Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 30 August 2022
Sec. Biomechanics
Volume 10 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1011816

Corrigendum: A potential screening index of corneal biomechanics in healthy subjects, forme fruste keratoconus patients and clinical keratoconus patients

This article is a correction to:

  1. A Potential Screening Index of Corneal Biomechanics in Healthy Subjects, Forme Fruste Keratoconus Patients and Clinical Keratoconus Patients

    1. Read original article
Lei Tian,&#x;Lei Tian1,2†Xiao Qin,,&#x;Xiao Qin3,4,5†Hui Zhang,Hui Zhang3,4Di Zhang,Di Zhang3,4Li-Li GuoLi-Li Guo6Hai-Xia Zhang,Hai-Xia Zhang3,4Ying WuYing Wu7Ying Jie Ying Jie1*Lin Li, Lin Li3,4*
  • 1Beijing Institute of Ophthalmology, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University and Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beihang University and Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 3Beijing Key Laboratory of Fundamental Research on Biomechanics in Clinical Application, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 4School of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 5Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 6The First People’s Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou, China
  • 7Department of Ophthalmology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China

A Corrigendum on
A potential screening index of corneal biomechanics in healthy subjects, forme fruste keratoconus patients and clinical keratoconus patients

by Tian L, Qin X, Zhang H, Zhang D, Guo L-L, Zhang H-X, Wu Y, Jie Y and Li L (2021). Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:766605. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.766605

In the published article, there was an error in affiliation 5. Instead of “Department of Ophthalmology, Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China”, it should be “Department of Otolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China”.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: forme fruste keratoconus, clinical keratoconus, corneal visualization scheimpflug technology, corneal elastic modulus, dynamic corneal response parameters

Citation: Tian L, Qin X, Zhang H, Zhang D, Guo L-L, Zhang H-X, Wu Y, Jie Y and Li L (2022) Corrigendum: A potential screening index of corneal biomechanics in healthy subjects, forme fruste keratoconus patients and clinical keratoconus patients. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:1011816. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1011816

Received: 04 August 2022; Accepted: 05 August 2022;
Published: 30 August 2022.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2022 Tian, Qin, Zhang, Zhang, Guo, Zhang, Wu, Jie and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Ying Jie, jie_yingcn@aliyun.com; Lin Li, lil@ccmu.edu.cn

†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.