signals in the SANPCT groups, significantly stronger fluorescence was observed when cells were incubated with DANPCT pretreated at pH 6.5 (Figure 5). These results verified that the penetration capacity of masked TAT was specifically activated by the extracellular pH microenvironment.
FIGURE 4. (A) Intracellular fluorescence of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT in MCF-7 cells at pH 7.4 or 6.5. (B) Intracellular Ce6 concentration in MCF-7 cells at different pH conditions. *p < 0.05.
FIGURE 5. CLSM observation of NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT on MCF-7 cells at either pH 7.4 or 6.5. Cell nuclei and F-actin were stained by DAPI (blue) and phalloidin-Alexa Fluor 488 (green), respectively. The scale bar is 20 μm.
Cell killing in vitro
The biocompatibility of non-loaded NP, SANP, and DANP was evaluated by CCK-8 assay, which showed no notable cytotoxicity in MCF-7 cells at the highest concentration of 500 μg/mL (Supplementary Figure S4). For chemo-PDT effectiveness, cells were incubated with NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT, exposed to 660-nm light for 20 min, and then cultured at different O2 concentrations. Without laser exposure, NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT induced low toxicity even under hypoxic conditions because of the absence of the PDT effect and TPZ (HAP) release (Figures 6A,B). However, laser irradiation-triggered cell killing occurred in all groups at comparable levels regardless of pH or O2 conditions. Hypoxic culture reduced cell viability, indicating that TPZ was reduced to cytotoxic radicals that interacted with the nuclear DNA. Compared to the viability of MCF-7 cells treated with DANPCT at pH 7.4, acidic treatment promoted cell killing with 51.07% ± 6.98% cell viability (Ce6 4.0 μg/mL) under normoxic conditions. This difference is attributable to the reactivable TAT ligands and improved Ce6 and TPZ internalization. Under hypoxic conditions, the viabilities of NPCT + L and DANPCT + L groups at acidic pH were 21.90% ± 2.30% and 26.67% ± 4.29%, respectively, 0.50- and 0.61-fold lower than those of SANPCT + L. Accordingly, the interactions between PDT and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy indicate that DANPCT could serve as a robust delivery platform for precise cancer therapy.
FIGURE 6. Relative MCF-7 cell viabilities after incubation with NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT at pH 7.4 (A) or 6.5 (B). *p < 0.05.
Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution of DATAT-NPCe6 in vivo
With pHe-sensitive DA masking, the penetrating ability of the TAT ligand in DANPCT was temporally blocked in the bloodstream, limiting phagocytosis. We measured the plasma concentrations of Ce6 following the intravenous injection of different formulations (Figure 7A). NPCT with bare TAT ligands was rapidly cleared from the circulation, yielding a Ce6 concentration of 0.63 ± 0.45 μg/mL at 72 h post-injection. In contrast, both SANPCT and DANPCT substantially prolonged the Ce6 circulation, consistent with prior reports (Gao et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2022). Compared to SANPCT administration, the Ce6 plasma concentration in the DANPCT group at 72 h post-injection was reduced from 2.71 ± 1.06 to 1.81 ± 0.54 μg/mL. The pharmacokinetic difference between SANPCT and DANPCT could be explained by the slight DA degradation at pH 7.4 (Supplementary Figure S4). We calculated the pharmacokinetic parameters of these nanocarriers using a non-compartmental model (Figures 7B,C) and found that the AUC0-t values of SANPCT and DANPCT were 3.08- and 2.32-fold higher than those of NPCT, respectively.
FIGURE 7. (A) Ce6 content in plasma vs. time, following i.v. injection of free Ce6, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT (n = 4). The area under the curve (B) and half-life (C) of free Ce6, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT calculated using a non-compartmental model. *p < 0.05. (D) Ce6 accumulation in MCF-7 tumor at 12, 24, and 48 h post-injection. *p < 0.05. (E) Ce6 distribution in major organs of MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice at 48 h post-injection.
Next, NPCT, SANPCT, or DANPCT were i.v. injected into BALB/c nude mice bearing MCF-7 xenografts to evaluate their biodistribution, especially toward tumor tissues. After administration, the mice were euthanized at predetermined timepoints, and the Ce6 content in different organs was analyzed by HPLC. DANPCT had the most preferential retention in tumor tissues at 48 h compared to NPCT and SANPCT due to the pHe-triggered TAT-presenting effect (Figure 7D). Although SANPCT showed more advanced tumor extravasation via EPR based on the best circulation pattern, stable SA modification impeded TAT ligand interaction and function in the tumor cells, resulting in insufficient tumor accumulation. The amounts of DANPCT quantified by Ce6 content were 2.32% ± 0.29%, 3.11% ± 0.23%, and 2.47% ± 0.21% ID per gram of tumor at 12, 24, and 48 h, respectively. The nano-sized delivery systems NPCT, SANPCT, and DANPCT accumulated in the liver and spleen, both components of the reticuloendothelial system (Figure 7E).
Therapeutic efficacy of DANPCT in vivo
Encouraged by the excellent in vitro performance, we evaluated the in vivo antitumor efficacy of DANPCT. MCF-7 tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided and treated via i.v. injection with (1) 0.9% NaCl, (2) free Ce6 + TPZ + PDT, (3) NPCT + PDT, (4) SANPCT + PDT, and (5) DANPCT + PDT. The equivalent TPZ dose was 5.0 mg/kg, and the tumor size was recorded every 3 days. Tumor volume in the saline group rapidly increased to 1986.15 mm3 at the end of treatment (Figure 8A). Because of their prolonged blood circulation and improved biodistribution, NPCT and SANPCT significantly inhibited tumor growth after PDT compared to the free Ce6 + TPZ + PDT. Notably, the smallest tumor volumes in the DANPCT + L group revealed that this treatment yielded the best therapeutic effect, with an average tumor volume of only 567.78 mm3 on day 24. The tumor weight after euthanizing confirmed these results (Figure 8B). Tumor mass in the DANPCT + PDT group was 0.70- and 0.52-fold lower than that in the NPCT + L and SANPCT + L groups, respectively. In addition, the body weight curves in Supplementary Figure S5 show that the DANPCT + L group did not experience a decline in the body weight, suggesting the biosafety of DANPCT in vivo. H&E staining (Figure 8C), routine blood count (Supplementary Table S1), and ELISA tests (Supplementary Figure S6) for liver/kidney damage after treatment showed no significant lesions or inflammation in any groups, validating the biocompatibility of the DANPCT system.
FIGURE 8. (A) Tumor growth curve of the MCF-7 tumor-bearing BALB/c nude mice treated with various formulations. The mice bearing intravenous injections were performed on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. *p < 0.05. (B) MCF-7 tumor mass after the treatment. *p < 0.05. (C) Tumor images at the end of the treatment. (D) H&E staining of tumors and major organs at the end of the tumor treatment.
Conclusion
In this work, a hierarchically responsive nanocarrier DANPCT was fabricated to spatially control TAT presentation in tumor sites for PDT-initiated, hypoxia-activated cancer therapy. DANPCT exhibited advanced stability at neutral pH and rapidly reactivated TAT function in response to pHe, specifically accelerating internalization by tumor cells. Upon 660-nm laser irradiation, Ce6-based PDT produced cell-killing ROS and consumed surrounding O2 to generate hypoxic conditions that stimulated DANPCT disassembly and TPZ liberation. Chemotherapy with TPZ was enhanced by the aggravated hypoxia in tumor tissues. The biosafety studies of DANPCT showed excellent in vivo biocompatibility with healthy organs. On the other hand, further studies on the feeding ratio of TAT-PEG-b-PHEP, PEG-b-P (AEP-g-NI), Ce6, and TPZ during the preparation of DANPCT is necessary for optimal therapeutical efficacy in vivo. This work contributes to the rational design of tumor microenvironment-responsive nanocarriers for precise and cascade cancer therapies.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Tianjin Medical University General Hospital.
Author contributions
Conceptualization, ZZ, AG, and CS; methodology, ZZ and JF; validation, ZZ, JF, and TZ; formal analysis, TZ and AG; investigation, ZZ and JF; data curation, AG; writing—original draft preparation, ZZ, JF, and AG; writing—review and editing, AG and CS; supervision, CS; funding acquisition, ZZ and CS. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071907 and 82271937), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (18JCYBJC25100), Health science and Technology Project of Tianjin (MS20022), Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project (TJYXZDXK-001A), and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation-Special Fund for Clinical Research (320.6750.2022-3-5).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1197404/full#supplementary-material
References
Abrahamse, H., and Hamblin, M. R. (2016). New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Biochem. J. 473 (4), 347–364. doi:10.1042/BJ20150942
Cairns, R. A., Harris, I. S., and Mak, T. W. (2011). Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11 (2), 85–95. doi:10.1038/nrc2981
Cheng, Y. J., Hu, J. J., Qin, S. Y., Zhang, A. Q., and Zhang, X. Z. (2020). Recent advances in functional mesoporous silica-based nanoplatforms for combinational photo-chemotherapy of cancer. Biomaterials 232, 119738. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119738
Conte, C., Maiolino, S., Pellosi, D. S., Miro, A., Ungaro, F., and Quaglia, F. (2016). Polymeric nanoparticles for cancer photodynamic therapy. Top. Curr. Chem. 370, 61–112. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22942-3_3
Deshpande, P. P., Biswas, S., and Torchilin, V. P. (2013). Current trends in the use of liposomes for tumor targeting. Nanomedicine 8 (9), 1509–1528. doi:10.2217/NNM.13.118
Dohmen, C., and Wagner, E. (2011). Multifunctional CPP polymer system for tumor-targeted pDNA and siRNA delivery. Methods Mol. Biol. 683, 453–463. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-919-2_32
Du, J. Z., Du, X. J., Mao, C. Q., and Wang, J. (2011). Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer-doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133 (44), 17560–17563. doi:10.1021/ja207150n
El-Hussein, A., Manoto, S. L., Ombinda-Lemboumba, S., Alrowaili, Z. A., and Mthunzi-Kufa, P. (2021). A review of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy for lung cancer treatment. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 21 (2), 149–161. doi:10.2174/1871520620666200403144945
Eruslanov, E., and Kusmartsev, S. (2010). Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 594, 57–72. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_4
Feng, L. Z., Cheng, L., Dong, Z. L., Tao, D. L., Barnhart, T. E., Cai, W. B., et al. (2017). Theranostic liposomes with hypoxia-activated prodrug to effectively destruct hypoxic tumors post-photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano 11 (1), 927–937. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b07525
Futaki, S., and Nakase, I. (2017). Cell-surface interactions on arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptides allow for multiplex modes of internalization. Acc. Chem. Res. 50 (10), 2449–2456. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00221
Gao, M., Fan, F., Li, D. D., Yu, Y., Mao, K. R., Sun, T. M., et al. (2017). Tumor acidity-activatable TAT targeted nanomedicine for enlarged fluorescence/magnetic resonance imaging-guided photodynamic therapy. Biomaterials 133, 165–175. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.013
Guidotti, G., Brambilla, L., and Rossi, D. (2017). Cell-penetrating peptides: From basic research to clinics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 38 (4), 406–424. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2017.01.003
Han, S. R. Y., Jeong, E., Cheon, S. Y., Lee, D. H. Y., Lee, Y., Lee, S. Y., et al. (2022). Perfluorooctylbromide-loaded fucoidan-chlorin e6 nanoparticles for tumor-targeted photodynamic therapy. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 223, 77–86. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.254
Huang, S., Shao, K., Kuang, Y., Liu, Y., Li, J., An, S., et al. (2013). Tumor targeting and microenvironment-responsive nanoparticles for gene delivery. Biomaterials 34 (21), 5294–5302. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.043
Jiang, M., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Wang, K., and Yuan, Y. (2022). Bioorthogonal chemistry and illumination controlled programmed size-changeable nanomedicine for synergistic photodynamic and hypoxia-activated therapy. Biomaterials 284, 121480. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121480
Jing, X., Yang, F., Shao, C., Wei, K., Xie, M., Shen, H., et al. (2019). Role of hypoxia in cancer therapy by regulating the tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer 18 (1), 157. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1089-9
Jing, Y. T., Xiong, X., Ming, Y., Zhao, J. Y., Guo, X., Yang, G., et al. (2018). A multifunctional micellar nanoplatform with pH-triggered cell penetration and nuclear targeting for effective cancer therapy and inhibition to lung metastasis. Adv. Healthc. Mater 7 (7), e1700974. doi:10.1002/adhm.201700974
Kim, H., and Xue, X. (2020). Detection of total reactive oxygen species in adherent cells by 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate staining. J. Vis. Exp. 160. doi:10.3791/60682
Kim, J., Cho, H. R., Jeon, H., Kim, D., Song, C., Lee, N., et al. (2017). Continuous O-2-Evolving MnFe2O4 nanoparticle-anchored mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient photodynamic therapy in hypoxic cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (32), 10992–10995. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b05559
Kopecka, J., Salaroglio, I. C., Perez-Ruiz, E., Sarmento-Ribeiro, A. B., Saponara, S., De Las Rivas, J., et al. (2021). Hypoxia as a driver of resistance to immunotherapy. Drug Resist Updat 59, 100787. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2021.100787
Li, D. D., Ma, Y. C., Du, J. Z., Tao, W., Du, X. J., and YangWang, X. Z. J. (2017). Tumor acidity/NIR controlled interaction of transformable nanoparticle with biological systems for cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 17 (5), 2871–2878. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b05396
Li, J. M., Liu, F., Shao, Q., Min, Y. Z., Costa, M., Yeow, E. K. L., et al. (2014). Enzyme-responsive cell-penetrating peptide conjugated mesoporous silica quantum dot nanocarriers for controlled release of nucleus-targeted drug molecules and real-time intracellular fluorescence imaging of tumor cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater 3 (8), 1230–1239. doi:10.1002/adhm.201300613
Li, Y., Zhao, L., and Li, X. F. (2021). Targeting hypoxia: Hypoxia-activated prodrugs in cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 11, 700407. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.700407
Ma, B. A., and Sun, C. Y. (2020). Tumor pH-triggered "charge conversion" nanocarriers with on-demand drug release for precise cancer therapy. J. Mater Chem. B 8 (40), 9351–9361. doi:10.1039/d0tb01692f
Ma, S., Zhao, Y., Lee, W. C., Ong, L. T., Lee, P. L., Jiang, Z., et al. (2022). Hypoxia induces HIF1α-dependent epigenetic vulnerability in triple negative breast cancer to confer immune effector dysfunction and resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 4118. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31764-9
Majerník, M., Jendželovský, R., Vargová, J., Jendželovská, Z., and Fedoročko, P. (2022). Multifunctional nanoplatforms as a novel effective approach in photodynamic therapy and chemotherapy, to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer. Pharmaceutics 14 (5), 1075. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14051075
Majmundar, A. J., Wong, W. H. J., and Simon, M. C. (2010). Hypoxia-inducible factors and the response to hypoxic stress. Mol. Cell 40 (2), 294–309. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.022
Mohammed, F., Ke, W. D., Mukerabigwi, J. F., Japir, A. M. M., Ibrahim, A., Wang, Y. H., et al. (2019). ROS-responsive polymeric nanocarriers with photoinduced exposure of cell-penetrating moieties for specific intracellular drug delivery. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 11 (35), 31681–31692. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b10950
Pei, P., Sun, C. Y., Tao, W., Li, J., Yang, X. Z., and Wang, J. (2019). ROS-sensitive thioketal-linked polyphosphoester-doxorubicin conjugate for precise phototriggered locoregional chemotherapy. Biomaterials 188, 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.010
Ruoslahti, E. (2017). Tumor penetrating peptides for improved drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 110, 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.008
Sun, X. K., Sun, J., Lv, J. K., Dong, B., Liu, M., Liu, J. S., et al. (2019). Ce6-C6-TPZ co-loaded albumin nanoparticles for synergistic combined PDT-chemotherapy of cancer. J. Mater. Chem. B 7 (38), 5797–5807. doi:10.1039/c9tb01346f
Tang, M. H., Lin, K., Ramachandran, M., Li, L. M., Zou, H. Y., Zheng, H. Z., et al. (2022). A mitochondria-targeting lipid-small molecule hybrid nanoparticle for imaging and therapy in an orthotopic glioma model. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12 (6), 2672–2682. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.04.005
Wang, Y. Z., Xie, Y., Li, J., Peng, Z. H., Sheinin, Y., Zhou, J. P., et al. (2017). Tumor-penetrating nanoparticles for enhanced anticancer activity of combined photodynamic and hypoxia-activated therapy. ACS Nano 11 (2), 2227–2238. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b08731
Yang, D. C., Wen, L. F., Du, L. Y., Luo, C. M., Lu, Z. Y., Liu, J. Y., et al. (2022). A hypoxia-activated prodrug conjugated with a BODIPY-based photothermal agent for imaging-guided chemo-photothermal combination therapy. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 14 (36), 40546–40558. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c09071
Yang, Y. L., Lin, K., and Yang, L. (2021). Progress in nanocarriers codelivery system to enhance the anticancer effect of photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics 13 (11). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13111951
Yu, M., Cao, R., Ma, Z., and Zhu, M. (2023). Development of "smart" drug delivery systems for chemo/PDT synergistic treatment. J. Mater Chem. B 11 (7), 1416–1433. doi:10.1039/d2tb02248f
Zhang, B. B., Xue, R., Lyu, J. S., Gao, A., and Sun, C. Y. (2022). Tumor acidity/redox hierarchical-activable nanoparticles for precise combination of X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy. J. Mater Chem. B 10 (20), 3849–3860. doi:10.1039/d2tb00303a
Zhang, Y., Xiao, Y., Huang, Y., He, Y., Xu, Y., Lu, W., et al. (2020). Poly(ethylene glycol) shell-sheddable TAT-modified core cross-linked nano-micelles: TAT-enhanced cellular uptake and lysosomal pH-triggered doxorubicin release. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 188, 110772. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.110772
Zhu, L., Wang, T., Perche, F., Taigind, A., and Torchilin, V. P. (2013). Enhanced anticancer activity of nanopreparation containing an MMP2-sensitive PEG-drug conjugate and cell-penetrating moiety. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (42), 17047–17052. doi:10.1073/pnas.1304987110
Zhu, R. Y., He, H., Liu, Y., Cao, D. S., Yan, J., Duan, S. Z., et al. (2019). Cancer-selective bioreductive chemotherapy mediated by dual hypoxia-responsive nanomedicine upon photodynamic therapy-induced hypoxia aggravation. Biomacromolecules 20 (7), 2649–2656. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00428
Keywords: tumor pH, responsive nanocarriers, hypoxia-activated prodrug, TAT reactivation, combined therapy
Citation: Zhang Z, Feng J, Zhang T, Gao A and Sun C (2023) Application of tumor pH/hypoxia-responsive nanoparticles for combined photodynamic therapy and hypoxia-activated chemotherapy. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1197404. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1197404
Received: 31 March 2023; Accepted: 22 May 2023;
Published: 09 June 2023.
Edited by:
Hongzhong Chen, Sun Yat-sen University, ChinaReviewed by:
Lisi Xie, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, ChinaKeni Yang, Suzhou Institute of Nano-tech and Nano-bionics (CAS), China
Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Feng, Zhang, Gao and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: An Gao, dG11X2dhb2FuQDE2My5jb20=; Chunyang Sun, Y2h5c3VuNDEyQDE2My5jb20=