Erik A. Gonzalez-Leon
Jerry C. Hu- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
Knee meniscus injuries are the most frequent causes of orthopedic surgical procedures in the U.S., motivating tissue engineering attempts and the need for suitable animal models. Despite extensive use in cardiovascular research and the existence of characterization data for the menisci of farm pigs, the farm pig may not be a desirable preclinical model for the meniscus due to rapid weight gain. Minipigs are conducive to in vivo experiments due to their slower growth rate than farm pigs and similarity in weight to humans. However, characterization of minipig knee menisci is lacking. The objective of this study was to extensively characterize structural and functional properties within different regions of both medial and lateral Yucatan minipig knee menisci to inform this model’s suitability as a preclinical model for meniscal therapies. Menisci measured 23.2–24.8 mm in anteroposterior length (33–40 mm for human), 7.7–11.4 mm in width (8.3–14.8 mm for human), and 6.4–8.4 mm in peripheral height (5–7 mm for human). Per wet weight, biochemical evaluation revealed 23.9–31.3% collagen (COL; 22% for human) and 1.20–2.57% glycosaminoglycans (GAG; 0.8% for human). Also, per dry weight, pyridinoline crosslinks (PYR) were 0.12–0.16% (0.12% for human) and, when normalized to collagen content, reached as high as 1.45–1.96 ng/µg. Biomechanical testing revealed circumferential Young’s modulus of 78.4–116.2 MPa (100–300 MPa for human), circumferential ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of 18.2–25.9 MPa (12–18 MPa for human), radial Young’s modulus of 2.5–10.9 MPa (10–30 MPa for human), radial UTS of 2.5–4.2 MPa (1–4 MPa for human), aggregate modulus of 157–287 kPa (100–150 kPa for human), and shear modulus of 91–147 kPa (120 kPa for human). Anisotropy indices ranged from 11.2–49.4 and 6.3–11.2 for tensile stiffness and strength (approximately 10 for human), respectively. Regional differences in mechanical and biochemical properties within the minipig medial meniscus were observed; specifically, GAG, PYR, PYR/COL, radial stiffness, and Young’s modulus anisotropy varied by region. The posterior region of the medial meniscus exhibited the lowest radial stiffness, which is also seen in humans and corresponds to the most prevalent location for meniscal lesions. Overall, similarities between minipig and human menisci support the use of minipigs for meniscus translational research.
Introduction
Damage to the knee meniscus can result from trauma or age-related degeneration; meniscal lesions are the most common intra-articular knee injury and account for the most frequent cause of orthopedic surgical procedures in the U.S. (Salata et al., 2010). Specifically, up to 20% of orthopedic procedures involve surgery on the meniscus, leading to approximately 850,00 patients per year (Logerstedt et al., 2010). The medial meniscus is about 4-times more likely to be damaged and undergo surgery compared to the lateral meniscus (Baker et al., 1985). Additionally, the meniscus is a fibrocartilaginous tissue that is nearly avascular and, thus, is generally not amenable to repair. Differences in injury prevalence between medial and lateral menisci can result from differences in structural properties and, thus, functionality, making it important to consider these properties during every step of developing new therapies, such as tissue engineered menisci.
Options for the management of meniscal injuries vary with respect to disease severity and type, ranging from physical therapy to invasive surgical intervention (Herrlin et al., 2007; Maffulli et al., 2010; Katz et al., 2013). Meniscectomy, the partial or complete removal of the knee meniscus, can relieve pain but is reserved for cases in which meniscus repair is unlikely (e.g., tears in the avascular portion) (Barber-Westin and Noyes, 2014; Xu and Zhao, 2015). Removal of either meniscus greatly predisposes a patient to osteoarthritis (Rangger et al., 1997). Thus, novel regenerative solutions for knee meniscus repair and replacement are required. Toward demonstrating efficacy of novel meniscal therapies, appropriate animal models will be needed to traverse the regulatory process. These animals should have menisci with morphological, biomechanical, and biochemical properties that are comparable to humans; similarities in gait, joint anatomy, and joint biomechanics should also be considered to facilitate translation (Donahue et al., 2019).
Engineered meniscal tissues are expected to experience complex loading patterns within the knee. For example, human medial menisci have been shown to have mechanical properties that vary by topographical location (Sweigart et al., 2004). Additionally, knee menisci have anisotropic tensile properties, or different mechanical properties when tested in circumferential versus radial directions; this difference in mechanical properties stems from circumferentially aligned collagen fibers that convert compressive forces into tensile hoop stresses. It is posited that tissue engineered implants should closely resemble the native tissue toward restoring function in vivo; thus, acquisition of complete design parameters from native tissue is crucial. Furthermore, engineered implants would require testing in a large animal model to show safety and efficacy prior to human trials (Donahue et al., 2019). Although characterization studies of human and farm pig knee menisci have been conducted (Sweigart et al., 2004; Sweigart and Athanasiou, 2005; Takroni et al., 2016) and bovine cells have been used to tissue engineer menisci (Huey and Athanasiou, 2011; Hadidi and Athanasiou, 2013; Gonzalez-Leon et al., 2020), neither farm pig nor bovine models may be suitable for preclinical testing due to these animals being vastly different from humans in terms of weight. More frequently, animal models such as the goat, sheep, dog, and rabbit have been used for meniscus studies (Chevrier et al., 2009; Deponti et al., 2015; Bansal et al., 2017; Brzezinski et al., 2017). An emerging large animal model is the minipig, which has been proposed as a possible model that can be incorporated into future guidance documents for meniscus repair (Donahue et al., 2019), but data on the knee menisci of minipigs are lacking.
The minipig model, specifically the Yucatan breed, is often used in biomedical research (Khoshnevis et al., 2017, 2020; Poupin et al., 2019; Melnick et al., 2020) and has been gaining popularity in orthopedic research and musculoskeletal science (Cone et al., 2017; Bansal et al., 2020; Kremen et al., 2020; Nordberg et al., 2021). Yucatan minipigs share physiological similarities with humans. For example, minipig neural vascularization patterns, central nervous system physiology, and weights are comparable to humans (Vodička et al., 2005; Walpole et al., 2012; Moriguchi et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2015); additionally, adult pig menisci have been shown to have similar vascularization patterns to humans (Peretti et al., 2004). In contrast to farm pigs, minipigs are more suitable for long-term studies because their smaller size leads to reductions in needs related to handling, housing, surgery, anesthesia, and food (Mardas et al., 2014). Particularly important is that the minipig weight gain throughout a study is not as drastic as farm pigs. For example, a Yucatan minipig weighs approximately 20–30 kg at sexual maturity (5–6 months old) and has a typical growth rate of 3–5 kg per month, while Yorkshire/Landrace hybrid pigs at sexual maturity (5–6 months) weigh well over 100 kg and continue to grow at 10–20 kg per month (Swine Models Premier BioSource). Because the Yucatan minipig provides physiological similarities to humans, requires less resources for surgery and handling, and change less over a study’s period as compared to farm pigs, its potential as a large animal model for meniscus research should be investigated, particularly through characterization of morphological, mechanical, and biochemical properties of native tissue.
This work characterized the medial and lateral knee menisci of Yucatan minipigs through extensive analyses of structure-function relationships within the native tissue. Minipig knee menisci were investigated by gross morphology, histology, mechanical testing under tension and compression, and biochemical analyses. Furthermore, motivated by topographical differences in properties in human menisci, different regions of the minipig menisci were examined for mechanical anisotropy and degree of collagen crosslinking to provide greater insight on the native tissue’s function. Because skeletally mature minipigs are similar in weight to humans and because regional differences in mechanical properties have been observed in human menisci, we hypothesized that 1) gross morphological dimensions of minipig menisci would fall within human menisci ranges, 2) as with humans, regional differences in mechanical properties would be observed in the minipig menisci, and 3) regional differences in mechanical properties would correspond to differences in collagen, glycosaminoglycan (GAG), and crosslink content. The data here will serve to advance our understanding of the regional structure-function relationships of minipig knee menisci, to provide benchmarks to assist the creation of novel regenerative solutions for human meniscal lesions, and to provide critical information regarding the suitability of the minipig as a model for investigations of the knee meniscus.
Materials and Methods
Animals, Knee Meniscus Gross Morphology, Histology, and Macroscopic Characterization
Knee menisci were obtained from eight healthy, skeletally mature, 16–18-month-old male and female Yucatan minipigs that were sacrificed due to reasons unrelated to this study. The menisci were excised and subsequently frozen in PBS-containing protease inhibitors 10 mmol/L N-ethylmaleimide and 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsufonyl fluoride (Sigma) at −20°C. Menisci were thawed and photographed, and the dimensions were measured using ImageJ (NIH; Figures 1A,2) before dividing each meniscus into three regions (anterior, central, posterior). Pieces for mechanical testing and biochemical analysis were resected from the white-red zone of each region (Figure 1B), while histology samples comprised of a cross section taken from the central region of each meniscus. For histology, construct samples were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, then embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 μm. Safranin-O/fast green, picrosirius red, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stains were conducted to visualize GAG, collagen, and cell distributions, respectively (Figure 3).
FIGURE 1. Gross morphology measurements and division of minipig knee menisci for mechanical and biochemical analyses. (A) Arrows indicate the locations where measurements were taken for anteroposterior length, regional width, and peripheral height. (B) Each meniscus was cut into three regions (anterior, central, posterior). Subsequently, each section was cut into layers from which tensile (circumferential and radial directions), compressive (creep indentation), biochemistry, and mass spectrometry samples were collected.
FIGURE 2. Gross morphology of Yucatan minipig knee menisci. Articulating surfaces and side profiles of medial and lateral menisci are shown.
FIGURE 3. Histological staining of Yucatan minipig knee menisci. Cross sections of menisci stained for collagen (picrosirius red), GAG (Safranin-O), and cell content (H&E) are shown.
Tensile and Compressive Testing
Tensile properties were assessed using uniaxial, strain-to-failure testing in circumferential and radial directions. Samples were cut into rectangular strips and photographed, and the dimensions were measured with ImageJ. Samples were then clamped within a uniaxial testing machine (Instron model 5,565) and subjected to a 1% s−1 strain rate until failure. Young’s modulus (EY) was calculated from the linear portion of the stress-strain curve, and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was calculated from the maximum stress.
Compressive properties were assessed via creep indentation testing of punches measuring 3 mm in diameter and placed into an automated indentation machine while submerged in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), as previously described (Brown et al., 2018; Espinosa et al., 2021b). Briefly, tissue punches were tested using a 0.5 mN tare load followed by a 0.04–0.05 N test load to maintain ∼10% applied strain. The loads were applied to the surface of specimens through a 1.0 mm diameter, flat-ended, porous tip, perpendicular to the surface at the center of the sample. The sample surface is assumed to be a semi-infinite half space, which allows the single measurement point to be representative of the whole sample. The tissue was allowed to reach creep equilibrium while the deformation was recorded over time. Using the analytical solution for the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem with Papkovich potential functions, preliminary estimations of the aggregate modulus of the samples were obtained. Using the linear biphasic theory followed by a finite element model, intrinsic biomechanical properties of the samples such as aggregate modulus, shear modulus, Poisson’s ratio, and permeability were calculated (Athanasiou et al., 1995; Elder et al., 2010).
Analysis of Tissue Biochemical Content
Biochemistry samples were weighed wet, then frozen and lyophilized to acquire dry weights. Collagen content was measured with the use of a Sircol standard (Biocolor) and a modified chloramine-T colorimetric hydroxyproline assay (Cissell et al., 2017). GAG content was quantified using the Blyscan Glycosaminoglycan assay kit (Biocolor). All quantification measurements for collagen and GAG content were performed with a GENios spectrophotometer/spectrofluorometer (TECAN).
Quantification of pyridinoline crosslink content was performed via a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) assay (Naffa et al., 2019). Lyophilized samples were hydrolyzed in 6N HCl at 105°C for 18 h. After evaporation, dried hydrolysates were resuspended in 25% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water, centrifuged at 15,000 g for 5 min, and the supernatant was transferred to a LCMS autosampler vial. Liquid chromatography was carried out on a Cogent Diamond Hydride HPLC Column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, particle size 2.2 μm, pore size 120 Å, MicroSolv) and a pyridinoline standard (BOC Sciences) as previously described (Gonzalez-Leon et al., 2020).
Statistical Analysis
For each biomechanical, biochemical, and morphological test, n = 5–7 samples were used. To identify outliers within groups, a ROUT test was applied using GraphPad Prism software; no outliers were identified. A Shapiro-Wilk test was applied using alpha = 0.01 to confirm that data within groups were normally distributed. Data were first analyzed using a Student’s t-test comparing aggregated data from all regions of the medial and of the lateral menisci to discern differences between the two sides. This level of analysis was motivated by literature showing that properties within medial and lateral menisci are different across multiple species. Next, a single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) or Kruskal–Wallis test was used when appropriate to determine, for each meniscus, whether the properties differed by region; the levels consisted of anterior, central, and posterior regions. A Tukey’s HSD post hoc test was performed when merited. All statistics were performed with p < 0.05. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. For all figures, a connecting letters report shows statistical significance as indicated by groups not sharing the same letters.
Results
Gross Morphology and Histology
The Yucatan minipig medial and lateral menisci were semi-lunar and wedge shaped (Figures 2, 3), with anteroposterior lengths of 23.2 and 24.8 mm, respectively; no significant difference in length was found between the two groups (Table 1). Significant difference was observed in width; medial meniscus width ranged from 7.7 to 10.2 mm across its regions while lateral meniscus width ranged from 8.4 to 11.4 mm. The posterior region was significantly wider than other regions for both menisci. Peripheral height also differed significantly; the medial and lateral meniscus peripheral heights varied from 6.4 to 6.6 mm and 6.4–8.4 mm, respectively. The anterior and posterior regions of the lateral meniscus exhibited significantly higher peripheral heights when compared to the central region; there were no significant differences in peripheral heights among medial meniscus regions.
TABLE 1. Morphological properties of minipig menisci. Student’s t-test showed a significant difference between medial and lateral menisci in hydration, width, and peripheral height values. For comparison of regions within each meniscus, Tukey’s HSD test showed significant differences among regions for both menisci in width, while the lateral meniscus exhibited differences in peripheral height values among its regions. Values marked with different letters within each category are significantly different among groups (p < 0.05), n = 7–8 per group. Human values of morphological properties from the literature are shown for comparison (Proffen et al., 2012; Takroni et al., 2016).
Tissue Biomechanics
Biomechanical data revealed no significant differences in circumferential Young’s modulus between medial and lateral menisci or among their regions, which ranged from 99.4 to 114.1 MPa in the medial meniscus and 78.4–116.2 MPa in the lateral meniscus (Figure 4A); additionally, circumferential UTS ranged from 18.2 to 25.9 MPa, though no significant difference among regions in either meniscus was shown (Figure 4B). Radial Young’s modulus was not significantly different between menisci and ranged from 2.5 to 10.9 MPa; however, the anterior region of the medial meniscus was significantly higher than the medial posterior region. No significant differences among regions in the lateral meniscus were observed (Figure 4C). UTS in the radial direction ranged from 2.5 to 4.2 MPa. There were no significant differences between menisci or among regions within either meniscus (Figure 4D).
FIGURE 4. Tensile properties of Yucatan minipig knee menisci. (A,B) Young’s Modulus and UTS of medial and lateral menisci are shown for the circumferential and radial directions, respectively. No significant difference was seen in circumferential stiffness and strength; (C,D) radial stiffness in the anterior region of the medial meniscus was significantly higher than the posterior region, though no significant difference was seen in radial tensile strength. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by bars not sharing the same letters within the same meniscus; additionally, horizontal dotted lines on the Y-axis represent human meniscus values from the literature for comparison to the minipig (Tissakht and Ahmed, 1995; Makris et al., 2011).
Compressive mechanical testing showed a significant difference in permeability values between medial and lateral menisci; however, no significant differences were observed among regions in either meniscus for the values of aggregate modulus, shear modulus, permeability, and Poisson’s ratio (Figure 5). Aggregate and shear modulus values ranged from 157 to 287 kPa and 91–147 kPa, respectively; both moduli trended highest in the anterior region of each meniscus and trended lowest in the posterior region.
FIGURE 5. Compressive properties of Yucatan minipig knee menisci. (A–D) Aggregate modulus, permeability, shear modulus, and Poisson’s ratio are shown for medial and lateral menisci, respectively. Student’s t-test showed a significant difference between medial and lateral menisci in permeability values. One-factor ANOVA showed no significant differences in any compressive property among regions of the same meniscus. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by bars not sharing the same letters within the same meniscus; additionally, horizontal dotted lines on the Y-axis represent human meniscus values from the literature for comparison to the minipig (Sweigart et al., 2004; Makris et al., 2011; Morejon et al., 2021).
Tissue Biochemistry
A significant difference in hydration percentages was observed between medial and lateral menisci, which ranged from 64.0–67.8% (Table 1). Biochemical analysis showed collagen (COL) and GAG throughout both menisci, with concentrations per wet weight (WW) ranging from 23.9–31.3% COL/WW and 1.20–2.57% GAG/WW, respectively (Figures 6A,C). There were no significant differences between menisci in collagen content normalized to wet weight or dry weight (DW). Significantly less COL/WW was observed in the anterior region of the medial meniscus compared to its other regions, while no significant differences among regions in the lateral meniscus were observed. COL/DW in the medial meniscus was significantly higher in the posterior region compared to the anterior; no significant differences in COL/DW were found among regions in the lateral meniscus (Figure 6B). Significant differences between menisci were observed for GAG/WW and GAG/DW. In the medial meniscus, the anterior region had significantly more GAG/WW and GAG/DW than the posterior region; no significant differences in GAG/WW or GAG/DW were seen among regions in the lateral meniscus (Figures 6C,D).
FIGURE 6. Biochemical properties of Yucatan minipig menisci. (A–F) Collagen, GAG, and pyridinoline crosslink content are shown normalized to wet and dry weights, respectively, in addition to (G) crosslinks normalized to collagen content. Student’s t-test shows significant differences between medial and lateral menisci in GAG content. One-factor ANOVA showed pyridinoline crosslinks normalized to collagen content was significantly higher in the central region of the medial meniscus compared to its posterior region; no significant differences were seen among regions in the lateral meniscus. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by bars not sharing the same letters within the same meniscus; additionally, horizontal dotted lines on the Y-axis represent human meniscus values from the literature for comparison to the minipig (Herwig et al., 1984; Takahashi et al., 1998; Makris et al., 2011).
Pyridinoline (PYR) crosslink content normalized to WW was not significantly different between medial and lateral menisci and ranged from 0.38 to 0.58 ng/µg. The central region of the medial meniscus contained significantly more PYR/WW compared to the anterior; there were no significant differences in PYR/WW content among lateral meniscus regions (Figure 6E). In addition, there were no significant differences in PYR/DW between menisci or among their regions (Figure 6F). Finally, PYR/COL ranged from 1.45 to 1.96 ng/µg and was not significantly different between medial and lateral menisci (Figure 6G).
Anisotropy
For the assessment of anisotropy, tensile properties of each region in both medial and lateral menisci were collected from two testing directions–circumferential and radial. Circumferential values were then divided by radial values to produce an anisotropy index. A significant difference between medial and lateral menisci was observed for tensile Young’s modulus but not for UTS. The Young’s modulus anisotropy index ranged from 11.2–49.9 and was significantly different among regions in the medial meniscus; the posterior region of the medial meniscus was significantly higher than other regions in the medial meniscus, while there were no significant differences among regions in the lateral meniscus (Figure 7A). UTS anisotropy levels ranged from 6.3–11.2 and no significant differences between menisci or among regions in either meniscus were found (Figure 7B).
FIGURE 7. Anisotropy index of Yucatan minipig meniscus tensile properties. (A,B) Anisotropy indices are shown for tensile Young’s modulus and UTS, respectively. Student’s t-test showed a significant difference in Young’s modulus anisotropy values between menisci. One-factor ANOVA showed the posterior region of the medial meniscus was significantly more anisotropic in tensile stiffness than its other regions, while no significant differences were seen among regions of the lateral meniscus. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Statistical significance is indicated by bars not sharing the same letters within the same meniscus; additionally, horizontal dotted lines on the Y-axis represent human meniscus values from the literature for comparison to the minipig (Makris et al., 2011).
Discussion
The objective of this study was to characterize the knee menisci of Yucatan minipigs because the minipig has been proposed as a large animal model for translational cartilage and meniscus research. This was performed through an extensive analysis of structure-function relationships within the native tissue by region, which was motivated by known regional differences in human menisci. The data may provide design criteria to tissue engineers who aim to create repair and replacement technologies for the knee meniscus and to researchers that aim to test novel meniscal technologies in large animals. Notably, previously unexplored characteristics, such as the degree of collagen crosslinking within minipig menisci, were elucidated using an LC-MS assay. With regard to the hypothesis that gross morphological properties would be comparable to human menisci ranges, it was found that the regional width and peripheral height of minipig menisci fell within human ranges. Additional hypotheses that regional differences in mechanical properties would be observed and that regional differences in mechanical properties would correspond to differences in structural characteristics were also supported by the data. Support for these hypotheses is significant because the data imply that analogous products designed for human menisci would likely be functional in the minipig, allowing for human meniscal products to be tested in this animal.
Morphological features of the Yucatan minipig menisci were measured to assess the similarity between native minipig and human tissue; morphologically similar tissues between species could allow for translation of surgical techniques in addition to engineered meniscus implants. This study found minipig menisci to be comparable to human menisci, which measure 33.3–39.8 mm in anteroposterior length, 8.5–14.8 mm in peripheral height, and 5–7 mm in regional width, respectively. For example, values measured for the minipig menisci dimensions were within ranges seen in human menisci for 2 out of 3 properties - average peripheral height and average regional width (Erbagci et al., 2004; Takroni et al., 2016); the lateral minipig meniscus trended higher in anteroposterior length than the medial meniscus and is approximately 28% shorter in length than the lateral human meniscus (Yoon et al., 2011). Despite this difference, minipig anteroposterior lengths are comparable to other animal models that have been used in knee meniscus research such as sheep, goats, and farm pigs that measure 22–26 mm on average (Proffen et al., 2012; Brzezinski et al., 2017). Additionally, the minipig and human both exhibit higher peripheral height values in the lateral meniscus compared to the medial side (Table 1). The posterior regions of both minipig menisci were significantly wider than their respective anterior and central regions, similar to human menisci; the posterior region of the lateral minipig meniscus, the widest by average in this study, was only 2% smaller than the average width reported for the lateral meniscus in the human. Additionally, comparable to what is seen in humans (Chevrier et al., 2009; Fedje-Johnston et al., 2021), histology of minipig meniscus cross sections showed a collagen network throughout the tissue, a positive staining for GAG, and cells dispersed throughout the tissue (Figure 3). Overall, minipig knee menisci provide gross morphological similarities to humans in terms of their peripheral height and regional width, which could allow for the ready implantation and, eventually, translation of engineered tissues for their repair or replacement.
The knee meniscus functions by developing tension when under compressive load, highlighting the importance of both mechanical properties for the meniscus. It was found that there were no significant differences in tensile stiffness and strength in the circumferential or radial directions between medial and lateral menisci (Figure 4). Additionally, no significant differences in circumferential tensile properties among meniscus regions were observed, replicating what is seen in humans; at their peak, minipig meniscus circumferential stiffness and strength are 81 and 138% of the peak values recorded in humans, respectively (Tissakht and Ahmed, 1995). Radial stiffness of minipig menisci were on par to those of human menisci; values averaged across both medial and lateral menisci and regions were 8.3 MPa for the minipig and 10.8 MPa for humans (Tissakht and Ahmed, 1995) (Figure 4C). In terms of compressive properties, only permeability was significantly different between medial and lateral menisci; this difference between menisci was not seen in human tissue in a study that measured compressive properties using stress-relaxation (Morejon et al., 2021). Additionally, the homogeneity seen among regions in Yucatan minipig menisci (Figure 5) is not reflected in the human, albeit a similar trend was identified; the anterior region of the human medial meniscus is stiffer than its central and posterior regions, and is 80% as stiff as the anterior region of the medial meniscus in the Yucatan minipig (Sweigart et al., 2004). Biomechanical properties crucial to meniscus functionality, such as circumferential and radial tensile properties, were comparable between minipigs and humans; because of this, it is plausible that a meniscus implant with mechanical properties akin to those of human menisci can survive within the minipig knee environment during translational studies.
For humans, longitudinal tears occur more often in the medial posterior meniscus when compared to the anterior region (Skaggs et al., 1994). It has been suggested that the posterior region of the human medial meniscus bears more load than the anterior region and, thus, experiences larger radial stresses that lead to longitudinal tears (Ahmed and Burke, 1983). In the minipig, this study showed that the posterior region exhibited significantly lower radial stiffness than the anterior region (Figure 4C), which also corresponded to differences in composition (Figure 5). Thus, although there are currently no data on meniscal tears in minipigs, the data here would suggest that, with its lower mechanical properties, the minipig may share similarities with humans in having menisci that are more prone to injuries in the medial posterior region. The mechanical data obtained here may further be supported by differences in structure, such as the density or thickness of radially aligned collagen fibers (Skaggs et al., 1994), which warrant additional structural studies.
Because regional differences in mechanical properties of knee menisci have been identified in humans and other species such as cows, farm pigs, rabbits, and baboons (Skaggs et al., 1994; Tissakht and Ahmed, 1995; Sweigart et al., 2004), it is crucial to investigate the biochemical composition of minipig menisci toward understanding their mechanical function. Minipig and human menisci share similar levels of hydration, with 67.8% hydration in the anterior region of the minipig lateral meniscus being just under the literature value of 72% for human menisci (Makris et al., 2011). Collagen accounts for 23.9–31.3% per wet weight of minipig meniscus tissue (Figure 6B), and human menisci contains 22% COL/WW (Herwig et al., 1984). In terms of GAG content, values in the minipig meniscus reached as high as 2.73% GAG/WW (Figure 6C), which is approximately 3-times higher than in humans (Herwig et al., 1984). Notably, the posterior region of the medial meniscus contained significantly less GAG per wet and dry weights than the anterior region. Although there were no significant differences in compressive properties among regions in the medial meniscus, the posterior region had the lowest aggregate and shear moduli values. Overall, minipig meniscus collagen and GAG content were on par with or slightly exceeded levels seen in the human.
In addition to measuring collagen and GAG content, quantifying pyridinoline crosslinks is crucial to understanding the structure-function relationship of the minipig knee meniscus because these crosslinks have been shown to correlate with tensile properties of menisci and other collagenous tissues (Chan et al., 1998; Williamson et al., 2003; Eleswarapu et al., 2011). Pyridinoline crosslink content normalized to dry weight trended highest in the central region of the medial minipig meniscus and was measured at approximately 0.16%, which is higher than levels obtained in human menisci using an HPLC fluorescence detection assay at 0.12% (Takahashi et al., 1998). It should be noted that values in the present study were obtained using an LC-MS method, which has been shown to be more precise and accurate than HPLC fluorescence detection methods (Milićević et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2012; Bandeira et al., 2013; Bielajew et al., 2020, 2021). Pyridinoline crosslink content, for example, has been quantified using LC-MS techniques in bovine articular cartilage, showing crosslink levels of 0.12% of total dry weight, which were on par with values recorded in this study (Espinosa et al., 2021a). The posterior region of the medial meniscus contained significantly fewer crosslinks normalized to collagen content compared to the central region (Figure 6G), which may contribute to the low radial tensile stiffness in the posterior region. Overall, the medial meniscus contained regional variability in biochemical content while the lateral meniscus was more homogeneous throughout; this is reflected in the mechanical properties and anisotropy indices of the medial meniscus.
The anisotropic organization of ECM within the meniscus is crucial to the tissue’s function. Circumferential tensile stiffness and strength of menisci have been reported to be approximately 10-fold higher than those of the radial direction in many species (Fithian et al., 1990). Tensile anisotropy indices were also measured, defined as circumferential tensile properties normalized to those in the radial direction (Gonzalez-Leon et al., 2020), in this study for Yucatan minipig menisci tensile stiffness and strength. These ranged from 11.2–49.9 and 6.3–11.2, respectively, and were similar to those previously reported (Fithian et al., 1990). The medial meniscus however, contained a significantly higher anisotropy index for tensile stiffness in its posterior region compared to other regions (Figure 7A), likely stemming from the low tensile properties in the radial direction. It is worth noting, though, that radial tensile values in this region of the minipig were still on par with those reported for the same meniscal region in humans (Tissakht and Ahmed, 1995). In summary, the posterior region of the minipig meniscus, thus, has a higher degree of anisotropy, less crosslinked collagen, and lower radial tensile properties compared to other medial regions; these findings correspond to a region in the human medial meniscus where more injuries have been reported (Skaggs et al., 1994), showing the clinical relevance of using the minipig as a large animal model.
While this study elucidated that minipig menisci morphological, mechanical, and biochemical properties fall within native human tissue ranges, it is important to note that additional investigations into minipig meniscus properties could further validate these findings. Meniscus structure-function relationships have been shown to vary by zone (i.e., outer red-red zone versus inner white-white zone) in pigs and other species (Chevrier et al., 2009). Compressive properties and GAG content, for example, have been shown to be higher in the inner white-white zone of human and porcine menisci when compared to the outer red-red zone (Nakano et al., 1997; Scott et al., 1997; Tanaka et al., 1999); because this study collected biochemical samples from the middle white-red zone, additional studies are warranted to compare outer and inner zones. Furthermore, as this study utilized menisci from both male and female minipigs, sex-specific differences that may exist in meniscus properties were not able to be elucidated. Identifying sex-based differences for meniscus properties, should they exist, might allow for better understanding of meniscal function and pathophysiology in humans; fibrocartilages such as the TMJ disc, for example, have a higher frequency of injury in female patients when compared to male patients (Warren and Fried, 2001). Additionally, human meniscus characteristics such as GAG content have been shown to decrease with age (Clark and Ogden, 1983); investigation into minipig menisci at different stages of development could provide further insight into appropriate models to consider in preclinical research. These factors, investigated with an adequate number of experimental samples to generalize the findings, could thus provide crucial insight into minipig meniscus structure-function relationships.
The prevalence and economic impact of meniscal injuries motivate tissue engineers to create novel regenerative solutions. For these new implant technologies to successfully translate from the benchtop to the clinic they must first undergo extensive preclinical testing in a large animal model. It is crucial to find an appropriate animal model with similar structural, mechanical, and biochemical characteristics to humans and, ideally, a docile temperament to facilitate post-surgical care. Minipigs such as the Yucatan breed have been proposed as animal models for studies involving injuries to articular cartilage and the knee meniscus. Engineered meniscal implants should aim to recapitulate native tissue properties to increase their chances of survival in the native knee’s biomechanical environment. The characterization this study provides shows that the Yucatan minipig meniscus is comparable to humans in terms of morphological, mechanical, and biochemical properties. In addition, human meniscus injury patterns were considered when identifying an analogous location where they may occur in minipigs. These findings provide design criteria for tissue engineers that aim to create regenerative solutions to meniscal injuries and support use of the Yucatan minipig as a large animal model for translating meniscal therapies.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Author Contributions
EG-L designed and conducted the experiments. The manuscript is mainly written by EG-L with contributions from all authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge support from the following funding sources: National Institutes of Health R01 AR071457, National Science Foundation GRFP (for EG-L), HHMI Gilliam Fellowship (for EG-L), and University of California, Irvine Eugene Cota Robles Fellowship (for EG-L).
References
Ahmed, A. M., and Burke, D. L. (1983). In-Vitro of Measurement of Static Pressure Distribution in Synovial Joints-Part I: Tibial Surface of the Knee. J. Biomech. Eng. 105, 216–225. doi:10.1115/1.3138409
Athanasiou, K. A., Agarwal, A., Muffoletto, A., Dzida, F. J., Constantinides, G., and Clem, M. (1995). Biomechanical Properties of Hip Cartilage in Experimental Animal Models. Clin. Orthopaedics Relat. Res. 316(316), 254–266. doi:10.1097/00003086-199507000-00035
Baker, B. E., Peckham, A. C., Pupparo, F., and Sanborn, J. C. (1985). Review of Meniscal Injury and Associated Sports. Am. J. Sports Med. 13, 1–4. doi:10.1177/036354658501300101
Bandeira, R. D. d. C. C., Uekane, T. M., Cunha, C. P. d., Rodrigues, J. M., la Cruz, M. H. C. d., Godoy, R. L. d. O., et al. (2013). Comparison of High Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detector and with Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods for Detection and Quantification of Ochratoxin A in green and Roasted Coffee Beans. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 56, 911–920. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132013000600004
Bansal, S., Keah, N. M., Neuwirth, A. L., O'Reilly, O., Qu, F., Seiber, B. N., et al. (2017). Large Animal Models of Meniscus Repair and Regeneration: A Systematic Review of the State of the Field. Tissue Eng. C: Methods 23, 661–672. doi:10.1089/TEN.TEC.2017.0080
Bansal, S., Miller, L. M., Patel, J. M., Meadows, K. D., Eby, M. R., Saleh, K. S., et al. (2020). Transection of the Medial Meniscus Anterior Horn Results in Cartilage Degeneration and Meniscus Remodeling in a Large Animal Model. J. Orthop. Res. 38, 2696–2708. doi:10.1002/JOR.24694
Barber-Westin, S. D., and Noyes, F. R. (2014). Clinical Healing Rates of Meniscus Repairs of Tears in the central-third (red-white) Zone. Arthrosc. J. Arthroscopic Relat. Surg. 30, 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.003
Bielajew, B. J., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2020). Collagen: Quantification, Biomechanics and Role of Minor Subtypes in Cartilage. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 730–747. doi:10.1038/S41578-020-0213-1
Bielajew, B. J., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2021). Methodology to Quantify Collagen Subtypes and Crosslinks: Application in Minipig Cartilages. Cartilage 13, 1742S–1754S. doi:10.1177/19476035211060508
Brown, W. E., Huey, D. J., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2018). Functional Self-Assembled Neocartilage as Part of a Biphasic Osteochondral Construct. PLoS One 13, e0195261. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0195261
Brzezinski, A., Ghodbane, S. A., Patel, J. M., Perry, B. A., Gatt, C. J., and Dunn, M. G. (2017). The Ovine Model for Meniscus Tissue Engineering: Considerations of Anatomy, Function, Implantation, and Evaluation. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 23, 829–841. doi:10.1089/TEN.TEC.2017.0192
Chan, B. P., Fu, S. C., Qin, L., Rolf, C., and Chan, K. M. (1998). Pyridinoline in Relation to Ultimate Stress of the Patellar Tendon during Healing: an Animal Study. J. Orthop. Res. 16, 597–603. doi:10.1002/JOR.1100160512
Chevrier, A., Nelea, M., Hurtig, M. B., Hoemann, C. D., and Buschmann, M. D. (2009). Meniscus Structure in Human, Sheep, and Rabbit for Animal Models of Meniscus Repair. J. Orthop. Res. 27, 1197–1203. doi:10.1002/JOR.20869
Cissell, D. D., Link, J. M., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2017). A Modified Hydroxyproline Assay Based on Hydrochloric Acid in Ehrlich's Solution Accurately Measures Tissue Collagen Content. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 23, 243–250. doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2017.0018
Clark, C. R., and Ogden, J. A. (1983). Development of the Menisci of the Human Knee Joint. Morphological Changes and Their Potential Role in Childhood Meniscal Injury. J. Bone Jt. Surg. 65, 538–547. doi:10.2106/00004623-198365040-00018
Cone, S. G., Warren, P. B., and Fisher, M. B. (2017). Rise of the Pigs: Utilization of the Porcine Model to Study Musculoskeletal Biomechanics and Tissue Engineering during Skeletal Growth. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 23, 763–780. doi:10.1089/TEN.TEC.2017.0227
Deponti, D., Giancamillo, A. D., Scotti, C., Peretti, G. M., and Martin, I. (2015). Animal Models for Meniscus Repair and Regeneration. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9, 512–527. doi:10.1002/term.1760
Donahue, R. P., Gonzalez-Leon, E. A., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2019). Considerations for Translation of Tissue Engineered Fibrocartilage from Bench to Bedside. J. Biomech. Eng. 141 (7), 0708021–07080216. doi:10.1115/1.4042201
Elder, B. D., Kim, D. H., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2010). Developing an Articular Cartilage Decellularization Process toward Facet Joint Cartilage Replacement. Neurosurgery 66, 722–727. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000367616.49291.9F
Eleswarapu, S. V., Responte, D. J., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2011). Tensile Properties, Collagen Content, and Crosslinks in Connective Tissues of the Immature Knee Joint. PLoS One 6, e26178. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0026178
Erbagci, H., Gumusburun, E., Bayram, M., Karakurum, G., and Sirikci, A. (2004). The normal Menisci: In Vivo MRI Measurements. Surg. Radiologic Anat. 26, 28–32. doi:10.1007/S00276-003-0182-2
Espinosa, M. G., Otarola, G. A., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2021a). Cartilage Assessment Requires a Surface Characterization Protocol: Roughness, Friction, and Function. Tissue Eng. Part C: Methods 27, 276–286. doi:10.1089/TEN.TEC.2020.0367
Espinosa, M. G., Otarola, G. A., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2021b). Vibrometry as a Noncontact Alternative to Dynamic and Viscoelastic Mechanical Testing in Cartilage. J. R. Soc. Interf. 18, 20210765. doi:10.1098/RSIF.2021.0765
Fedje-Johnston, W., Tóth, F., Albersheim, M., Carlson, C. S., Shea, K. G., Rendahl, A., et al. (2021). Changes in Matrix Components in the Developing Human Meniscus. Am. J. Sports Med. 49, 207–214. doi:10.1177/0363546520972418
Fithian, D. C., Kelly, M. A., and Mow, V. C. (1990). Material Properties and Structure-Function Relationships in the Menisci. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 252, 19–31. doi:10.1097/00003086-199003000-00004
Gonzalez-Leon, E. A., Bielajew, B. J., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2020). Engineering Self-Assembled Neomenisci through Combination of Matrix Augmentation and Directional Remodeling. Acta Biomater. 109, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.04.019
Hadidi, P., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2013). Enhancing the Mechanical Properties of Engineered Tissue through Matrix Remodeling via the Signaling Phospholipid Lysophosphatidic Acid. Biochem. Biophysical Res. Commun. 433, 133–138. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.02.048
Herrlin, S., Hållander, M., Wange, P., Weidenhielm, L., and Werner, S. (2007). Arthroscopic or Conservative Treatment of Degenerative Medial Meniscal Tears: A Prospective Randomised Trial. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 15, 393–401. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0243-2
Herwig, J., Egner, E., and Buddecke, E. (1984). Chemical Changes of Human Knee Joint Menisci in Various Stages of Degeneration. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 43, 635–640. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6548109. doi:10.1136/ard.43.4.635Accessed May 1, 2018)
Huey, D. J., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2011). Tension-compression Loading with Chemical Stimulation Results in Additive Increases to Functional Properties of Anatomic Meniscal Constructs. PLoS One 6, e27857–9. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027857
Katz, J. N., Brophy, R. H., Chaisson, C. E., de Chaves, L., Cole, B. J., Dahm, D. L., et al. (2013). Surgery versus Physical Therapy for a Meniscal Tear and Osteoarthritis. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1675–1684. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1301408
Khoshnevis, M., Carozzo, C., Bonnefont-Rebeix, C., Belluco, S., Leveneur, O., Chuzel, T., et al. (2017). Development of Induced Glioblastoma by Implantation of a Human Xenograft in Yucatan Minipig as a Large Animal Model. J. Neurosci. Methods 282, 61–68. doi:10.1016/J.JNEUMETH.2017.03.007
Khoshnevis, M., Carozzo, C., Brown, R., Bardiès, M., Bonnefont-Rebeix, C., Belluco, S., et al. (2020). Feasibility of Intratumoral 165Holmium Siloxane Delivery to Induced U87 Glioblastoma in a Large Animal Model, the Yucatan Minipig. PLoS One 15, e0234772. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0234772
Kim, H., Song, K. D., Kim, H. J., Park, W., Kim, J., Lee, T., et al. (2015). Exploring the Genetic Signature of Body Size in Yucatan Miniature Pig. PLoS One 10, e0121732. doi:10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0121732
Kremen, T. J., Stefanovic, T., Tawackoli, W., Salehi, K., Avalos, P., Reichel, D., et al. (2020). A Translational Porcine Model for Human Cell-Based Therapies in the Treatment of Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury. Am. J. Sports Med. 48, 3002–3012. doi:10.1177/0363546520952353
Logerstedt, D. S., Snyder-Mackler, L., Ritter, R. C., Axe, M. J., and Godges, J. (2010). Knee Pain and Mobility Impairments: Meniscal and Articular Cartilage Lesions. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 40, A1–A597. doi:10.2519/JOSPT.2010.0304
Maffulli, N., Longo, U. G., Campi, S., and Denaro, V. (2010). Meniscal Tears. Open Access J. Sport Med. 1, 45–54. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24198542. doi:10.2147/oajsm.s7753Accessed April 9, 2018)
Makris, E. A., Hadidi, P., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2011). The Knee Meniscus: Structure-Function, Pathophysiology, Current Repair Techniques, and Prospects for Regeneration. Biomaterials 32, 7411–7431. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.037
Mardas, N., Dereka, X., Donos, N., and Dard, M. (2014). Experimental Model for Bone Regeneration in Oral and Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. J. Invest. Surg. 27, 32–49. doi:10.3109/08941939.2013.817628
Melnick, G., Ferrone, M., Cheng, Y., Conditt, G. B., Guérios, Ê. E., Rousselle, S. D., et al. (2020). Long‐term Performance and Biocompatibility of a Novel Bioresorbable Scaffold for Peripheral Arteries: A Three‐year Pilot Study in Yucatan Miniswine. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 95, 1277–1284. doi:10.1002/CCD.28810
Milićević, D., Jurić, V., Stefanović, S., Baltić, T., and Janković, S. (2010). Evaluation and Validation of Two Chromatographic Methods (HPLC-Fluorescence and LC-MS/MS) for the Determination and Confirmation of Ochratoxin A in Pig Tissues. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 58, 1074–1081. doi:10.1007/s00244-009-9436-2
Morejon, A., Norberg, C. D., De Rosa, M., Best, T. M., Jackson, A. R., and Travascio, F. (2021). Compressive Properties and Hydraulic Permeability of Human Meniscus: Relationships with Tissue Structure and Composition. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 622552. doi:10.3389/FBIOE.2020.622552
Moriguchi, Y., Tateishi, K., Ando, W., Shimomura, K., Yonetani, Y., Tanaka, Y., et al. (2013). Repair of Meniscal Lesions Using a Scaffold-free Tissue-Engineered Construct Derived from Allogenic Synovial MSCs in a Miniature Swine Model. Biomaterials 34, 2185–2193. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.11.039
Naffa, R., Watanabe, S., Zhang, W., Maidment, C., Singh, P., Chamber, P., et al. (2019). Rapid Analysis of Pyridinoline and Deoxypyridinoline in Biological Samples by Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry and a Silica Hydride Column. J. Sep. Sci. 42, 1482–1488. doi:10.1002/jssc.201801292
Nakano, T., Dodd, C. M., and Scott, P. G. (1997). Glycosaminoglycans and Proteoglycans from Different Zones of the Porcine Knee Meniscus. J. Orthop. Res. 15, 213–220. doi:10.1002/JOR.1100150209
Nordberg, R. C., Espinosa, M. G., Hu, J. C., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2021). A Tribological Comparison of Facet Joint, Sacroiliac Joint, and Knee Cartilage in the Yucatan Minipig. Cartilage 13, 346S–355S. doi:10.1177/19476035211021906
Peretti, G. M., Gill, T. J., Xu, J.-W., Randolph, M. A., Morse, K. R., and Zaleske, D. J. (2004). Cell-Based Therapy for Meniscal Repair. Am. J. Sports Med. 32, 146–158. doi:10.1177/0095399703258790
Poupin, N., Tremblay-Franco, M., Amiel, A., Canlet, C., Rémond, D., Debrauwer, L., et al. (2019). Arterio-venous Metabolomics Exploration Reveals Major Changes across Liver and Intestine in the Obese Yucatan Minipig. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12. doi:10.1038/S41598-019-48997-2
Proffen, B. L., McElfresh, M., Fleming, B. C., and Murray, M. M. (2012). A Comparative Anatomical Study of the Human Knee and Six Animal Species. The Knee 19, 493–499. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.005
Rangger, C., Kathrein, A., Klestil, T., and Glötzer, W. (1997). Partial Meniscectomy and Osteoarthritis. Sports Med. 23, 61–68. doi:10.2165/00007256-199723010-00006
Salata, M. J., Gibbs, A. E., and Sekiya, J. K. (2010). A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Meniscectomy. Am. J. Sports Med. 38, 1907–1916. doi:10.1177/0363546510370196
Scott, P. G., Nakano, T., and Dodd, C. M. (1997). Isolation and Characterization of Small Proteoglycans from Different Zones of the Porcine Knee Meniscus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Gen. Subjects 1336, 254–262. doi:10.1016/S0304-4165(97)00040-8
Skaggs, D. L., Warden, W. H., and Mow, V. C. (1994). Radial Tie Fibers Influence the Tensile Properties of the Bovine Medial Meniscus. J. Orthop. Res. 12, 176–185. doi:10.1002/JOR.1100120205
Sweigart, M. A., and Athanasiou, K. A. (2005). Biomechanical Characteristics of the normal Medial and Lateral Porcine Knee Menisci. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 219, 53–62. doi:10.1243/095441105X9174
Sweigart, M. A., Zhu, C. F., Burt, D. M., Deholl, P. D., Agrawal, C. M., Clanton, T. O., et al. (2004). Intraspecies and Interspecies Comparison of the Compressive Properties of the Medial Meniscus. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 1569–1579. doi:10.1114/B:ABME.0000049040.70767.5c
Swine Models Premier BioSource Swine Models. Available at: http://www.premierbiosource.com/swine-models (Accessed October 25, 2021)
Takahashi, M., Suzuki, M., Kushida, K., Hoshino, H., and Inoue, T. (1998). The Effect of Aging and Osteoarthritis on the Mature and Senescent Cross-Links of Collagen in Human Meniscus. Arthrosc. J. Arthroscopic Relat. Surg. 14, 366–372. doi:10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70003-9
Takroni, T., Laouar, L., Adesida, A., Elliott, J. A. W., and Jomha, N. M. (2016). Anatomical Study: Comparing the Human, Sheep and Pig Knee Meniscus. J. Exp. Ortop 3, 35. doi:10.1186/S40634-016-0071-3
Tanaka, T., Fujii, K., and Kumagae, Y. (1999). Comparison of Biochemical Characteristics of Cultured Fibrochondrocytes Isolated from the Inner and Outer Regions of Human Meniscus. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 7, 75–80. doi:10.1007/S001670050125
Tissakht, M., and Ahmed, A. M. (1995). Tensile Stress-Strain Characteristics of the Human Meniscal Material. J. Biomech. 28, 411–422. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(94)00081-E
Vodička, P., Smetana, K., Dvořánková, B., Emerick, T., Xu, Y. Z., Ourednik, J., et al. (2005). The Miniature Pig as an Animal Model in Biomedical Research. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1049, 161–171. doi:10.1196/ANNALS.1334.015
Walpole, S. C., Prieto-Merino, D., Edwards, P., Cleland, J., Stevens, G., and Roberts, I. (20122012). The Weight of Nations: an Estimation of Adult Human Biomass. BMC Public Health 12 (12), 1–6. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-439
Wang, H., Walaszczyk, E. J., Li, K., Chung-Davidson, Y.-W., and Li, W. (2012). High-performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection and Ultra-performance Liquid Chromatography with Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Determination of Indoleamine Neurotransmitters and Their Metabolites in Sea Lamprey Plasma. Analytica Chim. Acta 721, 147–153. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2012.01.025
Warren, M. P., and Fried, J. L. (2001). Temporomandibular Disorders and Hormones in Women. Cells. Tissues. Organs 169, 187–192. doi:10.1159/000047881
Williamson, A. K., Chen, A. C., Masuda, K., Thonar, E. J. M. A., and Sah, R. L. (2003). Tensile Mechanical Properties of Bovine Articular Cartilage: Variations with Growth and Relationships to Collagen Network Components. J. Orthop. Res. 21, 872–880. doi:10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00030-5
Xu, C., and Zhao, J. (2015). A Meta-Analysis Comparing Meniscal Repair with Meniscectomy in the Treatment of Meniscal Tears: the More Meniscus, the Better Outcome? Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 23, 164–170. doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2528-6
Keywords: Yucatan minipig, knee meniscus, regenerative medicine, biomechanics, preclinical animal model
Citation: Gonzalez-Leon EA, Hu JC and Athanasiou KA (2022) Yucatan Minipig Knee Meniscus Regional Biomechanics and Biochemical Structure Support its Suitability as a Large Animal Model for Translational Research. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:844416. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.844416
Received: 28 December 2021; Accepted: 03 February 2022;
Published: 21 February 2022.
Edited by:
Joel Douglas Stitzel, Wake Forest School of Medicine, United StatesReviewed by:
Francesco Travascio, University of Miami, United StatesJay Patel, Emory University, United States
Copyright © 2022 Gonzalez-Leon, Hu and Athanasiou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kyriacos A. Athanasiou, athens@uci.edu