AUTHOR=Benca Emir , van Knegsel Kenneth P. , Zderic Ivan , Caspar Jan , Strassl Andreas , Hirtler Lena , Fuchssteiner Christoph , Gueorguiev Boyko , Windhager Reinhard , Widhalm Harald , Varga Peter 

TITLE=Biomechanical evaluation of an allograft fixation system for ACL reconstruction

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

VOLUME=10

YEAR=2022

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.1000624

DOI=10.3389/fbioe.2022.1000624

ISSN=2296-4185

ABSTRACT=<p>The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability, especially graft slippage of an allograft screw and a conventional interference screw for tibial implant fixation in ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four paired human proximal tibia specimens underwent ACL reconstruction, with the graft in one specimen of each pair fixed using the allograft screw and the other using the conventional interference screw. Specimens were subjected to cyclic tensile loading until failure. The two fixation methods did not show any statistical difference in load at graft slippage (<italic>p</italic> = 0.241) or estimated mean survival until slippage onset (<italic>p</italic> = 0.061). The ultimate load and the estimated mean survival until failure were higher for the interference screw (<italic>p</italic> = 0.04, and <italic>p</italic> = 0.018, respectively). Graft displacement at ultimate load reached values of up to 7.2 (interference screw) and 11.3 mm (allograft screw). The allograft screw for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction demonstrated comparable behavior in terms of graft slippage to the interference screw but underperformed in terms of ultimate load. However, the ultimate load, occurring at progressive graft slippage, may not be considered a direct indicator of clinical failure.</p>