Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 20 May 2022
Sec. Bioprocess Engineering

Scalable Process for High-Yield Production of PfCyRPA Using Insect Cells for Inclusion in a Malaria Virosome-Based Vaccine Candidate

Brbara Fernandes,Bárbara Fernandes1,2Marcos Sousa,&#x;Marcos Sousa1,2Rute CastroRute Castro1Anja Schfer,Anja Schäfer3,4Julia Hauser,Julia Hauser3,4Kai SchulzeKai Schulze5Mario Amacker,Mario Amacker6,7Marco Tamborrini,Marco Tamborrini3,4Gerd Pluschke,Gerd Pluschke3,4Paula M Alves,Paula M Alves1,2Sylvain FleurySylvain Fleury6Antnio Roldo,
António Roldão1,2*
  • 1iBET-Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica, Oeiras, Portugal
  • 2ITQB NOVA-Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal
  • 3Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland
  • 4University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • 5Helmhotz Center for Infecion Research, Braunschweig, Germany
  • 6Mymetics SA, Épalinges, Switzerland
  • 7Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Plasmodium falciparum cysteine-rich protective antigen (PfCyRPA) has been identified as a promising blood-stage candidate antigen to include in a broadly cross-reactive malaria vaccine. In the last couple of decades, substantial effort has been committed to the development of scalable cost-effective, robust, and high-yield PfCyRPA production processes. Despite insect cells being a suitable expression system due to their track record for protein production (including vaccine antigens), these are yet to be explored to produce this antigen. In this study, different insect cell lines, culture conditions (baculovirus infection strategy, supplementation schemes, culture temperature modulation), and purification strategies (affinity tags) were explored aiming to develop a scalable, high-yield, and high-quality PfCyRPA for inclusion in a virosome-based malaria vaccine candidate. Supplements with antioxidants improved PfCyRPA volumetric titers by 50% when added at the time of infection. In addition, from three different affinity tags (6x-His, 4x-His, and C-tag) evaluated, the 4x-His affinity tag was the one leading to the highest PfCyRPA purification recovery yields (61%) and production yield (26 mg/L vs. 21 mg/L and 13 mg/L for 6x-His and C-tag, respectively). Noteworthy, PfCyRPA expressed using High Five cells did not show differences in protein quality or stability when compared to its human HEK293 cell counterpart. When formulated in a lipid-based virosome nanoparticle, immunized rabbits developed functional anti-PfCyRPA antibodies that impeded the multiplication of P. falciparum in vitro. This work demonstrates the potential of using IC-BEVS as a qualified platform to produce functional recombinant PfCyRPA protein with the added benefit of being a non-human expression system with short bioprocessing times and high expression levels.

1 Introduction

Malaria is responsible for more than 627000 deaths per year, thus urging the need to develop a highly effective vaccine to control and eradicate this disease (World Health Organization, 2021). Recently, RTS,S/AS01 vaccine (MosquirixTM) against Plasmodium falciparum was the first malaria vaccine to get the WHO recommendation for wider use. However, its efficacy is still modest; thus, the development of an effective second-generation malaria vaccine able to provide broad coverage against parasite infection is a public health priority (Arora et al., 2021).

A highly effective malaria subunit vaccine needs to incorporate multiple conserved antigens for optimal long-term protection, and ideally having an essential protein–protein interaction devoid of alternative pathways. The Pf cysteine-rich protective antigen (PfCyRPA) fulfills these criteria and has emerged as a promising blood-stage candidate antigen with very limited genetic diversity that could elicit protective antibodies cross-reacting toward various Pf geographical strains (Dreyer et al., 2012; Favuzza et al., 2016).

A suitable manufacturing platform for the production of biologic products requires a cost-effective, scalable, and robust expression system. Recombinant PfCyRPA has been produced in bacteria (Dreyer et al., 2012) and human HEK293 cells (Favuzza et al., 2016). Insect cells feature several advantages over mammalian and human cells, including ease of culture and high production yields of antigens with human-like folding and post-translational modifications, in short time frames and at low cost (Jarvis, 2003; Ahn et al., 2008). Different FDA-approved vaccines for human use produced in the insect cell baculovirus expression vector system (IC-BEVS), such as Cervarix® against human papillomavirus, Flublok against influenza virus, and, more recently, Nuvaxovid against SARS-CoV-2, which underlines the high potential and versatility of this platform.

Several optimization strategies in insect cells and IC-BEVS have been attempted to cope with manufacturing pressure (Correia et al., 2020; Fernandes et al., 2020).

Screening of the most suitable cell line and fine-tuning infection strategy (e.g., multiplicity of infection, cell concentration at infection, and time of harvest) and process parameters (e.g., culture temperature) is essential to optimize protein expression in IC-BEVS (Aucoin et al., 2007; Sequeira et al., 2018; Correia et al., 2020; Fernandes et al., 2020). The increased interest in this expression system motivated the analysis of cell culture parameters and media components, resulting in the identification of specific supplements to modulate key cellular pathways influencing productivity (Monteiro et al., 2016). In addition, producing recombinant antigen proteins with the proper affinity tag is of utmost interest to facilitate the purification process (Jin et al., 2017) and reduce process costs.

Improving expression yield in insect cells can further revamp the interest and applicability of this expression system for vaccine manufacturing. This study describes, for the first time, the use of IC-BEVS for the expression of PfCyRPA protein and its inclusion in a virosome-based vaccine candidate. Different upstream and downstream process optimization strategies such as screening for best-performing cell line and affinity tag, supplementation regimens, and the modulation of culture temperature were combined to further improve this expression platform to produce highly immunogenic PfCyRPA.

2 Materials and Methods

2.1 Cell Lines and Culture Media

Insect Sf-9 (Invitrogen) and High Five (Invitrogen) cells were routinely subcultured at 0.4–1 × 106 cell/mL every 3–4 days when cell density reached 2–3x106cell/mL, as described elsewhere (Fernandes et al., 2020). Insect-XPRESSTM (Sartorius) and Sf-900TM II SFM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) media were used to culture Sf-9 and High Five cells, respectively. Human HEK293-E6 cells (NRC) (Durocher, 2002) were routinely subcultured to 0.5–0.6 × 106 cells/mL every 3–4 days when cell density reached 2–3 × 106 cells/mL in 125- or 500-mL shake flasks (20% working volume, w/v) in an Innova 44R incubator (orbital motion diameter of 2.54 cm Eppendorf) at 37°C with 5% CO2 and stirring rates of 75 or 90 rpm. FreeStyle F17 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) media, supplemented with 4 mM GlutaMAX™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 0.1% of Pluronic™ F-68 (Life Technologies), and 25 µg/mL of Geneticin were used to culture the HEK293 cells.

2.2 Expression Vectors

For expression in HEK293 cells, the PfCyRPA nucleotide sequence (Favuzza et al., 2017) was synthetically synthesized with the bee venom melittin (BVM) signal sequence to allow PfCyRPA secretion into the culture medium, and a C-terminal tag (His6-tag) to allow purification, and cloned into the pTT5 vector, resulting in the pTT5-hCyRPA-6His plasmid. For expression in insect cells, the PfCyRPA nucleotide sequence (Favuzza et al., 2017) was synthetically synthesized with the BVM signal sequence and a C-terminal tag (His6-tag, His4-tag, or C-tag) for purification, and cloned into the pOET3 vector, resulting in three different expression plasmids: pOET3-iCyRPA-His6, pOET3-iCyRPA-His4, and pOET3-iCyRPA-Ctag. All plasmids were synthetically synthesized by GenScript.

2.3 Baculovirus Generation

Recombinant baculovirus (rBac) containing pOET3-iCyRPA-His6, pOET3-iCyRPA-His4, or pOET3-iCyRPA-Ctag plasmids, from now on named “rBac-CyRPA-His6,” “rBac-CyRPA-His4,” and “rBac-CyRPA-Ctag,” respectively, were generated using the flashback ULTRATM system (Oxford Expression Technologies) in accordance with manufacturer’s instruction. The amplification of baculovirus stocks was performed as described elsewhere (Vieira et al., 2005). Briefly, Sf-9 cells were infected at a cell concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL with 0.01–0.1 infectious baculovirus per cell (pfu/cell). When cell viability reached 80–85%, cultures were harvested and centrifuged at ×200g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was centrifuged at ×2000g for 20 min at 4°C. The resulting supernatant was stored at 4°C until further use.

2.4 Production of PfCyRPA Protein

2.4.1 Insect Cells as Host

The production of PfCyRPA using Sf-9 and High Five cells was performed in shake flasks (SF; 500 mL, 10% w/v) and 2-L stirred tank bioreactors (STB). The cells were seeded at 0.6–0.3 × 106 cells/mL and infected with rBac containing pOET3-iCyRPA-His6, pOET3-iCyRPA-His4, or pOET3-iCyRPA-Ctag plasmid at different cell concentrations at the time of infection (CCI, 1 × 106 and 2 × 106) and MOI (0.1 and 1 pfu/cell).

Bioreactor cultures in the batch mode were performed in a computer-controlled BIOSTAT® DCU3 2 L vessel (Sartorius) equipped with two Rushton impellers and a ring sparger for gas supply. The pH was monitored (not controlled) along with culture time. The partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) was set at 30% of air saturation and was maintained by varying the agitation rate (70–250 rpm), and the percentage of O2 in the gas mixture (0–100%). The gas flow rate was set to 0.01 vessel volumes per minute (vvm). The temperature was set at 27°C, and the working volume was 2 L.

In the design of experiments (DoE) study (see Section 3.4), culture supplements known to enhance virus and recombinant protein production in IC-BEVS were tested (Table 1). The concentration of supplements was set in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and previously in-house developed work (Carinhas et al., 2010; Monteiro et al., 2016; Sequeira et al., 2018) and prepared using Insect-XPRESS™ (Sartorius). Culture supplementations and temperature shifts (to either 21, 31.5, or 36°C) were performed at the time of infection.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. List of culture medium supplements.

2.4 1 Human Cells as Host

The production of PfCyRPA in human HEK293 cells was performed in SF (500 mL, 20% w/v) and 2-L STBs. The cells were seeded at 0.4 × 106 cells/mL and transfected at a cell concentration of approximately 1.6 × 106 cells/mL with the pTT5-hCyRPA-6His plasmid using polyethyleneimine (PEI, Polysciences) cationic polymer at a ratio of 1.5 mg PEI/1 mg plasmid DNA (pDNA) prepared in 10% (v/v) of total culture volume. Briefly, the PEI was slowly added in a dropwise manner to the pDNA medium mix, incubated for 8 min at room temperature (RT), and then the mix was added to the culture.

Bioreactor cultures in the batch mode were performed in a computer-controlled BIOSTAT® DCU3 2 L vessel (Sartorius) equipped with two Rushton impellers and a ring sparger for gas supply. pO2 was set at 40% of air saturation and was maintained by varying the agitation rate (90–230 rpm) and the percentage of O2 in the gas mixture (0–100%). The gas flow rate was set to 0.01 vvm. The pH was set to 7.4 and controlled by CO2 and base addition (NaHCO3), and the temperature was kept at 37°C for a working volume of 2 L.

2.5 Purification of PfCyRPA Protein

Purification of PfCyRPA was carried out on an ÄKTA Explorer 100 System (Cytiva). Cell culture bulk was harvested, filtered through 0.45- and 0.22-μm Sartopore 2 Midicap Filter Cartridges 10 (Sartorius), and concentrated with a Sartocon disposable PES membrane 2 × 0.1 m2, 10 kDa (Sartorius). The concentrated sample was filtered through a Nalgene cup of 0.2 μm (Thermo Scientific). PfCyRPA His6- and His4-tagged proteins were purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography on a Histrap HP column (5 mL volume; Cytiva), while PfCyRPA C-tag tagged protein was purified on a CaptureSelect™ C-tagaffinity matrix chromatography column (5 mL volume; Thermo Fisher). Column eluates were concentrated using an AmiconUltra 15 Centrifugal Filter Unit 10 kDa (Merck Millipore), filtered through 0.2 μm, and applied to a HiLoad 26/60 Superdex 75 gel permeation column (GE Healthcare). The eluates were concentrated using an AmiconUltra 15 Centrifugal Filter Unit 10 kDa (Merck Millipore) and filtered through 0.2-μm filter. The final sample was stored in 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.4 and 150 mM NaCl buffer, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C.

2.6 Vaccine Formulation

The purified PfCyRPA was lipidated by chemical conjugation to 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[4-(p-maleinimidomethyl) cyclohexane-carboxamide)] (N-MCC-DPPE, Corden Pharma, Liestal, Switzerland) after limited modification of lysine residues with 2-iminothiolane (Merck & Cie, Schaffhausen, Switzerland) to introduce free thiol groups. The lipidated PfCyRPA antigens were subsequently inserted into the virosome lipid membrane, as previously described (Amacker et al., 2020). Virosomes were prepared by Mymetics from inactivated and purified influenza virus [A/Brisbane/59/2007 (H1N1), Seqirus, Australia] with membrane-integrated 3M-052 adjuvant as a TLR7/8 agonist (3M company, St. Paul, United States). The final liquid virosome-PfCyRPA contained approximately 40 μg/mL of PfCyRPA, 6 μg/mL of hemagglutinin (HA), and 15 μg/mL of 3M–052 adjuvant and was supplied in 50 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4, 142.5 mM NaCl. Quality controls were conducted using ELISA methods for determining the concentration (μg/mL) of PfCyRPA, HPLC for 3M-052, and single radial immunodiffusion assay (SRID) for HA concentration (μg/mL). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) for determining the virosome particle size and homogeneity (polydispersity index, PDI) was performed on a Malvern Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, United Kingdom). Each sample was analyzed in triplicate at 25°C, and each replicate was measured six times to obtain the average particle size.

2.7 Rabbit Immunization

New Zealand rabbits were immunized and bled at Kaneka Eurogentec S.A. (Belgium). The animals (n = 2) were given three subcutaneous immunizations (30 μg antigen per dose) in intervals of 4 weeks. Blood was collected before each immunization and 9 days after the final injection. Total serum IgG was purified from rabbit sera using protein A columns (Cytiva) and assessed for activity in a single-cycle in vitro GIA with the Pf 3D7 strain.

2.8 Analytics

2.8.1 Cell Concentration and Viability

Cell counting was performed in a Cedex HiRes Analyzer (Roche), and viability was assessed using the trypan blue exclusion method.

2.8.2 Baculovirus Titration

Baculovirus titers were determined using the MTT assay as described elsewhere (Mena et al., 2003; Roldão et al., 2009).

2.8.3 SDS-PAGE and Western Blot

Western blot analysis was performed as reported elsewhere (Correia et al., 2020). For the PfCyRPA identification, mouse monoclonal antibodies c12 anti-CyRPA (provided by Prof. Gerd Plushke from Swiss TPH, Switzerland) and anti-6xHis tag (Thermo Scientific) were used at dilutions of 1:3000 or 1:1000, respectively. As a secondary antibody, an anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated with alkaline phosphatase was used at a dilution of 1:5000 (Sigma, Ref.: A3438). A relative PfCyRPA protein titer (mg/L) was determined by densitometry analysis of the Western blot performed using FIJI software (Schindelin et al., 2012). The expected MW of PfCyRPA is 43 kDa.

2.8.4 Total Protein Concentration

Total protein concentration was determined by spectrophotometry at 280 nm on the mySPEC (VWR) and using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.8.5 Size Exclusion Chromatography

Purified CyRPA protein was analyzed using an HPLC system equipped with Photodiode Array Detector (Waters). CyRPA protein samples were injected in an XBridge BEH 125 Å SEC 3.5-μm HPLC column (Waters) equilibrated in 0.1 M sodium phosphate with 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.4. The system flow rate was maintained at 0.86 mL/min, and eluted proteins were detected at 280 nm. Then 20 mg of protein was injected in each HPLC run.

2.8.6 Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

DSF was performed in a Quant Studio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with excitation and emission wavelengths of 580 and 623 nm, respectively, using a MicroAmpTM EnduraPlateTM Optical 96-Well Fast Clear Reaction Plate with Barcode (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The samples were heated from 25°C to 90°C with stepwise increments of 0.016°C per second, followed by the fluorescence read-out. For each well, 20 µL final volume with 2 µg of PfCyRPA protein and 2-fold of ROX™ Passive Reference Dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was prepared with protein purification buffer. The assays were carried out in triplicates, and the results were analyzed in Protein Thermal ShiftTM Software V1.3.

2.8.7 Particle Size and Homogeneity

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) was performed on a SpectroLight 600 (Xtal Concepts) and Zetasizer Nano S instrument (Malvern) to determine population homogeneity, based on the polydispersity index (PDI) of purified PfCyRPA protein particles and virosome-PfCyRPA population, respectively. All the samples were pipetted (1 µL per well) onto a 96-well Vapor Batch Plate (Jena Bioscience GmbH). Before usage, the plates were filled with paraffin oil (Cat N. 18512; Merck) to protect sample solutions from drying out. The laser wavelength was 660 nm at a power of 100 mW. The scattering angle for placement of the detector was fixed at 142°. All samples were measured at constant 20°C, one scan per drop with 20 measurements of 20 s each.

2.8.8 Peptide Identification by LC-MS

Disulfide bonds in PfCyRPA protein were identified by LC-MS. Briefly, the peptides derived from proteolysis under native conditions by the endoproteases LysC, AspN, and trypsin were analyzed by LC-MS (X500B QTOF, ABSciex). The protein samples (10 μg of purified PfCyRPA) were digested with AspN, LysC, and trypsin overnight at 37°C, without reduction to maintain intact disulfide bonds. External calibration was performed using beta-galactosidase digest (ABSciex). The twelve most intense precursor ions from the MS spectra were selected for MS/MS analysis. The data were acquired in positive TOF-MS mode using an X500B QTOF with a Turbo V ion source (ABSciex) mass spectrometer connected to the ExionLC AD UPLC system. Peptides were separated on bioZen 2.6-μm peptide XB-C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm) by a 1–90% gradient of acetonitrile in water containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 200 μl/min over 64 min and eluted into the mass spectrometer. The raw MS and MS/MS data were analyzed using Explorer software of SCIEX OS-Q and the BioPharmaView software 3.0 (Sciex) for peptide identification using the sponsor protein sequence.

2.8.9 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

For the analysis of the binding reactivity of anti-PfCyRPA mAbs with purified PfCyRPA, Nunc MaxiSorpTM flat-bottomed 96-well ELISA plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were coated overnight at 4°C with 3 μg/mL of PfCyRPA protein produced either in HEK293 or High Five cells. The wells were then blocked with 5% (w/v) milk powder in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 h at room temperature, followed by washing three times with PBS containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20. The plates were then incubated with serial dilutions of mAbs in PBS for 1 hat room temperature. After washing, the plates were incubated with goat anti-mouse (Sigma) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody (Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was used as the substrate (KPL). The reaction was stopped after the appropriate time with 0.5 M H2SO4, and the absorbance was read at 450 nm with the Sunrise absorbance plate reader (Tecan). Data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8. PfCyRPA concentration in the virosome lipid particles was determined by ELISA and native immunoblot. The final vaccine was prepared by dilution of the intermediate mixture to the required final antigen concentration for the animal study (2 g PfCyRPA per dose) and prepared in HN buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 142 mM NaCl), followed by a final filtration step on a 0.22-µm PVDF syringe filter.

2.8.10 Single Radial Immunodiffusion Assay

Determination of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA) concentration in virosome-PfCyRPA was performed by SRID at Confarma France SAS (Hombourg, France).

2.8.11 In Vitro Growth Inhibition Assay

Total serum IgG was assessed for activity in a single-cycle in vitro GIA. Briefly, synchronized P. falciparum 3D7 trophozoites were adjusted to 0.5% parasitemia and then incubated for 48 h with various concentrations of purified rabbit IgG in PBS at 1% hematocrit. Each culture was set up in triplicate in 96-well flat-bottomed culture plates. The erythrocytes were then washed and resuspended in PBS supplemented with hydroethidine fluorescent vital stain (15 μg/mL) and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. After washing, the final parasitemia was quantified by flow cytometry in a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer by BD CellQuest software. Pooled purified IgG from collected pre-immune sera of both animals was used as a negative control. Percent inhibition was calculated relative to infection control wells containing PBS only. Data were processed and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 8.

2.9 Statistically Designed Experiments

Culture supplements and temperature were selected as factors for the screening DoE. A full factorial design with two levels and five factors was used to evaluate the effect of each parameter and their interactions with each other (Supplementary Table S1). This design allowed the determination of the main effects and all two-factor interactions without co-founding. A total of nineteen experiments were performed with three duplicates of the center point. For optimization of DoE, a central composite circumscribed design composed of a full or fractional factorial design and star points was implemented for optimization of conditions selected from the screening DoE (Supplementary Table S2). A total of eleven experiments were performed with three duplicates of the center point. The response for both screening and optimization DoEs was defined as the fold improvement in the PfCyRPA titer (assessed by densitometry analysis of Western blot images and for cell viabilities between 30 and 40%) of each experiment when compared to standard culture conditions (i.e., 27°C without supplementation). MODDE® 12.1 Pro software (Sartorius) was used to determine significant effects, interactions, and distribution of the data.

2.10 Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Differences were tested by one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison analysis methods and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant) and were tested by t-test unpaired Gaussian distribution (adjusted p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

2.11 Data Availability Statement

The sensitive nature of some of the reagents used in this study (e.g., cell lines, plasmids, baculoviruses, virosomes, and antibodies) means that they are only readily available internally to the author’s institutions staff for R&D purposes. For external researchers, approval of reagent requests may be obtained via email addressed to the corresponding author.

3 Results

3.1 PfCyRPA Production in Insect Cells: Sf-9 vs. High Five Cells

Sf9 and High Five cells were infected with rBac-CyRPA-His6 at different CCIs (1 and 2 × 106 cell/mL) and MOIs (0.1 and 1 pfu/cell), and their growth and expression kinetics were assessed in small-scale shake flasks (SF) (Supplementary Figure S1 and Figure 1). The highest PfCyRPA titer was achieved in High Five cells when infected at CCI = 2 × 106 cell/mL with MOI = 1 pfu/cell; thus, this cell line and infection strategy were used for subsequent experiments.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Production of PfCyRPA using insect Sf-9 and High Five cells. (A) Relative PfCyRPA protein titer (mg/L), obtained by densitometry analysis of Western blot images. (B) Identification of PfCyRPA in culture supernatant samples by Western blot. Positive control (CTL+) is an hsEGFR-His6 protein produced in-house at 50 and 75 ng; Ladder (L) is SeeBlue™ Plus2 Pre-stained Protein Standard. Data in the bar graph are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (relative to three biological replicates, n = 3). Statistical significance was tested by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison analysis methods, comparing the mean of each column to optimal condition (i.e., CCI = 2 × 106 cell/mL and MOI = 0.1 pfu/cell, High Five cells); *** = adjusted p-value<0.001 was considered statistically significant.

3.2 Scale-Up PfCyRPA Production: High Five vs. HEK293 Cells

The feasibility of producing PfCyRPA in High Five cells was demonstrated in controlled, scalable 2-L stirred tank bioreactors (STB) and compared to HEK293 cells; small-scale SF was used to assess scalability.

Cell growth and viability kinetics in STB and SF were similar for both cells. With regression coefficients (b) and Pearson’s correlations (r) close to 1 (Figure 2A). Likewise, PfCyRPA titers (estimated by densitometry analysis of Western blot images, Supplementary Figure S2), achieved in STB and SF, are comparable (Figure 2B). The intracellular PfCyRPA content at the time of harvest was also assessed (only for STB runs), and results have shown that 91–97% of total PfCyRPA produced was secreted, with no apparent difference between High Five and HEK293 cells.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Scale-up PfCyRPA production in insect and mammalian cells. (A) Cell growth and viability kinetics obtained in STB and SF cultures. (B) Relative PfCyRPA protein titer (mg/L) and the ratio of extracellular/total PfCyRPA (%), obtained by densitometry analysis of Western blot images. (C) SDS-PAGE of purified PfCyRPA, under reduced (R) and non-reduced (NR) conditions; Ladder (L) is SeeBlue™ Plus2 Pre-stained Protein Standard. (D) Dynamic light scattering profile of purified PfCyRPA. (E) Peptide identification of purified PfCyRPA, digested with LysC, trypsin, and AspN, by LC-MS using X500B QTOF (ABSciex). Color code: High Five cells (blue) and HEK293 cells (red). Data in bar graphs are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (relative to three technical replicates, n = 3). Statistical significance was tested by t-test unpaired assuming Gaussian distribution.

High Five and HEK293-derived PfCyRPA produced in STB were purified, and similar recovery yields were achieved (Table 2). Both proteins present purities above 90% (Figure 2C), similar melting temperatures (Tm, ≈ 61°C) (Table 2), and identical dimensions (Figure 2D). In addition, mass spectrometry analysis of proteolytic fragments from both PfCyRPA proteins revealed similar sequence coverage and the same disulfide bond numbers (Figure 2E).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Effect of expression and purification parameters on PfCyRPA yield and protein characteristics.

The results obtained confirm the feasibility and scalability of producing PfCyRPA in insect High Five cells.

3.3 Antigenicity and Immunogenicity of PfCyRPA Produced Using Insect Cells

Sets of anti-PfCyRPA mAbs have been grouped into six epitope groups (Favuzza et al., 2017) by determining competition for antigen binding and reactivity patterns with overlapping fragments of PfCyRPA as described elsewhere (Dreyer et al., 2012; Favuzza et al., 2016). No differences were observed, when the reactivity of representatives of these mAbs specific for the epitope groups A-F was tested with purified PfCyRPA produced using insect or mammalian cells (Figure 3A). Noteworthy, the immunization of rabbits with a lipid-based particle formulation of purified PfCyRPA expressed using High Five cells led to the generation of antibody responses that prevented the multiplication of P. falciparum in a parasite GIA (Figure 3B).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of PfCyRPA produced in insect and mammalian cells. (A) Binding of anti-PfCyRPA mAbs recognizing different epitopes on purified PfCyRPA protein by ELISA. (B) In vitro parasite growth-inhibitory activity of polyclonal IgG antibodies generated in rabbits upon immunization with High Five cells derived PfCyRPA. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation of triplicate wells of a single assay, and are representative of two independent runs. For each IgG preparation a four-parameter sigmoidal dose–response curve was fitted to the relationship between log10 (antibody concentration) and % inhibition and then used to interpolate IC50 values (antibody concentrations giving 50% growth inhibition).

3.4 Optimizing PfCyRPA Production in High Five Cells: Design of Experiments

The impact of culture temperature and medium supplementation on PfCyRPA expression was assessed in small-scale SF using ) a full factorial DoE to evaluate the effect of each parameter and their interaction with each other (screening DoE), followed by ) a central composite DoE for optimization of the previous conditions selected (optimization DoE). The culture temperatures explored were 21, 27, 31.5, and 36 C. The culture medium supplements evaluated were lipids, polyamines, antioxidants, and α-ketoglutarate (Table 1). The cultures at 27°C without supplements were used as the control.

Supplementation of antioxidants at the time of infection to cultures at 27°C (Supplementary Table S1) enhanced PfCyRPA expression when compared to control cultures (Figure 4A—Western blot images of these experiments are reported in Supplementary Figure S3A), and thus, antioxidants were selected for further optimization experiments.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Design of experiments (DoE) for optimizing PfCyRPA production in High Five cells. Response surface models for PfCyRPA protein titer (mg/L) from screening experiments (A) and optimization experiments (B). (C) Cell growth and viability kinetics in optimal conditions identified by DoE. Improvement of PfCyRPA protein titer (mg/L) in optimal conditions identified by DoE vs. standard condition (i.e., cultures at 27°C and no supplementation). DoE images were obtained using MODDE® 12.1 Pro software (Sartorius). Data in bar graphs are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (relative to three technical replicates, n = 3). Abbreviations: TOI, time of infection; Lip, lipids; Poly, polyamines; α-keta, α-ketoglutarate; AOx, antioxidants.

A central composite experimental design was used to optimize the concentration of antioxidants and the culture temperature. The experimental design matrix is shown in Supplementary Table S2. Based on the adjusted response surface model, it was possible to predict the best condition to maximize PfCyRPA expression: cultures at 27°C and supplemented with 0.26 × antioxidants at the time of infection (Figure 4B–Western blot images of these experiments are reported in Supplementary Figure S3B). This optimal condition was tested in small-scale SF, with an approximately 45% increase in PfCyRPA titer observed when compared to the control culture (Figure 4C, Western blot images of these experiments are reported in Supplementary Figure S4).

3.5 Optimizing PfCyRPA Purification in High Five Cells: Exploring Different Affinity Tags

The impact of different affinity tags (i.e., 6×-His, 4×-His, and C-tag) on PfCyRPA recovery yields was assessed in controlled, scalable 2-L STB. The optimal culture conditions identified before were used: CCI = 2 × 106 cell/mL, MOI = 0.1 pfu/cell, culture temperature of 27°C, and culture supplementation with 0.26 x antioxidants.

Cell growth and viability kinetics were similar in all STB production runs (Figure 5A), with no apparent impact of affinity tag on PfCyRPA expression (Supplementary Figure S4). Noteworthy, PfCyRPA recovery yields were higher when using histidine tags than C-tag, with 4×-His slightly outperforming 6×-His (Table 2), thus resulting in a higher final yield (Figure 5B). Independently of the affinity tag used, purified PfCyRPA proteins showed high purity (Figure 5C), similar melting temperatures (Table 2) and size (Figure 5D), and comparable sequence coverage with the same disulfide bonds detected (Figure 5E).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Impact of affinity tags on PfCyRPA production in High Five cells. (A) Cell growth and viability kinetics obtained in STB cultures. (B) PfCyRPA final yield (mg/L) after purification. (C) SDS-PAGE of purified PfCyRPA, under reduced (R) and non-reduced (NR) conditions; Ladder (L) is SeeBlue™ Plus2 Pre-stained Protein Standard. (D) Dynamic light scattering profile of purified PfCyRPA. (E) Peptide identification of purified PfCyRPA, digested with LysC, trypsin, and AspN, by LC-MS using X500B QTOF (ABSciex). Color code: PfCyRPA-His6 (blue); PfCyRPA-His4 (green); PfCyRPA-Ctag (yellow). Data in bar graphs are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (relative to three technical replicates, n = 3). Abbreviations: AOx, antioxidant.

These results confirm the feasibility of the strategy herein proposed (i.e. insect High Five cells cultured at 27°C with supplementation with 0.26 × antioxidants at time of infection, and 4×-His affinity tag) for the production of PfCyRPA protein.

4 Discussion

To date, the production of PfCyRPA antigen has been only attempted in human (HEK293) and bacteria (E. coli) cells. The high demand for a malaria vaccine urges the development of production systems capable of providing high yield and high quality (e.g., complex posttranslational modifications) at low cost and with straightforward scalability. In this study, two insect cell lines were compared for PfCyRPA expression, with results indicating that High Five cells can result in higher volumetric titers than Sf-9 cells. When compared to human HEK293 cells, the insect High Five cells induced similar PfCyRPA expression levels in shorter time frames (i.e., 3 vs. 5 days); the insect cells also usually allow reduced manufacturing costs (Rhodes, 1996; Kost et al., 2005; Yee et al., 2018). Importantly, yields achieved are within those reported in the literature, that is, 18 mg/L using HEK293 cells (Favuzza et al., 2016). Purified insect-derived PfCyRPA presents similar purity, protein stability, conformation, and sequence coverage to its human-derived counterpart. In addition, PfCyRPA produced in both hosts showed no differences in reactivity to the specific mAbs for different epitope groups, confirming the quality of the PfCyRPA produced using High Five cells. Noteworthy, a lipid-based virosome particle formulation with membrane-anchored PfCyRPA expressed in High Five cells resulted in the generation of antibody responses in rabbits that efficiently impeded the multiplication of P. falciparum in a parasite growth in vitro inhibition assay, with an IC50 in the range of 1–2 mg/mL of polyclonal serum. Similar outcomes have been reported for other malaria vaccine candidates, particularly with the conserved PfRH5 antigen produced in insect and mammalian cells (Bustamante et al., 2013; Patel et al., 2013), leading also to comparable in vitro growth inhibition. Taken together, these results demonstrate that recombinant PfCyRPA protein expressed with the IC-BEVS (in High Five cells) represents an improved blood-stage candidate antigen for inclusion in a broadly cross-reactive malaria vaccine.

A DoE approach was used to optimize the expression of PfCyRPA in High Five cells by manipulating two factors: 1) culture temperature and 2) culture medium supplementation. Best result was achieved at standard culture temperature (27°C) by supplementing the culture medium with (0.26×) antioxidants at the time of infection, improving PfCyRPA volumetric titer by 50% when compared to control cultures. Culture medium supplementation strategies using antioxidants have shown to increase cell-specific yields of infectious baculovirus particles by reducing the oxidative cellular microenvironment induced by baculovirus infection, further resulting in increased protein expression (Monteiro et al., 2016). Interestingly, combining different culture medium supplements (e.g., antioxidants with polyamines) with or without culture temperature shifts did not improve PfCyRPA expression as previously reported in other studies for similar biological entities (Aucoin et al., 2007; Carinhas et al., 2010; Monteiro et al., 2016; Somasundaram et al., 2016).

Although affinity tags can improve protein recovery yields in purification, they can also interfere with protein’s physicochemical properties, functionality, and immunogenicity (Arnau et al., 2006). In this study, three different affinity tags (6×-His, 4×-His, and C-tag) were explored as to their potential to improve PfCyRPA recovery yields. Independently of the affinity tag used, PfCyRPA could be detected in the culture supernatant as early as 24 h postinfection. Importantly, PfCyRPA recovery yields were higher when using histidine tags than when using C-tag, with the 4×-His process outperforming 6×-His in terms of final yields achieved (26 vs. 21 mg/L). The preference of one affinity tag over another depends on the properties of the protein of interest, with some studies reporting the same outcome as that herein obtained and others showing the opposite (Jin et al., 2017). Noteworthy, the recovery yields achieved in our study with histidine tags are more than those reported for other malaria vaccine targets using the same affinity tag (Hjerrild et al., 2016). Comparing the 4× vs. 6×-His-tag, the use of longer histidine tags has a positive impact on recovery yields, enabling more stringent and efficient washing steps. On the other hand, shorter histidine tags minimize potential interferences on protein biochemical properties (Bornhorst & Falke, 2000). Despite their differences, the three affinity tags explored in this study did not impact protein quality or stability. Taken together, these results suggest that 4×-His would be the ideal affinity tag to use for scale-up and clinical biomanufacturing of PfCyRPA antigen.

5 Conclusion

This work demonstrates the feasibility and scalability of producing PfCyRPA, a promising blood-stage candidate malaria antigen for inclusion into a broadly Pf cross-strain reactive malaria vaccine, using insect High Five cells with BEVS. We describe for the first time the use of insect cells for PfCyRPA production in combination with different upstream and downstream bioprocess optimization strategies to improve protein expression and purification. IC-BEVS is a scalable system yielding high protein titers in short time frames, herein employed to produce a correctly folded PfCyRPA protein capable of eliciting neutralizing antibodies in rabbits that inhibited multiplication of P. falciparum.

The presented work encourages not only the use of IC-BEVS as a robust platform for PfCyRPA production but also the use of High Five cell-derived PfCyRPA protein as an antigen candidate qualified for the inclusion in malaria vaccine.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the animal facilities of Kaneka Eurogentec S.A. and accredited and inspected by the Belgian authorities. Protocols were evaluated and reviewed by their internal Ethical Committee.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: BF, MA, SF, and AR; investigation: BF, MS, RC, AS, JH, KS, and MT; data curation: BF; formal analysis: BF; validation: AR, GP, MA, and SF; supervision: AR, SF, and PA; writing—original draft: BF; and writing—review and editing: BF, AR, SF, MA, GP, and PA. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge support the funding from European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No. 730964 (project “TRANSVAC2”) and No. 951668 (project “TRANSVAC-DS”), as well as funding from INTERFACE Programme, through the Innovation, Technology, and Circular Economy Fund (FITEC), iNOVA4Health–UIDB/04462/2020 and UIDP/04462/2020, a program financially supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT)/Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior, and by FCT through the initiatives “Investigador FCT” Program (IF/01704/2014), Exploratory Research and Development Projects (EXPL/BBB-BIO/1541/2013 and IF/01704/2014/CP1229/CT0001), and PhD fellowship (SFRH/BD/138937/2018). Work at Swiss TPH was funded by Fondation Botnar (grant 6349).

Conflict of Interest

MA and SF are employees of Mymetics SA; MS is presently an employee of Bayer and the contribution to the work was made as an iBET employee.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank UniMS–Mass Spectrometry Unit team (ITQB NOVA/iBET, Oeiras, Portugal) for the support in the peptide identification by LC-MS. MS Special thanks to Mark Tomai from the 3M company for its encouragement and the supply of the 3M-052 adjuvant for the virosome formulations.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.879078/full#supplementary-material

References

Ahn, M.-H., Song, M., Oh, E.-Y., Jamal, A., Kim, H., Ko, K., et al. (2008). Production of Therapeutic Proteins with Baculovirus Expression System in Insect Cell. Entomol. Res. 38, S71–S78. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5967.2008.00177.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amacker, M., Smardon, C., Mason, L., Sorrell, J., Jeffery, K., Adler, M., et al. (2020). New GMP Manufacturing Processes to Obtain Thermostable HIV-1 Gp41 Virosomes under Solid Forms for Various Mucosal Vaccination Routes. Npj Vaccin. 5 (1), 41. doi:10.1038/s41541-020-0190-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arnau, J., Lauritzen, C., Petersen, G. E., and Pedersen, J. (2006). Current Strategies for the Use of Affinity Tags and Tag Removal for the Purification of Recombinant Proteins. Protein Expr. Purif. 48 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2005.12.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arora, N., Anbalagan, L. C., and Pannu, A. K. (2021). Towards Eradication of Malaria: Is the WHO's RTS,S/AS01 Vaccination Effective Enough? Rmhp Vol. 14, 1033–1039. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S219294

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aucoin, M. G., Perrier, M., and Kamen, A. A. (2007). Improving AAV Vector Yield in Insect Cells by Modulating the Temperature after Infection. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 97 (6), 1501–1509. doi:10.1002/bit.21364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bornhorst, J. A., and Falke, J. J. (2000). [16] Purification of Proteins Using Polyhistidine Affinity Tags. Methods Enzymol. 326, 245–254. doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(00)26058-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bustamante, L. Y., Bartholdson, S. J., Crosnier, C., Campos, M. G., Wanaguru, M., Nguon, C., et al. (2013). A Full-Length Recombinant Plasmodium Falciparum PfRH5 Protein Induces Inhibitory Antibodies that Are Effective across Common PfRH5 Genetic Variants. Vaccine 31 (2), 373–379. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carinhas, N., Bernal, V., Monteiro, F., Carrondo, M. J. T., Oliveira, R., and Alves, P. M. (2010). Improving Baculovirus Production at High Cell Density through Manipulation of Energy Metabolism. Metab. Eng. 12 (1), 39–52. doi:10.1016/j.ymben.2009.08.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Correia, R., Fernandes, B., Alves, P. M., Carrondo, M. J. T., and Roldão, A. (2020). Improving Influenza HA-Vlps Production in Insect High Five Cells via Adaptive Laboratory Evolution. Vaccines 8 (4), 589. doi:10.3390/vaccines8040589

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dreyer, A. M., Matile, H., Papastogiannidis, P., Kamber, J., Favuzza, P., Voss, T. S., et al. (2012). Passive Immunoprotection ofPlasmodium Falciparum-Infected Mice Designates the CyRPA as Candidate Malaria Vaccine Antigen. J.I. 188 (12), 6225–6237. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1103177

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Durocher, Y. (2002). High-level and High-Throughput Recombinant Protein Production by Transient Transfection of Suspension-Growing Human 293-EBNA1 Cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (2), 9e–9. doi:10.1093/nar/30.2.e9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Favuzza, P., Blaser, S., Dreyer, A. M., Riccio, G., Tamborrini, M., Thoma, R., et al. (2016). Generation of Plasmodium Falciparum Parasite-Inhibitory Antibodies by Immunization with Recombinantly-Expressed CyRPA. Malar. J. 15 (1), 161. doi:10.1186/s12936-016-1213-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Favuzza, P., Guffart, E., Tamborrini, M., Scherer, B., Dreyer, A. M., Rufer, A. C., et al. (2017). Structure of the Malaria Vaccine Candidate Antigen CyRPA and its Complex with a Parasite Invasion Inhibitory Antibody. ELife 6, e20383. doi:10.7554/eLife.20383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fernandes, B., Vidigal, J., Correia, R., Carrondo, M. J. T., Alves, P. M., Teixeira, A. P., et al. (2020). Adaptive Laboratory Evolution of Stable Insect Cell Lines for Improved HIV-Gag VLPs Production. J. Biotechnol. 307, 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hjerrild, K. A., Jin, J., Wright, K. E., Brown, R. E., Marshall, J. M., Labbé, G. M., et al. (2016). Production of Full-Length Soluble Plasmodium Falciparum RH5 Protein Vaccine Using a Drosophila melanogaster Schneider 2 Stable Cell Line System. Sci. Rep. 6 (1), 30357. doi:10.1038/srep30357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jarvis, D. L. (2003). Developing Baculovirus-Insect Cell Expression Systems for Humanized Recombinant Glycoprotein Production. Virology 310 (1), 1–7. doi:10.1016/S0042-6822(03)00120-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, J., Hjerrild, K. A., Silk, S. E., Brown, R. E., Labbé, G. M., Marshall, J. M., et al. (2017). Accelerating the Clinical Development of Protein-Based Vaccines for Malaria by Efficient Purification Using a Four Amino Acid C-Terminal 'C-Tag'. Int. J. Parasitol. 47 (7), 435–446. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kost, T. A., Condreay, J. P., and Jarvis, D. L. (2005). Baculovirus as Versatile Vectors for Protein Expression in Insect and Mammalian Cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 567–575. doi:10.1038/nbt1095

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mena, J. A., Ramírez, O. T., and Palomares, L. A. (2003). Titration of Non-occluded Baculovirus Using a Cell Viability Assay. BioTechniques 34 (2), 260–264. doi:10.2144/03342bm05

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Monteiro, F., Bernal, V., Chaillet, M., Berger, I., and Alves, P. M. (2016). Targeted Supplementation Design for Improved Production and Quality of Enveloped Viral Particles in Insect Cell-Baculovirus Expression System. J. Biotechnol. 233, 34–41. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.06.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Patel, S. D., Ahouidi, A. D., Bei, A. K., Dieye, T. N., Mboup, S., Harrison, S. C., et al. (2013). Plasmodium Falciparum Merozoite Surface Antigen, PfRH5, Elicits Detectable Levels of Invasion-Inhibiting Antibodies in Humans. J. Infect. Dis. 208 (10), 1679–1687. doi:10.1093/infdis/jit385

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rhodes, D. J. (1996). Economics of Baculovirus?insect Cell Production Systems. Cytotechnology 20, 291–297. doi:10.1007/BF00350408

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Roldão, A., Oliveira, R., Carrondo, M. J. T., and Alves, P. M. (2009). Error Assessment in Recombinant Baculovirus Titration: Evaluation of Different Methods. J. Virol. Methods 159 (1), 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.03.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schindelin, J., Arganda-Carreras, I., Frise, E., Kaynig, V., Longair, M., Pietzsch, T., et al. (2012). Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 9 (7), 676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sequeira, D. P., Correia, R., Carrondo, M. J. T., Roldão, A., Teixeira, A. P., and Alves, P. M. (2018). Combining Stable Insect Cell Lines with Baculovirus-Mediated Expression for Multi-HA Influenza VLP Production. Vaccine 36 (22), 3112–3123. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.02.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Somasundaram, B., Chang, C., Fan, Y. Y., Lim, P.-Y., Cardosa, J., and Lua, L. (2016). Characterizing Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 Virus-like Particles Production in Insect Cells. Methods 95, 38–45. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.09.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vieira, H. L. A., Estêvão, C., Roldão, A., Peixoto, C. C., Sousa, M. F. Q., Cruz, P. E., et al. (2005). Triple Layered Rotavirus VLP Production: Kinetics of Vector Replication, mRNA Stability and Recombinant Protein Production. J. Biotechnol. 120 (1), 72–82. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.03.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2021). World Malaria Report 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.

Google Scholar

Yee, C. M., Zak, A. J., Hill, B. D., and Wen, F. (2018). The Coming Age of Insect Cells for Manufacturing and Development of Protein Therapeutics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 10061–10070. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00985

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: insect cells, BEVS, bioprocess engineering, malaria vaccine, PfCyRPA

Citation: Fernandes B, Sousa M, Castro R, Schäfer A, Hauser J, Schulze K, Amacker M, Tamborrini M, Pluschke G, Alves PM, Fleury S and Roldão A (2022) Scalable Process for High-Yield Production of PfCyRPA Using Insect Cells for Inclusion in a Malaria Virosome-Based Vaccine Candidate. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:879078. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.879078

Received: 18 February 2022; Accepted: 05 April 2022;
Published: 20 May 2022.

Edited by:

Maizirwan Mel, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

Reviewed by:

Mohd Azmir Arifin, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia
Fazia Adyani Ahmad Fuad, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia

Copyright © 2022 Fernandes, Sousa, Castro, Schäfer, Hauser, Schulze, Amacker, Tamborrini, Pluschke, Alves, Fleury and Roldão. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: António Roldão, YXJvbGRhb0BpYmV0LnB0

Present Address: Marcos Sousa, Bayer AG, Pharmaceuticals-Product Supply, Leverkusen, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.