Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 01 December 2022
Sec. Industrial Biotechnology
This article is part of the Research Topic Advanced Technologies and Perspectives on Sustainable Microalgae Production, Volume II View all 6 articles

Thermal-tolerant potential of ordinary Chlorella pyrenoidosa and the promotion of cell harvesting by heterotrophic cultivation at high temperature

Yu-Ren Dai&#x;Yu-Ren Dai1Die Wang&#x;Die Wang1Yu-Rong ZhuYu-Rong Zhu1Kun-Xiao YangKun-Xiao Yang1Ning JiaoNing Jiao1Zhong-Liang SunZhong-Liang Sun2Shi-Kai Wang
Shi-Kai Wang1*
  • 1Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
  • 2College of Life Sciences, Yantai University, Yantai, China

During the heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae, a cooled process against temperature rise caused by the metabolism of exogenous organic carbon sources greatly increases cultivation cost. Furthermore, microalgae harvesting is also a cost-consuming process. Cell harvesting efficiency is closely related to the characteristics of the algal cells. It may be possible to change cell characteristics through controlling culture conditions to make harvesting easier. In this study, the mesophilic Chlorella pyrenoidosa was found to be a thermal-tolerant species in the heterotrophic mode. The cells could maintain their maximal specific growth rate at 40°C and reached 1.45 day−1, which is equivalent to that of cultures at 35°C but significantly higher than those cultured at lower temperatures. Interestingly, the cells cultured at 40°C were much easier to be harvested than those at lower temperatures. The harvesting efficiency of the cells cultured at 40°C reached 96.83% after sedimentation for 240 min, while the cells cultured at lower temperatures were reluctant to settle. Likely, the same circumstance occurred when cells were harvested by centrifugation or flocculation. The promotion of cell harvesting for cells cultured at high temperatures was mainly attributed to increased cell size and decreased cell surface charge. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that cells cultured at high temperatures can promote microalgae harvesting. This study explores a new approach to simplify the cultivation and harvesting of microalgae, which effectively reduces the microalgae production cost.

1 Introduction

Microalgae have been recognized as promising alternative sources for the accumulation of high-value compounds, such as lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and pigments, which can be used for the production of biofuels, single-cell protein (SCP), animal feed, and food supplements (Janssen et al., 2022; Show, 2022). However, the high production cost and low production capacity greatly inhibit its commercial application. It is necessary to develop an efficient and economic approach for the abundant production of microalgal biomass. When compared to photoautotrophic cultivation, heterotrophic cultivation eliminates the light requirement; simplifies the design, operation, and scale-up of a bioreactor; and greatly boosts the biomass productivity (Wang et al., 2018). Under fed-batch heterotrophic fermentation of Chlorella sorokiniana GT-1, the biomass concentration reached as high as 271 g/L in 7.5 L bench-scale fermenters and 247 g/L in 1,000 L pilot-scale fermenters (Jin et al., 2021). Heterotrophic cultivation shows a great potential for economic and abundant production of microalgae.

During heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae, the metabolism of exogenous organic carbon sources generates a lot of heat, leading to a rise in the temperature of the culture. To maintain the optimal growth temperature, it is necessary to control temperature through cooling, but this process is usually expensive (Barten et al., 2022). It has been estimated that a cost reduction by 26.2% and 28.4% could be achieved if the algal cells could maintain their maximal productivity rate under high temperatures from 30 to 40 and 45°C, respectively (Ruiz et al., 2016). Temperature is one of the most important environmental parameters, impacting algal cellular physiology by changing the rate of chemical reactions and the stability of cellular components (Wang et al., 2016). Most industrial microalgal species have an optimal growth temperature ranging from 15 to 25°C, and the maximal growth temperature is usually between 25 and 35°C (Abdelaziz et al., 2014; Barten et al., 2022). Within a certain temperature range, the cell growth rate is enhanced by increasing the temperature, following the logic of the Arrhenius law. However, when exceeding the optimal growth temperature, the structure of some proteins, especially those in the electron transport chain, would be changed, leading to a rapid drop in cell growth rate concomitant with increased mortality (Serra-Maia et al., 2016). It would be helpful to reduce culture costs by screening algal species that are naturally resistant to stressful temperatures.

Harvesting algal cells from the culture broth is always considered a major obstruction for algal biomass production, which is the main limiting factor for its commercial application (Weschler et al., 2014). Due to the dilute nature of the algal broth, small cell size, and electronegative surface charge of most algal cells, the typically used harvesting methods, such as centrifugation, sedimentation, flocculation, filtration, flotation, or a combination of these methods, usually face various problems, such as high energy consumption, time consumption, and high cost (Wang et al., 2015). The cell harvesting efficiency is closely related to the characteristics of the algal cells, such as its morphology, motility, surface charge, cell mass density, and extracellular organic matter composition and concentration (Henderson et al., 2008). Cell characteristics are greatly influenced by environmental factors. It may be possible to change cell characteristics by controlling the culture conditions to make harvesting easier. However, no related studies have been reported.

In this study, mesophilic Chlorella pyrenoidosa was detected to have gained excellent heat resistance in heterotrophic cultures. More importantly, the cells cultured at high temperatures showed higher settlement efficiency. To explore the feasibility of promoting microalgae harvesting by high-temperature cultures, C. pyrenoidosa was heterotrophically cultured at different temperatures. The cell growth and bioproducts accumulation of the cultures at different temperatures were analyzed. Afterward, the algal cells cultured at different temperatures were harvested at the stationary phase by the commonly used separation methods, which included gravity sedimentation, centrifugation, and flocculation, to compare their harvesting performance. The main factors affecting cell harvesting were further clarified. This study has indicated that heterotrophic high-density fermentation at a high temperature might be an effective approach for efficient cultivation and simple harvesting of microalgae.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Microorganism strains and inoculum culture

Chlorella pyrenoidosa FACHB-9 was purchased from the Freshwater Algae Culture Collection at the Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. The inoculum culture used liquid BG-11 medium with 5 g/L glucose and was incubated at 25°C in an orbital shaker at 150 rpm under dark conditions. After being cultured for 4 days, it was inoculated in the following experiments.

2.2 Microalgae culture

The cultures were first conducted in a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask with a 100 ml working volume using the modified Endo medium (Endo et al., 1974). The initial concentration of glucose was chosen to be 20 g/L on the basis of the preexperimental results. The precultured cells were inoculated into an Erlenmeyer flask with an inoculum size of the OD680nm at 0.1. To investigate the effects of temperature on the growth of C. pyrenoidosa, the cultures were incubated at 25, 30, 35, 40, 42, and 45°C, respectively. All the cultures were conducted on an orbital shaker at a speed of 150 rpm in dark conditions.

2.3 Cell harvesting

When the growth reached the stationary phase, the culture broth was directly tested for cell harvesting without any treatment. The harvesting efficiency of the cells cultured at different temperatures was tested and compared using three commonly used harvesting methods, which include gravity sedimentation, flocculation, and centrifugation. Gravity sedimentation was carried out in a 100 ml beaker with 50 ml culture broth. Then, 200 μl of the sample was taken from the center of the broth to measure the optical density at 680 nm at different time intervals. Chitosan was used as the flocculant in the flocculation test. Chitosan (Sinopharm, China) was first dissolved in 0.1% acetic acid. Then, it was diluted to make the final chitosan concentration of 5 g/L using deionized water. The flocculation process was operated according to the method modified from Rashid et al. (2013). Briefly, a specific amount of chitosan was added to and mixed with the culture broth at 50 rpm for 2 min. Then, the algal cells were allowed to settle down for 3 min. Two hundred microliters of the sample was taken from the center of the broth to measure the optical density at 680 nm. A centrifuge (Cence H1850, China) was used for the centrifugation test. The centrifugation time was set to 2 min, and the centrifugation speed was set from 1,000 to 4,500 rpm. The relative centrifugal force (RCF, g) was calculated as shown in Eq. 1:

RCF=1.118×105×n2×r,(1)

where n and r are the centrifugation speed (rpm) and centrifugal radius (cm), respectively.

After centrifugation, the optical density at 680 nm of the supernatant was measured. The harvesting efficiency (R, %) in the aforementioned experiments was calculated as follows:

R%=1ODtOD0×100,(2)

where OD0 and ODt are the optical densities at time zero and time t, respectively.

All harvesting experiments were carried out at room temperature.

2.4 Analytic methods

Algal cells were first harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min. After being washed twice with distilled water, they were lyophilized using a lyophilizer (FD-1A-50, BiLon, China). The total biomass concentration in each culture was measured by the gravimetric method. The glucose concentration was measured by the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method. The protein content was measured according to the method reported by Tian et al. (2020). Lipid extraction and quantification were performed according to the methods reported by Wang et al. (2020). For the measurement of starch content, the lyophilized cells were first ground for 10 min using a mortar and pestle and then measured using a starch detection kit (BC0700, Solarbio, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The morphology of C. pyrenoidosa was observed using a microscope (Mshot ML31, China). For the analysis of cell size, more than 300 cells were randomly chosen and their diameters were measured using a microscope (MSHOT ML31, China). The size distribution of cells cultured at different temperatures was analyzed using Origin 9 (OriginLab, United States). The zeta potential of the cultures on the 5th day was measured using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS90.

2.5 Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean based on three parallel experiments. The statistical significances were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05) using Origin 9 (OriginLab, United States).

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Effect of temperature on growth and glucose consumption of Chlorella pyrenoidosa

As shown in Figure 1A, C. pyrenoidosa exhibited excellent heat resistance. With temperatures increasing from 25 to 35°C, the maximal specific growth rate increased from 0.89 to 1.47 day−1. Interestingly, the cells also grew well at 40°C, in which the specific growth rate reached 1.45 day−1, which is equivalent to the cells grown at 35°C (Table 1). However, when the temperature was further increased to 42°C, the cell growth became significantly inhibited and the culture broth turned yellow. At 45°C, the cell growth completely ceased and the cells gradually died. The biomass production in the cultures at 40°C reached 6.61 g/L, which was only slightly lower than that at the highest temperature, 7.13 g/L at 30°C.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Growth curves (A) and glucose consumption (B) of C. pyrenoidosa cultured at different temperatures.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Parameters of growth kinetics and cell composition of cells cultured at different temperatures.

Similar to the cell growth trend, the glucose consumption rate was also promoted with the temperature increasing from 25 to 35°C. The glucose was exhausted after 108 and 96 h in cultures at 30 and 35°C, respectively. However, even after 120 h of incubation, the remaining glucose was still as high as 5.35 g/L in cultures at 25°C (Figure 1B). At 40°C, the glucose consumption rate at an early stage followed the same trend as the ones at 35°C, and then it slowed down with decreasing cell growth rate. As the cell growth was strongly inhibited at 42°C, only a small amount of glucose was utilized under this condition.

Chlorella pyrenoidosa is generally regarded as a mesophilic species when cultured in an autotrophic mode. Currently, there is no report on the tolerance of wild-type Chlorella to high temperatures. It usually cannot grow at temperatures above 35°C (Sachdeva et al., 2016). The reported highest temperature for C. pyrenoidosa has been 30°C in either autotrophic or heterotrophic cultures (Fan et al., 2014; Dong et al., 2020). Zhang L et al. (2020) reported that the addition of exogenous salicylic acid distinctly alleviated the inhibition of heat stress on Nannochloropsis oceanica. In addition, adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) has been proven to be effective in improving the thermal tolerance of many algal species. For example, Huertas et al. (2011) found that Scenedesmus intermedius could grow rapidly at 40°C after gradually adapting to this temperature for 135 generations, while its ancestral strain could not survive at this condition. Barten et al. (2022) increased the maximum mid-day growth temperature of a thermos-tolerant microalgae Picochlorum sp. (BPE23) from 47.5 up to 49°C by using ALE. However, the adaptation process usually requires many generations of evolution or long-time processing (Huertas et al., 2011; Barten et al., 2022). Random mutagenesis is more efficient than ALE for screening thermo-tolerant species. Two thermo-tolerant mutants of C. pyrenoidosa NCIM 2738 were obtained by using ethyl methane sulfonate mutagenesis treatment. They were capable of surviving at temperatures up to 47°C and showed improved lipid and biomass yields, while the wild type could not survive at 35°C (Sachdeva et al., 2016). Although this method is efficient and simple, the workload is heavy. Algal cells can be acclimated to rebalance cellular homeostasis to counteract the adverse effects of increased temperature. This mainly includes the rebalancing of cell composition and elevation of cell membrane fluidity (Barten et al., 2021). When compared to autotrophic cultures, algal cells were more tolerant to high temperatures under the heterotrophic mode. Li et al. (2013) found that the optimal growth temperature for the heterotrophic culture of wild C. sorokiniana (UTEX 1602) was 37°C; in addition, the specific growth rates at 40 and 42°C reached 1.26 and 1.35 day−1, respectively, which is significantly higher than its counterpart at 21°C. This result indicated that the microalga C. sorokiniana could tolerate temperatures as high as 42°C, which is similar to this study. In this study, the naturally occurring wild type of C. pyrenoidosa showed excellent heat resistance at temperatures up to 40°C under heterotrophic cultures. Chlorella pyrenoidosa (FACHB-9) has been extensively studied in many aspects, but this is the first report involving its heat resistance; it might be possible that its ability of heat resistance in the heterotrophic culture mode might have been neglected.

3.2 Effect of temperature on cell composition of Chlorella pyrenoidosa

The accumulation of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates in cultures at different temperatures is summarized in Table 1. The protein content of cells cultured at 40°C reached 38.55%, which is comparable to the ones cultured at 25 and 35°C, but the protein content from the cultures at 30 and 42°C is significantly lower than that at other conditions. The highest lipid content of 23.71% was achieved at 30°C. Further temperature increase after 30°C led to a continuous decrease in lipid content. It reached 20.13% in cultures at 40°C. The lowest carbohydrate content was obtained at 35°C. It was enhanced either by increasing or decreasing the culture temperature. The highest carbohydrate content of 44.25% was obtained in cells cultured at 42°C. Combined with the biomass productivity, the protein productivity of cultures at 40°C reached 2.55 g/L/day, which is significantly higher than that of cultures at other temperatures except for cultures at 35°C. Meanwhile, the lipid productivity in cultures at 40°C was 1.33 g/L/day, which is lower than that of cultures at 30 and 35°C.

It has been widely reported that the biochemical composition is greatly influenced by culture temperature. For the accumulation of a specific product, temperature sometimes has a greater impact than the other factors, such as light intensity and inoculum size (Zheng et al., 2022). A decreasing trend in protein accumulation was found in Spirulina maxima and Spirulina platensis when increasing the temperature from 20 to 40°C (De Oliveira et al., 1999). Zhang Z et al. (2020) also found that low temperature was beneficial for the formation of protein during the mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris. However, Sayegh and Montagnes (2011) pointed out that there are no consistent trends in the change of protein with temperature, although significant temperature isolated interactions existed. Similar circumstances have also been detected in lipid formation. Chaisutyakorn et al. (2018) found that the lipid content of three tested marine microalgae was decreased with increasing temperatures from 25 to 40°C. Sonmez et al. (2016) reported that the highest lipid content was obtained at 25°C in the cultures of Micractinium sp. and Scenedesmus sp. It was greatly decreased when the temperature was increased to 30°C. These results are consistent with this study, indicating that the high temperature was unfavorable for lipid accumulation. However, in cultures of C. vulgaris and Scenedesmus sp., the temperatures below the optimal growth temperature were favorable for lipid accumulation (Converti et al., 2009; Li et al., 2011). De Oliveira et al. (1999) found that the lipid content in Spirulina maxima and Spirulina platensis was increased with increasing temperatures from 20 to 40°C. The change in temperature caused an imbalance between energy supply and consumption, and then the inherent biochemical or physiological functions changed accordingly (Ras et al., 2013). The variations in biochemical composition at different temperatures was a cellular adaptive process (Barten et al., 2021). Collectively, biochemical accumulation is effected by temperature in diverse ways, and there are no consistent trends across species. The accumulation rules of target products should be considered when choosing the culture temperature.

3.3 Effect of culture temperature on cell harvesting

By the end of the culture, it was occasionally identified that the cells cultured at high temperatures were prone to sedimentation. As shown in Figure 2, the harvesting efficiency of cells cultured at 40°C was gradually increased with time. It reached 94.27% and 96.83% after sedimentation for 180 and 240 min, respectively. However, cells cultured at lower temperatures (25, 30, and 35°C) were reluctant to settle (Figure 2A). The highest harvesting efficiency was no more than 4% at these conditions even for more than 300 min of sedimentation (Figure 2B). Although cell recovery by gravity sedimentation is an additive-free and low-cost harvesting method, it is only suitable for relatively large microalgae (Li et al., 2020). Microalgae with small size, for example, Chlorella sp., were usually hard to be harvested only by gravity sedimentation (Hong et al., 2022). To enhance the settling velocity, it is common to apply a coagulation or flocculation step prior to gravity sedimentation. Coagulation or flocculation can be induced by pH adjustment or the addition of flocculants (Hapońska et al., 2018; Hong et al., 2022). In addition, microalgae with autoflocculation ability could achieve a higher settling velocity and exhibit a better potential, as this process dispensed with the addition of flocculants (Li et al., 2021).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Gravity sedimentation process (A) and sedimentation efficiency (B) of C. pyrenoidosa cultured at different temperatures.

In addition to gravity sedimentation, flocculation and centrifugation are also widely used harvesting methods. As shown in Figure 3, likely, the harvesting efficiency of the cells cultured at 40 °C by flocculation and centrifugation was also significantly higher than that of cells cultured at lower temperatures. It reached 95.87% at the centrifugation speed of 1,000 rpm (103 × g). At this condition, the harvesting efficiency of the cells cultured at lower temperatures was only about 20%. To obtain a harvesting efficiency higher than 95%, the centrifugation speed should be more than 3,000 rpm (925 × g) for cells cultured at temperatures lower than 40°C (Figure 3A). For flocculation, at a chitosan dosage of 0.20 and 0.24 g/L, the harvesting efficiency of cells cultured at 40°C reached 90.76% and 96.78%, respectively, which was significantly higher than that of cells cultured at low culture temperatures. In addition, the cells cultured at 35°C showed a better harvesting efficiency than the ones cultured at 25 and 30°C. At a chitosan dosage of 0.28 g/L, the harvesting efficiency of cells cultured at 35°C reached 88.93%, while it was only 79.92% at 25°C and 82.71% at 30°C (Figure 3B). Summarily, the energy consumption for centrifugation and flocculant consumption for flocculation were substantially reduced for the harvesting of cells cultured at 40°C. Therefore, cells cultured at high temperatures can effectively reduce the cost of harvesting.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Harvesting efficiency of C. pyrenoidosa cultured at different temperatures by centrifugation (A) and chitosan flocculation (B). (The time for centrifugation is 2 min, and the settling time after flocculation is 3 min.)

3.4 Possible mechanism of high culture temperature promoting cell harvesting

In the process of gravity sedimentation, the settling of the suspended algal cells was derived by gravitational forces on the premise of density difference from the medium. In reality, centrifugation is an extension of gravity sedimentation and only the settling rate was greatly enhanced by the centrifugal force (Roy and Mohanty, 2019). The sedimentation principle can be well explained by Stokes’ law, and the settling rate can be calculated using the following equation (Milledge and Heaven, 2013):

Settlingvelocity=29gr2ηρsρl,(3)

where η denotes the fluid dynamic viscosity, r denotes the cell radius, g denotes the gravitational acceleration, and ρs and ρl denote the solid and liquid densities, respectively.

The harvesting efficiency of gravity sedimentation and centrifugation depends on the microalgae cell size and density difference between the microalgae biomass and the medium. As shown in Figure 4, there were significant differences in the average cell size at different temperatures after it had been cultured for 5 days. The average diameter of the cells cultured at 25°C reached 3.73 ± 0.60 μm, which is slightly larger than that of cells grown at 30°C (p < 0.05), with an average cell diameter of 3.28 ± 0.50 μm. The average size of the cells cultured at 35°C had no significant difference from that of cells cultured at 30°C (p > 0.05). However, the average diameter of cells cultured at 40°C was greatly larger than that of cells grown at lower temperatures, reaching 5.19 ± 0.87 μm (Table 2). This result indicated that the cell size was increased under the high culture temperature (Figure 4), which in turn promotes cell harvesting by gravity sedimentation and centrifugation. The enlargement of cell size at higher temperatures was also observed by Barten et al. (2022). They found that the cell volume of Picochlorum sp. (BPE23) increased by 46% after an adaptive laboratory evolution at a high temperature for 390 days. However, Yu et al. (2014) detected that the response of cell volume to temperature was species specific. Not all microalgae showed a positive correlation between cell size and temperature. It is noteworthy that most of the research related to the effects of temperature on cell size were conducted in autotrophic modes. The effect of temperature on the heterotrophically cultured algal cells was rarely reported. Therefore, more microalgae should be investigated at different temperatures to confirm whether the positive correlation between cell size and temperature is universal at heterotrophic modes.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Micrographs (A) and cell size distribution (B) of C. pyrenoidosa after being cultured at different temperatures for 5 days.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Cell average size, pH, and zeta potential of cells cultured at different temperatures at the stationary phase.

According to Eq. 3, the density difference between the microalgae biomass and the medium was another key factor for cell settling in the gravity sedimentation and centrifugation processes. Being a biological entity, the most of the composition in algal cells is water. In addition, they can adjust their water content in order to float in the medium freely. As a result, they do not have an exact density (Huang et al., 1999). The cell density is directly influenced by the cell composition as the density of proteins, lipids, and carbohydrates varies greatly. Their average densities are 1,300, 860, and 1,500 kg·m−3, respectively (Reynolds, 1984). According to these values, the density of the cells cultured at different temperatures has no significant difference. These indicate that the cell density has little effect on the harvesting efficiency.

The cell size also has a significant influence on flocculation efficiency. Chatsungnoen and Chisti (2016) found that to achieve an equal harvesting efficiency, microalgal species with a larger size required a lower dosage of flocculant than did those with smaller cells. In addition, Vandamme et al. (2010) reported that the dosage of a polymeric flocculant for the effective flocculation of Scenedesmus sp. was significantly lower than the dose required for Parachlorella sp, as the size of Scenedesmus sp. is greatly larger than the later species. This is mainly due to the fact that the cells of a smaller size have higher specific surface areas, thus requiring a higher flocculant dose per unit of biomass weight (Schenk et al., 2008). In this study, the cell size of C. pyrenoidosa cultured at 40°C was greatly larger than that of cells grown at the lower temperatures (Table 2). Therefore, less flocculant was required for efficient flocculation.

Due to the ionized functional groups on the cell surface, microalgal cells are generally negatively charged (Ndikubwimana et al., 2015). The stability of a cell suspension is greatly influenced by the cell surface charge. In addition, the surface charge also significantly affects the dosage of an ionic flocculant required to produce effective flocculation (Chatsungnoen and Chisti, 2016). As shown in Table 2, the zeta potential of cells cultured at different temperatures varies greatly. Similar to previous studies, the zeta potential of cells in all cultures was negative. However, its absolute value of cells cultured at 25°C was significantly higher than for others and was continuously decreasing with increasing culture temperature. The zeta potential of cells cultured at 40°C was only −7.5 mV, while its absolute value at other temperatures was more than 18 mV. It has been confirmed that the higher the absolute value of the zeta potential (either positive or negative), the more stable the suspension will remain as individual particles that are strongly repulsing each other (Branyikova et al., 2018). As the absolute value of the zeta potential was quite low at 40°C, harvesting the cells was easier, and the dosage of chitosan, a cationic flocculant, required for effective flocculation was also greatly reduced when compared to that for cells cultured at lower temperatures.

Except for the harvesting methods discussed in this study, flotation, various kinds of filtration, and magnetic separation are also widely used in microalgae harvesting. The harvesting efficiency of these methods is also closely related to cell size, cell density, and the zeta potential (Roy and Mohanty, 2019). The increase in cell size caused by high culture temperatures might also improve the harvesting efficiency of these methods.

3.5 Potential advantages

3.5.1 Enhancing cell growth rate

Following the logic of the Arrhenius law, the biological reaction rate and cell growth rate were improved with increasing temperatures within a certain range. In this study, the highest specific growth rate was achieved in cultures at 35 and 40°C. The culture period can be shortened at a higher temperature. This is conducive in improving the utilization of a bioreactor and reducing production costs.

3.5.2 Reducing cost of cell harvesting

Cell harvesting efficiency is closely related to the characteristics of algal cells. It was found that the cell size was significantly increased and the cell surface charge was greatly decreased with the culture temperature increasing to 40°C, which is favorable for cell harvesting by a series of commonly used methods, which include gravity sedimentation, centrifugation, and flocculation. Therefore, the cost of cell harvesting was significantly reduced in these harvesting processes.

3.5.3 Potential application in cultivation and harvesting of other microalgal species

As far as we know, this is the first report that heterotrophically cultured C. pyrenoidosa at high temperatures promotes cell harvesting. Currently, the effect of temperature on the heterotrophically cultured algal cells has been rarely reported. The promotion of cell harvesting induced by high culture temperatures might be universal in other microalgal species. This strategy might be widely used for the harvesting of heterotrophically cultured microalgae.

4 Conclusion

Chlorella pyrenoidosa is a heat-stable microalgae which is capable of growing rapidly at 40°C in the heterotrophic mode. The cells cultured at 40°C were much easier to harvest than those cultured at lower temperatures by gravity sedimentation, centrifugation, and flocculation. The promotion of cell harvesting was mainly attributed to the increased cell size and decreased absolute value of the zeta potential induced by the high culture temperature. This study explored a new approach to simplify heterotrophic cultivation and harvesting of microalgae, which effectively reduces microalgae production costs.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

Y-RD: investigation, methodology, data curation, and writing—original draft. DW: investigation, methodology, and data curation. Y-RZ: methodology and data curation. K-XY: investigation, methodology, and data curation. NJ: methodology and data curation. Z-LS: writing—review and editing. S-KW: conceptualization, writing—original draft, review and editing, supervision, validation, and resources.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the High-Level Talent Support Program of Yangzhou University and the Jiangsu Provincial College Student’s Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (202111117012Z).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xudong Chen (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University) for his assistance with zeta potential measurements.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of publisher, editors, and reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Abdelaziz, A. E. M., Leite, G. B., Belhaj, M. A., and Hallenbeck, P. C. (2014). Screening microalgae native to Quebec for wastewater treatment and biodiesel production. Bioresour. Technol. 157, 140–148. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barten, R., Djohan, Y., Evers, W., Wijffels, R., and Barbosa, M. (2021). Towards industrial production of microalgae without temperature control: The effect of diel temperature fluctuations on microalgal physiology. J. Biotechnol. 336, 56–63. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.06.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barten, R., Peeters, T., Navalho, S., Fontowicz, L., Wijffels, R. H., and Barbosa, M. (2022). Expanding the upper-temperature boundary for the microalga Picochlorum sp. (BPE23) by adaptive laboratory evolution. Biotechnol. J. 17, 2100659. doi:10.1002/biot.202100659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Branyikova, I., Prochazkova, G., Potocar, T., Jezkova, Z., and Branyik, T. (2018). Harvesting of microalgae by flocculation. Fermentation. 4, 93. doi:10.3390/fermentation4040093

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaisutyakorn, P., Praiboon, J., and Kaewsuralikhit, C. (2018). The effect of temperature on growth and lipid and fatty acid composition on marine microalgae used for biodiesel production. J. Appl. Phycol. 30, 37–45. doi:10.1007/s10811-017-1186-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chatsungnoen, T., and Chisti, Y. (2016). Harvesting microalgae by flocculation–sedimentation. Algal Res. 13, 271–283. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.12.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Converti, A., Casazza, A. A., Ortiz, E. Y., Perego, P., and Del Borghi, M. (2009). Effect of temperature and nitrogen concentration on the growth and lipid content of Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 48, 1146–1151. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2009.03.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Oliveira, M. A. C. L., Monteiro, M. P. C., Robbs, P. G., and Leite, S. G. F. (1999). Growth and chemical composition of Spirulina maxima and Spirulina platensis biomass at different temperatures. Aquac. Int. 7, 261–275. doi:10.1023/A:1009233230706

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dong, L., Li, D., and Li, C. (2020). Characteristics of lipid biosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa under stress conditions. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 43, 877–884. doi:10.1007/s00449-020-02284-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Endo, H., Nakajima, K., Chino, R., and Shirota, M. (1974). Growth characteristics and cellular components of Chlorella regularis, heterotrophic fast growing strain. Agric. Biol. Chem. 38, 9–18. doi:10.1080/00021369.1974.10861121

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fan, J., Cui, Y., Wan, M., Wang, W., and Li, Y. (2014). Lipid accumulation and biosynthesis genes response of the oleaginous Chlorella pyrenoidosa under three nutrition stressors. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 7, 17. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-7-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hapońska, M., Clavero, E., Salvadó, J., Farriol, X., and Torras, C. (2018). Pilot scale dewatering of Chlorella sorokiniana and Dunaliella tertiolecta by sedimentation followed by dynamic filtration. Algal Res. 33, 118–124. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.05.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Henderson, R., Parsons, S. A., and Jefferson, B. (2008). The impact of algal properties and pre-oxidation on solid–liquid separation of algae. Water Res. 42, 1827–1845. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hong, J. S., Shin, W., Nam, H., Yun, J. H., Kim, H. S., and Ahn, K. H. (2022). Sedimentation and rheological study of microalgal cell (Chlorella sp. HS2) suspension. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 27, 451–460. doi:10.1007/s12257-021-0275-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, C., Pan, J. R., and Huang, S. (1999). Collision efficiencies of algae and kaolin in depth filter: The effect of surface properties of particles. Water Res. 33, 1278–1286. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00309-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huertas, I. E., Rouco, M., López-Rodas, V., and Costas, E. (2011). Warming will affect phytoplankton differently: Evidence through a mechanistic approach. Proc. R. Soc. B. 278, 3534–3543. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.0160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janssen, M., Wijffels, R. H., and Barbosa, M. J. (2022). Microalgae based production of single-cell protein. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 75, 102705. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102705

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, H., Chuai, W., Li, K., Hou, G., Wu, M., Chen, J., et al. (2021). Ultrahigh-cell-density heterotrophic cultivation of the unicellular green alga Chlorella sorokiniana for biomass production. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 118, 4138–4151. doi:10.1002/bit.27890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, L., Chen, W., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., and Chen, H. (2021). Effect of hydrodynamics on autoflocculation and gravity sedimentation of Chlorella vulgaris. J. Water Process Eng. 43, 102259. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102259

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Hu, T., Xu, Y., Wang, J., Chu, R., Yin, Z., et al. (2020). A review on flocculation as an efficient method to harvest energy microalgae: Mechanisms, performances, influencing factors and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 131, 110005. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, T., Zheng, Y., Yu, L., and Chen, S. (2013) High productivity cultivation of a heat-resistant microalga Chlorella sorokiniana for biofuel production. Bioresour. Technol. 131, 60–67. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.121

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, X., Hu, H., and Zhang, Y. (2011). Growth and lipid accumulation properties of a freshwater microalga Scenedesmus sp. under different cultivation temperature. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 3098–3102. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.055

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milledge, J. J., and Heaven, S. (2013). A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 12, 165–178. doi:10.1007/s11157-012-9301-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ndikubwimana, T., Zeng, X., He, N., Xiao, Z., Xie, Y., Chang, J. S., et al. (2015). Microalgae biomass harvesting by bioflocculation-interpretation by classical DLVO theory. Biochem. Eng. J. 101, 160–167. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2015.05.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ras, M., Steyer, J. P., and Bernard, O. (2013). Temperature effect on microalgae: A crucial factor for outdoor production. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 12, 153–164. doi:10.1007/s11157-013-9310-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, N., Rehman, S. U., and Han, J. I. (2013). Rapid harvesting of freshwater microalgae using chitosan. Process Biochem. 48, 1107–1110. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, C. S. (1984). The ecology of freshwater phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar

Roy, M., and Mohanty, K. (2019). A comprehensive review on microalgal harvesting strategies: Current status and future prospects. Algal Res. 44, 101683. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101683

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruiz, J., Olivieri, G., de Vree, J., Bosma, R., Willems, P., Reith, J. H., et al. (2016). Towards industrial products from microalgae. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3036–3043. doi:10.1039/C6EE01493C

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sachdeva, N., Gupta, R. P., Mathur, A. S., and Tuli, D. K. (2016). Enhanced lipid production in thermo-tolerant mutants of Chlorella pyrenoidosa NCIM 2738. Bioresour. Technol. 221, 576–587. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sayegh, F. A. Q., and Montagnes, D. J. S. (2011). Temperature shifts induce intraspecific variation in microalgal production and biochemical composition. Bioresour. Technol. 102, 3007–3013. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schenk, P. M., Thomas-Hall, S. R., Stephens, E., Marx, U. C., Mussgnug, J. H., Posten, C., et al. (2008). Second generation biofuels: High-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenerg. Res. 1, 20–43. doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serra-Maia, R., Bernard, O., Gonçalves, A., Bensalem, S., and Lopes, F. (2016). Influence of temperature on Chlorella vulgaris growth and mortality rates in a photobioreactor. Algal Res. 18, 352–359. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.06.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Show, P. L. (2022). Global market and economic analysis of microalgae technology: Status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 357, 127329. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127329

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sonmez, C., Elcin, E., Akın, D., Oktem, H. A., and Yucel, M. (2016). Evaluation of novel thermo-resistant Micractinium and Scenedesmus sp. for efficient biomass and lipid production under different temperature and nutrient regimes. Bioresour. Technol. 211, 422–428. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.125

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, Y. T., Wang, X., Cui, Y. H., and Wang, S. K. (2020). A symbiotic yeast to enhance heterotrophic and mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa using sucrose as the carbon source. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 43, 2243–2252. doi:10.1007/s00449-020-02409-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vandamme, D., Foubert, I., Meesschaert, B., and Muylaert, K. (2010). Flocculation of microalgae using cationic starch. J. Appl. Phycol. 22, 525–530. doi:10.1007/s10811-009-9488-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. K., Stiles, A. R., Guo, C., and Liu, C. Z. (2015). Harvesting microalgae by magnetic separation: A review. Algal Res. 9, 178–185. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. K., Wang, X., Tian, Y. T., and Cui, Y. H. (2020). Nutrient recovery from tofu whey wastewater for the economical production of docosahexaenoic acid by Schizochytrium sp. S31. Sci. Total Environ. 710, 136448. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136448

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S. K., Wang, X., Tian, Y. T., Tao, H. H., and Sun, X. S. (2018). Direct utilization of starch for heterotrophic cultivation of Chlorella pyrenoidosa by co-culture with immobilized Saccharomycopsis fibuligera. Algal Res. 33, 406–411. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2018.06.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Y. Z., Hallenbeck, P. C., Leite, G. B., Paranjape, K., and Huo, D. Q. (2016). Growth and lipid accumulation of indigenous algal strains under photoautotrophic and mixotrophic modes at low temperature. Algal Res. 16, 195–200. doi:10.1016/j.algal.2016.03.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weschler, M. K., Barr, W. J., Harper, W. F., and Landis, A. E. (2014). Process energy comparison for the production and harvesting of algal biomass as a biofuel feedstock. Bioresour. Technol. 153, 108–115. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, J., Wang, C., Su, Z., Xiong, P., and Liu, J. (2014). Response of microalgae growth and cell characteristics to various temperatures. Asian J. Chem. 26, 3366–3370. doi:10.14233/ajchem.2014.17529

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Gao, P., Guo, L., Wang, Y., She, Z., Gao, M., et al. (2020). Elucidating temperature on mixotrophic cultivation of a Chlorella vulgaris strain: Different carbon source application and enzyme activity revelation. Bioresour. Technol. 314, 123721. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123721

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, S., Zou, S., Feng, T., Sun, S., Guo, X., He, M., et al. (2022) Low temperature combined with high inoculum density improves alpha-linolenic acid production and biochemical characteristics of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Bioresour. Technol. 348, 126746. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126746

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Yang, S., Xu, J., Liu, T., Yang, D., and Wu, Z. (2020) Application of exogenous salicylic acid on improving high temperature resistance of Nannochloropsis oceanica. Aquacult. Int. 28, 2235–2246. doi:10.1007/s10499-020-00592-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Chlorella pyrenoidosa, temperature, heterotrophic culture, cell harvesting, cell size, cell surface charge

Citation: Dai Y-R, Wang D, Zhu Y-R, Yang K-X, Jiao N, Sun Z-L and Wang S-K (2022) Thermal-tolerant potential of ordinary Chlorella pyrenoidosa and the promotion of cell harvesting by heterotrophic cultivation at high temperature. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:1072942. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1072942

Received: 18 October 2022; Accepted: 14 November 2022;
Published: 01 December 2022.

Edited by:

Jianhua Fan, East China University of Science and Technology, China

Reviewed by:

Jiangxin Wang, Shenzhen University, China
Yuqin Li, Xiangtan University, China

Copyright © 2022 Dai, Wang, Zhu, Yang, Jiao, Sun and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Shi-Kai Wang, skwang@yzu.edu.cn

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.