AUTHOR=Anderson Dennis E. , Groff Michael W. , Flood Thomas F. , Allaire Brett T. , Davis Roger B. , Stadelmann Marc A. , Zysset Philippe K. , Alkalay Ron N. 

TITLE=Evaluation of Load-To-Strength Ratios in Metastatic Vertebrae and Comparison With Age- and Sex-Matched Healthy Individuals

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.866970

DOI=10.3389/fbioe.2022.866970

ISSN=2296-4185

ABSTRACT=<p>Vertebrae containing osteolytic and osteosclerotic bone metastases undergo pathologic vertebral fracture (PVF) when the lesioned vertebrae fail to carry daily loads. We hypothesize that task-specific spinal loading patterns amplify the risk of PVF, with a higher degree of risk in osteolytic than in osteosclerotic vertebrae. To test this hypothesis, we obtained clinical CT images of 11 cadaveric spines with bone metastases, estimated the individual vertebral strength from the CT data, and created spine-specific musculoskeletal models from the CT data. We established a musculoskeletal model for each spine to compute vertebral loading for natural standing, natural standing + weights, forward flexion + weights, and lateral bending + weights and derived the individual vertebral load-to-strength ratio (LSR). For each activity, we compared the metastatic spines’ predicted LSRs with the normative LSRs generated from a population-based sample of 250 men and women of comparable ages. Bone metastases classification significantly affected the CT-estimated vertebral strength (Kruskal–Wallis, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001). Post-test analysis showed that the estimated vertebral strength of osteosclerotic and mixed metastases vertebrae was significantly higher than that of osteolytic vertebrae (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0016 and <italic>p</italic> = 0.0003) or vertebrae without radiographic evidence of bone metastasis (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0010 and <italic>p</italic> = 0.0003). Compared with the median (50%) LSRs of the normative dataset, osteolytic vertebrae had higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0375), natural standing + weights (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0118), and lateral bending + weights (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0111). Surprisingly, vertebrae showing minimal radiographic evidence of bone metastasis presented significantly higher median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001) and lateral bending + weights (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0009) than the normative dataset. Osteosclerotic vertebrae had lower median (50%) LSRs under natural standing (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001), natural standing + weights (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0005), forward flexion + weights (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001), and lateral bending + weights (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0002), a trend shared by vertebrae with mixed lesions. This study is the first to apply musculoskeletal modeling to estimate individual vertebral loading in pathologic spines and highlights the role of task-specific loading in augmenting PVF risk associated with specific bone metastatic types. Our finding of high LSRs in vertebrae without radiologically observed bone metastasis highlights that patients with metastatic spine disease could be at an increased risk of vertebral fractures even at levels where lesions have not been identified radiologically.</p>