- 1Department of Interventional Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- 2Department of Irradiation, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
Radioisotopes have long been leveraged for internal radiotherapy-mediated cancer treatment. However, such therapeutic approaches are associated with serious side effects, and their efficacy is limited by intratumoral hypoxia. Herein, we prepared a folic acid-decorated palladium decahedral platform capable of enhancing the radiotherapeutic efficacy of iodine-125 (125I) seed treatment. This decahedral nanoenzyme was able to target tumor regions and catalyze the conversion of intracellular H2O2 to O2, thereby alleviating hypoxia within the tumor microenvironment. In addition, palladium was hypoxia can be alleviated, on the other hand, palladium was able to enhance the radiotherapeutic energy deposition within tumor tissues. The results of this analysis indicated that synthesized decahedral constructs can efficiently target and modify the hypoxic tumor microenvironment while simultaneously enhancing radiation energy deposition therein. Relative to palladium nanodots, the prolonged in vivo circulation of these decahedral constructs better enabled them to facilitate sustained radiosensitization. Overall, the results of this study highlight a novel approach to improving the therapeutic utility of 125I seed interstitial implantation, thus underscoring an important direction for future clinical research.
Introduction
Esophageal cancer is among the most common forms of human malignancy and is frequently characterized by progressive dysphagia (Sung et al., 2021). Radiotherapy (RT) is one of the primary treatments for esophageal cancer (Guo et al., 2021), but patients undergoing RT are highly susceptible to esophageal mucosal edema and radiation esophagitis, both of which can aggravate underlying dysphagia and result in serious eating disorders (Su et al., 2016). In addition to hampering the efficacy of RT treatment, this can also result in potentially life-threatening venous thrombosis.
RT is among the most common forms of cancer treatment, relying on localized irradiation as an antitumor modality. Different forms of in vitro accelerator therapy and in vivo radioisotope therapy can be classified into external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and internal radioisotope therapy (RIT) strategies (Chao et al., 2018; Xie et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020) Both EBRT and RIT rely on high-energy rays (such as X-rays or electron beams), particle beams (such as proton beams), or radioactive isotopes to indirectly or directly damage nuclear DNA via the induction of ionizing radiation, thereby inducing tumor cell apoptosis (Pei et al., 2021). While RT has emerged as a primary cancer treatment strategy, it is subject to significant limitations that constrain its utility. In order to kill tumor cells, EBRT must pass through the skin and proximal normal tissues without any tumor-specific targeting, resulting in damage, inflammation, and potential oncogenesis in these otherwise healthy tissues (Dai et al., 2017; Huang et al., 2021a). In contrast, RIT approaches rely upon the intratumoral delivery of radioactive sources using a needle or similar mechanism (Sau et al., 2017). These radioactive sources are typically classified according to the particle type which they emit in the form of ionizing radiation, including α, β, and Auger particle emitters (Maier-Hauff et al., 2011). 255Ac and 213Bi, which emit alpha particles, exhibit a limited penetration depth (28–100 μm) and are thus only suited to the treatment of small or residual tumors after surgery (Zhu et al., 2017). In contrast, β-emitting particles such as 125I and 188Re can penetrate deeper tissues (20–130 mm) while maintaining relatively low cytotoxicity (Yi et al., 2018). Certain radioisotopes (123I-123, 125I-125) achieve optimal therapeutic efficacy only when present within the nucleus, and they exhibit a very low penetration depth (<0.5 μm) (Pirovano et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2020). Relative to EBRT, RIT is better suited to tumor targeting, but as an invasive treatment it can nonetheless damage surrounding normal tissues (Song et al., 2017). The tumor microenvironment (TME) is a highly acidic and hypoxic compartment, and repeated EBRT or RIT can aggravate such hypoxia, resulting in hypoxic radiotherapy tolerance and further reducing RT efficacy (Finley and Popel, 2013; Satterlee et al., 2017). As such, the selection of an excessively high radiation dose that damages healthy tissues or an excessively low dose that fails to induce sufficient tumor cell death can lead to adverse outcomes. Appropriately balancing tissue protection and tumor cell killing remains a major challenge to the effective treatment of cancer patients (Ma et al., 2017).
Rapid advances in the development of nanotechnology have highlighted a range of strategies well-suited to enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of radionuclides. Several studies have indicated that specific nanomaterials can improve RIT sensitivity and associated treatment outcomes (Kwatra et al., 2013; Lomax et al., 2013; Mi et al., 2016), with known RIT sensitizing materials being broadly classified based upon the mechanisms whereby they mediate radiosensitization. Nanomaterials containing elements with a high atomic number can improve the therapeutic effect of RIT (Chao et al., 2018). As the photoelectric effect associated with ionizing radiation is directly proportional to the cubic power of an element’s atomic number, an increase in this photoelectric effect will thus enhance RIT radiotherapeutic efficacy. Le Goas et al. prepared a Hybrid Polymer (PMAA-AUNPs) via controlled free radical polymerization and determined that the resultant particles were able to increase the radiation dose deposited proximal to this polymer while significantly enhancing the cytotoxic effects of systemic 125I administration on tumor cells, thereby increasing RIT sensitivity (Le Goas et al., 2019). The targeting of radioactive sources can improve the killing of tumor cells while minimizing healthy tissue damage (Ge et al., 2020). Chen et al. synthesized a hybrid protein nanoreactor (125I-HSA-CAT), that, as it incorporated catalase, was able to catalyze the decomposition of endogenous H2O2 while simultaneously delivering 125I to the target tumors, thereby significantly enhancing the efficacy of RIT treatment (Finger and Giaccia, 2010; Chen et al., 2019). Modulating the TME thus represents an attractive approach to increasing the radiosensitivity of tumor cells, thereby maximizing radiation dose utilization. Tao et al. designed a composite nanomaterial (125I-rGO-MnO2-PEG) in which MnO2 was able to consume H2O2 within the TME to alleviate hypoxia, together with the systemic intravenous administration of 125I along with the nanocarrier-reducing nano-graphene oxide (rGO), enabling the synergistic enhancement of 125I-mediated radiotherapy via a thermotherapy approach (Tao et al., 2018). While these current internal radiation sensitizers can effectively improve the treatment effect of RIT, they are nonetheless subject to multiple shortcomings and limitations. For example, the rapid internal circulation in vivo can lead to the rapid metabolic processing of these sensitizers such that they are largely discharged or degraded before playing an effective therapeutic role (Semenza, 2016; Yi et al., 2016; Xia et al., 2020) Additionally, the complexities of living systems and the role of the immune system in humans and other animal models can prevent these sensitizers from achieving the desired therapeutic effects (Huang et al., 2021b).
To enhance the therapeutic efficiency of 125I, we herein developed a nanoenzyme platform capable of alleviating intratumoral hypoxia and thereby achieving robust radiosensitization. For this approach, we synthesized a decahedron consisting of palladium (Pd Decahedron), and these decahedral constructs were then decorated with folic acid to yield PD-FA. PD-FA was able to catalyze the conversion of high levels of intratumoral H2O2 into oxygen, thus reducing intratumoral hypoxia. Following PD-FA injection via the tail vein, it was able to target tumor regions in a folic acid-dependent manner. 125I was then injected intratumorally, releasing γ rays in tumors and thereby inducing indirect or direct DNA damage. The resultant DNA radicals can then be fixed by the generated oxygen. Overall, these PD-FA nanoparticles exhibit promising properties that make them efficient radiosensitizers in the context of 125I treatment.
Results and Discussion
PD-FA nanoparticles were prepared via a two-step process wherein Pd decahedra were initially synthesized and were then coated with folic acid. Pd decahedra synthesis was conducted using a modified version of a previously published method. Briefly, 40 mg of Na2SO4 and 80 mg of polyvinyl pyrrolidone were dissolved and mixed in diethylene glycol at 105°C for 30 min, after which 15.5 mg of Na2PdCl4 was dissolved in 1 ml of diethylene glycol, and this solution was added to the prepared mixture. This solution was allowed to react for 5 h at 105°C, after which it was quenched with ice. Acetone was then added into the mixture, with was then centrifuged at 16,000 rpm to collect the product. This product was then washed twice with deionized water and dried overnight under vacuum. Folic acid surface modification was achieved by dispersing folic acid and Pd decahedra in absolute ethanol and stirring for 12 h under ultrasonication. The resultant product was then washed and dried under vacuum to yield PD-FA.
When Pd decahedra were analyzed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM), they exhibited a decahedral structure and were ∼30 nm in size (Supplementary Figure S1). PD-FA TEM images revealed the presence of a thin film surrounding the decahedron (Figure 1A). PD-FA size distribution profiles revealed these particles to have an average diameter of 31.9 nm (Figure 1B). Pd decahedra exhibited a zeta potential of 13.4 mV, but this shifted to −18.2 mV following folic acid addition, consistent with successful surface modification (Figure 1C). Various concentrations of PD-FA were then combined with H2O2. The X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) for these preparations exhibited characteristic Pd 3d5/2 and Pd 3d3/2 bands at 341.1 and 336.0 eV, respectively (Figure 1E). The ability of PD-FA to catalyze H2O2 conversion into oxygen, confirming that at a PD-FA concentration of 200 μg/ml, the oxygen content reached 17.9 mg/L after 200 s (Figure 1D), with this being sufficient to alleviate hypoxia.
FIGURE 1. PD-FA characterization. (A) TEM images of PD-FA and (B) PD-FA size distributions. (C) Zeta potential values for Pd decahedra and PD-FA preparations. (D) Oxygen content measurements following the addition of H2O2 to PD-FA samples at the indicated concentrations. (E) XPS spectra corresponding to elemental Pd.
Following successful PD-FA preparation, the ability of these nanoparticles to enhance radiosensitivity in vitro was assessed by using them to treat EC109 human esophageal cells. Both PD-FA and Pd decahedrons were labeled with Cy-5 and then cultured with EC109 cells, after which fluorescence was assessed via confocal laser scanning microscopy. Cells pretreated with PD-FA exhibited increased fluorescence intensity relative to those treated with Pd decahedrons (Figure 2A), consistent with enhanced PD-FA uptake owing to the targeting properties of folic acid. The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD-FA-treated cells was 3.1-fold higher than that for Pd decahedron-treated cells (Figure 2B). In light of these promising results, we examined the radiosensitization activity of these cells by assessing EC109 cell apoptosis using Calcein-AM and propidium iodide (PI) to stain for live and dead cells, respectively. No significant cell death was evident in the RT or PD-FA treatment groups (Figure 2C), whereas in the presence of PD-FA, significant apoptosis was induced upon subsequent RT treatment. These results were further confirmed via a quantitative CCK-8 assay (Figure 2D), as RT or PD-FA treatments were associated with limited cellular apoptosis, whereas the viability of cells in the PD-FA + RT group decreased by 42.1%, consistent with the marked radiosensitization ability of PD-FA. B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) is an important apoptosis-related gene, and Western blotting further demonstrated that Bcl-2 protein levels in the PD-FA + RT group were reduced relative to other treatment groups (Figure 2E), consistent with the increase in apoptotic cell death in this group.
FIGURE 2. Assessment of the in vitro radiosensitization ability of PD-FA in vitro. (A) CLSM images of cells and (B) corresponding quantitative analyses of image fluorescence. (C) CLSM images of live and dead cells following the indicated treatments and (D) results of CCK-8 assay. (E) Western blotting results for cells in the indicated treatment groups.
A subcutaneous tumor model was next established to confirm the ability of PD-FA treatment to alleviate intratumoral hypoxia. PA imaging was utilized to measure in vivo oxygen content as a function of time in mice that were injected intravenously with PD-FA (Figures 3A,B). Following injection, oxygen levels in tumors rose until 6 h post-injection, and remained at relatively high levels until 24 h post-injection, consistent with the ability of PD-FA to successfully alleviate hypoxia. These results suggested that 6 h post-injection would be the optimal time to conduct RT treatment, given the maximal oxygen levels at this time. The tumor-targeting abilities of PD-FA and Pd decahedrons were additionally evaluated via immunofluorescence staining (Figure 3C). In the control group, tumors exhibited extensive hypoxia that was partially alleviated following Pd decahedron administration, consistent with the ability of these nanoparticles to increase oxygen levels. Importantly, PD-FA treatment significantly reduced hypoxia within these tumors (Figure 3D), with the pimonidazole stained area in control groups being 6.6 times that observed in the PD-FA group.
FIGURE 3. Assessment of the in vivo PD-FA-mediated alleviation of intratumoral hypoxia. (A) PA images of tumors pre-injection and at 30 min, 6, 12, and 24 h post-injection, with (B) corresponding PA signal intensity analysis. (C) immunofluorescence-stained tumor sections following the indicated treatments with (D) corresponding quantification of pimonidazole fluorescence (sacle bar: 50 μm).
In order to be clinically viable, the off-target toxicity of novel biomaterials must be assessed to ensure they exhibit satisfactory biocompatibility. To that end, we next intravenously injected nude BALB/c mice with PBS or a suspension of PD-FA in PBS. PD-FA injection was not associated with any apparent lesions in the major organs of injected mice (Supplementary Figure S2), suggesting that it does not induce any significant off-target cytotoxicity. We then assessed the antitumor efficacy of combination PD-FA + RT treatment by randomly assigning mice bearing EC109 tumors of a similar size into control and treatment groups that were intravenously injected with PBS or PD-FA and intratumorally injected with PBS or implanted with two radioactive 125I particles. Murine body weight and tumor volumes were monitored after treatment, revealing no obvious difference of body weight in all groups (Figure 4C) and sustained tumor growth in control animals only administered PBS (Figure 4D). In contrast, mice in the PD-FA + RT group exhibited the most extensive tumor ablation owing to the precise targeting activity and radiosensitization effects of PD-FA treatment. RT treatment alone was also sufficient to suppress tumor growth to some extent. On day 19, mice were euthanized and tumor tissues were collected. Subsequent hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining demonstrated extensive tumor cell apoptosis in the PD-FA + RT group (Figure 4E). Together, these data suggest that PD-FA + RT treatment can lead to near-complete tumor ablation. Corresponding pharmacokinetic curves (Figure 4A) indicated that these PD-FA nanoparticles are retained in circulation for extended periods owing to the utilized folic acid coating. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) was used to assess Pd in tissue samples from these animals, revealing that PD-FA was associated with enhanced intratumoral accumulation and decreased hepatic and renal accumulation (Figure 4B). As such, these particles may achieve enhanced efficacy while reducing off-target toxicity. RT-PCR analyses further confirmed that HIF-1a and EGFR expression levels were reduced in the PD-FA + RT group relative to the control group (Figure 4F), while BAX and Caspase-3 expression exhibited the opposite phenotype (Figures 4G,H). Decreased changes in Bcl-2 and PCNA expression were observed in the PD-FA + RT group (Figures 4I,J). Taken together, these results show that PD-FA + RT can induce marked intratumoral cellular apoptosis.
FIGURE 4. Analysis of antitumor efficacy. (A) Pharmacokinetic curves. (B) Biodistribution results for the indicated treatment groups. (C) Murine body weight and (D) tumor volumes in the four treatment groups. (E) HE staning of tumors in four groups. Quantitative analyses of the expression of (F) EGFR, (G) BAX, (H) Caspase-3, (I) PCNA, and (J) Bcl-2 in the indicated groups as assessed via RT-PCR.
Conclusion
Hypoxia can impair the therapeutic efficacy of radiotherapy-based antitumor interventions. Herein, we successfully constructed a decahedral PD-FA nanoenzyme and leveraged it for the radiosensitization of RIT using 125I seed. PD-FA was able to efficiently and actively target tumor regions, therein catalyzing the conversion of H2O2 to oxygen and thus alleviating intratumoral hypoxia. IN addition, PD-FA was able to enhance 125I seed energy deposition within tumor regions, bolstering the generation of DNA radicals that can be fixed by oxygen cause permanent damage and induce cellular apoptosis. As such, this PD-FA nanoenzyme represents great potential for 125I seed radiosensitization, and exhibits good biocompatibility that warrants further clinical study.
Materials and Methods
Pd Decahedron and PD-FA Characterization
Pd decahedron and PD-FA NP morphological characteristics were assessed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Tecnai G2 F20 S-Twin, FEI, United States) at an acceleration voltage of 100 keV. Surface chemical elements were analyzed via XPS (ESCA-Lab250XI, Thermo Fisher Ltd., United States). The zeta potential and zeta-diameter measurements were quantified based upon dynamic light scattering (DLS, Nano-Zen 3,600, Malvern Instruments, United Kingdom).
Oxygen Measurements
To assess the oxygen-generating capacity of PD-FA, we utilized a dissolved oxygen meter to measure oxygen concentrations under a nitrogen atmosphere to assess the impact of different PD-FA concentrations (0, 50, 100, 200 μg/ml) on H2O2 at concentration of 30 mM generation.
Cell Culture
Human esophageal EC109 cancer cells (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) were cultured in RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS (Hyclone, United States) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity Analysis
A CCK-8 kit was used to assess in vitro EC109 cell killing. Initially, the impact of different PD-FA concentrations on cell survival following co-culture was assessed by plating EC109 cells overnight in 96-well plates (5,000/well), after which different PD-FA concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 μg/ml) were added, and cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. Next, 10 μl of CCK-8 reagent was added per well, and plates were incubated for 2 h, after which a microplate meter (Rayto-6000 system, Rayto, China) was used to measure absorbance at 450 nm as a correlate for cytotoxicity. A CCK-9 kit was also used to assess cytotoxicity as a function of treatment type. Briefly, EC109 cells were plated and incubated overnight as above, after which they were separated into 4 treatment groups (5 wells/group): 1) Control; 2) PD-FA; 3) RT; and 4) PD-FA + RT. The PD-FA concentration for all groups was 50 μg/ml. Cells were treated as appropriate and incubated overnight, after which 10 μl of CCK-8 was added per well for 2 h, and absorbance was measured as above.
Western Blotting
EC109 cells were separated into four treatment groups: 1) Control; 2) PD-FA; 3) RT; and 4) PD-FA + RT, with a PD-FA concentration of 50 μg/ml. Total protein was then isolated from treated cells, and Bcl-2 protein levels therein were assessed via Western blotting.
Confirmation of In Vitro Cytotoxicity
To assess the cytotoxic effects of PD-FA treatment, EC109 cells were separated into four treatment groups: 1) control; 2) PD-FA; 3) RT; and 4) PD-FA + RT groups and were treated for 4 h in 60 mm tissue culture dishes. The PD-FA dose for these analyses was 50 μg/ml, while the RT dose was 22 MBq. Following the addition of FDA and PI, cells were rinsed using PBS and examined via fluorescence microscope (IX81, Olympus, Japan).
Animal Model Establishment
Female BALB/c nude mice (4–5 weeks old, Vital River Company, Beijing, China) were subcutaneously injected with 1 × 105 EC109 cells in a 100 μl volume on the right side of the abdomen. All the protocols for the procedures were approved by Animal Experiment Center of Wuhan University according to the protocols of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Assessment of In Vivo Oxygenation
The in vivo oxygenation activity of PD-FA was assessed by removing the hair from tumor sites in five mice, and then scanning these sites with a Vevo Lazer system (Fujifilm, Visualsonics Inc. Canada) to obtain PA images of blood saturation. Next, 100 μl of PD-FA (200 μg/ml) was injected into the caudal vein, and the tumor site was scanned using this device at 0, 6, and 24 h.
For subsequent immunofluorescent analyses, mice in the control group and mice that had been injected with PD-FA 24 h previously were intraperitoneally injected with pimonidazole hydrochloride (60 mg/kg), after which tumors were collected and frozen. Tumor sections were then stained with anti-pimonidazole and HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-FITC (1:100), while blood vessels were stained with monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD31 (1:200) and a rhodamine-linked donkey anti-rat secondary antibody (1:200). DAPI (1:5,000) was used to stain cellular nuclei, and cells were imaged via confocal microscopy.
Assessment of In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy
A total of 20 BALB/c nude mice were subcutaneously implanted on the right side of their abdomen with 100 μl of an EC109 cell suspension. When tumors were ∼100 mm3 in size, animals were randomized into four treatment groups (5 mice/group): 1) control; 2) PD-FA; 3) RT; and 4) PD-FA + RT groups. The PD-FA concentration for all animals was 200 μg/ml (100 μl) for once, and the RT dose was 22 MBq by implantation of two 125I particles following the injection. Tumor growth was monitored every 3 days using calipers, and changes in tumor volume and body weight were recorded.
Analyses of Blood Biochemistry
When tumors had grown to 80–100 mm3 in size, mice were separated into three groups: 1) control mice, 2) mice injected with 100 μl of Pd decahedrons (200 μg/ml), and 3) mice injected with 100 μl of PD-FA (200 μg/ml) via the tail vein. Retroorbital blood samples were collected from these animals at 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h, post-treatment.
Safety Assessment of PD-FA
Healthy mice were divided into two groups to assess the in vivo biocompatibility of PD-FA. Mice of 6-week-old were intravenously administrated with PBS or PD-FA (100 μl; 200 μg/ml). 30 days post the injection, the mice were sacrificed and main organs including heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney were harvest for further HE staning.
RT-PCR Analysis of Tumor Tissues
After various treatment, mice in each group were sacrificed and tumor tissues were collected for RT-PCR to evaluate mRNA expression of EGFR, BAX, Caspase-3, PCNA, Bcl-2, respectively.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Experiment Center of Wuhan University.
Author Contributions
DJ, KW, XH, and RF contributed to conception and design of the study. DJ organized the database. KX performed the statistical analysis. DJ wrote the first draft of the manuscript. KW, KX, YL, and DZ wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.764531/full#supplementary-material
References
Chao, Y., Liang, C., Yang, Y., Wang, G., Maiti, D., Tian, L., et al. (2018). Highly Effective Radioisotope Cancer Therapy with a Non-Therapeutic Isotope Delivered and Sensitized by Nanoscale Coordination Polymers. ACS Nano 12 (8), 7519–7528. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02400
Chen, J., Liang, C., Song, X., Yi, X., Yang, K., Feng, L., et al. (2019). Hybrid Protein Nano-Reactors Enable Simultaneous Increments of Tumor Oxygenation and Iodine-131 Delivery for Enhanced Radionuclide Therapy. Small 15 (46), e1903628. doi:10.1002/smll.201903628
Dai, Y., Xu, C., Sun, X., and Chen, X. (2017). Nanoparticle Design Strategies for Enhanced Anticancer Therapy by Exploiting the Tumour Microenvironment. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (12), 3830–3852. doi:10.1039/c6cs00592f
Finger, E. C., and Giaccia, A. J. (2010). Hypoxia, Inflammation, and the Tumor Microenvironment in Metastatic Disease. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 29 (2), 285–293. doi:10.1007/s10555-010-9224-5
Finley, S. D., and Popel, A. S. (2013). Effect of Tumor Microenvironment on Tumor VEGF During Anti-VEGF Treatment: Systems Biology Predictions. JNCI: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 105 (11), 802–811. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt093
Ge, J., Zhang, Q., Zeng, J., Gu, Z., and Gao, M. (2020). Radiolabeling Nanomaterials for Multimodality Imaging: New Insights into Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Diagnosis. Biomaterials 228, 119553. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119553
Guo, D., Huang, Y., Jin, X., Zhang, C., and Zhu, X. (2021). A Redox-Responsive, In-Situ Polymerized Polyplatinum(IV)-Coated Gold Nanorod as an Amplifier of Tumor Accumulation for Enhanced Thermo-Chemotherapy. Biomaterials 266, 120400. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120400
Huang, C., Wang, F. B., Liu, L., Jiang, W., Liu, W., Ma, W., et al. (2021). Hypoxic Tumor Radiosensitization Using Engineered Probiotics. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10 (10), e2002207. doi:10.1002/adhm.202002207
Huang, C., Ding, S., Jiang, W., and Wang, F. B. (2021). Glutathione-Depleting Nanoplatelets for Enhanced Sonodynamic Cancer Therapy. Nanoscale 13, 4512–4518. doi:10.1039/d0nr08440a
Kwatra, D., Venugopal, A., and Anant, S. (2013). Nanoparticles in Radiation Therapy: A Summary of Various Approaches to Enhance Radiosensitization in Cancer. Translational Cancer Res. 2 (4), 330–342. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.08.06
Le Goas, M., Paquet, M., Paquirissamy, A., Guglielmi, J., Compin, C., Thariat, J., et al. (2019). Improving 131I Radioiodine Therapy by Hybrid Polymer-Grafted Gold Nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomedicine 14, 7933–7946. doi:10.2147/ijn.s211496
Liu, T., Yang, K., and Liu, Z. (2020). Recent Advances in Functional Nanomaterials for X-ray Triggered Cancer Therapy. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int. 30 (5), 567–576. doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2020.09.009
Lomax, M. E., Folkes, L. K., and O'Neill, P. (2013). Biological Consequences of Radiation-Induced DNA Damage: Relevance to Radiotherapy. Clin. Oncol. 25 (10), 578–585. doi:10.1016/j.clon.2013.06.007
Ma, N., Wu, F.-G., Zhang, X., Jiang, Y.-W., Jia, H.-R., Wang, H.-Y., et al. (2017). Shape-Dependent Radiosensitization Effect of Gold Nanostructures in Cancer Radiotherapy: Comparison of Gold Nanoparticles, Nanospikes, and Nanorods. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 9 (15), 13037–13048. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b01112
Maier-Hauff, K., Ulrich, F., Nestler, D., Niehoff, H., Wust, P., Thiesen, B., et al. (2011). Efficacy and Safety of Intratumoral Thermotherapy Using Magnetic Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy on Patients with Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. J. Neurooncol. 103 (2), 317–324. doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0389-0
Mi, Y., Shao, Z., Vang, J., Kaidar-Person, O., and Wang, A. Z. (2016). Application of Nanotechnology to Cancer Radiotherapy. Cancer Nano 7 (1), 11. doi:10.1186/s12645-016-0024-7
Pei, P., Liu, T., Shen, W., Liu, Z., and Yang, K. (2021). Biomaterial-Mediated Internal Radioisotope Therapy. Mater. Horiz. 8 (5), 1348–1366. doi:10.1039/d0mh01761b
Pirovano, G., Jannetti, S. A., Carter, L. M., Sadique, A., Kossatz, S., Guru, N., et al. (2020). Targeted Brain Tumor Radiotherapy Using an Auger Emitter. Clin. Cancer Res. 26 (12), 2871–2881. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-2440
Satterlee, A. B., Rojas, J. D., Dayton, P. A., and Huang, L. (2017). Enhancing Nanoparticle Accumulation and Retention in Desmoplastic Tumors via Vascular Disruption for Internal Radiation Therapy. Theranostics 7 (2), 253–269. doi:10.7150/thno.16681
Sau, S., Alsaab, H. O., Kashaw, S. K., Tatiparti, K., and Iyer, A. K. (2017). Advances in Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A new era of Targeted Cancer Therapy. Drug Discov. Today 22 (10), 1547–1556. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2017.05.011
Semenza, G. L. (2016). The Hypoxic Tumor Microenvironment: A Driving Force for Breast Cancer Progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Bba) - Mol. Cel. Res. 1863 (3), 382–391. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.05.036
Shen, C. J., Minn, I., Hobbs, R. F., Chen, Y., Josefsson, A., Brummet, M., et al. (2020). Auger Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in a Micrometastatic Model of Prostate Cancer. Theranostics 10 (7), 2888–2896. doi:10.7150/thno.38882
Song, G., Cheng, L., Chao, Y., Yang, K., and Liu, Z. (2017). Emerging Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials for Cancer Radiation Therapy. Adv. Mater. 29 (32). doi:10.1002/adma.201700996
Su, H., Lin, F., Deng, X., Shen, L., Fang, Y., Fei, Z., et al. (2016). Profiling and Bioinformatics Analyses Reveal Differential Circular RNA Expression in Radioresistant Esophageal Cancer Cells. J. Transl. Med. 14 (1), 225. doi:10.1186/s12967-016-0977-7
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021). Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA: A Cancer J. Clinicians 71 (3), 209–249. accepted. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
Tao, Y., Zhu, L., Zhao, Y., Yi, X., Zhu, L., Ge, F., et al. (2018). Nano-Graphene Oxide-Manganese Dioxide Nanocomposites for Overcoming Tumor Hypoxia and Enhancing Cancer Radioisotope Therapy. Nanoscale 10 (11), 5114–5123. doi:10.1039/c7nr08747k
Xia, D., Hang, D., Li, Y., Jiang, W., Zhu, J., Ding, Y., et al. (2020). Au-Hemoglobin Loaded Platelet Alleviating Tumor Hypoxia and Enhancing the Radiotherapy Effect with Low-Dose X-ray. ACS Nano 14 (11), 15654–15668. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c06541
Xie, J., Gong, L., Zhu, S., Yong, Y., Gu, Z., and Zhao, Y. (2019). Emerging Strategies of Nanomaterial-Mediated Tumor Radiosensitization. Adv. Mater. 31 (3), e1802244. doi:10.1002/adma.201802244
Yi, X., Chen, L., Zhong, X., Gao, R., Qian, Y., Wu, F., et al. (2016). Core-shell Au@MnO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Radiotherapy via Improving the Tumor Oxygenation. Nano Res. 9 (11), 3267–3278. doi:10.1007/s12274-016-1205-8
Yi, X., Xu, M., Zhou, H., Xiong, S., Qian, R., Chai, Z., et al. (2018). Ultrasmall Hyperbranched Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles with Different Radioisotopes Labeling for Cancer Theranostics. ACS Nano 12 (9), 9142–9151. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b03514
Keywords: nanoenzyme, radiotherapy, hypoxia, 125 I, esophageal cancer
Citation: Jiao D, Wu K, Xu K, Liu Y, Zhao D, Han X and Fan R (2021) Development of A Decahedral Nanoenzyme Capable of Overcoming Hypoxia to Facilitate the Iodine-125 Radiosensitization of Esophageal Cancer. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9:764531. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.764531
Received: 25 August 2021; Accepted: 22 September 2021;
Published: 08 October 2021.
Edited by:
Huihua Yuan, Nantong University, ChinaReviewed by:
Mingzhen Zhang, Xi’an Jiaotong University, ChinaJingchao Li, Donghua University, China
Fuyin Zheng, Beihang University, China
Copyright © 2021 Jiao, Wu, Xu, Liu, Zhao, Han and Fan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xinwei Han, MTM1OTI1ODM5MTFAMTYzLmNvbQ==; Ruitai Fan, ZmNjZmFucnRAenp1LmVkdS5jbg==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship