Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 06 February 2023
Sec. Biomaterials
This article is part of the Research Topic Cells, Biomaterials, and Biophysical Stimuli for Bone, Cartilage, and Muscle Regeneration, volume II View all 13 articles

MSC-Exos: Important active factor of bone regeneration

Sihang Ren,,&#x;Sihang Ren1,2,3Yuyang Lin&#x;Yuyang Lin1Wenyue LiuWenyue Liu1Liqun Yang,
Liqun Yang3,4*Muxin Zhao
Muxin Zhao1*
  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
  • 2Department of Plastic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 3NHC Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Medical Genetics (China Medical University), Liaoning Research Institute of Family Planning (The Affiliated Reproductive Hospital of China Medical University), Shenyang, China
  • 4Department of Biomaterials, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Bone defect and repair is a common but difficult problem in restorative and reconstructive surgery. Bone tissue defects of different sizes caused by different reasons bring functional limitations and cosmetic deformities to patients. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), a major hotspot in the field of regeneration in recent years, have been widely used in various studies on bone tissue regeneration. Numerous studies have shown that the bone regenerative effects of MSC can be achieved through exosome-delivered messages. Although its osteogenic mechanism is still unclear, it is clear that MSC-Exos can directly or indirectly support the action of bone regeneration. It can act directly on various cells associated with osteogenesis, or by carrying substances that affect cellular activators or the local internal environment in target cells, or it can achieve activation of the osteogenic framework by binding to materials. Therefore, this review aims to summarize the types and content of effective contents of MSC-Exos in bone regeneration, as well as recent advances in the currently commonly used methods to enable the binding of MSC-Exos to the framework and to conclude that MSC-Exos is effective in promoting osteogenesis.

1 Introduction

Bone regeneration is an extremely complex repair process. The combination of cells, growth factors and structural framework is essential for bone regeneration (Battafarano et al., 2021). Bone repair is delayed or stopped if these three elements are affected or absent for various reasons within the individual with a bone defect. In adult individuals, a bone defect of 2 cm is the threshold value, and bone defects exceeding 2 cm are difficult to heal on their own without external forces. In order to break the limit, the study aims to fundamentally reconstruct the homeostasis of the three elements of bone regeneration and simulate the normal bone regeneration process in vivo (Sobacchi et al., 2013).

Mesenchymal stem cells are pluripotent non-hematopoietic stem cells with self-renewal capacity (Xia et al., 2019). MSCs are not only abundant, which can be found in bone marrow, adipose, muscle, peripheral blood, umbilical cord, placenta, fetal tissue, and amniotic fluid (Brown et al., 2019), but also involved in tissue repair, immunomodulation and anti-inflammation by controlling immune response, angiogenesis, cell proliferation, migration, invasion and survival (Heo et al., 2019). Previous studies suggested that MSC could be a source of cells in bone regeneration, but recent studies have shown that MSCs are not only the cellular basis for osteogenesis, but also parental cells for the release of various factors (Du et al., 2019). However, recent studies have shown that MSC is not only the cellular basis for osteogenesis, but also an activator and fusion agent for the release of various factors, or structural frameworks, making MSC an “all-rounder” in osteogenesis. This ability is fully reflected by the fact that exosomes concentrate the active components of MSC and stimulate the maximum osteogenic potential of MSC, while discarding the ethical issues, immune resistance (EL Andaloussi et al., 2013) and the inconvenience of excessive cell size (Verweij et al., 2019).

Exosomes are small vesicles secreted by cells that mediate intercellular communication through paracrine and other means (Schott et al., 2021). Exosomes are influenced by parental cells (Xia et al., 2019) and the carriage of these substances results in exosomes from different sources with specific and unchangeable parental characteristics (Wang et al., 2018a). Furthermore, spectrum-specific exosomes have a greater impact on the differentiation of MSCs than extracellular matrix, and osteoblast-derived exosomes containing osteogenic factors can reverse the lipogenic differentiation potential of MSCs cultured in lipogenic medium (Kargozar et al., 2019). These vesicles, which can be secreted by almost all living cells, are important carriers of information between osteoblasts and other cells, or between cells and the microenvironment (Peng et al., 2020). The secreted exosomes could be taken up by recipient cells via endocytosis, ligand-receptor interaction (where both the ligand and the receptor are not clearly uncovered) or fusion then the contained bioactive cargos are transferred to modify gene expression, signaling, and overall functions and behaviors of recipient cells. Artificially interfered with exosomes can contain RNA, enzymes, therapeutic genes or drugs and other contents (Basso and Bonetto, 2016). Therefore, the effective application and potential development of MSC-Exos is an important topic and a necessary tool in the field of bone regeneration. By reviewing the various contributions of MSC-Exos in osteogenesis in recent years, we acknowledge the significant contribution of MSC-Exos in osteogenesis and also find the limitations and defects due to its low yield, difficulties in purification or difficulties in targetin.

2 Effect of MSC-Exos on osteogenesis-related cells and active factors

In the process of osteogenesis, cellular components are the basis of the whole process, including osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and chondrocytes (Kim and Mikos, 2021). The positive effect of MSC exosomes on the proliferation and/or migration of multiple cell types in vitro, including osteoblasts, osteocytes, MSCs and endothelial cells (Jia et al., 2020). The Effects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes on osteogenesis-related cells and their active factors are summarized in Table 1; Figure 1. Activation of the core cells can effectively promote the initiation and rapid progression of the osteogenic process (Li et al., 2018). In turn, the effect on macrophages provides beneficial regulation of the inflammatory environment of bone regeneration (Schlundt et al., 2021). Therefore, it can be assumed that the primary effect of MSC-Exos on cells lies in the direct action on osteogenic cells (Liu et al., 2021a). The active factors of the osteogenic elements are considered to be more important components than cells. In conjunction with the trend of being “cell-free”, the effective use of osteogenic factors and tissue frameworks plays a key role.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Effect of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells on osteogenic associated cells.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Effect of MSC-Exos on osteogenesis-related cells and active factors. MSC-EXOs act on MSCs, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, chondrocytes, osteocytes, endothelial cells, and the local immune microenvironment to have a positive impact on bone regeneration.

2.1 MSC-Exos act on MSC

Information transfer between MSCs through MSC-Exos is the initial direction in MSC-Exos research (Zhu et al., 2019). When jaw BMSC-Exos was co-cultured with iliac BMSC, it was found that ALP and osteogenic gene expression were upregulated, while siRNA against Rab27a blocked this osteogenic effect, and it was concluded that Exo interacted between BMSC-J as well as BMSC-I to upregulate maxillary BMSC osteogenic ability (Li et al., 2019). When human dental pulp stem cells (hPDSCs) were co-cultured with human stem cells (hADSC), the phenotype of osteoblast was upregulated and was able to upregulate the MAPK pathway, leading to phosphorylation of ERK1/2 as well as JNK, thus promoting hADSC osteogenic differentiation (Jin et al., 2020). MSC-derived sEVs increase the expression of VEGFA and VEGFR2 in MSCs and thus may facilitate osteogenesis and angiogenesis of bone regeneration (Pizzicannella et al., 2019a; Pizzicannella et al., 2019b). MSC-Exos induces osteogenic differentiation by using its cargo. hADSC-Exo, which is predifferentiated in osteogenic medium, may act on different targets of osteogenesis by altering its miRNA expression profile at different stages of culture and induce MSC differentiation towards osteoblasts by activating different pathways including PI3K/Akt as well as MAPK and thus initiate osteogenesis and promote bone regeneration (Zhai et al., 2020).

2.2 MSC-Exos act on osteoblasts

BMSC-Exo is able to carry the LncRNA MALAT1 and act as a sponge for miR-34c to promote SATB2 expression, while silencing of SATB2 is able to reduce ALP activity in osteoblasts and mineralized nodules (Yang et al., 2019). In osteoporotic rats, BMSC-Exos-miRNA-935 was able to act on osteoblasts to regulate STAT1 pathway, promoting ALP synthesis and osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, thereby inhibiting osteoporosis progression in OVX rats (Zhang et al., 2021a). After TNF-α acts on primary osteoblasts, it can upregulate the expression of miRNA-141-5p, thereby inhibiting osteogenesis. As a sponge, lncRNA-KCNQ1OT1 inhibits the block of primary osteoblast proliferation by miRNA-141-5p. ADSC-lncRNA-KCNQ1OT1 acts as the sponge of miRNA-214, and inhibits its expression, thereby upregulating BMP2 expression and promoting osteogenic differentiation of BMSC (Wang et al., 2019). In addition, lncRNA-HOTAIR targeting miRNA-138 and lncRNA-LOXLT-AS1 targeting miRNA-196a-5p have been found to play a regulatory role in osteogenesis (Wang et al., 2021a).

2.3 MSC-Exos act on osteoclasts

BMSC-Exos-miRNA-335 acts on VapB (vesicle associated membrane protein-associated protein B), and inhibition of its expression can target activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and promote fracture recovery. VapB is a key target for regulating PLcr2-Ca 2+-NFAT signaling, and inhibition of this signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation and stabilizes fracture ends (Hu et al., 2021). The Wnt pathway is a classical pathway of osteogenesis. ADSC-Exo-miRNA-130a-3p mediates the SIRT7/Wnt/β-catenin axis, targets silencing of SIRT mRNA, and activates the Wnt pathway, thereby preventing β-catenin from being degraded and entering the nucleus completes its process of promoting osteogenic gene expression (Yang et al., 2020a). The orofacial MSC appears to be unique in orofacial skeletal development. OMSCs are derived from neural crest cells (NCCs). The results confirmed that miRNA-206-3p is an important downstream factor of GATA4 (GATA-binding protein 4: transcription factor that regulates the expression of RUNX2 and TGF-β). Under the action of GATA4, upregulates miRNA-206-3p, promotes NFATc1 (nuclear factor of activated T cell cytoplasm 1) expression and suppresses BMP3 expression, thereby inhibiting osteoclastogenesis and promoting osteogenic differentiation (Guo et al., 2021a).

2.4 MSC-Exos act on chondrocytes

Chondrocytes treated with MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) enhanced migration, proliferation, chondrogenic differentiation and matrix synthesis ability (Otsuru et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018). This cascade of responses induced by MSC-derived sEVs leads to the stimulation of multiple cellular responses, such as cell survival, proliferation, differentiation and migration, which facilitated tissue repair (Chew et al., 2019). Recently, it was reported that targeting mTOR signaling in chondrocytes mediated by MSC-derived sEVs as an alternative mechanism for chondroprotection. The results showed that MSC-derived sEVs downregulated mTOR signaling, and regulated IL-1-mediated chondrocyte autophagy, thereby inhibiting apoptosis and regulating cellular metabolism for matrix production (Wu et al., 2019). In a mouse OA model induced by IL-1β and collagenase, MSC-Exos was able to promote COL2A1 and proteoglycan expression and resist IL-1β-induced chondrocyte proliferation inhibition and apoptosis. Further study revealed that lncRNA-KLF3-AS1 and miRNA-206 are competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs), and miRNA-206 can promote the expression of GIT1 (G-protein coupled receptor kinase interacting protein 1) lncRNA-KLF3-AS1 acts as a sponge for miRNA-206 and inhibits the expression of miRNA-206, thus achieving a protective effect against cartilage damage. In addition, hiPS-MSC-Exo acts on the PDCD4 (programmed cell death protein 4) gene via miRNA-135b, activating the downstream caspase-3 pathway, promoting OCN expression, promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis (Zhang et al., 2020). MSC-Exos alleviate TMJ osteoarthritis by attenuating inflammation and restoring matrix homeostasis through the mechanism of Adenosine, a receptor for receptor cells, binds to the CD73 ligand on the surface of the MSC-Exos membrane, causing the release of Exo contents into chondrocytes and activating the Akt/ERK/AMPK pathway, thereby regulating matrix homeostasis (Zhang et al., 2019).

2.5 MSC-Exos act on osteocytes

MSC exosomes have anti-apoptotic effects on osteocytes and bone marrow MSCs, producing proliferation-promoting, migration-promoting, anti-apoptotic effects on MSCs after low-intensity laser irradiation (Yin et al., 2017). ADSC-secreted Exo (LLLI-ADSC-Exo) inhibits hypoxia-induced apoptosis and promotes bone defect repair (Zhu et al., 2017). Human perivascular stem cell (PSC)-derived EVs promote mitosis, cell migration, and suppress osteoblast shRNA expression through tetra-transmembrane proteins to achieve pro-osteogenic effects (Xu et al., 2019a).

2.6 MSC-Exos act on endothelial cells

ADSC-Exo-miRNA125a is able to bind to the 3′UTR target of delta-like4 (DDL4), thereby promoting the formation of endothelial tip cells and angiogenesis (Liang et al., 2016). Also, ADSC-miRNA-21 acts on the PTEN pathway to promote endothelial cell vascularization, while exerting a similar effect (An et al., 2019).

Meanwhile, bone regeneration repair in a rat cranial defect model was achieved by PLGA/PDA scaffold mounted with Exo in the experiment in vivo. Under the action of GW4869, ADSC-Exo promoted the entry of ADSC-exo-miRNA-21, miRNA-27b, miRNA322, and let-7i into endothelial cells through the ESCRT-independent pathway, where miRNA-21 inhibited PTEN as well as Smad7 pathway, and miRNA-322 inhibited Cul-2 pathway, thus promoting angiogenesis (Kato et al., 2021). Therapeutic effect of human umbilical cord MSC exosomes in osteonecrosis, attributing the anti-apoptotic and pro-survival effects of MSC exosomes to miR-21-mediated downregulation of PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) and AKT (protein kinase B) phosphorylation (Kuang et al., 2019). In a model of hindlimb ischemia, ADSC-Exo promotes M2 polarisation, inhibits iNOS expression and time-as well as dose-dependently upregulates arginase 1 (Arg-1) levels, in which miRNA-21 plays a major role and inhibits Akt phosphorylation as well as CSF-1 secretion, and through this mode of action, promotes vascular regeneration in the ischaemic limb (Zhu et al., 2020). MiRNA-423-5p acts on the sufu of HUVECs, promoting their proliferation, migration and tube formation (Xu et al., 2019b). BMSC-Exos promotes HUVEC proliferation, migration and regulates the Hippo pathway through the YAP target, promoting angiogenesis, and by transporting lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and autocrine motility factors (ATX) also act on the Hippo pathway, prompting YAP/TAZ in complex with TEAD to direct nuclear gene expression and induce cartilage reconstruction in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (Wang et al., 2021b). LncRNA SNHG9 enters endothelial cells via ADSC-Exo and then targets and inhibits TRADD mRNA (TNF-R1-associated death domain), causing TRADD protein degradation, inhibiting the inflammatory response and apoptosis, thereby upregulating endothelial cell function (Song et al., 2020). Angiogenesis is a critical step in osteogenesis and a key target for the treatment of ischemic bone diseases.

2.7 MSC-Exos act in the osteoimmune microenvironment

Osteoimmunology reveals that the immune system and the skeletal system are closely linked and share many commonalities in terms of cytokines, receptors and signaling. Immune cells often play the role of regulators in the formation of the local bone microenvironment: by regulating the expression of various factors, they regulate osteogenic differentiation, osteolytic differentiation, fibrosis, vascularisation and other processes closely related to bone regeneration (Schmidt-Bleek et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2016). The release of regulatory factors by immune cells can influence the osteogenic and osteolytic processes in bone tissue. Macrophages play an important role in the regulation of the bone immune microenvironment. The different subtypes of macrophages correspond to the stages of fracture healing. In the inflammatory phase, activated M1 macrophages perform phagocytosis and produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-12 to promote early and mid-stage osteogenesis. In the late phase, alternative activated M2 macrophages release pro-regenerative cytokines such as IL-10, TGF-β, BMP2, and VEGF to establish an anti-inflammatory environment and promote osteochondral differentiation and angiogenesis (Shin et al., 2021). Zhang et al. (2022) developed bioactive 3D PLA-Exo scaffolds and found significantly lower expression of pro-inflammatory markers and reactive oxygen species (ROS) compared to the PLA scaffold group. After co-culture of exosomes from jawbone-derived OMMSCs with macrophages, increased miR-223 in macrophages could be achieved by inhibiting Pknox1 expression, polarizing macrophages toward the M2 type (Yuan et al., 2017). It has also been shown that ADSC-Exos containing miR-10a promotes the differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells towards Th17 and Treg (Bolandi et al., 2020).

3 MSC-Exos in combination with biomaterials for bone defect repair

Currently, most bone defects are repaired with bone replacement materials (Carriel et al., 2018), which are not optimally suited to replacement due to their biological inertness, foreign body reactions and the additional damage caused after placement. The combination of biomaterials with MSC-Exos enables adhesion between cells and implants and is now used as a method for in vivo experiments in scientific research in the direction of osteogenesis, not only for testing the osteogenic effect of MSC-Exos, but also for clinical transformation. MSC-Exo is mostly combined with biological material by co-incubation. Among the biomaterials, the more mature materials can be divided into natural polymers, synthetic polymers, metal and inorganic non-metal materials (Ren et al., 2022a). The Classification of biomaterials combined with MSC-EXOs are summarized in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Combination of exosomes and biomaterials. Biomaterials combined with MSC-EXO for bone defect repair can be classified into 4 categories: natural material, synthetic material, inorganic material and metallic material.

3.1 Natural material

3.1.1 Hydroxyapatite scaffold

Pouya et al. synthesized and characterized hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffold, following the osteogenesis and angiogenesis of HA scaffold with or without endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (hEnSCs) derived exosomes were investigated in rat with calvaria defect (Youseflee et al., 2022). Studies have shown that Alg (alginate)/HA is inferior to Alg/hydroxyapatite (Hap) in terms of mechanical properties, cytocompatibility and induction of cell differentiation in MSC (Yu et al., 2017). Therefore, some studies have chosen to use periumbilical stem cell-Exo co-embedded with hydroxyapatite (HAP) in HA-Alg for bone regeneration (Yang et al., 2020b). Some studies have also used this Exo combined with novel coral hydroxyapatite (CHA), filamentous protein (SF), glycolic chitosan (GCS) and bifunctional polyethylene glycol (DF-PEG) to form a novel self-healing hydrogel, which was successfully used for the repair of bone defects in mice (Wang et al., 2020a). MSC-Exos wrapped hydrogels form MSC-Exos-HAGel + nanohydroxy apatite-poly (hHP) to form uMSCEXO/Gel/nHP, which promotes angiogenesis by promoting endothelial cell proliferation and migration. In-depth studies have found that miRNA-21 is the target for intercellular communication and promotes the notch/DLL4 pathway to achieve pro-angiogenic purposes (Bohner et al., 2020).

3.1.2 β-tricalcium phosphate

β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) is resorbable, osteoconductive and osteoinductive, making it one of the most potent bone graft substitutes (Zhang et al., 2016). Exosomes can enhance the osteoinductivity of β-TCP by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway in hBMSCs, which implies that the exosome/β-TCP scaffold has better osteogenic activity than the β-TCP scaffold (Ying et al., 2020). And BMSC-Exoss-HIF1α combined with β-TCP scaffolds could repair critical-sized bone defects by promoting new bone regeneration and neovascularization (Nikhil and Kumar, 2022).

3.1.3 Composite natural scaffold

Aman et al. prepared two types of cryogels, namely chitosan-gelatin-chondroitin sulfate (CGC) for articular cartilage and nanohydroxyapatite-gelatin (HG) for subchondral bone (Bahar et al., 2022).A novel bilayer cryogel manufactured using a single process of two layers (CGC as top layer and HG as the bottom layer) to mimic osteochondral units. The CS/HA/Exo combination is a new therapy for bone defect repair to induce bone formation. The CS scaffold significantly promoted bone regeneration compared to the control (Wang et al., 2022).

3.1.4 Others

Exosomes derived from osteogenic differentiated BMSC (OBMSC) are osteogenic, leading to the proposal of a novel exosomal decellularized fish scale (DE-FS) scaffold for promoting bone regeneration in vivo. The DE-FS scaffold is obtained through a process of decellularization and decalcification and has high biocompatibility and low immune rejection. The intrinsically anisotropic structure of DE-FS enhances the adhesion and proliferation of BMSCs in vitro (Zhang et al., 2022).

3.2 Synthetic material

3.2.1 PLA scaffolds

Zhang et al. developed bioactive 3D PLA scaffolds based on exosomes to enhance their osteogenic and immunomodulatory potential (Zhang et al., 2022). PLA (polylactic acid)-10CaSi (calcium silicate) was produced by the thermal phase separation technique Porous scaffolds were placed in HBSS and immersed for 28 days. The surface micromorphology of the scaffolds was studied by ESEM-EDX and the exo-rich complex was used for bone regeneration with good results (Gandolfi et al., 2020). Zha et al. (2021) used ATDC5-derived exosomes to encapsulate the VEGF gene and construct gene-activated engineered exosomes. The specific exosome anchor peptide CP05 was used as a flexible joint to effectively combine engineered exosome nanoparticles with 3D-printed porous bone scaffolds. It was also verified that the CP05 anchor peptide (PCL-CP05)-modified 3D printed PCL scaffold could effectively induce massive vascularized bone regeneration.

3.2.2 PCL scaffolds

Chondroprogenitor cell-derived (ATDC5) exosome plays a key role in osteogenic induction and vascular remodeling of large segmental bone defects by transfecting VEGF plasmid and binding to GPI, CP05 and CD63 to form a composite 3D scaffold material of ATDC5-Exo-VEGF-GPI CP05 using PCL as a scaffold (Zha et al., 2021). In addition, S-GSNO and MSC-Exos-modified PCL, GSNO modulates fibrin structure, limits Plt activity, inhibits coagulation and thrombosis, and GSNO alters blood coagulation structure, thus providing a critical contribution to early blood scab formation and early bone regeneration (Wang et al., 2020b).

3.2.3 PLGA scaffolds

Li et al. (2018) demonstrated the development of a polydopamine-encapsulated PLGA scaffold to achieve controlled release of hASC-Exos and repair of cranial defects in mice. Gao et al. adsorbed hypoxic Exosomes onto the surface of injectable porous poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microspheres with bioinspired polydopamine (PDA) coating (PMS-PDA microspheres) to induce vascularized bone regeneration in 5-mm rat calvarial defect (Gao et al., 2022). Swanson et al. (2020) improved encapsulation and controlled release of poly (lactic acid-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and poly (ethylene glycol) (PEG) triblock copolymer microsphere exosomes on a tunable time scale.

3.2.4 Sulfonated polyetheretherketone scaffolds

Bone marrow stem cell (BMSC)-derived exosomes contain a variety of signaling molecules and have been proven to have immunomodulatory functions. Fan et al. (2021) developed a BMSC-derived Exos functionalized implant that accelerates osseointegration through immunomodulation. BMSC-Exoss is reversibly incorporated onto tannic acid (TA)-modified sulfonated polyetheretherketone (SPEEK) via strong interactions of TA with biomolecules. The slow release of exosomes from SPEEK can be phagocytosed by co-cultured cells, which can effectively improve the biocompatibility of SPEEK.

3.3 Inorganic non-metallic materials

Sr replaces Casi ceramics into BMSC to promote endocytosis of Exo-carrying miRNA-146a by HUVECs, allowing miRNA-146a to promote angiogenesis by inhibiting Smad4 and Nf2 pathways in target cells. This alternative approach greatly reduces rejection through the release of anti-inflammatory factors, and is of great clinical application (Liu et al., 2021b). The use of lithium-containing glass ceramics co-cultured with BMSC produced Li-BGC-BMSC-Exos, which highly expresses miRNA130a, promotes endothelial cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis by inhibiting PTEN protein expression, as well as Akt activation (Liu et al., 2019). In addition, ionic products from bioglass acting on MSC were found to promote the expression of nSMase2 as well as Rab7a, thereby promoting endothelial cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis by promotion of exosomes genesis and the ability to increase the content of miRNA-1290 and decrease the content of miRNA-342-5p in the output exosomes and promote the expression of vasoactive factors such as VEGF, thus promoting angiogenesis. This study, although focusing on novel biomaterials, provides constructive insights into the mechanisms of Exo product action in promoting Exo genesis (Zhang et al., 2016). BMSC and ADSC from different sources were screened for BMSC-Oi-Exo in osteoinduction medium or normal medium with increased levels of miRNA-328a, miRNA31a-5p, let-7c-5p, and let-7c-5p, and activation of BMP through miRNA regulation of BMP induction by BMPR2/Acvr 2b Smad1/5/9 phosphorylation. The Exo lyophilized formulation is also bound to the material by binding to a hierarchical porous bioactive glass scaffold to achieve maintenance of bioactivity and slow release (Liu et al., 2021c).

3.4 Metal scaffolds

Due to the limited duration of Exo activity in vivo, some studies have shifted the focus to maintaining the long-term stability and osteogenic ability of Exo in vivo. It was found that the combination of Ti-pyrrole -biotin forms a Bio-ppy-Ti complex, followed by the addition of streptavidin (SA), with ADSC-evs. The combination forms a novel biomaterial that exerts an efficient and stable bone-enabling effect (Chen et al., 2019). Alternatively, lyophilization techniques were used to address the problems of low cell implantation rate and short cell life span during Ti cage osteoinduction (Bari et al., 2021). A complex Gr-Ti scaffold was prepared using ADSC-derived Exos. The results showed that the Gr-Ti scaffold had low toxicity and good biocompatibility and promoted the adhesion and osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs. Exosomes play a role in promoting osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs: mRNA levels of RUNX2, ALP, and Osterix were significantly higher in the Gr-Ti/Exos group than in the Gr-Ti group, and this process was associated with the Wnt signaling pathway. Gr-Ti scaffolds with ADSC and ADSC-derived Exos successfully repaired mandibular defects in rabbits. The bone density and flexural strength were significantly higher in the Gr-Ti/Exos group than in the Gr-Ti group (Sun et al., 2022).

4 Regulators of MSC-Exos production

Exosomes are tiny EVs as their small yields hinder the expansion of basic research in exogenous analysis. Intracellular calcium levels, external stress, cytoskeletal blockade, drug effects, gene expression factors and other factors all affect EXOs production (Liu and Su, 2019). Therefore, it is of great significance for its practical application in the future to increase its output through the engineering production of exosomes.

4.1 MSC pretreatment

The characteristics of exosomes vary with the source of MSCs. When the MSC is subjected to different external effects, it transmits different signaling factors to exosomes to guide exosomes to work. Thus, treatment of the MSC can influence the formation, secretion and cargo of the exosome from the initiation. The Pretreatment of mesenchymal stem cells are summarized in Figure 3.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Pretreatment of mesenchymal stem cells. Physical and chemical alterations of MSCs or cultivation of MSCs with kinds of biomaterials can affect the formation, secretion and carrying of exosomes.

4.1.1 Physical alterations

4.1.1.1 Temperature

By changing the ambient temperature of cultured cells (42°C and 37°C), it was found that the surface markers CD9 and CD63 were more significantly expressed in the 42°C group. And that bone regeneration experiments using heat stress-induced ADSC-Exo with β-TCP (tricalcium phosphate) as a carrier were more effective than using β-TCP alone or using the ADSC with β-TCP (Akdeniz-Dogan et al., 2021).

4.1.1.2 Stress

BMSC under cyclic mechanical stress (CMS) regulates osteogenic differentiation via HDAC1 and Dnmt 3b epigenetically, while RUNX2-sensitive miRNA-103a is upregulated by stress in BMSC, and CMS-BMSC-Exo inhibits osteoclast formation and function by suppressing the NF-kB pathway, in the same way that acting on periodontal membrane exosome inhibits IL-1β production in M, thereby suppressing apoptosis and inhibiting bone formation (Xiao et al., 2021). The rotary cell culture system (RCCS) provides a novel mechanical environment for HUMSCs, and the different speeds of RCCS can increase exosome production within 196 h at the beginning of culture, and RCCS acts on HUMSCs through the microgravity and fluid shear of the RCCS, resulting in high expression of lncRNA-H19. lncRNA-H19 is a highly conserved sequence involved in stem cell formation and function. is a highly conserved sequence involved in stem cell differentiation, embryonic growth and tumorigenesis. This highly expressed lncRNA H19 is released via exosomes and acts on chondrocytes to promote chondrocyte proliferation, anti-apoptosis, ECM formation and function (Yan et al., 2021).

4.1.1.3 Culture media stereotyping

Bioreactors act on PDSCs, ADSCs, and SMSCs within 2D or 3D culture media through fluidic and tensile forces, and act on Yes-associated-protein (YAP) through mechanical stimulation, thereby activating the Wnt pathway and promoting the secretion and production of osteogenic exo (Guo et al., 2021b). Dental pulp pluripotent stem cells (DPPSC) are considered to be an important source of stem cells in the field of bone regeneration, and 3D culture promotes Nanog expression and osteogenesis, as well as the isolation of exosomes, providing a serum-free environment that excludes the influence of serum-derived exosomes on experimental result (Faruqu et al., 2020).

4.1.1.4 Oxygen concentration

Hypoxia-pretreated ADSC-Exo was able to promote angiogenesis in adipose grafts thereby promoting ADSC as well as adipose graft survival (Han et al., 2018). Using MLO-Y4 as a model, the environment of hypoxia and serum deprivation triggered increased apoptosis by ROS. hADSC-Exo was able to inhibit RANKL expression, thereby suppressing osteoclast-mediated osteoclastogenesis, and by upregulating Bcl-2/Bax, inhibiting ROS and reducing cytochrome enzyme production, thereby resisting apoptosis in the hypoxic environment (Ren et al., 2019). It has even been suggested that Evs in hypoxic environments are important factors in regenerative medicine. This effect is induced by HIF-1α, which hydroxylates and cleaves HIF-1α in a normoxic environment via prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs) on proline residues. In contrast, under hypoxia, PHDs require oxygen in conjunction with α-ketoglutarate and Fe, so HIF-1α hydroxylation is reduced and stabilized and translocated in the nucleus, activating hypoxia-sensitive genes that regulate cell cycle, apoptosis and cell differentiation (Imanirad et al., 2014). In contrast, MSC under hypoxic conditions exhibit reduced Mit activity, increased glucose depletion, reduced Mit autophagy, reduced ROS, lower telomeric shortening rates, and decreased cellular senescence overall (Noronha et al., 2019). Therefore, the influence of hypoxia has been incorporated in various studies on MSC-Exos and the hypoxic state of animal models or cultured cells has been achieved by atmospheric hypoxia, chemical hypoxia or other methods to interfere with the mechanism of action of MSC-Exos.

4.1.1.5 Laser or electrostimulation treatment

After low-intensity laser irradiation, it produced proliferation-promoting, migration-promoting and anti-apoptotic effects on MSC (Yin et al., 2017). Exosomes secreted by ADSC (LLLI-ADSC-Exo) was able to inhibit hypoxia-induced apoptosis in osteoblasts 40 and promote bone defect repair (Wang et al., 2018b). In contrast, after radiation treatment of hPMSC, miRNA-23a levels in extracted Exo decreased, thereby inhibiting the CXCL12 (chemokine 12) pathway in BMSC and thus inhibiting BMSC osteogenesis (Zhuang and Zhou, 2020). ESCRT-III-related protein Alix stimulated ADSC in the microgrooved matrix, promoting secretion of EVs, upregulation of miRNA pro-angiogenesis, and increased secretion of growth factors (Ji et al., 2021).

4.1.2 Chemical alterations

Dimethyl oxalylglycine-stimulated human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes enhance bone regeneration through angiogenesis by targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway (Liang et al., 2019). Inflammatory preconditioning of ADSC-Exo has immunosuppressive properties (Domenis et al., 2018). Pretreatment of ADSC with TNF-α, which mimics the acute inflammatory microenvironment, promotes Wnt3a expression and enhances osteogenic gene expression in ADSC-CM by pretreating parental cells with Exo (Lu et al., 2017). Alternatively, Exo production was promoted by TNF-α acting on human dental pulp MSCs carrying miRNA-1260b, which inhibited osteoclastogenesis due to Wnt5a and promoted M2 polarization, thereby inhibiting periodontal inflammatory bone loss (Nakao et al., 2021). In addition, it has been shown that controlled Nitric Oxide releasing acts on PMSC to promote exo-miRNA-126 release as well as VEGF expression and acts on EC to promote angiogenesis and indirectly promote osteogenesis (Du et al., 2017).

4.1.3 Biomaterials transformation

The use of lithium-containing glass ceramics co-cultured with BMSC produced Li-BGC-BMSC-Exo with high expression of miRNA130a, which promoted endothelial cell proliferation, migration and angiogenesis by inhibiting PTEN protein expression, as well as Akt activation (Liu et al., 2019). In addition, ionic products in bioglass acting on MSC were found to promote the expression of nSMase2 as well as Rab7a, thus promoting Exo output by promoting Exo genesis, and were able to increase the content of miRNA-1290 in the output Exo, decreasing the content of miRNA-342-5p, and promote the expression of vasoactive factors such as VEGF, thus promoting angiogenesis, the study, while focusing on novel biomaterials, also provided constructive insights into the mechanisms of Exo promotion by the action of ionic products (Bohner et al., 2020). The composite particles made by using PLGA and PEI as coating materials and cyanine 5.5 as an indicator, in which SPIO magnetic nanoparticles were encapsulated, promoted the secretion of Exo under dynamic-induced endocytosis and were able to carry a variety of miRNAs including miRNA-2127, achieving antioxidant, regeneration, proliferation and immune (Park et al., 2020). M-Exo isolated under BMP2 stimulation was co-cultured with nanotube implants and was able to promote osteogenesis (Wei et al., 2019). It was shown that there are two structures of micro/nanostructured hierarchical titanium topographies, reticular and tubular, both of which can extend the diffusion area of BMSC on the Ti surface and promote BMSC osteogenesis in vitro, with the key targets being SMPD3 (sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3) and Rab27b (the small GTPase Rab27), which promotes Exo biogenesis and secretion to improve osseointegration (Zhang et al., 2021b).

4.2 MSC-Exos pretreatment

Exosome engineering summarises the common methods used regarding Exo treatment, such as freeze-thaw cycles, sonication, electroporation, extrusion, click chemistry, antibody, etc (Choi et al., 2021; Khayambashi et al., 2021). In contrast to the osteogenic modification of MSC-Exo, current research is more inclined to develop new ideas and methods while verifying the effectiveness and safety of the original methods.

It has been shown that ADSC-Exo proteins obtained by different isolation methods are characterized differently. Studies comparing ultracentrifugation (UC), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), Exo Quick-TC precipitation and Exo Quick-TC ULTRA isolation methods found that all proteins were involved in integrin pathways and inflammatory pathways, but the UC method also involved in cholecystokinin-R (CCKR) signaling pathway, ROS, and angiogenesis; qEV favored CCKR, EGF-R, and cytoskeletal regulation; TC favored cytoskeleton, angiogenesis, EGF-R, and PDGF-R; and Tcu appeared to be similar to TC but with a slightly lesser role for PDGF-R and concluded that different isolation methods of ADSC-Exo had different effects on LPS-stimulated cells differently, and if studies in related fields are conducted, the TCU method is recommended to promote greater tube formation function (Huang et al., 2021).

The modification of the exosome can be divided into two aspects: cargo filling and exosome membrane modification, but of course, not being bound to natural sources of exosomes, one also sets out to reassemble the components of the exosome thus engineering the production of exosomes.

4.2.1 Cargo filling

The role of MSC-Exo is largely dependent on the modulation of target cells and environments by the active factors carried by its contents, therefore enrichment of the contents in the exosome will be central to enhancing the osteogenic role of the Exo.

4.2.1.1 Electroporation

With regard to Exo modification, electroporation is the more common practice, using a PBS solution to dilute the exosome extracted from MSC and then mixing it with the target contents in an electroporation buffer. After electroporation, the electroporation solution is aspirated and placed in a new RNase-free Eppendorf tube and kept at 37°C for 30 min to restore the integrity of the exosome membrane. Subsequently, the solution was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 2 h to remove excess target contents (Duan et al., 2021). However, it was found that membrane defects in the Exo triggered by electroporation were still difficult to repair in a short period of time, promptly by resting, thus triggering adverse effects on the structural integrity and function of the Exo (Khayambashi et al., 2021). However, it has been shown that electroporation can inactivate exo-let-7 in preosteoblasts, thereby inhibiting osteogenesis (Liu and Su, 2019).

4.2.1.2 Freeze-dried

The use of freeze-dried ADSC-Exos and GMP-compliant pharmaceuticals can be used to modulate immunity (Choi et al., 2019). And the freeze-dried method is generally not used alone, but mostly in combination with biological materials. For example, in experiments with GMSC-Exos to promote wound healing, chitosan solution was mixed with silk fibroin solution and then the chitosan-silk fibroin emulsion was incubated at −20°C for 12 h, then at −70°C for 6 h and then lyophilized in a vacuum freeze dryer for 48 h to obtain a chitosan/silk fibroin hydrogel sponge that was effective for wound healing (Bari et al., 2019).

4.2.1.3 Freeze-thaw cycles

A mixture of exosome and liposome is designed using membrane fusion of the exosome and liposome. Exosomes and liposomes are prepared separately and then mixed in equal volume ratios. the mixture is frozen in liquid nitrogen and thawed at room temperature for 15 min. The freeze-thaw cycle is repeated several times and the resulting mixture is a mixture of exosomes and liposomes. This method allows for the carriage of membrane surface proteins and markers and membrane fusion (Shi et al., 2017).

4.2.2 Membranes modification

4.2.2.1 Click chemistry

Atomic transfer radical polymerization for the packaging of Exo has also been successful (Sato et al., 2016), with PLGA (polylactic acid-ethanolic acid copolymer) + PEG (polyethylene glycol) forming triblock copolymer microspheres and assembling Exo by droplet microfluidics to form a controlled mineralized Exo, which is combined with the aqueous and organic phases to make an Exo scaffold, thus making a cell-promoting craniofacial bone regeneration free material 75. A study combined HUVEC-Exo with new coral hydroxyapatite (CHA), filamentous protein (SF), glycolic chitosan (GCS) and bifunctional polyethylene glycol (DF-PEG) to make a composite hydrogel to promote bone regeneration. It was found that the new composite had more new bone tissue and morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and the highest microvascular density 61. Another study used exosome-encapsulated dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Dex) nanoparticles (Exo/Dex) with a folic acid (FA)-polyethylene glycol (PEG)-cholesterol modified (Chol) compound on its surface to achieve an active targeted drug delivery system (Lathwal et al., 2021).

4.2.2.2 Receptor-ligand

After the study selected bone marrow stromal cell target bone (ST)-derived Exo (Ste-Exos) and clarified its characteristic action of promoting BMSC osteogenesis, ste-exos was modified to improve its difficulty in improving postmenopausal osteoporosis in OVX mice after intravenous administration in vivo, and the targeted delivery of Exo was achieved through the assembly of Ste-Exos and aptamer complexes to form a complex targeting BMSC (Yan et al., 2020).

4.2.2.3 Electrostatic interaction

The anionic environment in the joint cavity results in minimal utilization of MSC-Evs in intra-articular injectables. A study used a new cationic amphiphilic macromolecule: e-polylysine-polyethylene distearyl phosphatidylethanolamine to modify MSC-Evs, reversing their surface charge, and the method maintains the integrity of the Evs with no interference with the cargo, resulting in good stability in the presence of anionic macromolecule interference (Luo et al., 2019).

4.2.2.4 Hydrophobic insertion

IL-10 pretreatment of immature DC (imDC) induces tolDex, the Dex that inhibits inflammation in osteoarthritis. The study used tolerogenic DC (tolDC)-derived exosome to immobilise ROS-sensitive thioredoxin (TK)-embedded polyethylene glycol (PEG) joints on the exosome surface using a hydrophobic insertion method. This processing method was used to achieve targeted delivery of the exosome to mature DCs, reduce CD40 expression levels and counteract the inflammatory response of osteoarthritis. In addition, the presence of PEG was found to prolong the duration of action of the exosome in the circulation as well as in inflamed joints (Feng et al., 2021a).

4.2.3 New attempts

Some studies have even artificialized Exo, using nanoporous membranes, microfluidics and other techniques to extract cell fragmentation, adding specific exosome cargo and designing a mimetic of Exo for replacing biological sources of Exo that are less abundant and have more uncontrollable factors in the organism (Lee et al., 2021).

Combined with the current research progress, based on the improvement of each key step of MSC-Exo, and the trend of mainstream research ideas, we can roughly deduce the scheme of exo optimization: firstly, to provide a 3D culture environment for MSC and to encapsulate the active ingredients of MSC-Exo by modifying the contributing bone factors, to select a suitable vector for the specificity of different sites of bone defects The vector is selected for the specificity of the bone defect at different sites, and the target binding of Exo is enhanced by means of receptors and ligands to promote the maximization of Exo function. In the future, researchers may need to integrate multiple approaches to develop standardized and consistent quality procedures and propose methods for large-scale production of MSC-Exo.

5 Future perspectives

When we look for clinical applications of bone regeneration biomaterials, we are used to evaluating them in terms of safety, biocompatibility, the difficulty of preparation, price and convenience of use, so it is particularly important to build an evaluation system for biomaterials for bone defect repair.

The combination of exosomes and biomaterial scaffolds while maintaining the activity of the exosomes is the challenge of this technology, which has been solved by hydrogels, lyophilization and surface modification of the scaffold material. Recent literature has focused on keywords such as 3D bioprinting, composite scaffolds and multi-porous scaffolds, which may reveal future research hotspots in this field. However, it is important to notice that we should not stiffly composite exosomes and scaffolds at the expense of the properties of both themselves.

The advantages of combining exosomes with biological scaffolds are: 1) the enrichment of exosomes; 2) the storage of exosomes; 3) the avoidance of ethics due to “cell-free”, which is the current research trend and facilitates clinical translation. Although exosomes have a promising application in bone tissue repair, there are also many constraints that hinder their development, as they are difficult to extract, with low yields, low target utilization, and often difficult to act accurately in complex in vivo environments. The existing research focuses on 1) the mechanism of MSC-Exos osteogenesis in different sources and environments, and 2) the modification and functional enhancement of MSC-Exos.

As for materials, they should not only act as a carrier, but should intervene at all stages of exosome production. For example, combining different properties of materials to promote the secretion of exosomes containing active ingredients from parental cells, or the isolation or accumulation of exosomes through the adsorption of materials, and also researchers have focused on how to achieve functional substitution of exosomes through the exploration of lipophilic materials, thus enabling the mass production of exosomes.

Although MSC-Exos were promising therapeutic agents, the research on the efficacy of MSC-Exos on bone regeneration is still in its infancy. Numerous in vitro trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of MSC-Exo in bone disease, (Feng et al., 2021b), while most experiments in vivo have been conducted on small animals (including rats, mice and rabbits), validating the effectiveness of MSC-Exo on bone regeneration in animal models of bone defects and diseases such as osteonecrosis and osteoporosis (Tan et al., 2020), supporting the basis for clinical translation of MSC therapeutic agents (Ren et al., 2022b). However, the clinical trials of MSC-Exo is still limited. www.clinicaltrials.gov lists 7 clinical trials of exosomes in relation to bone, 3 of which describe the use of exosomes as an early diagnostic tool and 2 for clinical treatment. One is attempting to verify whether transplantation of hASCs-CM and a synthetic bone substitute can facilitate maxillary bone repair, and another is attempting to verify the feasibility of intradiscal injection of PRP with exosomes derived from blood for the treatment of chronic low back pain but has not yet published results. As the translation of MSC-Exo-based therapies from preclinical studies to the clinic requires a number of key parameters, including the establishment of optimal MSC culture conditions and exosome production, isolation and storage protocols to provide batch-to-batch consistency, optimal dosing and exosome dosing schedules, and the development of potency assays to allow efficacy evaluation (Mendt et al., 2019). More clinical trials remain to be conducted.

In addition, we should also focus on enhancing the compliance of MSC-Exosomes and the immunomodulatory effects of MSC-Exosomes on bone regeneration. Bone regeneration is not only about bone defects caused by trauma and fractures, but also about bone loss caused by systemic diseases such as osteoporosis, femoral necrosis or drugs. Therefore, it is not enough to combine exosomes with biomaterials, but also to focus on the concentration enhancement and targeted presentation of exosomes in circulation, and thus to maximize the contribution of exosomes to the three basic elements of bone regeneration.

6 Conclusion

The production of MSC-Exos can be achieved by direct action on various osteogenic cells or by carrying substances that affect cellular activity factors or the local internal environment in target cells, or by binding to biological materials to activate the osteogenic framework. The generation of MSC-Exos can be achieved by pretreatment of its parental cells and exosome contents and membranes with a view to obtaining the possibility of mass production of MSC-Exos.

Author contributions

SR and YL were responsible for the project design, data collection, results in analysis, manuscript preparation, and literature search. WL was responsible for the literature search and preparation of the manuscript. LY was responsible for the project design, data analysis, the content of the article, and funding collection. MZ was responsible for the project design, manuscript preparation, and funding collection.

Funding

This work was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (2022-YGJC-69) and the support program for excellent young scholars of China Medical University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Akdeniz-Dogan, Z., Sendur, S., Karademir-Yilmaz, B., Bugdayci, O., Cilingir-Kaya, O. T., Yilmaz-Goler, A. M., et al. (2021). The role of extracellular vesicles secreted from thermal stress-induced adipose-derived stem cells on bone regeneration. J. Craniofac Surg. 32 (6), 2245–2250. doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000007901

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

An, Y., Zhao, J., Nie, F., Qin, Z., Xue, H., Wang, G., et al. (2019). Exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) overexpressing miR-21 promote vascularization of endothelial cells. Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 12861. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49339-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bahar, D., Gonen, Z. B., Gumusderelioglu, M., Onger, M., Tokak, E., Ozturk-Kup, F., et al. (2022). Repair of rat calvarial bone defect by using exosomes of umbilical cord–derived mesenchymal stromal cells embedded in chitosan/hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 37 (5), 943–950. doi:10.11607/jomi.9515

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bari, E., Perteghella, S., Catenacci, L., Sorlini, M., Croce, S., Mantelli, M., et al. (2019). Freeze-dried and GMP-compliant pharmaceuticals containing exosomes for acellular mesenchymal stromal cell immunomodulant therapy. Nanomedicine Lond. Engl. 14 (6), 753–765. doi:10.2217/nnm-2018-0240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bari, E., Tartara, F., Cofano, F., di Perna, G., Garbossa, D., Perteghella, S., et al. (2021). Freeze-dried secretome (lyosecretome) from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells promotes the osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties of titanium cages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (16), 8445. doi:10.3390/ijms22168445

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Basso, M., and Bonetto, V. (2016). Extracellular vesicles and a novel form of communication in the brain. Front. Neurosci. 10, 127. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Battafarano, G., Rossi, M., De Martino, V., Marampon, F., Borro, L., Secinaro, A., et al. (2021). Strategies for bone regeneration: From graft to tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (3), 1128. doi:10.3390/ijms22031128

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bohner, M., Santoni, B. L. G., and Döbelin, N. (2020). β-tricalcium phosphate for bone substitution: Synthesis and properties. Acta Biomater. 113, 23–41. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolandi, Z., Mokhberian, N., Eftekhary, M., Sharifi, K., Soudi, S., Ghanbarian, H., et al. (2020). Adipose derived mesenchymal stem cell exosomes loaded with miR-10a promote the differentiation of Th17 and Treg from naive CD4+ T cell. Life Sci. 259, 118218. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brown, C., McKee, C., Bakshi, S., Walker, K., Hakman, E., Halassy, S., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells: Cell therapy and regeneration potential. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 13 (9), 1738–1755. doi:10.1002/term.2914

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carriel, V., Geuna, S., and Alaminos, M. (2018). Ex vivo and in vivo stem cells-based tissue engineering strategies for their use in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 1–2. doi:10.1155/2018/7143930

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, L., Mou, S., Li, F., Zeng, Y., Sun, Y., Horch, R. E., et al. (2019). Self-assembled human adipose-derived stem cell-derived extracellular vesicle-functionalized biotin-doped polypyrrole titanium with long-term stability and potential osteoinductive ability. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 11 (49), 46183–46196. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Z., Klein, T., Murray, R. Z., Crawford, R., Chang, J., Wu, C., et al. (2016). Osteoimmunomodulation for the development of advanced bone biomaterials. Mater Today 19 (6), 304–321. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chew, J. R. J., Chuah, S. J., Teo, K. Y. W., Zhang, S., Lai, R. C., Fu, J. H., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes enhance periodontal ligament cell functions and promote periodontal regeneration. Acta Biomater. 89, 252–264. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, H., Choi, Y., Yim, H. Y., Mirzaaghasi, A., Yoo, J. K., and Choi, C. (2021). Biodistribution of exosomes and engineering strategies for targeted delivery of therapeutic exosomes. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 18 (4), 499–511. doi:10.1007/s13770-021-00361-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Choi, S. Y., Han, E. C., Hong, S. H., Kwon, T. G., Lee, Y., and Lee, H. J. (2019). Regulating osteogenic differentiation by suppression of exosomal MicroRNAs. Tissue Eng. Part A 25 (15-16), 1146–1154. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2018.0257

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Domenis, R., Cifu, A., Quaglia, S., Pistis, C., Moretti, M., Vicario, A., et al. (2018). Pro inflammatory stimuli enhance the immunosuppressive functions of adipose mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 13325. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-31707-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, W., Su, L., Zhang, N., and Wang, H. (2019). Exosomes derived from preadipocytes improve osteogenic differentiation, potentially via reduced miR223 expression. Mol. Med. Rep. 19 (2), 951–958. doi:10.3892/mmr.2018.9760

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Du, W., Zhang, K., Zhang, S., Wang, R., Nie, Y., Tao, H., et al. (2017). Enhanced proangiogenic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes stimulated by a nitric oxide releasing polymer. Biomaterials 133, 70–81. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.04.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, L., Xu, X., Xu, L., Chen, H., Li, X., Alahdal, M., et al. (2021). Exosome-mediated drug delivery for cell-free therapy of osteoarthritis. Curr. Med. Chem. 28 (31), 6458–6483. doi:10.2174/1875533xmtexenjqg4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

EL Andaloussi, S., Mager, I., Breakefield, X. O., and Wood, M. J. A. (2013). Extracellular vesicles: Biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 12 (5), 347–357. doi:10.1038/nrd3978

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, L., Guan, P., Xiao, C., Wen, H., Wang, Q., Liu, C., et al. (2021). Exosome-functionalized polyetheretherketone-based implant with immunomodulatory property for enhancing osseointegration. Bioact. Mater 6 (9), 2754–2766. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faruqu, F. N., Zhou, S., Sami, N., Gheidari, F., Lu, H., and Al-Jamal, K. T. (2020). Three-dimensional culture of dental pulp pluripotent-like stem cells (DPPSCs) enhances Nanog expression and provides a serum-free condition for exosome isolation. FASEB Bioadv 2 (7), 419–433. doi:10.1096/fba.2020-00025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, K., Xie, X., Yuan, J., Gong, L., Zhu, Z., Zhang, J., et al. (2021). Reversing the surface charge of MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles by εPL-PEG-DSPE for enhanced osteoarthritis treatment. J. Extracell. Vesicles 10 (13), e12160. doi:10.1002/jev2.12160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, Z. Y., Zhang, Q. Y., Tan, J., and Xie, H. Q. (2021). Techniques for increasing the yield of stem cell-derived exosomes: What factors may be involved? Sci. China Life Sci. 65, 1325–1341. doi:10.1007/s11427-021-1997-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gandolfi, M. G., Gardin, C., Zamparini, F., Ferroni, L., Esposti, M. D., Parchi, G., et al. (2020). Mineral-doped poly(L-lactide) acid scaffolds enriched with exosomes improve osteogenic commitment of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Nanomater. (Basel) 10 (3), 432. doi:10.3390/nano10030432

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, Y., Yuan, Z., Yuan, X., Wan, Z., Yu, Y., Zhan, Q., et al. (2022). Bioinspired porous microspheres for sustained hypoxic exosomes release and vascularized bone regeneration. Bioact. Mater 14, 377–388. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.01.041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, S., Debbi, L., Zohar, B., Samuel, R., Arzi, R. S., Fried, A. I., et al. (2021). Stimulating extracellular vesicles production from engineered tissues by mechanical forces. Nano Lett. 21 (6), 2497–2504. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04834

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Guo, S., Gu, J., Ma, J., Xu, R., Wu, Q., Meng, L., et al. (2021). GATA4-driven miR-206-3p signatures control orofacial bone development by regulating osteogenic and osteoclastic activity. Theranostics 11 (17), 8379–8395. doi:10.7150/thno.58052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, Y. D., Bai, Y., Yan, X. L., Ren, J., Zeng, Q., Li, X. d., et al. (2018). Co-transplantation of exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned adipose mesenchymal stem cells promotes neovascularization and graft survival in fat grafting. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 497 (1), 305–312. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heo, J. S., Choi, Y., and Kim, H. O. (2019). Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote M2 macrophage phenotype through exosomes. Stem Cells Int. 2019, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2019/7921760

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, H., Wang, D., Li, L., Yin, H., He, G., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Role of microRNA-335 carried by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles in bone fracture recovery. Cell death Dis. 12 (2), 156. doi:10.1038/s41419-021-03430-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, L. H., Rau, C. S., Wu, S. C., Wu, Y., Wu, C. J., Tsai, C., et al. (2021). Identification and characterization of hADSC-derived exosome proteins from different isolation methods. J. Cell Mol. Med. 25 (15), 7436–7450. doi:10.1111/jcmm.16775

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Imanirad, P., Solaimani Kartalaei, P., Crisan, M., Vink, C., Yamada-Inagawa, T., de Pater, E., et al. (2014). HIF1α is a regulator of hematopoietic progenitor and stem cell development in hypoxic sites of the mouse embryo. Stem Cell Res. 12 (1), 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.scr.2013.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ji, Y., Han, W., Fu, X., Li, J., Wu, Q., and Wang, Y. (2021). Improved small extracellular vesicle secretion of rat adipose-derived stem cells by micro grooved substrates through upregulation of the ESCRT-III-associated protein Alix. Adv. Healthc. Mater 10 (16), 2101876. doi:10.1002/adhm.202101876

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, Y., Qiu, S., Xu, J., Kang, Q., and Chai, Y. (2020). Exosomes secreted by young mesenchymal stem cells promote new bone formation during distraction osteogenesis in older rats. Calcif. Tissue Int. 106 (5), 509–517. doi:10.1007/s00223-019-00656-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, Q., Li, P., Yuan, K., Zhao, F., Zhu, X., Zhang, P., et al. (2020). Extracellular vesicles derived from human dental pulp stem cells promote osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells via the MAPK pathway. J. Tissue Eng. 11, 204173142097556. doi:10.1177/2041731420975569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kargozar, S., Mozafari, M., Hamzehlou, S., Brouki Milan, P., Kim, H. W., and Baino, F. (2019). Bone tissue engineering using human cells: A comprehensive review on recent trends, current prospects, and recommendations. Appl. Sci. 9 (1), 174. doi:10.3390/app9010174

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kato, T., Kato, K., Shimizu, Y., Takefuji, M., and Murohara, T. (2021). Treatment with adipose-derived regenerative cells enhances ischemia-induced angiogenesis via exosomal microRNA delivery in mice. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 83 (3), 465–476. doi:10.18999/nagjms.83.3.465

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Khayambashi, P., Iyer, J., Pillai, S., Upadhyay, A., Zhang, Y., and Tran, S. (2021). Hydrogel encapsulation of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes for tissue engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2), 684. doi:10.3390/ijms22020684

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, Y. S., and Mikos, A. G. (2021). Emerging strategies in reprogramming and enhancing the fate of mesenchymal stem cells for bone and cartilage tissue engineering. J. Control Release 330, 565–574. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuang, M. J., Huang, Y., Zhao, X. G., Zhang, R., Ma, J. x., Wang, D. c., et al. (2019). Exosomes derived from Wharton's jelly of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells reduce osteocyte apoptosis in glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head in rats via the miR-21-PTEN-AKT signalling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 15 (9), 1861–1871. doi:10.7150/ijbs.32262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lathwal, S., Yerneni, S. S., Boye, S., Muza, U. L., Takahashi, S., Sugimoto, N., et al. (2021). Engineering exosome polymer hybrids by atom transfer radical polymerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118 (2), e2020241118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2020241118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lee, E. S., Sul, J. H., Shin, J. M., Shin, S., Lee, J. A., Kim, H. K., et al. (2021). Reactive oxygen species-responsive dendritic cell-derived exosomes for rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Biomater. 128, 462–473. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, P., Tang, Y., Zhou, M., Jiang, W., et al. (2018). Tissue-engineered bone immobilized with human adipose stem cells-derived exosomes promotes bone regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 10 (6), 5240–5254. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b17620

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Zheng, Y., Hou, L., Zhou, Z., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). Exosomes derived from maxillary BMSCs enhanced the osteogenesis in iliac BMSCs. Oral Dis. 26 (1), 131–144. doi:10.1111/odi.13202

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, B., Liang, J. M., Ding, J. N., Xu, J., Xu, J. G., and Chai, Y. M. (2019). Dimethyloxaloylglycine-stimulated human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes enhance bone regeneration through angiogenesis by targeting the AKT/mTOR pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10 (1), 335. doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1410-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, X., Zhang, L., Wang, S., Han, Q., and Zhao, R. C. (2016). Exosomes secreted by mesenchymal stem cells promote endothelial cell angiogenesis by transferring miR-125a. J. Cell Sci. 129 (11), 2182–2189. doi:10.1242/jcs.170373

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, A., Lin, D., Zhao, H., Chen, L., Cai, B., Lin, K., et al. (2021). Optimized BMSC-derived osteoinductive exosomes immobilized in hierarchical scaffold via lyophilization for bone repair through Bmpr2/Acvr2b competitive receptor-activated Smad pathway. Biomaterials 272, 120718. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, C., and Su, C. (2019). Design strategies and application progress of therapeutic exosomes. Theranostics 9 (4), 1015–1028. doi:10.7150/thno.30853

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Guo, S., Shi, W., Liu, Q., Huo, F., Wu, Y., et al. (2021). Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles promote periodontal regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 27 (13-14), 962–976. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2020.0141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Liu, Y., Feng, C., Chang, J., Fu, R., Wu, T., et al. (2019). Lithium-containing biomaterials stimulate bone marrow stromal cell-derived exosomal miR-130a secretion to promote angiogenesis. Biomaterials 192, 523–536. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, L., Yu, F., Li, L., Zhou, L., Zhou, T., Xu, Y., et al. (2021). Bone marrow stromal cells stimulated by strontium-substituted calcium silicate ceramics: Release of exosomal miR-146a regulates osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 119, 444–457. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lu, Z., Chen, Y., Dunstan, C., Roohani-Esfahani, S., and Zreiqat, H. (2017). Priming adipose stem cells with tumor necrosis factor-alpha preconditioning potentiates their exosome efficacy for bone regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A 23 (21-22), 1212–1220. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0548

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luo, Z. W., Li, F. X., Liu, Y. W., Rao, S. S., Yin, H., Huang, J., et al. (2019). Aptamer-functionalized exosomes from bone marrow stromal cells target bone to promote bone regeneration. Nanoscale 11 (43), 20884–20892. doi:10.1039/c9nr02791b

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mendt, M., Rezvani, K., and Shpall, E. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes for clinical use. Bone Marrow Transplant. 54 (S2), 789–792. doi:10.1038/s41409-019-0616-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nakao, Y., Fukuda, T., Zhang, Q., Sanui, T., Shinjo, T., Kou, X., et al. (2021). Exosomes from TNF-alpha-treated human gingiva-derived MSCs enhance M2 macrophage polarization and inhibit periodontal bone loss. Acta Biomater. 122, 306–324. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nikhil, A., and Kumar, A. (2022). Evaluating potential of tissue-engineered cryogels and chondrocyte derived exosomes in articular cartilage repair. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 119 (2), 605–625. doi:10.1002/bit.27982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noronha, N. C., Mizukami, A., Caliári-Oliveira, C., Cominal, J. G., Rocha, J. L. M., Covas, D. T., et al. (2019). Priming approaches to improve the efficacy of mesenchymal stromal cell-based therapies. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10 (1), 131. doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1224-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Otsuru, S., Desbourdes, L., Guess, A. J., Hofmann, T. J., Relation, T., Kaito, T., et al. (2018). Extracellular vesicles released from mesenchymal stromal cells stimulate bone growth in osteogenesis imperfecta. Cytotherapy 20 (1), 62–73. doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.09.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Park, D. J., Yun, W. S., Kim, W., Park, J. E., Lee, S. H., Ha, S., et al. (2020). Improvement of stem cell-derived exosome release efficiency by surface-modified nanoparticles. J. Nanobiotechnology 18 (1), 178. doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00739-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peng, H., Ji, W., Zhao, R., Yang, J., Lu, Z., Li, Y., et al. (2020). Exosome: A significant nano-scale drug delivery carrier. J. Mater Chem. B 8 (34), 7591–7608. doi:10.1039/d0tb01499k

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pizzicannella, J., Diomede, F., Gugliandolo, A., Chiricosta, L., Bramanti, P., Merciaro, I., et al. (2019). 3D printing PLA/gingival stem cells/EVs upregulate miR-2861 and -210 during osteoangiogenesis commitment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (13), 3256. doi:10.3390/ijms20133256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pizzicannella, J., Gugliandolo, A., Orsini, T., Fontana, A., Ventrella, A., Mazzon, E., et al. (2019). Engineered extracellular vesicles from human periodontal-ligament stem cells increase VEGF/VEGFR2 expression during bone regeneration. Front. physiology 10, 512. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00512

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, L., Song, Z. J., Cai, Q. W., Chen, R. x., Zou, Y., Fu, Q., et al. (2019). Adipose mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes ameliorate hypoxia/serum deprivation-induced osteocyte apoptosis and osteocyte-mediated osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 508 (1), 138–144. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.11.109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, S., Guo, S., Yang, L., and Wang, C. (2022). Effect of composite biodegradable biomaterials on wound healing in diabetes. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 1060026. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1060026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ren, S., Wang, C., and Guo, S. (2022). Review of the role of mesenchymal stem cells and exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of orthopedic disease. Med. Sci. Monit. 28, e935937. doi:10.12659/msm.935937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sato, Y. T., Umezaki, K., Sawada, S., Mukai, S. a., Sasaki, Y., Harada, N., et al. (2016). Engineering hybrid exosomes by membrane fusion with liposomes. Sci. Rep. 6, 21933. doi:10.1038/srep21933

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schlundt, C., Fischer, H., Bucher, C. H., Rendenbach, C., Duda, G. N., and Schmidt-Bleek, K. (2021). The multifaceted roles of macrophages in bone regeneration: A story of polarization, activation and time. Acta Biomater. 133, 46–57. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schmidt-Bleek, K., Schell, H., Lienau, J., Schulz, N., Hoff, P., Pfaff, M., et al. (2014). Initial immune reaction and angiogenesis in bone healing. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 8 (2), 120–130. doi:10.1002/term.1505

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schott, N. G., Friend, N. E., and Stegemann, J. P. (2021). Coupling osteogenesis and vasculogenesis in engineered orthopedic tissues. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 27 (3), 199–214. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, Q., Qian, Z., Liu, D., Sun, J., Wang, X., Liu, H., et al. (2017). GMSC-derived exosomes combined with a chitosan/silk hydrogel sponge accelerates wound healing in a diabetic rat skin defect model. Front. physiology 8, 904. doi:10.3389/fphys.2017.00904

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, R. L.-Y., Lee, C. W., Shen, O. Y. J., Xu, H., and Lee, O. K. S. (2021). The crosstalk between mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages in bone regeneration: A systematic review. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 1–21. doi:10.1155/2021/8835156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sobacchi, C., Schulz, A., Coxon, F. P., Villa, A., and Helfrich, M. H. (2013). Osteopetrosis: Genetics, treatment and new insights into osteoclast function. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 9 (9), 522–536. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2013.137

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, Y., Li, H., Ren, X., and Feng, C. (2020). SNHG9, delivered by adipocyte-derived exosomes, alleviates inflammation and apoptosis of endothelial cells through suppressing TRADD expression. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 872, 172977. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.172977

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, X., Yang, S., Tong, S., and Guo, S. (2022). Study on exosomes promoting the osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs in graphene porous titanium alloy scaffolds. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 905511. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.905511

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Swanson, W. B., Zhang, Z., Xiu, K., Gong, T., Eberle, M., Wang, Z., et al. (2020). Scaffolds with controlled release of pro-mineralization exosomes to promote craniofacial bone healing without cell transplantation. Acta Biomater. 118, 215–232. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.09.052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, S. H. S., Wong, J., Sim, S., Tjio, C., Wong, K., Chew, J., et al. (2020). Mesenchymal stem cell exosomes in bone regenerative strategies—A systematic review of preclinical studies. Mater. Today Bio 7, 100067. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100067

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verweij, F. J., Revenu, C., Arras, G., Dingli, F., Loew, D., Pegtel, D. M., et al. (2019). Live tracking of inter-organ communication by endogenous exosomes in vivo. Dev. Cell 48 (4), 573–589.e4. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, C. G., Liao, Z., Xiao, H., Liu, H., Hu, Y. H., Liao, Q. D., et al. (2019). LncRNA KCNQ1OT1 promoted BMP2 expression to regulate osteogenic differentiation by sponging miRNA-214. Exp. Mol. pathology 107, 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.01.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Wang, J., Zhou, X., Sun, J., Zhu, B., Duan, C., et al. (2020). A new self-healing hydrogel containing hucMSC-derived exosomes promotes bone regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 564731. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.564731

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, M., Yuan, Q., and Xie, L. (2018). Mesenchymal stem cell-based immunomodulation: Properties and clinical application. Stem Cells Int. 2018, 1–12. doi:10.1155/2018/3057624

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. Z., Jia, J., and Chen, C. H. (2021). lncRNA-KCNQ1OT1: A potential target in exosomes derived from adipose-derived stem cells for the treatment of osteoporosis. Stem Cells Int. 2021, 1–17. doi:10.1155/2021/7690006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, X., Ao, J., Lu, H., Zhao, Q., Ma, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2020). <p&gt;Osteoimmune modulation and guided osteogenesis promoted by barrier membranes incorporated with S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes</p&gt;. Int. J. Nanomedicine 15, 3483–3496. doi:10.2147/ijn.s248741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Kong, B., Chen, X., Liu, R., Zhao, Y., Gu, Z., et al. (2022). BMSC exosome-enriched acellular fish scale scaffolds promote bone regeneration. J. Nanobiotechnology 20 (1), 444. doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01646-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Zhao, M., Li, W., Yang, Y., Zhang, Z., Ma, R., et al. (2021). BMSC-derived small extracellular vesicles induce cartilage reconstruction of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis via autotaxin-YAP signaling Axis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 656153. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.656153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y. H., Wu, J. Y., Kong, S. C., Chiang, M. H., Ho, M. L., Yeh, M. L., et al. (2018). Low-power laser irradiation and human adipose-derived stem cell treatments promote bone regeneration in critical-sized calvarial defects in rats. PLoS One 13 (4), e0195337. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wei, F., Li, M., Crawford, R., Zhou, Y., and Xiao, Y. (2019). Exosome-integrated titanium oxide nanotubes for targeted bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 86, 480–492. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, J., Kuang, L., Chen, C., Yang, J., Zeng, W. N., Li, T., et al. (2019). miR-100-5p-abundant exosomes derived from infrapatellar fat pad MSCs protect articular cartilage and ameliorate gait abnormalities via inhibition of mTOR in osteoarthritis. Biomaterials 206, 87–100. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.03.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, X., Chan, K. F., Wong, G. T. Y., Wang, P., Liu, L., Yeung, B. P. M., et al. (2019). Mesenchymal stem cells promote healing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related peptic ulcer through paracrine actions in pigs. Sci. Transl. Med. 11 (516), eaat7455. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7455

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiao, F., Zuo, B., Tao, B., Wang, C., Li, Y., Peng, J., et al. (2021). Exosomes derived from cyclic mechanical stretch-exposed bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis through the NF-κB signaling pathway. Ann. Transl. Med. 9 (9), 798. doi:10.21037/atm-21-1838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, F., Xiang, Q., Huang, J., Chen, Q., Yu, N., Long, X., et al. (2019). Exosomal miR-423-5p mediates the proangiogenic activity of human adipose-derived stem cells by targeting Sufu. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 10 (1), 106. doi:10.1186/s13287-019-1196-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, J., Wang, Y., Hsu, C. Y., Gao, Y., Meyers, C. A., Chang, L., et al. (2019). Human perivascular stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles mediate bone repair. Elife 8, e48191. doi:10.7554/elife.48191

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, F., Zhong, Z., Wang, Y., Feng, Y., Mei, Z., Li, H., et al. (2020). Exosome-based biomimetic nanoparticles targeted to inflamed joints for enhanced treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J. Nanobiotechnology 18 (1), 115. doi:10.1186/s12951-020-00675-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, L., Liu, G., and Wu, X. (2021). Exosomes derived from umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in mechanical environment show improved osteochondral activity via upregulation of LncRNA H19. J. Orthop. Transl. 26, 111–120. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2020.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Guo, S., Tong, S., and Sun, X. (2020). Exosomal miR-130a-3p regulates osteogenic differentiation of Human Adipose-Derived stem cells through mediating SIRT7/Wnt/β-catenin axis. Cell Prolif. 53 (10), e12890. doi:10.1111/cpr.12890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, S., Zhu, B., Yin, P., Zhao, L., Wang, Y., Fu, Z., et al. (2020). Integration of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes with hydroxyapatite-embedded hyaluronic acid-alginate hydrogel for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 6 (3), 1590–1602. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, X., Yang, J., Lei, P., and Wen, T. (2019). LncRNA MALAT1 shuttled by bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells-secreted exosomes alleviates osteoporosis through mediating microRNA-34c/SATB2 axis. Aging 11 (20), 8777–8791. doi:10.18632/aging.102264

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yin, K., Zhu, R., Wang, S., and Zhao, R. C. (2017). Low-Level laser effect on proliferation, migration, and antiapoptosis of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 26 (10), 762–775. doi:10.1089/scd.2016.0332

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ying, C., Wang, R., Wang, Z., Tao, J., Yin, W., Zhang, J., et al. (2020). BMSC-exosomes carry mutant HIF-1α for improving angiogenesis and osteogenesis in critical-sized calvarial defects. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 565561. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.565561

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Youseflee, P., Ranjbar, F. E., Bahraminasab, M., Ghanbari, A., Faradonbeh, D. R., Arab, S., et al. (2022). Exosome loaded hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffold promotes bone regeneration in calvarial defect: An in vivo study. Cell Tissue Bank. doi:10.1007/s10561-022-10042-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, H., Cauchois, G., Louvet, N., Chen, Y., Rahouadj, R., and Huselstein, C. (2017). Comparison of MSC properties in two different hydrogels. Impact of mechanical properties. Biomed. Mater Eng. 28 (1), S193–S200. doi:10.3233/bme-171641

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yuan, L., Cao, Y., Yang, Z., Sun, J., Pan, G., Qian, J., et al. (2017). Exosomes secreted by mesenchymal stem cells derived from orofacial bone regulate the function of macrophage. J. Pract. Stomatology 33 (03), 344–348.

Google Scholar

Zha, Y., Li, Y., Lin, T., Chen, J., Zhang, S., and Wang, J. (2021). Progenitor cell-derived exosomes endowed with VEGF plasmids enhance osteogenic induction and vascular remodeling in large segmental bone defects. Theranostics 11 (1), 397–409. doi:10.7150/thno.50741

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhai, M., Zhu, Y., Yang, M., and Mao, C. (2020). Human mesenchymal stem cell derived exosomes enhance cell-free bone regeneration by altering their miRNAs profiles. Adv. Sci. (Weinh). 7 (19), 2001334. doi:10.1002/advs.202001334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Liu, X., Li, H., Chen, C., Hu, B., Niu, X., et al. (2016). Exosomes/tricalcium phosphate combination scaffolds can enhance bone regeneration by activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 7 (1), 136. doi:10.1186/s13287-016-0391-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Chuah, S. J., Laial, R. C., Hui, J. H. P., Lim, S. K., and Toh, W. S. (2018). MSC exosomes mediate cartilage repair by enhancing proliferation, attenuating apoptosis and modulating immune reactivity. Biomaterials 156, 16–27. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.028

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, S., Teo, K. Y. W., Chuah, S. J., Lai, R. C., Lim, S. K., and Toh, W. S. (2019). MSC exosomes alleviate temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis by attenuating inflammation and restoring matrix homeostasis. Biomaterials 200, 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.02.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, X., You, J. M., Dong, X. J., and Wu, Y. (2020). Administration of mircoRNA-135b-reinforced exosomes derived from MSCs ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) in rats. J. Cell Mol. Med. 24 (23), 13973–13983. doi:10.1111/jcmm.16006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Cao, X., Li, P., Fan, Y., Zhang, L., Ma, X., et al. (2021). microRNA-935-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes enhance osteoblast proliferation and differentiation in osteoporotic rats. Life Sci. 272, 119204. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Huo, M., Wang, Y., Xiao, L., Wu, J., Ma, Y., et al. (2022). A tailored bioactive 3D porous poly(lactic-acid)-exosome scaffold with osteoimmunomodulatory and osteogenic differentiation properties. J. Biol. Eng. 16 (1), 22. doi:10.1186/s13036-022-00301-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Xu, R., Yang, Y., Liang, C., Yu, X., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). Micro/nano-textured hierarchical titanium topography promotes exosome biogenesis and secretion to improve osseointegration. J. Nanobiotechnology 19 (1), 78. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00826-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, C. T., Li, T., Hu, Y. H., Zou, M., -Guo, Q., and Qu, X. W. (2017). Exosomes secreted by mice adipose-derived stem cells after low-level laser irradiation treatment reduce apoptosis of osteocyte induced by hypoxia. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 21 (24), 5562–5570. doi:10.26355/eurrev_201712_13993

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, D., Johnson, T. K., Wang, Y., Thomas, M., Huynh, K., Yang, Q., et al. (2020). Macrophage M2 polarization induced by exosomes from adipose-derived stem cells contributes to the exosomal proangiogenic effect on mouse ischemic hindlimb. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 11 (1), 162. doi:10.1186/s13287-020-01669-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., Jia, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, J., and Chai, Y. (2019). Impaired bone regenerative effect of exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in type 1 diabetes. STEM CELLS Transl. Med. 8 (6), 593–605. doi:10.1002/sctm.18-0199

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhuang, X. M., and Zhou, B. (2020). Exosome secreted by human gingival fibroblasts in radiation therapy inhibits osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells by transferring miR-23a. Biomed. Pharmacother. 131, 110672. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110672

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MSC-Exos, bone regenaration, mesenchyaml stem cells, osteogenic cells, biomaterials

Citation: Ren S, Lin Y, Liu W, Yang L and Zhao M (2023) MSC-Exos: Important active factor of bone regeneration. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11:1136453. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1136453

Received: 05 January 2023; Accepted: 24 January 2023;
Published: 06 February 2023.

Edited by:

Yunfeng Lin, Sichuan University, China

Reviewed by:

Bei Li, The Fourth Military Medical University, China
Bingdong Sui, Air Force Medical University, China

Copyright © 2023 Ren, Lin, Liu, Yang and Zhao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Liqun Yang, eWFuZ2xxQGxuc3pqay5jb20uY24=; Muxin Zhao, emhhb211eGluQDEyNi5jb20=

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.